|Researched by||Eliane De-Bastos & Dr Harvey Tyler-Walters||Refereed by||Admin|
|EUNIS Code||A5.421||EUNIS Name||Aphelochaeta spp. and Polydora spp. in variable salinity infralittoral mixed sediment|
|EUNIS 2008||A5.421||Aphelochaeta spp. and Polydora spp. in variable salinity infralittoral mixed sediment|
|EUNIS 2006||A5.421||Aphelochaeta spp. and Polydora spp. in variable salinity infralittoral mixed sediment|
|JNCC 2004||SS.SMx.SMxVS.AphPol||Aphelochaeta spp. and Polydora spp. in variable salinity infralittoral mixed sediment|
|1997 Biotope||SS.IMX.EstMx.PolMtru||Polydora ciliata, Mya truncata and solitary ascidians in variable salinity infralittoral mixed sediment|
In sheltered muddy mixed sediments in estuaries or marine inlets with variable or reduced/low salinity communities characterized by Aphelochaeta marioni and Polydora ciliata may be present. Other important taxa may include the polychaetes Nephtys hombergii, Caulleriella zetlandica and Melinna palmata, tubificid oligochaetes and bivalves such as Abra nitida. Conspicuous epifauna may include members of the bivalve family Cardiidae (cockles) and the slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata. This biotope is often found in polyhaline waters (Information taken from the Marine Biotope Classification for Britain and Ireland, Version 15.03; Connor et al., 2004).
This biotope occurs in the lower estuary where the hydrodynamic regime allows a suitable environment to develop. The presence of a suitable substratum is probably the primary structuring force, rather than the interspecific relationships. Mixed sediment provides a stable substratum for the epifauna such as solitary and colonial ascidians while the soft sediment supports infaunal annelids, crustaceans and bivalves. Sediment is the most extensive sub-habitat within the biotope and hence infauna dominate.
Seasonal changes occur in the abundance of the fauna due to seasonal recruitment processes. Variation in abundance is very pronounced in the polychaete Aphelochaeta marioni. In the Wadden Sea, peak abundance occurred in January (71,200 individuals per m²) and minimum abundance occurred in July (22,500 individuals per m²) following maximum spawning activity between May and July (Farke, 1979). However, the spawning period varies according to environmental conditions and so peak abundances will not necessarily occur at the same time each year. Adult densities of the bivalve, Abra alba, may exceed 1000 per m² in favourable conditions but typically fluctuate widely from year to year due to variation in recruitment success or adult mortality (see review by Rees & Dare, 1993). However, the sea squirt Ascidiella scabra showed regular annual recruitment onto artificial and scraped natural substrata and was described as an 'annual ascidian' by Svane (1988).
One of the key factors affecting benthic habitats is disturbance which, in shallow subtidal habitats increases in winter due to weather conditions. Storms may cause dramatic changes in distribution of macro-infauna by washing out dominant species, opening the sediment to recolonization by adults and/or available spat/larvae (Eagle, 1975; Rees et al., 1977; Hall, 1994) and by reducing success of recruitment by newly settled spat or larvae (see Hall, 1994 for review). For example, during winter gales along the North Wales coast large numbers of Abra alba were cast ashore and over winter survival rate was as low as 7% in the more exposed locations, whilst the survival rates of the polychaetes Eteone longa and Nephtys hombergi were 29% and 22% respectively (Rees et al., 1977). Soft bodied epifauna, such as ascidians, are likely to be very sensitive to storm damage and will probably suffer high mortality during winter storms. Rapid recolonization occurs in summer and therefore abundances are likely to vary considerably due to physical disturbance. Sediment transport and the risk of smothering also occurs. A storm event at a silt/sand substratum site in Long Island Sound resulted in the deposition of a 1 cm layer of shell fragments and quartz grains (McCall, 1977).
The biotope consists of hard substrata such as cobbles and pebbles or shell debris sitting in or on consolidated sediments. The mixed substrata provides habitats for a diverse assemblage of epifaunal and infaunal species. Most of the species that occur in the biotope are not closely associated with the community and it is probably transitional between other biotopes such as Aphelochaeta marioni (e.g. IMU.AphTub), or bivalves (e.g. IMX.VsenMtru).
The majority of the productivity in the biotope is secondary, derived from detritus and organic particulates. Primary production is derived from phytoplankton and converted into secondary productivity by the suspension feeders. The benthos is supported predominantly by pelagic production and by detrital materials emanating from the coastal fringe (Barnes & Hughes, 1992). Secondary productivity is probably high given the high densities attained by some species and the diversity of species within the biotope, however no specific information was found.
The recruitment processes exhibited by the major groups within the biotope are demonstrated by the examples below.
Most other macrofauna in the biotope breed several times in their life history (iteroparous) and are planktonic spawners producing large numbers of gametes. Dispersal potential is high. Overall recruitment is likely to be patchy and sporadic, with high spat fall occurring in areas devoid of adults, perhaps lost due to predation or storms. The presence of fast growing space occupying species, e.g. Polydora ciliata and Ascidiella scabra suggests that competition for space for settling larvae is probably intense, with recruitment dependent on the coincidence of factors that free space (e.g. death of short-lived species or storm related physical disturbance) with larval supply. The presence of numerous suspension feeders and surface deposit feeders suggests that post-settlement mortality of larvae would be high.
The community is dominated by fast growing opportunistic polychaete and ascidian species and the community most likely reaches maturity within one year of space becoming available. In an experimental study investigating recovery of a range of species characteristically found in this biotope after copper contamination, Hall & Frid (1995) found that recovery took up to a year. Hall & Frid (1998) found that colonization by many of the polychaetes associated with this biotope did not vary significantly with season, although recruitment of Tubificoides benedii and Ophyrotrocha hartmanni did vary significantly with season. Polydora ciliata is another short-lived species that reaches maturity within a few months and has three or four spawnings during a breeding season of several months. For example, in colonization experiments in Helgoland (Harms & Anger, 1983), Polydora ciliata settled on panels within one month in the spring. The bivalve Abra alba demonstrates an 'r' type life-cycle strategy and is able to rapidly exploit any new or disturbed substratum available for colonization through larval recruitment, secondary settlement of post-metamorphosis juveniles or re-distribution of adults. For example, Abra alba recovered to former densities following loss of a population from Keil Bay owing to deoxygenation within 1.5 years, as did Lagis koreni, taking only one year (Arntz & Rumohr, 1986). Mya arenaria has a high fecundity and reproductive potential but larval supply is sporadic and juvenile mortality is high, so that although large numbers of spat may settle annually, successful recruitment and hence recovery may take longer than a year. For example, Beukema (1995) reported that a population of Mya arenaria in the Wadden Sea, drastically reduced by lugworm dredging took about 5 years to recover. Therefore, the polychaete infauna, ascidian and tube worm epifauna would probably colonize the habitat rapidly, producing a recognizeable biotope within 1-2 years, while the abundance of some species, e.g. Mya sp. would take up to 5 years to develop.
|Recorded distribution in Britain and Ireland||Found off Hartlepool on the north east coast, in several river channels of the south coast of Britain and Milford Haven, Wales.|
|Water clarity preferences|
|Limiting Nutrients||Data deficient|
|Other preferences||None known|
SS.SMx.SMxVS.AphPol is a sublittoral biotope occurring in sheltered, very sheltered and extremely sheltered areas with moderately strong and weak tidal streams (Connor et al., 2004). The biotope occurs in muddy mixed sediment, in reduced and variable/low salinities that are experienced due to its locations in estuaries and marine inlets. These conditions allow the occurrence of Aphelochaeta spp. in high abundances, as well as Polydora spp. that characterize this biotope. Therefore, these species are considered as important characterizing species and are the focus of this assessment. Other characteristic taxa include a numbers of polychaete and tubificid oligochaetes and bivalves. These contribute to species richness and diversity but are not considered important characterizing, defining or structuring species and are not considered within the assessment. More information on these species can be found in other biotope assessments available on this website.
The mixed sediment in this biotope is the important structural component, providing the complexity required by the associated community. Sediment deposition and, therefore, the spatial extent of the biotope, is dictated by the physiography and underlying geology coupled with the hydrodynamic regime (Elliot et al., 1998). There is a traditional view that the distribution of infaunal invertebrates is correlated solely with sediment grain size. In reality, and in this biotope, it is likely that a number of additional factors, including organic content, microbial content, food supply and trophic interactions, interact to determine the distribution of the infauna (Snelgrove & Butman, 1994).
Little direct evidence for Aphelochaeta spp. was found to undertake this assessment. Most of the evidence found related to occurrence and distribution data so confidence in the assessments may be low in cases.
Aphelochaeta marioni is a thin, thread like, segmented worm, typically between 2 and 3.5 cm in length, although, individuals can reach 10 cm in length (Rayment, 2007a). It lives buried in the upper 4 cm of soft sediments, with the smaller animals nearer the surface. Aphelochaeta marioni can live up to 2-3 years and its lifecycle varies according to environmental conditions (Rayment, 2007a). In Stonehouse Pool, Plymouth Sound, Aphelochaeta marioni (studied as Tharyx marioni) spawned in October and November (Gibbs, 1971) whereas in the Wadden Sea, Netherlands, spawning occurred from May to July (Farke, 1979). Laboratory observation reported spawning occurring at night, with females that rose up into the water column with their tail end in the burrow, and shed eggs within a few seconds that sank to form puddles on the sediment (Farke, 1979). Fertilization was not observed, probably because the male does not leave the burrow. The embryos developed lecithotrophically and hatched in about 10 days (Farke, 1979). The newly hatched juveniles were ca 0.25 mm in length and immediately dug into the sediment. Where the sediment depth was not sufficient for digging, the juveniles swam or crawled in search of a suitable substratum (Farke, 1979). In the laboratory, juvenile mortality was high (ca 10% per month) and most animals survived for less than a year (Farke, 1979). In the Wadden Sea, the majority of the cohort reached maturity and spawned at the end of their first year, although, some slower developers did not spawn until the end of their second year (Farke, 1979). However, the population of Aphelochaeta marioni in Stonehouse Pool spawned for the first time at the end of their second year (Gibbs, 1971). There was no evidence of a major post-spawning mortality and it was suggested that individuals may survive to spawn over several years. Gibbs (1971) found that the number of eggs laid varied from 24-539 (mean=197) and was correlated with the female's number of genital segments and, hence, female size and age.
Polyodra spp. is a small, sedentary, burrowing polychaete worm up to 3 cm long. All Polydora spp. make a U-shaped tube from small particles (Hayward & Ryland, 1995b). Polydora ciliata usually burrows into substrata containing calcium carbonate such as limestone, chalk and clay, as well as shells or oysters, mussels and periwinkles (Fish & Fish, 1996). The sexes are separate and breeding has been recorded in spring in a number of locations. In northern England, it has been recorded to occur from February until June and three or four generations succeed one another during the spawning period (Gudmundsson, 1985). Eggs are laid in a string of capsules that are attached by two threads to the wall of the burrow (Fish & Fish, 1996). After a week the larvae emerge and are believed to have a pelagic life of 2-6 weeks before settling. Length of life is no more than 1 year (Fish & Fish, 1996). Almeda et al. (2009) suggested low filtration rates and low growth rates despite high food availability for Polydora ciliata larvae, which suggested a compromise to ensure efficient larval dispersion. Larvae are substratum specific, selecting rocks according to their physical properties or sediment depending on particle size. Larvae of Polydora ciliata have been collected as far as 118 km offshore (Murina, 1997). Adults of Polydora ciliata produce a 'mud' resulting from the perforation of soft rock substrata and the larvae of the species settle preferentially on substrata covered with mud (Lagadeuc, 1991).
A Polydora biotope is likely to reach maturity very rapidly because Polydora ciliata is a short lived species that reaches maturity within a few months and has three or four spawnings during a breeding season of several months. The early reproductive period of Polydora ciliata often enables the species to be the first to colonize available substrata (Green, 1983). For example, in colonization experiments in Helgoland (Harms & Anger, 1983), Polydora ciliata settled on panels within one month in the spring. The tubes built by Polydora sometimes agglomerate to form layers of mud up to an average of 20 cm thick.
The settling of the first generation in April is followed by the accumulation and active fixing of mud continuously up to a peak during the month of May. The following generations do not produce a heavy settlement due to interspecific competition and heavy mortality of the larvae (Daro & Polk, 1973). Later in the year, the surface layer cannot hold the lower layers of the mud mat in place. They crumble away and are then swept away by water currents. The empty tubes of Polydora may saturate the sea in June.
Resilience assessment: The community is dominated by fast growing opportunistic polychaetes and is likely to reach maturity within one year of space becoming available. Seasonal changes may, however, occur in the abundance of the fauna due to seasonal recruitment processes. For example, variation in abundance is very pronounced in the polychaete Aphelochaeta marioni. In the Wadden Sea, peak abundance occurred in January (71,200 individuals per m²) and minimum abundance occurred in July (22,500 individuals per m²) following maximum spawning activity between May and July (Farke, 1979). Polydora ciliata is a short lived species that reaches maturity within a few months and has three or four spawnings during a breeding season of several months, so is likely to reach maturity very rapidly. For example, in colonization experiments in Helgoland (Harms & Anger, 1983) Polydora ciliata settled on panels within one month in the spring. Removal of the characterizing species Aphelochaeta and Polydora would likely result in the biotope being lost and re-classified. Where a disturbance event removes part of the community (resistance High, Medium or Low) and recruitment of the characterizing species is possible by adult migration or recruitment from the remaining members of the community, resilience is likely to be High. However, Aphelochaeta marioni has no pelagic phase in its lifecycle, and dispersal is limited to the slow burrowing of the adults and juveniles (Farke, 1979). So where the community is severely reduced (resistance None), recruitment is likely to depend on dispersal by hydrodynamic conditions. The low energy conditions experienced by the biotope may limit immediate re-colonization. However, as long as the substratum nature of the biotope remains suitable for the settlement of Aphelochaeta and Polydora recruits, the community is likely to reach maturity within 2-10 years, so resilience is likely to be Medium.
NB: The resilience and the ability to recover from human induced pressures is a combination of the environmental conditions of the site, the frequency (repeated disturbances versus a one off event) and the intensity of the disturbance. Recovery of impacted populations will always be mediated by stochastic events and processes acting over different scales including, but not limited to, local habitat conditions, further impacts and processes such as larval-supply and recruitment between populations. Full recovery is defined as the return to the state of the habitat that existed prior to impact. This does not necessarily mean that every component species has returned to its prior condition, abundance or extent but that the relevant functional components are present and the habitat is structurally and functionally recognizable as the initial habitat of interest. It should be noted that the recovery rates are only indicative of the recovery potential.
Aphelochaeta marioni is distributed over a wide temperature range. It has been recorded from the Mediterranean Sea and Indian Ocean (Farke, 1979). Therefore, the species must be capable of tolerating higher temperatures than it experiences in Northern Europe. For example, Covazzi Harriague et al. (2007) reported Aphelochate marioni occurring in the Rapallo Harbour (Ligurian Sea, NW Mediterranean) at 24°C. Furthermore, Aphelochaeta marioni lives infaunally and so is likely to be insulated from rapid temperature change. An increase in temperature would be expected to cause some physiological stress but no mortality. Murina (1997) categorized Polydora ciliata as a eurythermal species because of its ability to spawn in temperatures ranging from 10.6-19.9°C. This is consistent with a wide distribution in north-west Europe which extends into the warmer waters of Portugal and Italy (Pardal et al., 1993; Sordino et al., 1989). In the western Baltic Sea, Gulliksen (1977) recorded high abundances of Polydora ciliata in temperatures of 7.5 to 11.5°C and in Whitstable in Kent, where sea temperatures varied between 0.5 and 17°C (Dorsett, 1961). Growth rates may increase if temperature rises. For example at Whitstable in Kent, Dorsett (1961) found that a rapid increase in growth of Polydora ciliata coincided with the rising temperature of the seawater during March.
Most organisms in the biotope are distributed to the north and south of Britain and Ireland and unlikely to be affected adversely by long-term temperature change. In addition, subtidal and especially infaunal species are likely to be protected from acute temperature change. Nevertheless, an increase in temperature may indirectly affect some species as microbial activity within the sediments will be stimulated increasing oxygen consumption and promoting hypoxia (see de-oxygenation pressure).
Sensitivity assessment: Typical surface water temperatures around the UK coast vary seasonally from 4-19°C (Huthnance, 2010). No information was found on the maximum temperature tolerated by the characterizing species Aphelochaeta marioni and Polydora ciliata. However, it is likely that the species are able to resist a long term increase in temperature of 2°C and may resist a short term increase of 5°C. Resistance and resilience are therefore assessed as High and the biotope is judged as Not Sensitive.
Aphelochaeta marioni is distributed over a wide temperature range. It has been recorded from the western Baltic Sea, South Atlantic Ocean and North Sea (Farke, 1979). Therefore the species must be capable of tolerating low temperatures. Aphelochaeta marioni lives buried in sediment and is therefore well insulated from decreases in temperature. In the Wadden Sea, the population was apparently unaffected by a short period of severe frost in I973 (Farke, 1979). Kędra et al. (2010) reported Aphelochaete marioni occurring in the Svalbard Archipelago where temperatures below zero may be experienced in the winter. A decrease in temperature would be likely to cause some physiological stress but no mortality.
Murina (1997) categorized Polydora ciliata as a eurythermal species because of its ability to spawn in temperatures ranging from 10.6-19.9°C. This is consistent with a wide distribution in north-west Europe. In the western Baltic Sea, Gulliksen (1977) recorded high abundances of Polydora ciliata in temperatures of 7.5 to 11.5°C and in Whitstable in Kent abundance was high when winter water temperatures dropped to 0.5°C (Dorsett, 1961). During the extremely cold winter of 1962/63 Polydora ciliata was apparently unaffected, when temperature anomalies of between 2.5-5.8°C were observed (Crisp, 1964).
Sensitivity assessment: Typical surface water temperatures around the UK coast vary seasonally from 4-19°C (Huthnance, 2010). Aphelochaeta marioni and Polydora ciliata are likely to be able to resist a long term decrease in temperature of 2°C and may resist a short term decrease of 5°C. Temperature may act as a spawning cue and an acute or chronic decrease may result in some delay in spawning, however this is not considered to impact the adult population and may be compensated by later spawning events. Resistance and resilience are therefore assessed as High and the biotope judged as Not Sensitive.
Populations of Aphelochaeta marioni inhabit the open coast where seawater is at full salinity. Covazzi Harriague et al. (2007) reported Aphelochate marioni in the Rapallo Harbour (Ligurian Sea, NW Mediterranean) at salinities above 38 psu. Farke (1979) studied the effects of changing salinity on Aphelochaeta marioni (studied as Tharyx marioni) in a microsystem in the laboratory. Over several weeks, the salinity in the microsystem was increased from 25-40 psu and no adverse reaction was noted. However, when individuals were removed from the sediment and displaced to a new habitat, they only dug into their new substratum if the salinities in the two habitats were similar. If the salinities differed by 3-5 psu, the worms carried out random digging movements, failed to penetrate the sediment and died at the substratum surface after a few hours. This would suggest that Aphelochaeta marioni can tolerate salinity changes when living infaunally but may not resist an increase in salinity when removed from its habitat.
Polydora ciliata is an euryhaline species inhabiting fully marine and estuarine habitats. However, there are no records of the species occurring in hypersaline waters.
Sensitivity assessment: In SS.SMx.SMxVS.AphPol, an increase in salinity at the pressure benchmark (one MNCR salinity category above the usual range of the biotope) would represent an increase to full salinity. Based on the evidence presented, both characterizing species occur in environments of full salinity and are likely to resist an increase in salinity at the pressure benchmark level. However, as salinity increases SS.SMx.SMxVS.AphPol may grade into SS.SMu.ISaMu.MelMagThy, with those species characteristic of the latter increasing in abundance (Connor et al., 2004), so the biotope may be gradually lost and eventually re-classified at the pressure benchmark level that assumes a change in salinity for one year. Resistance is therefore assessed as Low (loss 25-75%) and resilience is likely to be High, so the biotope is considered to have Low sensitivity to an increase in salinity at the pressure benchmark level.
Aphelochaeta marioni thrives in estuaries and is therefore likely to be tolerant of decreases in salinity. It has been recorded from brackish inland waters in the Southern Netherlands with a salinity of 16 psu, but not in areas permanently exposed to lower salinities (Wolff, 1973). However, it also penetrates into areas exposed to salinities as low as 4 psu for short periods at low tide when freshwater discharge from rivers is high (Farke, 1979). In the Severn Estuary, Aphelochaeta marioni (studied as Tharyx marioni) characterized the faunal assemblage of very poorly oxygenated, poorly sorted mud with relatively high interstitial salinity (Broom et al., 1991).
Polydora ciliata is an euryhaline species inhabiting fully marine and estuarine habitats. In an area of the western Baltic Sea, where bottom salinity was between 11.1 and 15.0 psu Polydora ciliata was the second most abundant species with over 1000 individuals per m2 (Gulliksen, 1977).
Overall, the important characterizing species are likely to tolerate a short-term change in salinity from e.g. variable to low salinity and a long term change from variable to reduced salinity. The species richness of the biotope may decline but the biotope will probably not be adversely affected.
Sensitivity assessment: Records indicate SS.SMx.SMxVS.AphPol occurs in areas of reduced (18-30 ppt), variable (18-35 ppt) and low (<18 ppt) salinity (Connor et al., 2004). The characterizing species Aphelochaeta marioni and Polydora ciliata are therefore likely to resist a decrease in salinity at the pressure benchmark level. Resistance is therefore assessed as High and resilience as High (by default) and the biotope is considered Not Sensitive to a decrease in salinity at the pressure benchmark level.
Aphelochaeta marioni has been recorded in the Wadden Sea with flow rates up to 0.45 m/s (Compton et al., 2013), and in the Westerscheld estuary (SW Netherlands) where spring current velocities vary between 0.1-0.58 m/s (Van Colen et al., 2010a). Polydora ciliata colonized test panels in Helgoland in three areas, two exposed to strong tidal currents and one site sheltered from currents (Harms & Anger, 1983). Very strong water flows may sweep away Polydora colonies, where these are present as a thick layer of mud on a hard substratum.
The hydrographic regime is an important structuring factor in sedimentary habitats. An increase in water flow rate is not likely to affect Aphelochaeta marioni directly as it lives infaunally. The most damaging effect of increased flow rate would be the erosion of the substratum as this could eventually lead to loss of the habitat. Orvain et al. (2007) investigated the spatio-temporal variations in intertidal mudflat erodibility in Western France and suggested a potential link between Polychaeta and bed erodibility given the high polychaete abundances observed in the study.
Increased water flow rates is likely to change the sediment characteristics in which the species live, primarily by re-suspending and preventing deposition of finer particles (Hiscock, 1983). The characterizing species prefer habitats with silty/muddy substrata which would not occur in very strong tidal streams. Additionally, the consequent lack of deposition of particulate matter at the sediment surface would reduce food availability. Decreased water movement would result in increased deposition of suspended sediment (Hiscock, 1983). An increased rate of siltation resulting from a decrease in water flow may result in an increase in food availability for the characterizing species and therefore growth and reproduction may be enhanced, but only if food was previously limiting.
Sensitivity assessment: Sand particles are most easily eroded and likely to be eroded at about 0.20 m/s (based on Hjulström-Sundborg diagram, Sundborg, 1956). Although having a smaller grain size than sand, clays and silts require greater critical erosion velocities because of their cohesiveness. SS.SMx.SMxVS.AphPol is recorded in moderately strong (0.5-1 m/s) and weak (>0.5 m/s) tidal streams (Connor et al., 2004). A change in water flow rate at the pressure benchmark level of 0.1-0.2 m/s is considered to fall within the range of flow speeds experienced by populations in the middle of their range. Resistance and resilience are, therefore, assessed as High and the biotope considered Not Sensitive to a change in water flow at the pressure benchmark level.
SS.SMx.SMxVS.AphPol occurs in the infralittoral so only the upper extent of shallow examples of the biotope is likely to be emersed on extreme low tides. Aphelochaeta marioni lives in the intertidal zone in significant numbers (Gibbs, 1969; Farke, 1979), and Polydora ciliata occur in the mid to low intertidal. Both characterizing species would probably survive an increase in emergence. However, the species can only feed when immersed and therefore likely to experience reduced feeding opportunities. Over the course of a year, the resultant energetic cost is likely to cause some mortality. In addition, increased emergence is likely to increase the vulnerability to predation from shore birds. A decrease in emergence is likely to allow the biotope to extend its upper limit, where suitable substrata exist.
Sensitivity assessment: Some mortality of the characterizing species is likely to occur because of emergence regime changes. Resistance is therefore assessed as Medium and resilience is likely to be High, so the biotope is considered to have Low sensitivity to emergence regime changes at the pressure benchmark level.
The biotope is found in sheltered, very sheltered and extremely sheltered sites (Connor et al., 2004). Strong wave action is likely to cause damage or withdrawal of delicate feeding and respiration structures resulting in loss of feeding opportunities and compromised growth of Aphelochaeta marioni and Polydora ciliata, and changes in wave exposure may also influence the supply of particulate matter for tube building Polydora. Decreases in wave exposure may influence the supply of particulate matter because wave action may have an important role in re-suspending the sediment that is required by the species to build its tubes. Furthermore, Aphelochaeta marioni characteristically inhabits soft sediments in sheltered areas (Broom et al., 1991), so individuals may be damaged or dislodged by scouring from sand and gravel mobilized by increased wave action.
Sensitivity assessment: Hydrographic regimes are an important structuring factor in sedimentary habitats, and an increase in wave exposure could result in fine sediments being eroded (Hiscock, 1983), resulting in the likely reduction of the habitat and a decrease in food availability. Some erosion will occur naturally and storm events may be more significant in loss and damage of the substratum than changes in wave height at the pressure benchmark. SS.SMx.SMxVS.AphPol occurs in sheltered, very sheltered and extremely sheltered areas (Connor et al., 2004), and a change at the benchmark level is likely to fall within the range experienced by the mid-range examples of this biotope. The biotope is therefore considered to have High resistance to changes at the pressure benchmark where these do not lead to increased erosion of the substratum. Resilience is therefore assessed as High and the biotope is considered to be Not Sensitive at the pressure benchmark.
|Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)||Not sensitive|
Evidence suggests that polychaetes are fairly resistant to the effects of heavy metals (Bryan, 1984). Aphelochaeta marioni is tolerant of heavy metal contamination occurring in the heavily polluted Restronguet Creek (Bryan & Gibbs, 1983) and it is also an accumulator of arsenic (Gibbs et al., 1983). Polydora ciliata occurs in an area of the southern North Sea polluted by heavy metals but was absent from sediments with very high heavy metal levels (Diaz-Castaneda et al., 1989).
Sensitivity assessment: Taking account of the variable salinity conditions that affect this biotope (in general, for estuarine animals, heavy metal toxicity increases as salinity decreases and temperature increases: McLusky et al., 1986), it seems possible that some polychaete species at least in the biotope might be adversely affected by high contamination by heavy metals. However, the biotope is considered Not Sensitive at the pressure benchmark that assumes compliance with all relevant environmental protection standards.
|Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)||Not sensitive|
Cirratulids seem to be mostly immune to oil spills, probably because their feeding tentacles are protected by a heavy secretion of mucus (Suchanek, 1993). This is supported by observations of Aphelochaeta marioni following the Amoco Cadiz oil spill in March, 1978 (Dauvin, 1982, 2000). Prior to the spill, Aphelochaeta marioni (studied as Tharyx marioni) was present in very low numbers in the Bay of Morlaix, western English Channel. Following the spill, the level of hydrocarbons in the sediment increased from 10 mg/kg dry sediment to 1443 mg/kg dry sediment 6 months afterwards. In the same period, Aphelochaeta marioni increased in abundance to a mean of 76 individuals/m2, which placed it among the top five dominant species in the faunal assemblage. It was suggested that the population explosion occurred due to the increased food availability because of accumulation of organic matter resulting from high mortality of browsers. Six years later, abundance of Aphelochaeta marioni began to fall away again, accompanied by gradual decontamination of the sediments.
In analysis of kelp holdfast fauna following the Sea Empress oil spill in Milford Haven, the fauna present, including Polydora ciliata, showed a strong negative correlation between numbers of species and distance from the spill (SEEEC, 1998). After the extensive oil spill in West Falmouth, Massachusetts, Grassle & Grassle (1974) followed the settlement of polychaetes in the disturbed area. Species with the most opportunistic life histories, including Polydora ligni, were able to settle in the area. This species has some brood protection which enables larvae to settle almost immediately in the nearby area (Reish, 1979).
Sensitivity assessment: Overall, hydrocarbon contamination is likely to adversely affect some members of the community, resulting in more tolerant or opportunistic species to increase in abundance, and consequent reduction in species richness. However, the biotope is considered Not Sensitive at the pressure benchmark that assumes compliance with all relevant environmental protection standards.
|Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)||Not sensitive|
There is little evidence directly relating to the effects of synthetic chemicals on Aphelochaeta marioni. Waldock et al. (1999) reported that the species diversity of polychaete infauna, including Aphelochaeta marioni, in the Crouch estuary increased in the three years after the use of TBT was banned within the estuary, suggesting that TBT had suppressed their abundance previously.
Polydora ciliata was abundant at polluted sites close to acidified, halogenated effluent discharge from a bromide-extraction plant in Amlwch, Anglesey (Hoare & Hiscock, 1974). Spionid polychaetes were found by McLusky (1982) to be relatively resistant of distilling and petrochemical industrial waste in Scotland.
Furthermore, Beaumont et al. (1989) concluded that TBT had a detrimental effect on the larval and/or juvenile stages of infaunal polychaetes.
Sensitivity assessment: The biotope is considered Not Sensitive at the pressure benchmark that assumes compliance with all relevant environmental protection standards.
|No evidence (NEv)||Not relevant (NR)||No evidence (NEv)|
No Evidence is available on which to assess this pressure.
|Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)||Not sensitive|
The biotope is considered to be Not Sensitive at the pressure benchmark that assumes compliance with all relevant environmental protection standards.
Connor et al. (1997a) described sediments in which Aphelochaeta marioni is commonly found as usually with a "black anoxic layer close to the sediment surface". Broom et al. (1991) recorded that Aphelochaeta marioni (studied as Tharyx marioni) characterized the faunal assemblage of very poorly oxygenated mud in the Severn Estuary. They found Aphelochaeta marioni to be dominant where the redox potential at 4 cm sediment depth was 56 mV and, therefore, concluded that the species was tolerant of very low oxygen tensions. It is likely that feeding, growth and reproduction would be impaired under sustained low oxygen conditions.
Polydora ciliata is frequently found at localities with oxygen deficiency (Pearson & Rosenberg, 1978). For example, in polluted waters in Los Angeles and Long Beach harbours Polydora ciliata was present in the oxygen range 0.0-3.9 mg/l and the species was abundant in hypoxic fjord habitats (Rosenberg, 1977). Furthermore, in a study investigating a polychaete community in the north west Black Sea, Polydora ciliata was observed in all four study sites, including those severely affected by eutrophication and hypoxia as a result of discharges of waste waters (Vorobyova et al., 2008). However, Polydora ciliata is unlikely to be able to resist anoxic conditions. Hansen et al. (2002) reported near total extinction of all metazoan in the Mariager Fjord (Denmark), including Polydora spp. after a severe hypoxia event that resulted in complete anoxia in the water column for two weeks. Additionally, Como & Magni (2009) investigated seasonal variations in benthic communities known to be affected by episodic events of hypoxia. The authors observed that abundance of Polydora ciliata varied seasonally, decreasing during the summer months, and suggested it could be explained by the occurrence of hypoxic/anoxic conditions and sulphidic sediments during the summer. No details of the levels of dissolved oxygen leading to these community responses were provided.
Sensitivity assessment: The characterizing species are likely to only be affected by severe de-oxygenation episodes. Resistance to de-oxygenation at the pressure benchmark level is likely to be High. Opportunistic Polydora spp. have also repeatedly been reported amongst the first to recover hypoxia events (Hansen et al., 2002; Van Colen et al., 2010). Resilience of the biotope is likely to also be High and the biotope is therefore considered Not Sensitive to exposure to dissolved oxygen concentration of less than or equal to 2 mg/l for 1 week.
|Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)||Not sensitive|
Raman & Ganapati (1983) studied the distribution of Aphelochaeta marioni (studied as Tharyx marioni) in relation to a sewage outfall in Visakhaptnam Harbour, Bay of Bengal. Increased nutrients often derive from sewage inputs and presence of species such as Aphelochaeta marioni in such situations (for instance Broom et al., 1991) may reflect tolerance to high nutrients or to de-oxygenated conditions or both. Aphelochaeta marioni was found to be dominant in the 'semi-healthy zone' characterized by low nutrients (nitrate 0.02 mg/l, phosphate 0.88 mg/l). Aphelochaeta marioni was not found in high numbers in the polluted zone close to the sewage outfall, characterized by high nutrients (nitrate 0.042-0.105 mg/l, phosphate 2.35-3.76 mg/l) (Rayment, 2007a). This would suggest that Aphelochaeta marioni is intolerant of eutrophication. However, it would be expected that an increase in organic nutrients would lead to increased food availability for the deposit feeding Aphelochaeta marioni. Furthermore, Dauvin (1982, 2000) recorded an increase in abundance of Aphelochaeta marioni following an oil spill, which resulted in an explosion of plant growth due to high mortality of grazers. Therefore, the available evidence on the resistance of Aphelochaeta marioni to nutrient changes does not allow consistent conclusions to be drawn.
Polydora ciliata is often found in environments subject to high levels of nutrients. For example, the species was abundant in areas of the Firth of Forth exposed to high levels of sewage pollution (Smyth, 1968), in nutrient rich sediments in the Mondego estuary, Portugal (Pardal et al., 1993) and the coastal lagoon Lago Fusaro in Naples (Sordino et al., 1989). The extensive growth of Polydora ciliata in mat formations were recorded at West Ganton, in the Firth of Forth, prior to the introduction of the Sewage Scheme (Read et al., 1983). The abundance of the species was probably associated with their ability to use the increased availability of nutrients as a food source and silt for tube building.
Sensitivity assessment: Nutrient enrichment may reduce the abundance of Aphelochaeta marioni while Polydora is probably resistant. However, the biotope is considered Not Sensitive at the pressure benchmark that assumes compliance with good status as defined by the WFD.
Kędra et al. (2010) reported Aphelochaeta mariori that occurred in the Hornsundfjord, Svalbard, where primary production has been recorded as 120 gC/m2/yr. Covazzi-Harriague et al. (2007) reported Aphelochaeta mariori at sites with organic matter sedimentation as high as 359 mg/m2/hr in the Ligurian Sea, Italy. Furthermore, Markert et al. (2010) compared macrofaunal communities in the Wadden Sea in reefs dominated by Mytilus edulis and Cassostrea gigas and found Aphelochaeta mariori as a dominate species throughout the study site, which suggested the species was unlikely to be affected by organic enrichment.
In colonization experiments in an organically polluted fjord receiving effluent discharge from Oslo, Polydora ciliata settled in large numbers within the first month (Green, 1983; Pardal et al., 1993). However, Callier et al. (2007) investigated the spatial distribution of macrobenthos under a suspended mussel culture, in eastern Canada, where the sedimentation of organic matter to the bottom was approx. 1-3 gC/m2/d. Polydora ciliata was recorded as absent in the sites under the suspended mussel farm after one year and as dominant in reference areas of the study. It should be noted that the organic matter input from the mussel farm exceeds the pressure benchmark. Como & Magni (2009) investigated seasonal variations in benthic communities known to be affected by episodic events of sediment over-enrichment. The authors observed that abundance of Polydora ciliata varied seasonally, and suggested this could be a result of major accumulation of organic carbon-binding fine sediments in the study site. Studies by Almeda et al. (2009) and Pedersen et al. (2010) investigated larval energetic requirements for Polydora ciliata, and suggested maximum growth rates were reached at food concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 1.4 μg C/ml depending on larval size, and energetic carbon requirements of 0.09 to 3.15 μg C l/d, respectively. On the other hand, Polydora ciliata can also occur in organically poor areas (Pearson & Rosenberg, 1978).
Borja et al. (2000) and Gittenberger & Van Loon (2011) both assigned Aphelochaeta marioni and Polydora ciliata to their AMBI Ecological Group IV ‘Second-order opportunistic species present in slight to pronounced unbalanced situations’.
Sensitivity assessment: The evidence presented suggests the characterizing species may not be affected by organic enrichment at the benchmark level. Resistance and resilience are therefore assessed as High and the biotope is considered Not Sensitive to organic enrichment (deposit of 100 gC/m2/yr).
All marine habitats and benthic species are considered to have a resistance of None to this pressure and to be unable to recover from a permanent loss of habitat (Resilience is Very Low). Sensitivity within the direct spatial footprint of this pressure is therefore High. Although no specific evidence is described, confidence in this assessment is ‘High’, due to the incontrovertible nature of this pressure.
If the mixed sediment that characterizes this biotope were replaced with rock substrata, this would represent a fundamental change to the physical character of the biotope. The characterizing species would no longer be supported and the biotope would be lost and/or reclassified.
Sensitivity assessment: Resistance to the pressure is considered None, and resilience Very Low. Sensitivity has been assessed as High. Although no specific evidence is described, confidence in this assessment is ‘High’, due to the incontrovertible nature of this pressure.
Aphelochaeta marioni has been recorded from a variety of different sediment types. In the intertidal area of the Wadden Sea, it achieved highest abundance where the sediment fraction smaller than 0.04 mm diameter was greater than 10% of the total sediment (Farke, 1979). Where a change in sediment type results in decrease of the mud fraction in the sediment, tube building for the characterizing species Polydora ciliata could be compromised.
Sensitivity assessment: Some mortality of the characterizing species Polydora ciliata may occur where a change in sediment type by one Folk class results in decrease of the mud fraction in the sediment. Resistance to the pressure is therefore considered Low. Resilience, however, is likely to be Very Low given the permanent nature of the pressure. Sensitivity has been assessed as High.
Aphelochaeta marioni lives buried in soft sediments with the majority of individuals found in the upper 4 cm of the sediment (Rayment, 2007a). The tubes built by Polydora sometimes agglomerate to form layers of mud up to an average of 20 cm thick (Hill, 2007). Removal of the substratum to 30 cm would result in the loss of the characterizing species. Resistance to the pressure is considered None, and resilience Medium. Sensitivity has been assessed as Medium.
Aphelochaeta marioni is a soft bodied organism which exposes its palps and cirri at the surface while feeding (Rayment, 2007a). The species lives infaunally in soft sediment, usually within a few centimetres of the sediment surface. Physical disturbance, such as dredging or dragging an anchor, would be likely to penetrate the upper few centimetres of the sediment and cause physical damage to Aphelochaeta marioni. De Biasi & Pacciardi (2008) compared macrobenthic communities in a commercial fishing ground exploited by otter trawling with an area closed to fishing for over 10 years in the Adriatic Sea. The authors found that polychaetes, including Aphelochaeta spp. were among the species dominating the disturbed areas, which is likely to result from the ability of the species to recolonize disturbed areas rapidly, rather than indicate that the polychaetes are resistant to disturbance of the seabed surface.
The tubes of characterizing species Polydora spp. are also likely to be removed by abrasion as these project above the surface and are not physically robust. A thick Polydora mud may crumble away and be swept away by water currents.
Sensitivity assessment: The characterizing community in this biotope is considered likely to be damaged and removed by abrasion. As a soft bodied species, both Aphelochaeta marioni and Polydora ciliata are likely to be crushed and killed by an abrasive force or physical blow. Resistance to abrasion is considered Low. However, the community is likely to be able to re-establish rapidly, so resilience of the biotope is assessed as High with the biotope considered to have Low sensitivity to abrasion or disturbance of the surface of the seabed.
Activities that penetrate below the surface would remove a significant proportion of the characterizing species within the direct area of impact (see evidence under ‘abrasion’ above). Biotope resistance is therefore assessed as Low and recovery is assessed as High based on the assumption that the suitable substratum to support the community of the characterizing species would not be lost. Sensitivity is therefore assessed as Low.
This biotope is probably exposed to the high levels of suspended sediment characteristic of estuarine conditions. Therefore, the resident species are probably adapted to high suspended sediment levels. Aphelochaeta marioni lives infaunally and is a surface deposit feeder (Rayment, 2007a), therefore relying on a supply of nutrients at the sediment surface. An increased rate of siltation may result in an increase in food availability and therefore growth and reproduction of Aphelochaeta marioni. However, food availability would only increase if the additional suspended sediment contained a significant proportion of organic matter and the population would only be enhanced if food was previously limiting. A decrease in the suspended sediment would result in a decreased rate of deposition on the substratum surface and therefore a reduction in food availability for Aphelochaeta marioni. This would be likely to impair growth and reproduction.
In the Firth of Forth, Polydora ciliata formed extensive mats in areas that had an average of 68 mg/l suspended solids and a maximum of approximately 680 mg/l, indicating the species is able to tolerate different levels of suspended solids (Read et al., 1982; Read et al., 1983). Occasionally, in certain places siltation is speeded up when Polydora ciliata is present because the species actually produces a 'mud' as it perforates soft rock and chalk habitats and larvae settle preferentially on substrates covered with mud (Lagadeuc, 1991). Suspended sediment and siltation of particles is important for tube building in Polydora ciliata so a decrease in suspended solids may reduce tube building or the thickness of the mud surrounding the 'colonies'. Daro & Polk (1973) reported that the success of Polydora is directly related to the quantities of muds of any origin carried along by rivers or coastal currents.
An increase in turbidity, reducing light availability may reduce primary production by phytoplankton in the water column. A reduction in primary production in the water column and by the microphytobenthos on the sediment surface may result indirectly in reduced food supply to the characterizing species, which in turn may affect growth rates and fecundity.
Sensitivity assessment: An increase in suspended solids at the pressure benchmark level is unlikely to affect the characterizing species of this biotope. However, a decrease in suspended matter in the biotope could result in limitation of material for tube building of Polydora and in the substratum being no longer suitable for colonization by new recruits. Resistance of the biotope is therefore assessed as Low (loss of 25-75%) and resilience is High (following a return to normal conditions), so the biotope is considered to have Low sensitivity to a decrease in suspended solids at the pressure benchmark level.
Aphelochaeta marioni lives infaunally in soft sediments and moves by burrowing. It deposit feeds at the surface by extending contractile palps from its burrow. An additional 5 cm layer of sediment would result in a temporary cessation of feeding activity, and therefore growth and reproduction are likely to be compromised. However, Aphelochaeta marioni would be expected to quickly relocate to its favoured depth, with no mortality. Kędra et al. (2010) reported Aphelochaeta mariori to occur in the Hornsundfjord, Svalbard, where sedimentation rates can vary between 0.1-35 cm/yr.
Adults of Polydora ciliata produce a 'mud' resulting from the perforation of soft rock substrates (Lagadeuc, 1991). A Polydora mud can be up to 50 cm thick, but the animals themselves occupy only the first few centimetres. They either elongate their tubes to reach the surface, or leave them to rebuild close to the surface. Munari & Mistri (2014) investigated the spatio-temporal variation pattern of a benthic community following deposition of dredged material, at a maximum thickness of 30–40 cm. Polydora ciliata was amongst the first colonizers of the newly deposited sediments. The authors suggested that it was possible that the individuals migrated vertically through the deep layer of dredged sand. This was based on the results of Roberts et al. (1998) who suggested 15 cm as the maximum depth of overburden through which benthic infauna can successfully migrate. After one year, no adverse impact of sand disposal on the benthic fauna was detected on the study site.
In the low energy environment where the biotope occurs, a ‘light’ deposition of sediments is likely to be cleared in a few tidal cycles.
Sensitivity assessment: The characterizing species of this biotope are considered likely to resist smothering by 5 cm of sediment. Resistance and resilience are therefore assessed as High and the biotope is considered Not Sensitive to a ‘light’ deposition of up to 5 cm of fine material in a single discrete event.
Aphelochaeta marioni lives infaunally in soft sediments and moves by burrowing. It deposit feeds at the surface by extending contractile palps from its burrow. An additional layer of sediment would result in a temporary cessation of feeding activity, and therefore growth and reproduction are likely to be compromised. However, Aphelochaeta marioni would be expected to quickly relocate to its favoured depth, with no mortality. Kędra et al. (2010) reported Aphelochaeta mariori to occur in the Hornsundfjord, Svalbard, where sedimentation rates can vary between 0.1-35 cm/yr. Furthermore, Do et al. (2012) studied the macrobenthos recovery in the Arcachon Bay (France) following a deposition of sediment up to 10 cm thick that resulted from dredging activities. The authors reported Aphelochaeta marioni as considerably reduced or absent from impacted areas characterized mainly by mud substrata.
Adults of Polydora ciliata produce a 'mud' resulting from the perforation of soft rock substrates (Lagadeuc, 1991). A Polydora mud can be up to 50 cm thick, but the animals themselves occupy only the first few centimetres. They either elongate their tubes, or leave them to rebuild close to the surface. Munari & Mistri (2014) investigated the spatio-temporal variation pattern of a benthic community following deposition of dredged material, at a maximum thickness of 30–40 cm. Polydora ciliata was amongst the first colonizers of the newly deposited sediments. The authors suggested that it was possible that the individuals migrated vertically through the deep layer of dredged sand. This was based on the results of Roberts et al. (1998) who suggested 15 cm as the maximum depth of overburden through which benthic infauna can successfully migrate. After one year, no adverse impact of sand disposal on the benthic fauna was detected on the study site.
Sensitivity assessment: Polychaete species have been reported to migrate through depositions of sediment greater than the benchmark (30 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single discrete event) (Maurer et al., 1982). However, it is not clear whether the characterizing species are likely to be able to migrate through a maximum thickness of fine sediment because muds tend to be more cohesive and compacted than sand. Some mortality of the characterizing species is likely to occur. Resistance is therefore assessed as Low and resilience as High, and the biotope is considered to have Low sensitivity to a ‘heavy’ deposition of up to 30 cm of fine material in a single discrete event.
|Not Assessed (NA)||Not Assessed (NA)||Not assessed (NA)|
No Evidence is available on which to assess this pressure.
|No evidence (NEv)||Not relevant (NR)||No evidence (NEv)|
No Evidence is available on which to assess this pressure.
|Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)|
None of the species in the biotope are likely to be sensitive to noise or vibration at the benchmark level and no information was found concerning the intolerance of Aphelochaeta marioni to noise. Polydora ciliata may respond to vibrations from predators or bait diggers by retracting their palps into their tubes. However, the characterizing species are unlikely to be affected by noise pollution and so the biotope is assessed as Not Sensitive.
Changes in light availability impact primary production by phytoplankton in the water column and by the microphytobenthos on the sediment surface, which in turn may affect food availability for the characterizing species. However, SS.SMx.SMxVS.AphPol is not directly dependent on sunlight so the biotope is considered to have High resistance and, by default, High resilience and therefore is Not Sensitive to the introduction of light or shading.
|Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)|
Not Relevant to biotopes restricted to open waters.
|Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)|
Not Relevant to seabed habitats. NB. Collision by grounding vessels is addressed under surface abrasion
Most species will respond to the shading caused by the approach of a predator, however, their visual acuity is probably very low. Farke (1979) noted that Aphelochaeta marioni is intolerant to visual disturbance in a microsystem in the laboratory, possibly due to its nocturnal life habits (Farke, 1979). In order to observe feeding and breeding in the microsystem, the animals had to be gradually acclimated to lamp light. Even then, additional disturbance, such as an electronic flash, caused the retraction of palps and cirri and cessation of all activity for some minutes.
Polydora ciliata exhibits shadow responses withdrawing its palps into its burrow, believed to be a defence against predation. However, since the withdrawal of the palps interrupts feeding and possibly respiration the species also shows habituation of the response (Kinne, 1970).
Sensitivity assessment: Nevertheless, the characterizing species are unlikely to have the visual acuity to respond of visual disturbance and defined in the pressure. Resistance and resilience are therefore assessed as High and the biotope judged as Not Sensitive to visual disturbance.
|Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)|
The important characterizing species in the biotope are not cultivated or likely to be translocated. This pressure is therefore considered Not Relevant.
|Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)|
There is no evidence on the presence of non-indigenous species or impacts of non-indigenous species relevant to this biotope. This pressure is therefore considered Not Relevant.
Introduced organisms (especially parasites or pathogens) are a potential threat in all coastal ecosystems. Little information was found regarding microbial infection of polychaetes, although Gibbs (1971) recorded that nearly all of the population of Aphelochaeta marioni in Stonehouse Pool, Plymouth Sound, was infected with a sporozoan parasite belonging to the acephaline gregarine genus Gonospora, which inhabits the coelom of the host. No evidence was found to suggest that gametogenesis was affected by Gonospora infection and there was no apparent reduction in fecundity. No information was found on microbial pathogens affecting Polydora ciliata.
Sensitivity assessment. The biotope is judged to have High resistance to this pressure. By default resilience is assessed as High and the biotope is classed as Not Sensitive.
|Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)||Not relevant (NR)|
SS.SMx.SMxVS.AphPol is currently not targeted by commercial fisheries and hence not directly affected by this pressure. This pressure is therefore considered Not Relevant.
Direct, physical impacts are assessed through the abrasion and penetration of the seabed pressures, while this pressure considers the ecological or biological effects of by-catch. Species in this biotope, including the characterizing species, may be damaged or directly removed by static or mobile gears that are targeting other species (see abrasion and penetration pressures). Hall & Harding (1997) demonstrated that commercial cockle harvesting by suction dredging had significant effects on soft-sediment infaunal communities. Following dredging, species numbers were reduced by up to 30% and abundances by up to 50%.
Sensitivity assessment. Removal of the characterizing species would result in the biotope being lost or re-classified. Therefore, the biotope is considered to have a resistance of Low to this pressure and to have High resilience, resulting in the sensitivity being judged as Low.
|Habitats Directive Annex 1||Estuaries|
Almeda, R., Pedersen, T.M., Jakobsen, H.H., Alcaraz, M., Calbet, A. & Hansen, B.W., 2009. Feeding and growth kinetics of the planktotrophic larvae of the spionid polychaete Polydora ciliata (Johnston). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 382 (1), 61-68.
Arntz, W.E. & Rumohr, H., 1986. Fluctuations of benthic macrofauna during succession and in an established community. Meeresforschung, 31, 97-114.
Attrill, M.J., Ramsay, P.M., Thomas, R.M. & Trett, M.W., 1996. An estuarine biodiversity hot-spot. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 76, 161-175.
Bamber, R.N. & Spencer, J.F. 1984. The benthos of a coastal power station thermal discharge canal. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 64, 603-623.
Barnes, R.S.K. & Hughes, R.N., 1992. An introduction to marine ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Beaumont, A.R., Newman, P.B., Mills, D.K., Waldock, M.J., Miller, D. & Waite, M.E., 1989. Sandy-substrate microcosm studies on tributyl tin (TBT) toxicity to marine organisms. Scientia Marina, 53, 737-743.
Beukema, J.J. & De Vlas, J., 1979. Population parameters of the lugworm, Arenicola marina, living on tidal flats in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 13, 331-353.
Beukema, J.J., 1995. Long-term effects of mechanical harvesting of lugworms Arenicola marina on the zoobenthic community of a tidal flat in the Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 33, 219-227.
Borja, A., Franco, J. & Perez, V., 2000. A marine biotic index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40 (12), 1100-1114.
Boström, C. & Bonsdorff, E., 2000. Zoobenthic community establishment and habitat complexity - the importance of seagrass shoot density, morphology and physical disturbance for faunal recruitment. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 205, 123-138.
Broom, M.J., Davies, J., Hutchings, B. & Halcrow, W., 1991. Environmental assessment of the effects of polluting discharges: stage 1: developing a post-facto baseline. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 33, 71-87.
Brouseau, D.J. & Baglivo, J.A., 1991. Disease progression and mortality in neoplastic Mya arenaria in the field. Marine Biology, 110, 249-252.
Brousseau, D.J., 1978b. Population dynamics of the soft-shell clam Mya arenaria. Marine Biology, 50, 67-71.
Brown, B. & Wilson, W.H., 1997. The role of commercial digging of mudflats as an agent for change of infaunal intertidal populations. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 218, 39-51.
Bryan, G.W. & Gibbs, P.E., 1983. Heavy metals from the Fal estuary, Cornwall: a study of long-term contamination by mining waste and its effects on estuarine organisms. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. [Occasional Publication, no. 2.]
Bryan, G.W. & Gibbs, P.E., 1991. Impact of low concentrations of tributyltin (TBT) on marine organisms: a review. In: Metal ecotoxicology: concepts and applications (ed. M.C. Newman & A.W. McIntosh), pp. 323-361. Boston: Lewis Publishers Inc.
Bryan, G.W. & Hummerstone, L.G., 1971. Adaptation of the polychaete Nereis diversicolor to estuarine sediments containing high concentrations of heavy metals. I. General observations and adaption to copper. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 845-863.
Bryan, G.W., 1984. Pollution due to heavy metals and their compounds. In Marine Ecology: A Comprehensive, Integrated Treatise on Life in the Oceans and Coastal Waters, vol. 5. Ocean Management, part 3, (ed. O. Kinne), pp.1289-1431. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Bullimore, B., 1985. An investigation into the effects of scallop dredging within the Skomer Marine Reserve. Report to the Nature Conservancy Council by the Skomer Marine Reserve Subtidal Monitoring Project, S.M.R.S.M.P. Report, no 3., Nature Conservancy Council.
Callier, M. D., McKindsey, C.W. & Desrosiers, G., 2007. Multi-scale spatial variations in benthic sediment geochemistry and macrofaunal communities under a suspended mussel culture. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 348, 103-115.
Clay, E., 1966. Literature survey of the common fauna of estuaries. 12. Mya arenaria L., Mya truncata L. Imperial Chemical Industries Limited, Brixham Laboratory, BL/A/707.
Cole, S., Codling, I.D., Parr, W. & Zabel, T., 1999. Guidelines for managing water quality impacts within UK European Marine sites. Natura 2000 report prepared for the UK Marine SACs Project. 441 pp., Swindon: Water Research Council on behalf of EN, SNH, CCW, JNCC, SAMS and EHS. [UK Marine SACs Project.], http://www.ukmarinesac.org.uk/
Collier, L.M. & Pinn, E.H., 1998. An assessment of the acute impact of the sea lice treatment Ivermectin on a benthic community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 230, 131-147.
Como, S. & Magni, P., 2009. Temporal changes of a macrobenthic assemblage in harsh lagoon sediments. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 83 (4), 638-646.
Compton, T.J., Holthuijsen, S., Koolhaas, A., Dekinga, A., Ten Horn, J., Smith, J., Galama, Y., Brugge, M., van der Wal, D., Van der Meer, J., Van Der Veer, H.W. & Piersma, T., 2013. Distinctly variable mudscapes: Distribution gradients of intertidal macrofauna across the Dutch Wadden Sea. Journal of Sea Research, 82, 103-116.
Connor, D.W., Allen, J.H., Golding, N., Howell, K.L., Lieberknecht, L.M., Northen, K.O. & Reker, J.B., 2004. The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland. Version 04.05. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. www.jncc.gov.uk/MarineHabitatClassification.
Connor, D.W., Dalkin, M.J., Hill, T.O., Holt, R.H.F. & Sanderson, W.G., 1997a. Marine biotope classification for Britain and Ireland. Vol. 2. Sublittoral biotopes. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, JNCC Report no. 230, Version 97.06., Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, JNCC Report no. 230, Version 97.06.
Cotter, A.J.R., Walker, P., Coates, P., Cook, W. & Dare, P.J., 1997. Trial of a tractor dredger for cockles in Burry Inlet, South Wales. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 54, 72-83.
Covazzi-Harriague, A., Misic, C., Petrillo, M. & Albertelli, G., 2007. Stressors affecting the macrobenthic community in Rapallo harbour (Ligurian Sea, Italy). Scientia Marina, 71 (4), 705-714.
Crisp, D.J. (ed.), 1964. The effects of the severe winter of 1962-63 on marine life in Britain. Journal of Animal Ecology, 33, 165-210.
Daro, M.H. & Polk, P., 1973. The autecology of Polydora ciliata along the Belgian coast. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 6, 130-140.
Dauvin, J.C., 1982. Impact of Amoco Cadiz oil spill on the muddy fine sand Abra alba - Melinna palmata community from the Bay of Morlaix. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science, 14, 517-531.
Dauvin, J.C., 2000. The muddy fine sand Abra alba - Melinna palmata community of the Bay of Morlaix twenty years after the Amoco Cadiz oil spill. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40, 528-536.
Davies, C.E. & Moss, D., 1998. European Union Nature Information System (EUNIS) Habitat Classification. Report to European Topic Centre on Nature Conservation from the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood, Cambridgeshire. [Final draft with further revisions to marine habitats.], Brussels: European Environment Agency.
De Biasi, A. & Pacciardi, L., 2008. Macrobenthic communities in a fishery exclusion zone and in a trawled area of the middle Adriatic Sea (Italy). Ciencias Marinas, 34 (4).
Dernie, K.M., Kaiser, M.J., Richardson, E.A. & Warwick, R.M., 2003. Recovery of soft sediment communities and habitats following physical disturbance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 285-286, 415-434.
Diaz, R.J. & Rosenberg, R., 1995. Marine benthic hypoxia: a review of its ecological effects and the behavioural responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 33, 245-303.
Diaz-Castaneda, V., Richard, A. & Frontier, S., 1989. Preliminary results on colonization, recovery and succession in a polluted areas of the southern North Sea (Dunkerque's Harbour, France). Scientia Marina, 53, 705-716.
Do, V.T., de Montaudouin, X., Blanchet, H. & Lavesque, N., 2012. Seagrass burial by dredged sediments: Benthic community alteration, secondary production loss, biotic index reaction and recovery possibility. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 64 (11), 2340-2350.
Dorsett, D.A., 1961. The reproduction and maintenance of Polydora ciliata (Johnst.) at Whitstable. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 41, 383-396.
Dow, R.C., 1978. Size-selective mortalities of clams in an oil spill site. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 9, 45-48.
Dow, R.L. & Wallace, D.E., 1961. The soft-shell clam industry of Maine. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, Circular no. 110., U.S.A: Washington D.C.
Eagle, R.A., 1975. Natural fluctuations in a soft bottom benthic community. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 865-878.
Eisler, R., 1977. Toxicity evaluation of a complex meta mixture to the softshell clam Mya arenaria. Marine Biology, 43, 265-276.
Eleftheriou, A. & Robertson, M.R., 1992. The effects of experimental scallop dredging on the fauna and physical environment of a shallow sandy community. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 30, 289-299.
Elliot, M., Nedwell, S., Jones, N.V., Read, S.J., Cutts, N.D. & Hemingway, K.L., 1998. Intertidal sand and mudflats & subtidal mobile sandbanks (Vol. II). An overview of dynamic and sensitivity for conservation management of marine SACs. Prepared by the Scottish Association for Marine Science for the UK Marine SACs Project.
Emerson, C.M., Grant, J. & Rowell, T.W., 1990. Indirect effects of clam digging on the viability of soft-shell clams, Mya arenaria L. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 27, 109-118.
Emerson, C.W. & Grant, J., 1991. The control of soft-shell clam (Mya arenaria) recruitment on intertidal sandflats by bedload sediment transport. Limnology and Oceanography, 36, 1288-1300.
Eno, N.C., Clark, R.A. & Sanderson, W.G. (ed.) 1997. Non-native marine species in British waters: a review and directory. Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
Farke, H., 1979. Population dynamics, reproduction and early development of Tharyx marioni (Polychaeta, Cirratulidae) on tidal flats of the German Bight. Veroffentlichungen des Instituts fur Meeresforschung in Bremerhaven, 18, 69-99.
Feder, H.M. & Pearson, T.H., 1988. The benthic ecology of Loch Linnhe and Loch Eil, a sea-loch system on the west coast of Scotland. 5. Biology of the dominant soft-bottom epifauna and their interaction with the infauna. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 116, 99-134.
Fish, J.D. & Fish, S., 1996. A student's guide to the seashore. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flach, E.C., 1992. Disturbance of benthic infauna by sediment-reworking activities of the lugworm Arenicola marina. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 30, 81-89.
Gibbs, P.E., 1969. A quantitative study of the polychaete fauna of certain fine deposits in Plymouth Sound. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 311-326.
Gibbs, P.E., 1971. Reproductive cycles in four polychaete species belonging to the family Cirratulidae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 745-769.
Gibbs, P.E., Langston, W.J., Burt, G.R. & Pascoe, P.L., 1983. Tharyx marioni (Polychaeta) : a remarkable accumulator of arsenic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63, 313-325.
Giere, O., Preusse, J. & Dubilier, N. 1999. Tubificoides benedii (Tubificidae, Oligochaeta) - a pioneer in hypoxic and sulfide environments. An overview of adaptive pathways. Hydrobiologia, 406, 235-241.
Gittenberger, A. & Van Loon, W.M.G.M., 2011. Common Marine Macrozoobenthos Species in the Netherlands, their Characterisitics and Sensitivities to Environmental Pressures. GiMaRIS report no 2011.08.
Grassle, J.F. & Grassle, J.P., 1974. Opportunistic life histories and genetic systems in marine benthic polychaetes. Journal of Marine Research, 32, 253-284.
Green, N.W., 1983. Key colonisation strategies in a pollution-perturbed environment. In Fluctuations and Succession in Marine Ecosystems: Proceedings of the 17th European Symposium on Marine Biology, Brest, France, 27 September - 1st October 1982. Oceanologica Acta, 93-97.
Gudmundsson, H., 1985. Life history patterns of polychaete species of the family spionidae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 93-111.
Gulliksen, B., 1977. Studies from the U.W.L. "Helgoland" on the macrobenthic fauna of rocks and boulders in Lübeck Bay (western Baltic Sea). Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresunters, 30, 519-526.
Hall, J.A. & Frid, C.L.J. 1998. Colonisation patterns of adult macrobenthos in a polluted North Sea Estuary. Aquatic Ecology, 31, 333-340.
Hall, J.A. & Frid, C.L.J., 1995. Response of estuarine benthic macrofauna in copper-contaminated sediments to remediation of sediment quality. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 30, 694-700.
Hall, S.J. & Harding, M.J.C., 1997. Physical disturbance and marine benthic communities: the effects of mechanical harvesting of cockles on non-target benthic infauna. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34, 497-517.
Hall, S.J., 1994. Physical disturbance and marine benthic communities: life in unconsolidated sediments. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 32, 179-239.
Hansen, B. W., Stenalt, E., Petersen, J.K. & Ellegaard, C., 2002. Invertebrate re-colonisation in Mariager Fjord (Denmark) after severe hypoxia. I. Zooplankton and settlement. Ophelia 56 (3), 197-213.
Harms, J. & Anger, K., 1983. Seasonal, annual, and spatial variation in the development of hard bottom communities. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen, 36, 137-150.
Hayward, P.J. & Ryland, J.S. (ed.) 1995b. Handbook of the marine fauna of North-West Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hill, J.M. 2007. Polydora ciliata A bristleworm. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1410
Hiscock, K., 1983. Water movement. In Sublittoral ecology. The ecology of shallow sublittoral benthos (ed. R. Earll & D.G. Erwin), pp. 58-96. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hoare, R. & Hiscock, K., 1974. An ecological survey of the rocky coast adjacent to the effluent of a bromine extraction plant. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 2 (4), 329-348.
Huthnance, J., 2010. Ocean Processes Feeder Report. London, DEFRA on behalf of the United Kingdom Marine Monitoring and Assessment Strategy (UKMMAS) Community.
Jennings, S. & Kaiser, M.J., 1998. The effects of fishing on marine ecosystems. Advances in Marine Biology, 34, 201-352.
JNCC (Joint Nature Conservation Committee), 1999. Marine Environment Resource Mapping And Information Database (MERMAID): Marine Nature Conservation Review Survey Database. [on-line] http://www.jncc.gov.uk/mermaid,
Johnston, R., 1984. Oil Pollution and its management. In Marine Ecology: A Comprehensive, Integrated Treatise on Life in the Oceans and Coastal Waters vol. 5. Ocean Management, part 3 (ed. O. Kinne), pp.1433-1582. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Kędra, M., Gromisz, S., Jaskuła, R., Legeżyńska, J., Maciejewska, B., Malec, E., Opanowski, A., Ostrowska, K., Włodarska-Kowalczuk, M. & Węsławski, J., 2010. Soft bottom macrofauna of an All Taxa Biodiversity Site: Hornsund (77○ N, Svalbard). Polish Polar Research, 31 (4), 309-326.
Kinne, O. (ed.), 1970. Marine Ecology: A Comprehensive Treatise on Life in Oceans and Coastal Waters. Vol. 1 Environmental Factors Part 1. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
Kott, P., 1985. The Australian Ascidiacea. Part I, Phlebobranchia and Stolidobranchia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 23, 1-440.
Lagadeuc, Y., 1991. Mud substrate produced by Polydora ciliata (Johnston, 1828) (Polychaeta, Annelida) - origin and influence on fixation of larvae. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 32, 439-450.
Landsberg, J.H., 1996. Neoplasia and biotoxins in bivalves: is there a connection? Journal of Shellfish Research, 15, 203-230.
Levell, D., 1976. The effect of Kuwait Crude Oil and the Dispersant BP 1100X on the lugworm, Arenicola marina L. In Proceedings of an Institute of Petroleum / Field Studies Council meeting, Aviemore, Scotland, 21-23 April 1975. Marine Ecology and Oil Pollution (ed. J.M. Baker), pp. 131-185. Barking, England: Applied Science Publishers Ltd.
Markert, A., Wehrmann, A. & Kröncke, I., 2010. Recently established Crassostrea-reefs versus native Mytilus-beds: differences in ecosystem engineering affects the macrofaunal communities (Wadden Sea of Lower Saxony, southern German Bight). Biological Invasions, 12 (1), 15-32.
Maurer, D., Keck, R.T., Tinsman, J.C. & Leathem, W.A., 1982. Vertical migration and mortality of benthos in dredged material: Part III—polychaeta. Marine Environmental Research, 6 (1), 49-68.
McCall, P.L., 1977. Community patterns and adaptive strategies of the infaunal benthos of Long Island Sound. Journal of Marine Research, 35, 221-266.
McLaughlin, S.M. & Faisal, M., 2000. Prevalence of Perkinsus spp. in Chesapeake Bay soft-shell clams, Mya arenaria Linnaeus, 1758 during 1990-1998. Journal of Shellfish Research, 19, 349-352.
McLusky, D.S., 1982. The impact of petrochemical effluent on the fauna of an intertidal estuarine mudflat. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 14, 489-499.
McLusky, D.S., Bryant, V. & Campbell, R., 1986. The effects of temperature and salinity on the toxicity of heavy metals to marine and estuarine invertebrates. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 24, 481-520.
Meire, P.M., 1993. The impact of bird predation on marine and estuarine bivalve populations: a selective review of patterns and underlying causes. In Bivalve filter feeders in estuarine and coastal ecosystem processes (ed. R.F. Dame). NATO ASI Series, Springer Verlag.
Mills, E.L., 1967. The biology of an ampeliscid amphipod crustacean sibling species pair. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 24, 305-355.
Munari, C. & Mistri, M., 2014. Spatio-temporal pattern of community development in dredged material used for habitat enhancement: A study case in a brackish lagoon. Marine Pollution Bulletin 89 (1–2), 340-347.
Murina, V., 1997. Pelagic larvae of Black Sea Polychaeta. Bulletin of Marine Science, 60, 427-432.
Newell, C.R. & Hidu, H., 1986. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (North Atlantic) . Softshell clam. http://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/wdb/pub/0168.pdf, 2000-10-02
Newell, R.C., Seiderer, L.J. & Hitchcock, D.R., 1998. The impact of dredging works in coastal waters: a review of the sensitivity to disturbance and subsequent biological recovery of biological resources on the sea bed. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 36, 127-178.
Olafsson, E.B. & Persson, L.E., 1986. The interaction between Nereis diversicolor (Muller) and Corophium volutator (Pallas) as a structuring force in a shallow brackish sediment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 103, 103-117.
Olive, P.J.W., Porter, J.S., Sandeman, N.J., Wright, N.H. & Bentley, M.G. 1997. Variable spawning success of Nephtys hombergi (Annelida: Polychaeta) in response to environmental variation. A life history homeostasis? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 215, 247-268.
Orvain, F., Sauriau, P.-G., Le Hir, P., Guillou, G., Cann, P. & Paillard, M., 2007. Spatio-temporal variations in intertidal mudflat erodability: Marennes-Oléron Bay, western France. Continental Shelf Research, 27 (8), 1153-1173.
Pardal, M.A., Marques, J.-C. & Bellan, G., 1993. Spatial distribution and seasonal variation of subtidal polychaete populations in the Mondego estuary (western Portugal). Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 34, 497-512.
Pearson, T.H. & Rosenberg, R., 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 16, 229-311.
Pedersen, T. M., Almeda, R., Fotel, F.L., Jakobsen, Hans H., Mariani, P. & Hansen, B.W., 2010. Larval growth in the dominant polychaete Polydora ciliata is food-limited in a eutrophic Danish estuary (Isefjord). Marine Ecology Progress Series, 407, 99-110.
Pfitzenmeyer, H.T. & Drobeck, K.G., 1967. Some factors influencing reburrowing activity of soft-shell clam, Mya arenaria. Chesapeake Science, 8, 193-199.
Poggiale, J.C. & Dauvin, J.C., 2001. Long term dynamics of three benthic Ampelisca (Crustacea - Amphipoda) populations from the Bay of Morlaix (western English Channel) related to their disappearance after the Amoco Cadiz oil spill. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 214, 201-209.
Raman, A.V. & Ganapati, P.N., 1983. Pollution effects on ecobiology of benthic polychaetes in Visakhapatnam Harbour (Bay of Bengal). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 14, 46-52.
Rasmussen, E., 1973. Systematics and ecology of the Isefjord marine fauna (Denmark). Ophelia, 11, 1-507.
Rayment, W.J. 2007a. Aphelochaeta marioni A bristleworm. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1556
Read, P.A., Anderson, K.J., Matthews, J.E., Watson, P.G., Halliday, M.C. & Shiells, G.M., 1982. Water quality in the Firth of Forth. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 13, 421-425.
Read, P.A., Anderson, K.J., Matthews, J.E., Watson, P.G., Halliday, M.C. & Shiells, G.M., 1983. Effects of pollution on the benthos of the Firth of Forth. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 14, 12-16.
Rees, E.I.S., Nicholaidou, A. & Laskaridou, P., 1977. The effects of storms on the dynamics of shallow water benthic associations. In Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Marine Biology, Galway, Ireland, October 5-11, 1976. Biology of Benthic Organisms, (ed. B.F. Keegan, P. O'Ceidigh & P.J.S. Boaden), pp. 465-474.
Rees, H.L. & Dare, P.J., 1993. Sources of mortality and associated life-cycle traits of selected benthic species: a review. MAFF Fisheries Research Data Report, no. 33., Lowestoft: MAFF Directorate of Fisheries Research.
Rees, H.L., Waldock, R., Matthiessen, P. & Pendle, M.A., 2001. Improvements in the epifauna of the Crouch estuary (United Kingdom) following a decline in TBT concentrations. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42, 137-144.
Reise, K., 1985. Tidal flat ecology. An experimental approach to species interactions. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Reish, D.J., 1979. Bristle Worms (Annelida: Polychaeta) In Pollution Ecology of Estuarine Invertebrates, (eds. Hart, C.W. & Fuller, S.L.H.), 78-118. Academic Press Inc, New York.
Rhoads, D.C. & Young, D.K., 1970. The influence of deposit-feeding organisms on sediment stability and community trophic structure. Journal of Marine Research, 28, 150-178.
Roberts, R. D., Gregory, M.R. & Foster, B.A., 1998. Developing an efficient macrofauna monitoring index from an impact study—a dredge spoil example. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 36 (3), 231-235.
Rosenberg, R. & Loo, L., 1988. Marine eutrophication induced oxygen deficiency: effects on soft bottom fauna, western Sweden. Ophelia, 29, 213-225.
Rosenberg, R., 1977. Benthic macrofaunal dynamics, production, and dispersion in an oxygen-deficient estuary of west Sweden. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 26, 107-33.
Rosenberg, R., Hellman, B. & Johansson, B., 1991. Hypoxic tolerance of marine benthic fauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 79, 127-131.
Sagasti, A., Schaffner, L.C. & Duffy, J.E., 2000. Epifaunal communities thrive in an estuary with hypoxic episodes. Estuaries, 23, 474-487.
SEEEC (Sea Empress Environmental Evaluation Committee), 1998. The environmental impact of the Sea Empress oil spill. Final Report of the Sea Empress Environmental Evaluation Committee, 135 pp., London: HMSO.
Smyth, J.C., 1968. The fauna of a polluted site in the Firth of Forth. Helgolander Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 17, 216-233.
Snelgrove, P.V.R. & Butman, C.A., 1994. Animal-sediment relationships revisited: cause versus effect. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 32, 111-177.
Sordino, P., Gambi, M.C. & Carrada, G.C., 1989. Spatio-temporal distribution of polychaetes in an Italian coastal lagoon (Lago Fusaro, Naples). Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 30, 375-391.
Strasser, M., 1999. Mya arenaria - an ancient invader of the North Sea coast. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen, 52, 309-324.
Strasser, M., Walensky, M. & Reise, K., 1999. Juvenile-adult distribution of the bivalve Mya arenaria on intertidal flats in the Wadden Sea: why are there so few year classes. Helgoland Marine Research, 53, 45-55.
Suchanek, T.H., 1993. Oil impacts on marine invertebrate populations and communities. American Zoologist, 33, 510-523.
Sundborg, Å., 1956. The River Klarälven: a study of fluvial processes. Geografiska Annaler, 38 (2), 125-237.
Svane, I, Havenhund, J.N. & Jorgensen, A.J., 1987. Effects of tissue extract of adults on metamorphosis in Ascidia mentula O.F. Mueller and Ascidiella scabra (O.F. Müller). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 110, 171-181.
Svane, I., 1988. Recruitment and development of epibioses on artificial and cleared substrata at two site in Gullmarsfjorden on the Swedish west coast. Ophelia, 29, 25-41.
Theede, H., Ponat, A., Hiroki, K. & Schlieper, C., 1969. Studies on the resistance of marine bottom invertebrates to oxygen-deficiency and hydrogen sulphide. Marine Biology, 2, 325-337.
Tokioka, T. & Kado, Y., 1972. The occurrence of Molgula manhattensis (deKay) in brackish water near Hiroshima, Japan. Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, Kyoto University, 21, 21-29.
Van Colen, C., De Backer, A., Meulepas, G., van der Wal, D., Vincx, M., Degraer, S. & Ysebaert, T., 2010a. Diversity, trait displacements and shifts in assemblage structure of tidal flat deposit feeders along a gradient of hydrodynamic stress. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 406, 79-89.
Van Colen, C., Montserrat, F., Vincx, M., Herman, P.M.J., Ysebaert, T. & Degraer, S., 2010. Long-term divergent tidal flat benthic community recovery following hypoxia-induced mortality. Marine Pollution Bulletin 60 (2), 178-186.
Veale, L.O., Hill, A.S., Hawkins, S.J. & Brand, A.R., 2000. Effects of long term physical disturbance by scallop fishing on subtidal epifaunal assemblages and habitats. Marine Biology, 137, 325-337.
Vorobyova, L., Bondarenko, O. & Izaak, O., 2008. Meiobenthic polychaetes in the northwestern Black Sea. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 37 (1), 43-55.
Waldock, R., Rees, H.L., Matthiessen, P. & Pendle, M.A., 1999. Surveys of the benthic infauna of the Crouch Estuary (UK) in relation to TBT contamination. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 79, 225 - 232.
Wolff, W.J., 1973. The estuary as a habitat. An analysis of the data in the soft-bottom macrofauna of the estuarine area of the rivers Rhine, Meuse, and Scheldt. Zoologische Verhandelingen, 126, 1-242.
This review can be cited as:
Last Updated: 19/06/2016