|Researched by||Karen Riley||Refereed by||This information is not refereed.|
|EUNIS Code||A1.215||EUNIS Name||Rhodothamniella floridula on sand-scoured lower eulittoral rock|
|EUNIS 2008||A1.215||Rhodothamniella floridula on sand-scoured lower eulittoral rock|
|EUNIS 2006||A1.215||Rhodothamniella floridula on sand-scoured lower eulittoral rock|
|JNCC 2004||LR.MLR.BF.Rho||Rhodothamniella floridula on sand-scoured lower eulittoral rock|
|1997 Biotope||LR.MLR.Eph.Rho||Rhodothamniella floridula on sand-scoured lower eulittoral rock|
This biotope is predominantly of algae which dominate the rock surface and canopy. Macroalgae provide habitats for many species of invertebrates and fish and also provide shade under their canopy.
Rock type and sand scour effects are of critical importance to the development of this biotope. Sand-binding algal species are able to colonize soft or crumbly rock more successfully than fucoids (Lewis, 1964). Where sand scour is severe, fucoids and Rhodothamniella floridula tend to be absent while ephemeral green algae dominate the substratum and a different biotope will be present (Connor et al., 1997b).
Bedrock and boulders form the substratum in this biotope; the pits, crevices and inclination of which create microhabitats exploitable by both mobile and sessile epilithic species. In addition, the macroalgal species of the community add considerable structural complexity to the biotope in the form of additional substratum for settlement by epiphytic species. The sand scour tolerant species, Rhodothamniella floridula, enhances the structural complexity by binding sand within a mat over the rocky substratum into which polychaetes and amphipods can burrow. There is likely to be considerable structural heterogeneity over a small scale within the biotope. For instance, although barnacles may form a dense layer over the substratum that largely excludes other species, the gaps created by dead barnacles may be exploited by small invertebrates.
Rocky shore communities are highly productive and are an important source of food and nutrients for members of neighbouring terrestrial and marine ecosystems (Hill et al., 1998). Macroalgae exude considerable amounts of dissolved organic carbon which is taken up readily by bacteria and may even be taken up directly by some larger invertebrates. Dissolved organic carbon, algal fragments and microbial film organisms are continually removed by the sea. This may enter the food chain of local, subtidal ecosystems, or be exported further offshore. Rocky shores make a contribution to the food of many marine species through the production of planktonic larvae and propagules which contribute to pelagic food chains.
Many rocky shore species, plant and animal, possess a planktonic stage: gamete, spore or larva which float in the plankton before settling and metamorphosing into adult form. This strategy allows species to rapidly colonize new areas that become available such as in the gaps often created by storms. For these organisms it has long been evident that recruitment from the pelagic phase is important in governing the density of populations on the shore (Little & Kitching, 1996). Both the demographic structure of populations and the composition of assemblages may be profoundly affected by variation in recruitment rates.
|Recorded distribution in Britain and Ireland||Recorded in locations all around the British Isles, particularly along the Northumbrian and south coasts.|
|Depth Range||Lower shore|
|Water clarity preferences||Oceanic water|
|Limiting Nutrients||Nitrogen (nitrates)|
|Salinity||Full (30-40 psu)|
|Biological Zone||Lower eulittoral|
|Substratum||Bedrock, Large to very large boulders, Small boulders|
|Tidal||Moderately Strong 1 to 3 knots (0.5-1.5 m/sec.), Weak < 1 knot (<0.5 m/sec.)|
|Wave||Moderately exposed, Sheltered, Very sheltered|
This MarLIN sensitivity assessment has been superseded by the MarESA approach to sensitivity assessment. MarLIN assessments used an approach that has now been modified to reflect the most recent conservation imperatives and terminology and are due to be updated by 2016/17.
|Community Importance||Species name||Common Name|
|Important other||Fucus serratus||Toothed wrack|
|Important functional||Patella vulgata||Common limpet|
|Important characterizing||Rhodothamniella floridula||A red seaweed|
|The community would be highly intolerant of substratum loss as it is dominated by sessile epilithic species. Removal of the substratum would remove these species and slow moving species associated with them. Intolerance has been assessed to be high. Recoverability is likely to be high (see additional information below).|
|Whilst the community is characterized by the binding of sand which, no doubt, would smother underlying species such as barnacles, smothering is a part of the characteristic of the community. However, a 5cm covering of sediment will most likely completely cover the algal understorey and unless the tide removes the smothering material, photosynthesis will be inhibited and the algae may begin to rot or at least suffer cell damage on fronds. Respiration, feeding and locomotion of other faunal species would probably also be inhibited or prevented. Over a period of one month it is likely to affect the species viability, if not cause death. Impermeable materials, such as concrete, oil, or tar, are likely to have a greater effect. An intolerance of high is recorded. A recoverability of high is recorded (see additional information below).|
Although Rhodothamniella floridula needs a certain amount of sand in suspension to bind with, Connor et al. (1997b) noted that in areas where sand scour is more severe, fucoids and Rhodothamniella floridula may be rare or absent and ephemeral algae such as Enteromorpha spp., Ulva spp. and Porphyra spp. dominate the substratum. If this occurs, the biotope may change and not be recognised as MLR.Rho.
The respiration and feeding of suspension feeders, such as barnacles and mussels may be limited, due to blockages. Fucus serratus and Patella vulgata are unlikely to be affected by an increase in suspended sediment, as they occur naturally in areas where there is a high suspended sediment concentration. Therefore, assuming that suspended sediment causes scour and loss of the dominant characterizing species intolerance has been assessed to be high. Recoverability is likely to be high (see additional information below).
|Rhodothamniella floridula needs sediment to bind to and will therefore need enough available to do so. In situations where suspended sediment (sand) is reduced or not present for a significant period of time (> 1 year) barnacles, limpets, mussels and algae will probably thrive and become dominant and the biotope will no longer be recognised as MLR.Rho. Intolerance has been assessed to be low. Recoverability is likely to be high (see additional information below).|
Seaweeds have a critical water content, desiccation past this point causes irreversible damage. The critical point for Fucus serratus is 40% water content. A reduction in water content to 40% can occur after 2 hours exposure to sunshine. Fucus spiralis, a similar species to Fucus serratus, transplanted further up the shore to the Pelvetia canaliculata zone (greater desiccation) died within 4-8 weeks (Schonbeck & Norton, 1978). Rhodothamniella floridula may be protected from desiccation by the water held in the sand it binds with. However, drying is likely to cause mortality of a proportion of the population. Patella vulgata is able to tolerate desiccation very well as it can clamp down to the rock. In the absence of grazers and competition for space between barnacles and Fucus serratus, Rhodothamniella floridula may increase in abundance. However, little information is known about its desiccation tolerance. Intolerance to desiccation has been assessed to be intermediate. Recoverability is likely to be high (see additional information below).
|The upper limits of Rhodothamniella floridula may be depressed by a greater risk of desiccation and larger fluctuations in temperature and salinity, as a result of an increase in emergence. Replacement may occur by other flora and fauna more tolerant of desiccation. Barnacles, Mytilus edulis and other seaweeds occur higher up the shore, therefore an increase in emergence at the benchmark level would probably not affect these species. Similarly, Patella vulgata typically moves about when submerged or when conditions are very damp so a change in emergence may alter grazing time, but will probably have little other effect. Some mortality of key species is likely, so an intolerance of intermediate has been recorded. Recoverability is likely to be high (see additional information below).|
|Decreases in emergence may put the algal species in competition with species that typically remain submerged (e.g. laminarians). A decrease in the time exposed to air would reduce the likelihood of desiccation and the upper limit of the biotope may extend up the shore. However, algal species may not benefit as grazing species would probably be more active and epiphytic species that were kept in check by periodic exposure to air may increase in abundance and smother the species they are attached to. Also, species from the zone/community below may become more dominant which could result in a depression in the lower limit of the MLR.Rho biotope. An intermediate intolerance has been recorded. Recoverability has been assessed to be high (see additional information below).|
|Tolerant||Not relevant||Not relevant||Decline||High|
|Moderate water movement is beneficial to seaweeds as it carries a supply of nutrients and gases to the plants and removes waste products. The MLR.Rho biotope occurs in areas where the water flow rate is either 'moderately strong' or 'weak' (Connor et al., 1997b). However, this biotope occurs in wave exposed situations where the forces of wave surge are likely to be much more damaging than an increase in tidal flow. It is unlikely therefore that the benchmark increase in water flow rate would result in any adverse effect or mortality. Therefore, not sensitive has been recorded.|
|The MLR.Rho biotope occurs in areas where the water flow rate is either 'moderately strong' or 'weak' (Connor et al., 1997b). However, the most important water movement in this biotope is wave action. The biotope occurs in wave exposed situations so that supply of suspended sediment will continue even if tidal flow reduces. Therefore intolerance has been assessed as not sensitive.|
|Low||Very high||Very Low||No change||High|
Maximum sea surface temperatures around the British Isles rarely exceed 20 °C (Hiscock, 1998) and, as Rhodothamniella floridula and Fucus serratus occur south of the British Isles, an increase in temperature is not likely to cause mortality. An acute change in temperature may cause photosynthesis and growth to be impaired, compensating for increased spore production. For instance, spore production of Rhodothamniella floridula is higher at higher temperatures (Stegenga, 1978).
No mortality of key species is likely to occur, although physiological compensation may take place. Therefore, intolerance is assessed as low. When temperatures return to normal, respiration, reproduction and growth will quickly recover. Recoverability is assessed as very high.
Minimum surface sea water temperatures rarely fall below 5 °C around the British Isles (Hiscock, 1998). Fucus serratus, barnacles and limpets are all found to the north of the British Isles and will therefore probably be tolerant of a chronic 2°C decrease in temperature. However, the distribution of Rhodothamniella floridula has not been recorded north of the British Isles and may not be able to survive a chronic decrease in temperature.
Dixon & Irvine (1977) observed that Rhodothamniella floridula (as Audouinella floridula) grows much faster in winter, but low temperatures may delay or slow reproduction (Stegenga, 1978). A long-term decrease in temperature is likely to increase the survival and abundance of Semibalanus balanoides in south west England (Southward et al., 1995).As mortality of characterizing species may occur if chronic changes in temperature occur, intolerance has been assessed to be intermediate. When temperature returns to normal, respiration, reproduction and growth will quickly recover in surviving species. Recoverability has been assessed to be high (see additional information below).
|Changes in turbidity will probably have little direct effect on the key species within this biotope. An increase in turbidity for one month is likely to cause a reduction in the photosynthetic capability and growth of algae, but will probably not result in any mortality. However, a long term increase in turbidity, for one year, may result in mortality of a proportion of the population.
Reduced food availability may reduce limpet growth rates and reproductive capacity.
In the short term, the viability of the population would probably decrease, but in the long term some mortality of Rhodothamniella floridula may occur. Intolerance has been assessed to be intermediate. Recoverability is likely to be high (see additional information below).
|Tolerant*||Not sensitive||No change||Moderate|
|Decreased turbidity would probably lead to more light available for algal photosynthesis. Photosynthesis will probably be more efficient and growth rates may therefore increase, but a decrease in turbidity is not likely to affect faunal species within the biotope and an assessment of not sensitive* has been made.|
|Fucus serratus and Rhodothamniella floridula only occur on coasts with moderate wave exposure or less. On more exposed coasts, adult Fucus serratus are fewer. Increased wave action above this level may cause damage to individual plants, breaking fronds and removing entire plants from the substratum. As Fucus serratus is taller than Rhodothamniella floridula it will probably be more susceptible to wave damage. Growths of Rhodothamniella floridula may become dislodged, leading to susceptible patchiness.|
Semibalanus balanoides can tolerate all levels of wave exposure. However, as wave exposure increases on rocky shores, barnacles and fucoids are replaced by mussel dominated communities, meaning that the MLR.Rho biotope may be reduced or destroyed. Therefore, intolerance has been assessed to be high. Recoverability is likely to be high (see additional information below).
|A decrease in the level of wave exposure could cause a shift in the community towards fucoid algae, which may prevent barnacle larvae from settling and provide more substratum for Rhodothamniella floridula to occupy. However, Rhodothamniella floridula is characterizing of situations where there is sand in suspension and, since decreased wave exposure may lead to absence of sand in suspension, Rhodothamniella floridula may be adversely affected and may decline. The biotope may have a high intolerance to decrease in wave exposure. Recoverability is likely to be high.|
|Tolerant||Not relevant||Not relevant||No change||High|
|Seaweeds have no known mechanism for detection of noise vibrations and species of barnacles and mussels are also unlikely to be affected by noise. Although limpets are not likely to be affected by atmospheric noise levels, vibrations near to the animal will cause the shell muscles to contract vigorously, clamping the limpet to the rock (Fretter & Graham, 1994). This may briefly affect the animals grazing ability. However, the biotope is unlikely to be sensitive.|
|Tolerant||Not relevant||Not relevant||No change||High|
|Algae have no known visual perception, and most macroinvertebrates have poor or short range visual perception and are unlikely to be affected by visual disturbance at the benchmark level. The biotope has therefore, been assessed as not sensitive.|
|Although algal species are highly flexible, abrasion is likely to cause damage to and removal of fronds and may even remove entire plants from the substratum. The cushion-like base of turf forming algae (such as Rhodothamniella floridula) may offer some protection against abrasion but if a portion is removed, the sharp edges may be subject to lifting by wave action. Limpets, Mytilus edulis and barnacle populations have also been reported to be dislodged by abrasion or physical disturbance. Intolerance has been assessed to be intermediate. Recoverability is likely to be high (see additional information below).|
|Rhodothamniella floridula, Fucus serratus and barnacles are permanently attached to the substratum. If removed, the attachment cannot be reformed. Limpets are intolerant of being knocked off the rock by trampling on the shore and if the foot is damaged do not re-attach easily (Professor Steve Hawkins, pers. comm. to Hill, 2000). Therefore, intolerance has been assessed to be high. Recoverability is likely to be high (see additional information below).|
Scalan & Wilkinson (1987) found that spermatozoa and newly fertilised eggs of Fucus serratus were the most intolerant of biocides, while adult plants were only just significantly affected at 5 ml/l of the biocides Dodigen v181-1, Dodgen v 2861-1 and ML-910.
O'Brien & Dixon (1976) suggested that red algae were the most sensitive group of algae to oil or dispersant contamination. Laboratory studies of the effects of oil and dispersants on several red algal species concluded that they were all sensitive to oil/dispersant mixtures, with little difference between adults, sporelings, diploid or haploid stages (Grandy, 1984, cited in Holt et al., 1995). Cole et al. (1999) suggested that herbicides, such as simazine and atrazine were very toxic to macrophytes.
Therefore, a high intolerance has been recorded. Recovery is likely to be high (see additional information below).
Bryan (1984) suggested that the general order for heavy metal toxicity in seaweeds is: Organic Hg > inorganic Hg > Cu > Ag > Zn > Cd > Pb. Cole et al. (1999) reported that Hg was very toxic to macrophytes. The sub-lethal effects of Hg (organic and inorganic) on the sporelings of an intertidal red algae, Plumaria elegans, were reported by Boney (1971). 100% growth inhibition was caused by 1 ppm Hg. Fucoid algae readily accumulate heavy metals within their tissues. Copper significantly reduces the growth rate of vegetative apices at 25 µg/l over 10 days (Strömgren, 1979b). Zinc, lead, cadmium and mercury significantly reduced growth rate at 1400 µg/l , 810µg/l, 450µg/l and 5µg/l respectively (Strömgren, 1980a & b).
In the Fal estuary Patella vulgata occurs at, or just outside, Restronguet Point at the end of the creek where metal concentrations are in the order: Zinc (Zn) 100-2000µg/l, copper (Cu) 10-100µg/l and cadmium (Cd) 0.25-5µg/l (Bryan & Gibbs, 1983). However, in the laboratory Patella vulgata was found to be intolerant of small changes in environmental concentrations of Cd and Zn by Davies (1992). At concentrations of 10µg/l pedal mucus production and levels of activity were both reduced, indicating a physiological response to metal concentrations. Exposure to Cu at a concentration of 100µg/l for one week resulted in progressive brachycardia (slowing of the heart beat) and the death of limpets. Zn at a concentration of 5500µg/l produced the same effect (Marchan et al.,1999).
Barnacles and mussels have all been reported to be fairly tolerant of heavy metals (Foster et al., 1978).
intolerance has been assessed to be intermediate. Recoverability is likely to be high (assuming deterioration of contaminants) (see additional information below).
No evidence was found specifically relating to the intolerance of Rhodothamniella floridula to hydrocarbon contamination. However, inferences may be drawn from the sensitivities of red algal species generally. O'Brien & Dixon (1976) suggested that red algae were the most sensitive group of algae to oil or dispersant contamination. Laboratory studies of the effects of oil and dispersants on several red algal species concluded that they were all sensitive to oil/dispersant mixtures, with little difference between adults, sporelings, diploid or haploid life stages (Grandy, 1984, cited in Holt et al., 1995).
Adult Fucus serratus plants are tolerant of exposure to spills of crude oil although very young germlings are intolerant of relatively low concentrations of 'water soluble' extractions of crude oils. Exposure of eggs to these extractions (at 1.5 micrograms/ml for 96 hours) interferes with adhesion during settling) and (at 0.1micrograms/ml) prevents further development (Johnston, 1977).
Limpets, mussels and barnacles can survive moderate levels of contamination, but mortality may occur at high levels of contamination (Smith, 1968; Glegg et al., 1999; Holt et al., 1995 & Highsmith, et al., 1996). Therefore intolerance has been assessed to be high. Recoverability has been assessed to be high (see additional information below).
|No information||Not relevant||No information||Insufficient
|Mytilus edulis has been shown to be able to accumulate radionuclides (Widdows & Donkin, 1992, Cole et al., 1999), but no information concerning the effects of radionuclides on any other species within the biotope was found and insufficient information has been recorded.|
|Nutrient availability is the most important factor controlling algal germling growth. Plants under low nutrient regimes achieve smaller sizes and may be out competed. A moderate increase in nutrient levels may enhance their growth. This would increase the food available to Patella vulgata. However, if nutrient loading is excessive this can have a detrimental effect on algal productivity and hence limpet growth. Mytilus edulis and Semibalanus balanoides would also benefit from a moderate increase in nutrients, as food would be more readily available. However, Holt et al. (1995) predict that smothering of barnacles by ephemeral green algae is a possibility under eutrophic conditions. Some mortality of key species within the biotope may occur. Therefore, intolerance has been assessed to be intermediate. Recoverability is likely to be high ( see additional information below).|
|Tolerant||Not relevant||Not relevant||No change||High|
|Rhodothamniella floridula and Fucus serratus occur in full salinity. However, the maximal growth rate for Fucus serratus is at a salinity of 20 psu, above and below this level its growth rate declines. As most of the key species also occur in rockpools, where hypersaline conditions can occur, it is likely that they would tolerate an increase in salinity. Therefore not sensitive has been recorded.|
|Rhodothamniella floridula, occurs only in full salinity conditions and it is probable that a proportion of the population would die in lower salinities, or at least be out-competed by brackish water tolerant species. Although Fucus serratus will probably survive at lower salinities, its maximal growth rate is at a salinity of 20 psu. Above and below this level its growth rate declines. Little et al. (1991) found that growth and reproduction was impaired in Patella vulgata at lower salinity, although the species was found to die only when the salinity was reduced to <3psu (Fretter & Graham, 1994). As mortality of a proportion of the key species within the biotope may occur, an intermediate intolerance has been recorded. Recoverability is likely to be high (see additional information below).|
The effects of reduced oxygenation on algae are not well studied. Plants require oxygen for respiration, but this may be provided by production of oxygen during periods of photosynthesis. Lack of oxygen may impair both respiration and photosynthesis (see review by Vidaver, 1972). A study of the effects of anoxia on Delesseria sanguinea (a red algae), revealed that specimens died after 24 hours at 15°C but that some survived at 5°C (Hammer, 1972). Cole et al. (1999) suggest possible adverse effects on marine species below 4 mg/l and probable adverse effects below 2mg/l.
In laboratory experiments a reduction in the oxygen tension of seawater from 148mm Hg (air saturated seawater) to 50mm Hg rapidly resulted in reduced heart rate in Patella spp. (Marshall & McQuaid, 1993). Heartbeat rate returned to normal in oxygenated water within two hours. However, Patella vulgata is an intertidal species, being able to respire in air, so would only be intolerant of low oxygen in the water column intermittently during periods of tidal immersion. However, long periods of deoxygenation may increase the mortality of the population.
Mytilus edulis is regarded as euryoxic, tolerant of a wide range of oxygen concentrations including zero (Zwaan de & Mathieu, 1992). Diaz & Rosenberg (1995) suggest it is resistant to severe hypoxia, but incurs a metabolic cost.
Semibalanus balanoides can respire anaerobically, so it can tolerate some reduction in oxygen concentration (Newell, 1979). As some important species within the biotope may die, an intermediate intolerance has been recorded. Recoverability is likely to be high (see additional information below).
|No information||Not relevant||No information||Insufficient
|Patella vulgata, Mytilus edulis and Semibalanus balanoides have all been observed to have parasites. Heavy infestation of Hemioniscus balani can cause castration of barnacles. No other information relating to the effects of microbial pathogens on the key species within the biotope.|
|No information||Not relevant||No information||Insufficient
|No alien species are known to compete with species within the biotope. The Australasian barnacle Elminius modestus was introduced to British waters on ships during the second world war. The species does well in estuaries and bays, where it can displace Semibalanus balanoides and Chthamalus montagui. However, as these species are not characteristic of the biotope, it is considered that insufficient information is available.|
Extraction of the key or important characterizing species is not likely to occur at present. However, Fucus serratus is one algal species that might be harvested. Removal of some of the adult canopy will allow the understorey and algal turf to grow faster, due to greater light available for photosynthesis. Although the biotope is likely to remain, intermediate intolerance has been suggested to reflect the likely loss of some of this important species. Recovery is expected to be high providing some Fucus serratus remains.
|No information||Not relevant||No information||Not relevant||Not relevant|
Following major loss of component species, there will be a colonization succession such as that observed following a severe oil spill. The loss of grazing species results in an initial proliferation of ephemeral green then fucoid algae, which then attracts mobile grazers, and encourages settlement of other grazers. Limpet grazing reduces the abundance of fucoids allowing barnacles to colonize the shore. Recovery rates were dependant on local variation in recruitment and mortality so that sites varied in recovery rates, for example maximum cover of fucoids occurred within 1-3 years, barnacle abundance increased in 1-7 years, limpet number were still reduced after 6-8 years and species richness was regained in 2 to >10 years. Overall, recovery took 5-8 years on many shores but was estimated to take about 15 years on the worst affected shores (Southward & Southward, 1978; Hawkins & Southward, 1992; Raffaelli & Hawkins, 1999).
This biotope is characterized by mats of Rhodothamniella floridula. No information was found relating to colonization or recolonization rates of Rhodothamniella floridula, however, red algae are typically highly fecund, but their spores are non-motile (Norton, 1992) and therefore highly reliant on the hydrodynamic regime for dispersal. Kain (1975) reported that after displacement some Rhodophyceae were present after 11 weeks, and after 41 weeks, in June, Rhodophyceae species predominated. However, Stegenga (1978) noted that tetrasporangia of Rhodothamniella floridula (as Rhodochorton floridulum) germinated in 'rather low numbers'. Recoverability of the biotope has been assessed as high, although recovery of remote populations will be more protracted and dependent upon favourable currents bringing spores.
|Habitats Directive Annex 1||Reefs|
|UK Biodiversity Action Plan Priority|
Hill, S., Burrows, S.J. & Hawkins, S.J., 1998. Intertidal Reef Biotopes (Volume VI). An overview of dynamics and sensitivity characteristics for conservation management of marine Special Areas of Conservation. Oban: Scottish Association for Marine Science (UK Marine SACs Project)., Scottish Association for Marine Science (UK Marine SACs Project).
This review can be cited as:
Last Updated: 20/11/2002