| Basic Information | Biotope classification | Ecology | Habitat preferences and distribution | Species composition | Sensitivity | Importance |

Image Bernard Picton - Dense Lanice conchilega and other polychaetes in tide-swept infralittoral sand. Image width ca 7 cm
Image copyright information
SS.SCS.ICS.SLan recorded (
) and expected (
) distribution in Britain and Ireland (see below)
The hydrodynamic regime and sediment composition and interaction between the two are probably the most significant factors structuring the community rather than biological interactions (Tyler, 1977; Warwick & Uncles, 1980; Elliott et al., 1998).
Species in the biotope are predominantly suspension and deposit feeders, and probably little direct interaction occurs between them other than competition for space.
Some species feed on both suspended particulates and surface deposits (e.g. the bivalves Fabulina fabula and Abra alba and the tube building polychaete Lanice conchilega. Following laboratory experiments, Buhr (1976) concluded that Lanice conchilega was capable of completely replacing deposit feeding by suspension feeding. The absolute amounts of food retained from suspension feeding and the assimilation efficiencies calculated were in the range typical for obligatory suspension-feeding organisms.
Studies of Lanice conchilega aggregations in the Wadden Sea ( Zühlke et al.,1998; Dittmann, 1999; Zühlke, 2001) have shown that tubes built by Lanice conchilega can have significant effects on the distribution, density and diversity of other macrobenthic species and meiobenthic nematodes compared to sites with a lower density of Lanice conchilega or ambient sediment without biogenic structures. The polychaete Harmothoe lunulata occurs in aggregations of Lanice conchilega and is often found inside the polychaetes' tubes, possibly being a commensal associated to Lanice conchilega (Zühlke et al., 1998). Juvenile bivalves (Mya arenaria, Mytilus edulis, Macoma balthica) were more frequent in patches with Lanice conchilega and settled especially on the tentacle crown of the worm tubes. In particular, abundances of predatory polychaetes (Eteone longa, Nephtys hombergii, Hediste diversicolor) were higher (Dittmann, 1999). The increased species diversity and abundance recorded in patches of Lanice conchilega are also known to occur around the tubes of other species of polychaetes (Woodin, 1978).
In sand, the primitive sea slug Faction tornatilis preys upon tube building polychaetes. A series of choice experiments suggested that the preferred prey items were the polychaetes Owenia fusiformis and Lanice conchilega (Yonow, 1989).
Lanice conchilega constitutes an important prey item for curlew, Numenius arquata, bar-tailed godwit, Limosa lapponica and grey plover, Pluvialis squatarola. The amphipods e.g. Ampelisca and Atylus species are probably epistatic grazers, grazing benthic microalgae from sand grains.
Amphipods and the infaunal annelid species in the biotope probably interfere strongly with each other. Adult worms probably reduce amphipod numbers by disturbing their burrows and tubes, while high densities of amphipods can prevent establishment of worms by consuming larvae and juveniles (Olafsson & Persson, 1986).
Spatial competition probably occurs between the infaunal suspension feeders and deposit feeders. Reworking of sediment by deposit feeders makes the substratum less stable, increases the suspended sediment and makes the environment less suitable for suspension feeders (Rhoads & Young, 1970). Tube building by amphipods and polychaetes stabilizes the sediment and arrests the shift towards a community consisting entirely of deposit feeders. In the coarse sediments in this biotope the suspension feeding species dominate.
Amphipods are preyed upon chiefly by nemertean worms (see McDermott, 1984) and demersal fish (Costa & Elliott, 1991).
The abundant infauna are preyed upon by carnivorous polychaetes, e.g. phyllodocids species of Anaitides and Eumida, scale worms (e.g. Harmothoe sp.) and Nephtys hombergii. Asterias rubens, predates the bivalves (Aberkali & Trueman, 1985; Elliott et al., 1998).
Crabs, particularly Liocarcinus depurator and Carcinus maenas, are scavengers and predators of molluscs and annelids (Thrush, 1986; Elliott et al., 1998).
The hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus, brittlestars (e.g. Ophiura albida) and nemerteans are probably scavengers on detritus and carrion.
Gobies (e.g. Pomatoschistus species) and flatfish frequent the biotope to feed upon polychaetes, small crustaceans such as amphipods, cumaceans, small crabs, such predators also nip the siphons of bivalves and tails of polychaetes.
This review can be cited as follows:
Budd, G.C. 2006. Dense Lanice conchilega and other polychaetes in tide-swept infralittoral sand. Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Sub-programme [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. [cited 24/05/2013]. Available from: <http://www.marlin.ac.uk/habitatecology.php?habitatid=116&code=2004>