Mytilus edulis beds on reduced salinity tide-swept infralittoral rock

30-11-2001
Researched byDr Keith Hiscock Refereed byThis information is not refereed.
EUNIS CodeA3.361 EUNIS NameMytilus edulis beds on reduced salinity infralittoral rock

Summary

UK and Ireland classification

EUNIS 2008A3.361Mytilus edulis beds on reduced salinity infralittoral rock
EUNIS 2006A3.361Mytilus edulis beds on reduced salinity infralittoral rock
JNCC 2004IR.LIR.IFaVS.MytRSMytilus edulis beds on reduced salinity tide-swept infralittoral rock
1997 BiotopeIR.SIR.EstFa.MytTMytilus edulis beds on reduced salinity tide-swept infralittoral rock

Description

This biotope is reported to occur in shallow tide-swept conditions and also in reduced salinity tide-swept conditions (may be 2 biotopes?). Some descriptions indicate a wide variety of epifaunal colonizers on the mussel valves, including seaweeds, hydroids and bryozoans. Predatory starfish Asterias rubens also occur in this biotope. This biotope generally appears to lack large kelp plants, although transitional examples containing mussels and kelps plants may also occur. [Further data and analysis required for this biotope]. (Information taken from the Marine Biotope Classification for Britain and Ireland, Version 97.06: Connor et al., 1997a, b).

Recorded distribution in Britain and Ireland

Isolated locations on the west and east coast of Scotland, Outer Hebrides and Shetland. Also found on the north west coast of Wales.

Depth range

0-5 m

Additional information

This biotope appears to be distinguished from other biotopes by occurring on rock and in strong currents suggesting that it is a feature of the tidal rapids at the entrance to lagoonal habitats.

Listed By

Further information sources

Search on:

JNCC

Habitat review

Ecology

Ecological and functional relationships

Mussels appear to provide the predominant substratum in this biotope but no information has been found on any species living amongst the mussels or infaunal components in sediments. The mussel shells are colonized by epibiota - species that can survive reduced (but not necessarily 'low') salinity. Most species are suspension feeders and so do not interact but the predatory starfish Asterias rubens is likely to have a major effect on survival of the mussels. Kautsky (1981) examined subtidal mussel beds in the Baltic Sea and reported that mussels were a major food source for the flounder (Platichthys flesus) but probably of only minor importance for eelpout (Zoarces viviparus): both species that might occur in this biotope.

Seasonal and longer term change

The dominant species in the biotope can be present throughout the year except for filamentous brown and any other algae which most likely show seasonal change related to light levels. It is possible that some species in the biotope will be killed by low salinity during heavy rain in the winter. Asterias rubens is known to 'invade' mussel biotopes and cause high mortality but no such changes have been noted specifically for this biotope. Kautsky (1981) reported that no major fluctuations in distribution and abundance of Mytilus edulis was noted in the Baltic Sea over a ten year period. However, his studied population was not significantly affected by predation.

Habitat structure and complexity

The mussels provide hard substratum for a range of algae and invertebrates to settle and interstices for polychaete worms and other mobile biota to live. If sediments are present amongst the mussels, infaunal burrowing species will be supported.

Productivity

Mussels can be very fast growing (high productivity).

Recruitment processes

All of the species named in the biotope and most likely the majority of species occurring in the biotope have planktonic propagules and are likely to settle readily. Recruitment in many Mytilus sp. populations is sporadic, with unpredictable pulses of recruitment, possibly from the pool of young mussels on filamentous algae (Seed & Suchanek, 1992). Mytilus sp. is highly gregarious and final settlement often occurs around or in between individual mussels of established populations. Competition with surrounding adults may suppress growth of the young mussels settling within the mussel bed, due to competition for food and space, until larger mussels are lost (Seed & Suchanek, 1992). Persistent mussel beds can be maintained by relatively low levels of recruitment. McGrorty et al., (1990) reported that adult populations were largely unaffected by large variations in spat fall between 1976-1983 in the Exe estuary.

Time for community to reach maturity

In the tidal rapids or tidal sound habitat where this species is most likely to occur, productivity and growth are likely to be high. Mussels will grow rapidly but associated species will settle at a particular time of year so that it would take in excess of one year for the community to reach maturity.

Additional information

-

Preferences & Distribution

Recorded distribution in Britain and IrelandIsolated locations on the west and east coast of Scotland, Outer Hebrides and Shetland. Also found on the north west coast of Wales.

Habitat preferences

Depth Range 0-5 m
Water clarity preferences
Limiting Nutrients No information found
Salinity Reduced (18-30 psu)
Physiographic Enclosed coast / Embayment, Isolated saline water (Lagoon), Sea loch / Sea lough
Biological Zone Infralittoral
Substratum Bedrock, Large to very large boulders, Small boulders
Tidal Strong 3 to 6 knots (1.5-3 m/sec.)
Wave Extremely sheltered, Very sheltered
Other preferences

Additional Information

Species composition

Species found especially in this biotope

    Rare or scarce species associated with this biotope

    -

    Additional information

    Sensitivity reviewHow is sensitivity assessed?

    Explanation

    The biotope is dominated structurally and functionally by Mytilus edulis. Without Mytilus edulis, it would not be this biotope. The starfish Asterias rubens is a significant predator or Mytilus edulis. Other species included in those representing sensitivity are ones that are common components.

    Species indicative of sensitivity

    Community ImportanceSpecies nameCommon Name
    Key structuralAsterias rubensCommon starfish
    Important functionalBalanus crenatusAn acorn barnacle
    Important otherHalichondria paniceaBreadcrumb sponge
    Key structuralMytilus edulisCommon mussel

    Physical Pressures

     IntoleranceRecoverabilitySensitivitySpecies RichnessEvidence/Confidence
    High High Moderate Major decline Moderate
    Removal of the substratum will include the removal of all the species within the biotope. Therefore, an intolerance of high has been recorded. For recoverability, see additional information below.
    Intermediate High Low Decline Moderate
    Although smothering by sediment is unlikely in the strong tidal currents to which this biotope is exposed, mortality of mussels might occur as a result on smothering by large scale movements of sand (Daly & Mathieson, 1977; Holt et al., 1998). Similarly, biodeposition within a mussel bed results in suffocation or starvation of individuals that cannot re-surface. Young mussels have been shown to move up through a bed, avoiding smothering, while many others were suffocated (Dare, 1976; Holt et al., 1998). This suggests that a proportion of the population may be able to avoid smothering in subtidal conditions, and, therefore, an intolerance of intermediate has been recorded. Associated species will most likely also survive some smothering. Although a single good recruitment event for mussels may recolonize the substratum within a year, recovery in relation to size of mussels and presence of associated species may take up to 5 years, and is some circumstances significantly longer (see additional information below). Therefore, a recoverability of high has been recorded.
    Low Immediate Not sensitive No change Moderate
    Mytilus edulis has been reported to be relatively tolerant of suspended sediment and siltation and survived over 25 days at 440 mg/l and on average 13 days at 1200 mg/l (Purchon, 1937; Moore, 1977). Similarly, Asterias rubens flourishes in naturally turbid conditions and is capable of cleansing itself of adherent mud particles (Moore, 1977). However, mussels and the species living on mussels probably suffer a metabolic cost resulting from the cleansing mechanisms, mucus production and interrupted or impaired feeding. Therefore, a biotope intolerance of low, at the benchmark level, has been recorded. The majority of the organisms within the biotope probably have mechanisms to deal with siltation and suspended sediment, so that recoverability of immediate has been recorded.
    Low High Not relevant Minor decline Moderate
    Decrease in the amount of suspended sediment is likely to reduce available food for the suspension feeders that dominate this biotope. However, the result would be a slowing of growth and not decline.
    Low Very high Very Low Minor decline Moderate
    The dominant species in the biotope, Mytilus edulis, is capable of closing valves and surviving significant exposure to air. Although Balanus crenatus has more permeable shell plates than other littoral barnacles and therefore loses water quicker and dies sooner when exposed to air, it is still capable of surviving for long periods in air (see the Balanus crenatus review). Halichondria panicea is likely to be less resistant to desiccation. However, as this is a sublittoral biotope that would only be subject to desiccation for short periods if at all, intolerance is assessed as low and recoverability as very high.
    Low Very high Very Low Minor decline Moderate
    The dominant species in the biotope, Mytilus edulis, is capable of closing valves and surviving significant exposure to air. Although Balanus crenatus has more permeable shell plates than other littoral barnacles and therefore loses water quicker and dies sooner when exposed to air, it is still capable of surviving for long periods in air (see the Balanus crenatus review). Halichondria panicea is likely to be less resistant to increased emergence and therefore desiccation. However, as this is a sublittoral biotope that would only be subject to emergence for short periods if at all, intolerance is assessed as low and recoverability as very high.
    Not sensitive* Not relevant
    This is a sublittoral biotope and decrease in emergence is not therefore relevant.
    Tolerant Not relevant Not relevant Not relevant Moderate
    The dominant species in the biotope, Mytilus edulis, together with other sessile species in the biotope lives in very strong tidal currents and in extremely wave exposed situations. It might be expected that an increase in water flow may dislodge a proportion of the Mytilus edulis. However, Young (1985) reported that Mytilus edulis increased byssus thread production in response to increased agitation and water flow rates. Therefore it is not expected that increased water flow rate would remove the dominant species and therefore the species attached to it. Mobile species such as Asterias rubens may be swept away but this seems unlikely based on the occurrence of the species in very strong flows.
    Not sensitive* Not relevant
    Decreases in water flow rates are likely to increase siltation and allow increased predation pressure from crabs, lobsters and starfish such as Asterias rubens. The biotope is likely to suffer from competition from species adapted to more sheltered conditions. Also, the supply of food will be reduced, mussels will have to rely more on active suspension feeding and growth will be lessened. At the benchmark level of a decrease by two categories of tidal stream exposure for one year, it is likely that the biotope will be substantially altered and may no longer be SIR.EstFa.MytT. Species richness may increase as Mytilus edulis will no longer dominate the rock surfaces. Therefore, an intolerance of high has been recorded. On return to previous conditions, recoverability is likely to be high (see Additional information below).
    Low High Low Minor decline Moderate
    An upper, sustained temperature tolerance limit of about 29°C has been reported for Mytilus edulis in the United Kingdom (Read & Cumming, 1967; Almada-Villela et al., 1982). Therefore, Mytilus edulis is considered to be of low intolerance to temperature change. Temperatures that adversely affect Balanus crenatus and Asterias rubens are higher than the benchmark level and, even though outflow from enclosed areas might be of water that has significantly heated in sunny weather, it is unlikely to reach the levels suggested as harmful (for instance Naylor, 1965 for Balanus crenatus; Schäfer, 1972 for Asterias rubens). Overall, the biotope has been assessed as of low intolerance to increased temperatures. Recovery is likely to be rapid (see additional information below).
    Low Very high Moderate Minor decline Moderate
    Mytilus edulis tolerates decreases in temperature and even freezing for short periods. Similarly, Balanus crenatus and Asterias rubens were unaffected by the severe winter of 1962/63 (Crisp, 1964) when average temperatures were 5 to 6 °C below normal. However, Halichondria panicea was recorded as being killed by frost in North Wales. It appears, therefore, that most of the characterizing species within the biotope are tolerant of an acute short term temperature decrease and a biotope intolerance of low has been recorded.
    Low Very high Very Low Minor decline Moderate
    Filamentous brown algae are present in this biotope (Hiscock, 1984). However, the biotope is primarily an animal dominated community, dependant on secondary production and not dependant on light. Therefore, the biotope is probably only intolerant of changes in turbidity and light attenuation in that some algae might be reduced in abundance or lost.
    Low Very high Moderate Rise Moderate
    Decrease in turbidity will increase light penetration and therefore the possibility that abundance of algae might increase. Seaweed growth may adversely affect the survival of mussels: Suchanek (1985) found that urchin grazing removed seaweeds and increased survival of mussel beds. However, the overwhelming dominance of mussels in the conditions of tidal stream exposure make it unlikely that addition of algae will change the biotope present. Thus an intolerance of low is suggested.
    Intermediate High Low Decline Low
    Oscillatory water movement is potentially far more destructive than tidal streams due to the 'to and fro' motion that is more likely to loosen mussels. Although, mussels occur in extremely wave exposed situations, the large and loosely attached mussels likely to occur in this biotope will be easily dislodged. However, Young (1985) reported that Mytilus edulis increased byssus thread production in response to increased agitation and water flow rates. Any loss of mussels will result in loss of associated species and therefore at least a reduction in extent of the biotope. Therefore, an intolerance of intermediate has been recorded. For recoverability see 'Additional Information below'.
    Not sensitive* Not relevant
    This biotope already occurs in extremely sheltered conditions so that further decrease in wave exposure is probably not relevant.
    Tolerant* Not relevant Not sensitive* No change Moderate
    The species in this biotope are insensitive to noise disturbance at the levels of the benchmark. However, wildfowl are a major predator and several species are highly intolerant of noise. Therefore, noise at the level of the benchmark may disturb predatory wildfowl, so that the mussel populations and the species that live attached to them may benefit indirectly.
    Tolerant* Not relevant Not sensitive* No change Moderate
    The species living in the biotope are unlikely to be sensitive to visual disturbance. However, wildfowl are highly intolerant of visual presence and are likely to be scared away by increased human activity, therefore reducing the predation pressure on the mussels and the species attached to them. Therefore, visual disturbance may be of indirect benefit to the biotope.
    Intermediate High Low Decline Moderate
    It is likely that abrasion or impact at the level of the benchmark would damage or remove patches of the population of mussels and the species attached to the mussels. Several long term studies have shown that gaps took a long time to heal in intertidal populations, and in some cases enlarged (presumably due to wave action and predation), with little recovery within 3-5 years, leading to estimated recovery times of 8-34 years (Pain & Levin, 1981) or several hundreds of years (Seed & Suchanek, 1992). However, enlargement of gaps due to wave action will not occur in the sheltered situations where this biotope occurs and settlement rates of mussels in tide-swept sublittoral situations is rapid. Taking account of time for mussels to grow to a significant size and to be colonized by the associated species (see further information below), a recoverability of 'high' has been reported.
    Intermediate High Low Minor decline Moderate
    The dominant species in the biotope, Mytilus edulis, is capable of re-attaching itself to suitable substrata once displaced. Overall, however, displacement will result in loss of mussels and associated species from this biotope. Displaced starfish are unlikely to be adversely affected and could probably return. Overall, a proportion of the mussel bed would probably survive displacement and an intolerance of intermediate has been recorded. However, other members of the community are probably more intolerant, resulting in a decline in species richness until they are able to recolonize. Recovery is dependant on recruitment of Mytilus edulis from outside the biotope and a recoverability of high has been reported (see additional information below).

    Chemical Pressures

     IntoleranceRecoverabilitySensitivityRichnessEvidence/Confidence
    Intermediate Very high Low No change Low
    The effects of contaminants on Mytilus edulis were extensively reviewed by Widdows & Donkin (1992) and Livingstone & Pipe (1992). Overall, Mytilus edulis is probably relatively tolerant of contaminants, although mortalities have been recorded (see species review for details). For example,
    • Widdows et al. (1995) noted that polar organics, and organo-chlorines reduced scope for growth in Mytilus edulis
    • Mytilus edulis has been shown to accumulate PCBs and ivermecten (Hummel et al., 1989; Holt et al., 1995; Cole et al., 1999);
    • the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons, cis-chlordane pesticides and cadmium gas been associated with an increase in tumours in Mytilus edulis (Hillman, 1993; Holt et al., 1998), and
    • mussels may be absent from areas of high boating activity, presumably due to TBT (Holt et al., 1998).
    Barnacles, such as Balanus crenatus were considered to be highly sensitive to chemical contaminants (Holt et al., 1995). PCB exposure resulted in defective larvae in Asterias rubens (Besten et al., 1989). Although only filamentous brown algae are named in the biotope description, kelp plants may occur and possibly some other algal species. Cole et al. 1999 report the following as very toxic to macrophytes: atrazine; simazine; diuron; and linuron (herbicides). It is likely therefore that Laminariales such as Laminaria hyperborea have an intermediate intolerance to atrazine and some other herbicides. No information was found concerning the effect of contaminants on other named species in the biotope. Therefore, chemical contamination may cause mortalities and sub-lethal effects in the Mytilus edulis bed but affect other members of the community to varying degrees, and an overall intolerance of intermediate has been recorded. Since likely effects at the benchmark level are generally sublethal, a recoverability of very high is recorded.
    Heavy metal contamination
    Intermediate Very high Low No change Moderate
    Lethal threshold concentrations for several heavy metals have been determined in Mytilus edulis (see species review; Widdows & Donkin (1992) and Livingstone & Pipe (1992) for reviews). Mussels were also reported to be missing from a wider area of the Cumbrian coast than other organisms in the vicinity of a phosphate rich effluent contaminated by heavy metals (Holt et al., 1998). Widdows & Donkin (1992) noted that lethal responses give a false impression of high tolerance. However, Mytilus edulis is probably relatively tolerant of heavy metal contamination. Besten et al. (1989) suggested that cadmium (Cd) pollution posed a significant threat to populations of Asterias rubens since it affected reproduction. Little information concerning heavy metal toxicity was found for other animal species in the biotope. Although only filamentous brown algae are named in the biotope description, kelp plants may occur and possibly some other algal species. Hopkin & Kain (1978) examined the effect of Cu, Zn, Hg and Cd on Laminaria hyperborea gametophytes and sporophytes. Sublethal effects on sporophyte development, growth and respiration were shown at concentrations higher than the short term benchmark for Hg, Zn and Cd. Hg was found to be lethal at 0.05 mg/l. However, Cu affected sporophyte development at 0.01 mg/l but was lethal at 0.1 mg/l. Given the evidence of sub-lethal and lethal effects of heavy metals in Mytilus edulis especially, a biotope intolerance of intermediate has been reported. Effects are likely to be sublethal and recovery rapid.
    Hydrocarbon contamination
    Intermediate Very high Low Minor decline High
    The effects of contaminants including hydrocarbons on Mytilus edulis were extensively reviewed by Widdows & Donkin (1992) and Livingstone & Pipe (1992). Overall, Mytilus edulis is probably relatively tolerant of contaminants, although mortalities have been recorded (see species review for details). Hydrocarbon contamination in infralittoral populations is limited to exposure to lighter oil fractions and PAHs in solution or as droplets as a result of turbulent flow or adsorbed onto particulates.
    • Toxic hydrocarbons and PAHs contribute to a decline on the scope for growth in Mytilus edulis (Widows & Donkin, 1992; Widdows et al., 1995).
    • The presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons, cis-chlordane pesticides and cadmium gas been associated with an increase in tumours in Mytilus edulis (Hillman, 1993; Holt et al., 1998).
    • Mesocosm experiments have shown high mortalities of Mytilus edulis exposed to the water accommodated fraction of diesel (Widdows et al., 1987; Bokn et al., 1993).
    • Ingestion of droplets of sunflower oil, from a tanker spill off the Anglesey coast resulted in mortalities after spawning in Mytilus edulis (Mudge et al., 1993; Holt et al., 1998).
    • Asterias rubens suffered mass mortalities after the Torrey Canyon oil spill and was reported to be lost from mesocosms treated with the water accommodated fraction of diesel (Smith, 1968; Bokn et al., 1993).
    • Whilst it is unclear what the full species complement of this biotope is, it seems likely that some likely species including crustaceans and echinoderms may be adversely affected by oil which might cause narcotization and possible mortality.
    • Mytilus edulis dominated jetty piles immediately adjacent to an oil refinery effluent in Milford Haven, suggesting a high tolerance of hydrocarbon contamination (K. Hiscock, pers. comm.).
    Overall, Mytilus edulis and many of the associated species in this biotope are appear to be relatively tolerant of hydrocarbon pollution. However, due to the incidence of mortality after exposure to diesel and oils Mytilus edulis was regarded as of intermediate intolerance to hydrocarbon contamination.
    Although, Asterias rubens has been assessed as highly intolerant, the mussel bed may benefit from a reduction in starfish predation. An overall biotope intolerance of intermediate has been recorded. Since dominant species and most other species at least are likely to survive hydrocarbon contamination, a recoverability of very high is recorded.
    Radionuclide contamination
    No information Not relevant No information Insufficient
    information
    Not relevant
    No information has been found.
    Changes in nutrient levels
    Tolerant* Not relevant Not sensitive* No change Not relevant
    Moderate nutrient enrichment, especially in the form of organic particulates and dissolved organic material, is likely to increase food availability for all the suspension feeders within the biotope. Therefore a 'tolerant*' has been recorded. However, long term or high levels of organic enrichment may result in deoxygenation and algal blooms. Mytilus edulis has been reported to suffer mortalities due to algal blooms of Gyrodinium aureolum and Phaeocystis poucheri (Holt et al., 1998). In this biotope, there is unlikely to be any danger of de-oxygenation as a result of the death of algal blooms caused by nutrient enrichment because of the strong tidal flow and water mixing to which the biotope is exposed.
    High High Moderate Rise Low
    The dominant species, Mytilus edulis, thrives in strong tidal currents whether or not subject to low salinity. However, Mytilus is able to tolerate low salinity conditions much more than some other species likely to thrive in full salinity. Those other species, for instance Halichondria panicea, other encrusting sponges and Tubularia indivisa, may out-compete and dominate in the place of Mytilus edulis and therefore the biotope will no longer be SIR.EstFa.MytT.
    Intermediate High Low Minor decline Moderate
    Mytilus edulis thrives in brackish lagoons and estuaries, including the reduced salinity that this biotope is exposed to. Overall, Mytilus edulis can acclimate to a wide range of salinities and a change of salinity at the benchmark level is unlikely to adversely affect this species. However, some of the associated species in this biotope do not penetrate far into estuarine or reduced salinity situations and are most likely intolerant of a fall in salinity below that to which the biotope is usually exposed. Therefore an intolerance of intermediate is indicated. Once conditions return to normal, most of the associated species will recolonize from planktonic stages. A recoverability of high is given.
    Intermediate High Low Decline Moderate
    Mytilus edulis was regarded to be tolerant of a wide range of oxygen concentrations including zero (Zwaan de & Mathieu, 1992; Diaz & Rosenberg, 1995; see species review). However, echinoderms such as Asterias rubens are highly intolerant of anoxic conditions. Similarly, Balanus crenatus was considered to be highly intolerant to anoxia. Although Mytilus edulis is likely to tolerate hypoxic conditions, an intolerance of intermediate has been recorded due to the likely intolerance of the other members of the community. It should be noted that in the presence of strong to moderate tidal streams, anoxic conditions are unlikely to occur unless combined with reduced water flow rates. Recoverability of the associated species is likely to be rapid (see additional information below).

    Biological Pressures

     IntoleranceRecoverabilitySensitivityRichnessEvidence/Confidence
    Intermediate High Low No change Low
    The diseases and parasites of Mytilus edulis were reviewed by Bower (1992) and Bower & McGladdery (1996) (see the species review).
    Asterias rubens may be parasitised by the ciliate Orchitophyra stellarum (Vevers, 1951; Bouland & Clareboudt, 1994) resulting in castration of males, and subsequent reduction in population size (Vevers, 1951). However, little information on diseases of other members of the community has been found.
    Therefore, an intolerance of intermediate has been recorded. Recovery of the mussel beds will be dependant on recruitment from other populations and a recoverability of high has been recorded (see additional information below).
    Low Immediate Not sensitive No change Moderate
    Mytilus edulis is an effective space occupier and few other species are able to out-compete it. The South American mytilid Aulocomya ater, which has been reported recently in the Moray Firth (Eno et al., 2000), is not expected to be a threat to this reduced salinity populations.
    Intermediate High Low Decline Moderate
    Mytilus edulis is the only species indicative of sensitivity within this biotope that is subject to commercial extraction. Subtidal mussel beds may be exploited by dredging. Holt et al. (1998) suggest that in particular embayments over-exploitation may reduce subsequent recruitment leading to long term reduction in the population or stock. Extraction of Mytilus edulis is likely to remove much of the epifaunal and infaunal community, resulting in a decline in species richness. Overall, an intolerance of intermediate has been recorded at the benchmark level of extraction. However, recovery is likely to occur within 5 years and a recoverability of high has been recorded (see additional information below).
    Not relevant Not relevant Not relevant Not relevant Not relevant

    Additional information

    Recoverability
    Recovery will depend mainly on recruitment of the dominant species, Mytilus edulis. Although a single good recruitment event for mussels may recolonize the substratum within a year, recovery in relation to size of mussels and presence of some associated species may take up to 5 years, and is some circumstances significantly longer. In the case of Balanus crenatus, the species is an important early colonizer of sublittoral rock surfaces (Kitching, 1937) and it densely colonized a site that had been dredged for gravel within 7 months (Kenny & Rees, 1994). Halichondria panicea also appears to be a rapid colonizer, suggested by its presence dominating kelp stipes that would not be more than a few years old. Therefore, recovery is predicted to be high.

    Importance review

    Policy/Legislation

    Habitats Directive Annex 1Estuaries, Reefs
    UK Biodiversity Action Plan Priority
    Priority Marine Features (Scotland)Blue mussel beds

    Exploitation

    Mussels have been harvested for food and bait since early times. British mussel production is relatively small, comprising only 5% of total European Community production (Edwards, 1997). Edwards (1997) reported 10,347 tonnes of mussels landed in 1994 with a value of £32 million. However, collection in the strong tidal flow conditions that occur in this biotope is not believed to take place.

    Additional information

    The biotope relies on flowing water being present and so that factor should not be obstructed.

    Bibliography

    1. Akaishi, F.M., St-Jean, S.D., Bishay, F., Clarke, J., Rabitto, I.d.S. & Ribeiro, C.A., 2007. Immunological responses, histopathological finding and disease resistance of blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) exposed to treated and untreated municipal wastewater. Aquatic Toxicology, 82 (1), 1-14.
    2. Alfaro, A.C., 2005. Effect of water flow and oxygen concentration on early settlement of the New Zealand green-lipped mussel, Perna canaliculus. Aquaculture, 246, 285-94.
    3. Alfaro, A.C., 2006. Byssal attachment of juvenile mussels,Perna canaliculus, affected by water motion and air bubbles. Aquaculture, 255, 357-61
    4. Almada-Villela P.C., 1984. The effects of reduced salinity on the shell growth of small Mytilus edulis L. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom64, 171-182.
    5. Almada-Villela P.C., 1984. The effects of reduced salinity on the shell growth of small Mytilus edulis L. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom64, 171-182.
    6. Almada-Villela, P.C., Davenport, J. & Gruffydd, L.L.D., 1982. The effects of temperature on the shell growth of young Mytilus edulis L. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 59, 275-288.
    7. Ameyaw-Akumfi, C. & Naylor, E., 1987. Spontaneous and induced components of salinity preference behaviour in Carcinus maenas. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 37, 153-158.
    8. Atkinson, P.W., Clark, N.A., Bell, M.C., Dare, P.J., Clark, J.A. & Ireland, P.L., 2003. Changes in commercially fished shellfish stocks and shorebird populations in the Wash, England. Biological Conservation, 114, 127-141.
    9. Auker, L.A. & Oviatt, C.A., 2007. Observations on the colonization of the invasive tunicate Didemnum sp. in Rhode Island In Naturalist, 14, 1-4.
    10. Auker, L.A. & Oviatt, C.A., 2008. Factors influencing the recruitment and abundance of Didemnum in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, 65 (5), 765-769.
    11. Aunaas, T., Denstad, J-P. & Zachariassen, K., 1988. Ecophysiological importance of the isolation response of hibernating blue mussels (Mytilus edulis). Marine Biology 98: 415-9
    12. Bahmet, I., Berger, V. & Halaman, V., 2005. Heart rate in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis (Bivalvia) under salinity change. Russian Journal of Marine Biology 31: 314-7
    13. Bailey, J., Parsons, J. & Couturier, C., 1996. Salinity tolerance in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Rep. Report no. 0840-5417, Aquaculture Association of Canada, New Brunswick, Canada
    14. Baird, R.H., 1966. Factors affecting the growth and condition of mussels (Mytilus edulis). Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Series II, no. 25, 1-33.
    15. Balseiro P., Montes A., Ceschia G., Gestal C., Novoa B. & Figueras A., 2007. Molecular epizootiology of the European Marteilia spp., infecting mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis and M. edulis) and oysters (Ostrea edulis): an update. Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists, 27(4), 148-156.
    16. Baxter, J.M., 1997. Aulacomya ater: Magellan mussel: Moray Firth in Scotland in 1994 and again in 1997. Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
    17. Bayne, B., Iglesias, J., Hawkins, A., Navarro, E., Heral, M., Deslous-Paoli, J-M., 1993. Feeding behaviour of the mussel, Mytilus edulis: responses to variations in quantity and organic content of the seston. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 73, 813-29
    18. Bayne, B.L. (ed.), 1976b. Marine mussels: their ecology and physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [International Biological Programme 10.]
    19. Bayne, B.L., Widdows, J. & Thompson, R.J., 1976. Physiological integrations. In Marine mussels: their ecology and physiology (ed. B.L. Bayne), pp. 261-299. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [International Biological Programme 10.]
    20. Beauchamp, K.A., Gowing, M.M., 1982. A quantitative assessment of human trampling effects on a rocky intertidal community. Marine Environmental Research, 7, 279-94
    21. Beaumont, A., Abdul-Matin, A. & Seed, R., 1993. Early development, survival and growth in pure and hybrid larvae of Mytilus edulis and M. galloprovincialis. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 59, 120-123.
    22. Beaumont, A.R., Gjedrem, T. & Moran, P., 2007. Blue mussel Mytilus edulis and Mediterranean mussel M. galloprovincialis. In T., S., et al. (eds.). Genetic impact of aquaculture activities on native populations. GENIMPACT final scientific report (EU contract n. RICA-CT-2005-022802), pp. 62-69.
    23. Beaumont, A.R., Turner, G., Wood, A.R. & Skibinski, D.O.F., 2004. Hybridisations between Mytilus edulis and Mytilus galloprovincialis and performance of pure species and hybrid veliger larvae at different temperatures. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 302 (2), 177-188.
    24. Berge, J., Johnsen, G., Nilsen, F., Gulliksen, B. & Slagstad, D. 2005. Ocean temperature oscillations enable reappearance of blue mussels Mytilus edulis in Svalbard after a 1000 year absence. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 303, 167–175.
    25. Bergmann, M., Wieczorek, S.K., Moore, P.G., 2002. Utilisation of invertebrates discarded from the Nephrops fishery by variously selective benthic scavengers in the west of Scotland. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 233,185-98
    26. Bergmann, M., Wieczorek, S.K., Moore, P.G., 2002. Utilisation of invertebrates discarded from the Nephrops fishery by variously selective benthic scavengers in the west of Scotland. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 233,185-98
    27. Berthe, F.C.J., Le Roux, F., Adlard, R.D. & Figueras, A., 2004. Marteiliosis in molluscs: a review. Aquatic Living Resources, 17 (4), 433-448.
    28. Besten, P.J. den, Herwig, H.J., Zandee, D.I. & Voogt, P.A., 1989. Effects of Cd and PCBs on reproduction in the starfish Asterias rubens: aberrations in early development. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 18, 173-180.
    29. Bierne, N., David, P., Boudry, P. & Bonhomme, F., 2002. Assortative fertilization and selection at larval stage in the mussels Mytilus edulis and M. galloprovincialis. Evolution, 56, 292-298.
    30. Bishop, J. 2012c. Carpet Sea-squirt, Didemnum vexillum.Great Britain Non-native Species Secretariat [On-line]. [cited 16/06/2015]. Available from: <http://www.nonnativespecies.org
    31. Blanchard, M., 1997. Spread of the slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata (L.1758) in Europe. Current state and consequences. Scientia Marina, 61, Supplement 9, 109-118.
    32. Bokn, T.L., Moy, F.E. & Murray, S.N., 1993. Long-term effects of the water-accommodated fraction (WAF) of diesel oil on rocky shore populations maintained in experimental mesocosms. Botanica Marina, 36, 313-319.
    33. Boström, C. & Bonsdorff, E., 2000. Zoobenthic community establishment and habitat complexity - the importance of seagrass shoot density, morphology and physical disturbance for faunal recruitment. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 205, 123-138.
    34. Bouland, C. & Claereboudt, M.R., 1994. Effect of the castrating parasitic ciliate Orchitophrya stellarum on the population structure of Asterias vulgaris. In Echinoderms through time (ed. B. David, A. Guille, J.P. Féral & M. Roux), pp. 280. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
    35. Bourget, E., 1983. Seasonal variations of cold tolerance in intertidal molluscs and their relation to environmental conditions in the St. Lawrence Estuary. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 61, 1193-1201.
    36. Bower S.M., 2010. Synopsis of Infectious Diseases and Parasites of Commercially Exploited Shellfish [online]. Ontario, Fisheries and Oceans, Canada. Available from: http://dev-public.rhq.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/science/species-especes/shellfish-coquillages/diseases-maladies/index-eng.htm [Accessed: 14/02/2014]
    37. Bower, S.M., 2011. Marteilia refringens/maurini of Mussels [online]. Available from: http://dev-public.rhq.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/science/species-especes/shellfish-coquillages/diseases-maladies/pages/mrmaurmu-eng.htm [Accessed: 05/03/2014]
    38. Bower, S.M. & McGladdery, S.E., 1996. Synopsis of Infectious Diseases and Parasites of Commercially Exploited Shellfish. SeaLane Diseases of Shellfish. [on-line]. http://www-sci.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/sealane/aquac/pages/toc.htm, 2000-11-27
    39. Bower, S.M., 1992. Diseases and parasites of mussels. In The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture (ed. E.M. Gosling), pp. 543-563. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ. [Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science, no. 25.]
    40. Brosnan, D.M., 1993. The effect of human trampling on biodiversity of rocky shores: monitoring and management strategies. Recent Advances in Marine Science and Technology, 1992, 333-341.
    41. Brosnan, D.M. & Crumrine, L.L., 1994. Effects of human trampling on marine rocky shore communities. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 177, 79-97.
    42. Browne, M.A., Dissanayake, A., Galloway, T.S., Lowe, D.M. & Thompson, R.C., 2008. Ingested microscopic plastic translocates to the circulatory system of the mussel, Mytilus edulis (L.). Environmental Science & Technology, 42 (13), 5026-5031.
    43. Bryan, G.W., 1984. Pollution due to heavy metals and their compounds. In Marine Ecology: A Comprehensive, Integrated Treatise on Life in the Oceans and Coastal Waters, vol. 5. Ocean Management, part 3, (ed. O. Kinne), pp.1289-1431. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    44. Buschbaum, C. & Saier, B., 2001. Growth of the mussel Mytilus edulis L. in the Wadden Sea affected by tidal emergence and barnacle epibionts. Journal of Sea Research, 45, 27-36

    45. Bussell, J. A., Gidman, E. A., Causton, D. R., Gwynn-Jones, D., Malham, S. K., Jones, M. L. M., Reynolds, B. & Seed. R., 2008. Changes in the immune response and metabolic fingerprint of the mussel, Mytilus edulis (Linnaeus) in response to lowered salinity and physical stress.  Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 358,  78-85.
    46. Cohen A.N., 2011. The Exotics Guide: Non-native Marine Species of the North American Pacific Coast. [online]. Richmond, CA, Center for Research on Aquatic Bioinvasions. Available from: http://www.exoticsguide.org [Accessed: 20/03/2014]
    47. Cole, S., Codling, I.D., Parr, W., Zabel, T., 1999. Guidelines for managing water quality impacts within UK European marine sites [On-line]. UK Marine SACs Project. [Cited 26/01/16]. Available from: http://www.ukmarinesac.org.uk/pdfs/water_quality.pdf

    48. Cole, S., Codling, I.D., Parr, W. & Zabel, T., 1999. Guidelines for managing water quality impacts within UK European Marine sites. Natura 2000 report prepared for the UK Marine SACs Project. 441 pp., Swindon: Water Research Council on behalf of EN, SNH, CCW, JNCC, SAMS and EHS. [UK Marine SACs Project.], http://www.ukmarinesac.org.uk/
    49. Commito, J.A., 1982. Effects of Lunatia heros predation on the population dynamics of Mya arenaria and Macoma balthica in Maine, USA. Marine Biology, 69, 187-193.
    50. Connor, D.W., Allen, J.H., Golding, N., Howell, K.L., Lieberknecht, L.M., Northen, K.O. & Reker, J.B., 2004. The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland. Version 04.05. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. www.jncc.gov.uk/MarineHabitatClassification,
    51. Connor, D.W., Dalkin, M.J., Hill, T.O., Holt, R.H.F. & Sanderson, W.G., 1997a. Marine biotope classification for Britain and Ireland. Vol. 2. Sublittoral biotopes. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, JNCC Report no. 230, Version 97.06., Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, JNCC Report no. 230, Version 97.06.
    52. Craeymeersch, J.A., Herman, P.M.J. & Meire, P.M., 1986. Secondary production of an intertidal mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) population in the Eastern Scheldt (S.W. Netherlands). Hydrobiologia, 133, 107-115.
    53. Crisp, D.J. & Southward, A.J., 1961. Different types of cirral activity Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 243, 271-308.
    54. Crisp, D.J. (ed.), 1964. The effects of the severe winter of 1962-63 on marine life in Britain. Journal of Animal Ecology, 33, 165-210.
    55. Crompton, T.R., 1997. Toxicants in the aqueous ecosystem. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    56. Crothers, J.H., 1985. Dog-whelks: an introduction to the biology of Nucella lapillus (L.) Field Studies, 6, 291-360.
    57. Culloty, S.C., Novoa, B., Pernas, M., Longshaw, M., Mulcahy, M.F., Feist, S.W. & Figueras, A., 1999. Susceptibility of a number of bivalve species to the protozoan parasite Bonamia ostreae and their ability to act as vectors for this parasite. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 37 (1), 73-80.
    58. Daguin, C., Bonhomme, F. & Borsa, P., 2001. The zone of sympatry and hybridization of Mytilus edulis and M. galloprovincialis, as described by intron length polymorphism at locus mac-1. Heredity, 86, 342-354.
    59. Daly, M.A. & Mathieson, A.C., 1977. The effects of sand movement on intertidal seaweeds and selected invertebrates at Bound Rock, New Hampshire, USA. Marine Biology, 43, 45-55.
    60. Dame, R.F.D., 1996. Ecology of Marine Bivalves: an Ecosystem Approach. New York: CRC Press Inc. [Marine Science Series.]
    61. Dare, P.J., 1976. Settlement, growth and production of the mussel, Mytilus edulis L., in Morecambe Bay, England. Fishery Investigations, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Series II, 28 , 25pp.
    62. Davenport, J., 1979. The isolation response of mussels (Mytilus edulis) exposed to falling sea water concentrations. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59, 124-132.
    63. Davies, C.E. & Moss, D., 1998. European Union Nature Information System (EUNIS) Habitat Classification. Report to European Topic Centre on Nature Conservation from the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood, Cambridgeshire. [Final draft with further revisions to marine habitats.], Brussels: European Environment Agency.
    64. de Vooys, C.G.N., 1987. Elimination of sand in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 21, 75-78.
    65. Denny, M.W., 1987. Lift as a mechanism of patch initiation in mussel beds. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 113, 231-45
    66. Diaz, R.J. & Rosenberg, R., 1995. Marine benthic hypoxia: a review of its ecological effects and the behavioural responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 33, 245-303.
    67. Diaz, R.J. & Rosenberg, R., 1995. Marine benthic hypoxia: a review of its ecological effects and the behavioural responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 33, 245-303.
    68. Diederich, S., 2005. Differential recruitment of introduced Pacific oysters and native mussels at the North Sea coast: coexistence possible? Journal of Sea Research, 53 (4), 269-281.
    69. Diederich, S., 2006. High survival and growth rates of introduced Pacific oysters may cause restrictions on habitat use by native mussels in the Wadden Sea. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 328 (2), 211-227.
    70. Dijkstra, J., Harris, L.G. & Westerman, E., 2007. Distribution and long-term temporal patterns of four invasive colonial ascidians in the Gulf of Maine. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 342 (1), 61-68.
    71. Dinesen, G.E., Timmermann K., Roth E., Markager S., Ravn-Jonsen, L., Hjorth, M., Holmer M. & Støttrup J.G., 2011. Mussel Production and Water Framework Directive Targets in the Limfjord, Denmark: an Integrated Assessment for Use in System-Based Management. Ecology & Society, 16(4).
    72. Dobretsov, S. & Wahl, M., 2008. Larval recruitment of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis: The effect of flow and algae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 355, 137-44
    73. Doherty, S.D., Brophy, D. & Gosling, E., 2009. Synchronous reproduction may facilitate introgression in a hybrid mussel (Mytilus) population. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 378, 1-7.
    74. Dolmer, P. & Svane, I. 1994. Attachment and orientation of Mytilus edulis L. in flowing water. Ophelia, 40, 63-74
    75. Dolmer, P., Kristensen, T., Christiansen, M.L., Petersen, M.F., Kristensen, P.S. & Hoffmann, E., 2001. Short-term impact of blue mussel dreding (Mytilus edulis L.) on a benthic community. Hydrobiologia, 465, 115-127.
    76. Dolmer, P., Sand Kristensen, P. & Hoffmann, E., 1999. Dredging of blue mussels (Mytilus edulis L.) in a Danish sound: stock sizes and fishery-effects on mussel population dynamic. Fisheries Research, 40 (1), 73-80.
    77. Donkin, P., Widdows, J. & Evans, S.V., 1989. Quantitative structure activity relationships for the effect of hydrophobic organic chemicals on the rate of feeding of mussels. Aquatic Toxicology, 14, 277-294.
    78. Ebere, A.G. & Akintonwa, A., 1992. Acute toxicity of pesticides to Gobius sp., Palaemonetes africanus, and Desmocaris trispimosa. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 49, 588-592.
    79. Edwards, E., 1997. Molluscan fisheries in Britain. In The History, Present Condition, and Future of the Molluscan Fisheries of North and Central American and Europe, vol. 3, Europe, (ed. C.L. MacKenzie, Jr., V.G. Burrell, Jr., Rosenfield, A. & W.L. Hobart). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA Technical Report NMFS 129.
    80. Emson, R.H., & Wilkie, I.C., 1980. Fission and autotomy in echinoderms. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 18, 155-250.
    81. Essink, K., 1999. Ecological effects of dumping of dredged sediments; options for management. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 5, 69-80.
    82. Fish, J.D. & Fish, S., 1996. A student's guide to the seashore. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    83. Frechette, M., Butman, C.A., Geyer, W.R., 1989. The importance of boundary-layer flow in supplying phytoplankton to the benthic suspension feeder, Mytilus edulis L. Limnology and Oceanography, 34, 19-36.
    84. Gardner, J.P.A., 1996. The Mytilus edulis species complex in southwest England: effects of hybridization and introgression upon interlocus associations and morphometric variation. Marine Biology, 125(2), 385-399.
    85. Gibbs, P.E., Green, J.C. & Pascoe, P.C., 1999. A massive summer kill of the dog-whelk, Nucella lapillus, on the north Cornwall coast in 1995: freak or forerunner? Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 79, 103-109.
    86. Giltrap, M., Ronan, J., Hardenberg, S., Parkes, G., McHugh, B., McGovern, E. & Wilson, J., 2013. Assessment of biomarkers in Mytilus edulis to determine good environmental status for implementation of MSFD in Ireland. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 71 (1), 240-249.
    87. Gosling, E.M. (ed.), 1992a. The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ. [Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science, no. 25]
    88. Gray, A.R., Lucas, I.A.N, Seed, R. & Richardson, C.A., 1999. Mytilus edulis chilensis infested with Coccomyxa parasitica (Chlorococcales, Coccomyxaceae). Journal of Molluscan Studies, 65, 289-294.
    89. Gray, J.S., Wu R.S.-S. & Or Y.Y., 2002. Effects of hypoxia and organic enrichment on the coastal marine environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 238, 249-279.
    90. Groenewold, S. & Fonds, M., 2000. Effects on benthic scavengers of discards and damaged benthos produced by the beam-trawl fishery in the southern North Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57 (5), 1395-1406.
    91. Gruffydd, L.D., Huxley, R. & Crisp, D., 1984. The reduction in growth of Mytilus edulis in fluctuating salinity regimes measured using laser diffraction patterns and the exaggeration of this effect by using tap water as the diluting medium. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 64: 401-9
    92. Gubbay, S., & Knapman, P.A., 1999. A review of the effects of fishing within UK European marine sites. English Nature. (UK Marine SACs Project, vol .12).
    93. Hailey, N., 1995. Likely impacts of oil and gas activities on the marine environment and integration of environmental considerations in licensing policy. English Nature Research Report, no 145., Peterborough: English Nature.
    94. Hall, S.J., Basford, D.J. & Robertson, M.R., 1990. The impact of hydraulic dredging for razor clams Ensis spp. on an infaunal community. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 27, 119-125.
    95. Harding, J.M. & Mann, R., 1999. Observations on the biology of the Veined Rapa whelk, Rapana whelk (Valenciennes, 1846) in the Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Shellfish Research, 18(1), 9-17.
    96. Harger, J.R.E. & Landenberger, D.E., 1971. The effects of storms as a density dependent mortality factor on populations of sea mussels. The Veliger, 14, 195-210.
    97. Hawkins, A., Smith, R., Bayne, B. & Heral, M., 1996. Novel observations underlying the fast growth of suspension-feeding shellfish in turbid environments: Mytilus edulis. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 131, 179-90
    98. Herbert, R.J.H., Roberts, C., Humphreys, J., & Fletcher, S. 2012. The Pacific oyster (Crassostra gigas) in the UK: economic, legal and environmental issues associated with its cultivation, wild establishment and exploitation. Available from: http://www.dardni.gov.uk/pacific-oysters-issue-paper.pdf
    99. Hickman, C.S., 1992. Reproduction and development of trochean gastropods. Veliger, 35, 245-272.
    100. Hillman, R.E., 1993. Relationship of environmental contaminants to occurrence of neoplasia in Mytilus edulis populations from east to west coast mussel-watch sites. Journal of Shellfish Research, 12, 109.
    101. Holt, T.J., Jones, D.R., Hawkins, S.J. & Hartnoll, R.G., 1995. The sensitivity of marine communities to man induced change - a scoping report. Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor, Contract Science Report, no. 65.
    102. Holt, T.J., Rees, E.I., Hawkins, S.J. & Seed, R., 1998. Biogenic reefs (Volume IX). An overview of dynamic and sensitivity characteristics for conservation management of marine SACs. Scottish Association for Marine Science (UK Marine SACs Project), 174 pp.
    103. Hummel, H., Groeneveld, J.P., Nieuwenhuize, J., van Liere, J.M., Bogaards, R.H. & de Wolf, L., 1989. Relationship between PCB concentrations and reproduction in mussels Mytilus edulis. In Fifth International Symposium on Responses of Marine Organisms to Pollutants, 12-14 April 1989, Plymouth (ed. M.N. Moore & J. Stegeman). Marine Environmental Research, 28, 489-493.
    104. Jenner, H.A., Whitehouse, J.W., Taylor, C.J. & Khalanski, M. 1998. Cooling water management in European power stations Biology and control of fouling. Hydroécologie Appliquée, 10, I-225.
    105. JNCC, 2013. Blue Mussel Beds. Scottish MPA Project Fisheries Management Guidance, Joint Nature Conservation Committie, Peterborough,  http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/pdf/SMPA_fisheries_management_guidance_blue_mussel_beds_July_2013.pdf
    106. JNCC (Joint Nature Conservation Committee), 1999. Marine Environment Resource Mapping And Information Database (MERMAID): Marine Nature Conservation Review Survey Database. [on-line] http://www.jncc.gov.uk/mermaid,
    107. Jones, N.S., 1951. The bottom fauna of the south of the Isle of Man. Journal of Animal Ecology, 20, 132-144.
    108. Jones, S.J., Lima, F.P. & Wethey, D.S., 2010. Rising environmental temperatures and biogeography: poleward range contraction of the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis L., in the western Atlantic. Journal of Biogeography 37: 2243-59
    109. Jorgensen, B.B., 1980. Seasonal oxygen depletion in the bottom waters of a Danish fjord and its effect on the benthic community. Oikos, 32, 68-76.
    110. Jørgensen, C.B., 1981. Mortality, growth, and grazing impact on a cohort of bivalve larvae, Mytilus edulis L. Ophelia, 20, 185-192.
    111. Kaiser, M.J. & Spencer, B.E., 1994. Fish scavenging behaviour in recently trawled areas. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 112 (1-2), 41-49.
    112. Kaiser, M.J. & Spencer, B.E., 1994. Fish scavenging behaviour in recently trawled areas. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 112 (1-2), 41-49.
    113. Kautsky, N., 1981. On the trophic role of the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) in a Baltic coastal ecosystem and the fate of the organic matter produced by the mussels. Kieler Meeresforschungen Sonderheft, 5, 454-461.
    114. Kittner, C. & Riisgaard, H.U., 2005. Effect of temperature on filtration rate in the mussel Mytilus edulis: no evidence for temperature compensation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 305: 147-52
    115. Kochmann, J., Buschbaum, C., Volkenborn, N. & Reise, K., 2008. Shift from native mussels to alien oysters: differential effects of ecosystem engineers. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 364 (1), 1-10.
    116. Koehn, R.K. & Hilbish, T.J., 1987. The biochemical genetics and physiological adaptation of an enzyme polymorphism. American Scientist, 75, 134-141.
    117. Koehn, R.K., 1983. Biochemical genetics and adaptation in molluscs. In The Mollusca. vol. 2. Environmental biochemistry and physiology, (ed. P.W. Hochachka),pp 305-330.
    118. Lambert, G., 2004. The south temperate and Antarctic ascidian Corella eumyota reported in two harbours in north-western France. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 84, 239-241.
    119. Lander, T.R., Robinson, S.M., MacDonald, B.A. & Martin, J.D., 2012. Enhanced growth rates and condition index of blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) held at integrated multitrophic aquaculture sites in the Bay of Fundy. Journal of Shellfish Research, 31 (4), 997-1007.
    120. Langan R. & Howell W.H., 1994. Growth responses of Mytilus edulis to changes in water flow: A test of the "inhalant pumping speed" hypothesis. Journal of Shellfish Research13(1), 289.
    121. Last, K.S., Hendrick V. J, Beveridge C. M & Davies A. J, 2011. Measuring the effects of suspended particulate matter and smothering on the behaviour, growth and survival of key species found in areas associated with aggregate dredging. Report for the Marine Aggregate Levy Sustainability Fund,
    122. Lawrence, J.M., 1996. Mass mortality of echinoderms from abiotic factors. In Echinoderm Studies Vol. 5 (ed. M. Jangoux & J.M. Lawrence), pp. 103-137. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
    123. Le Roux, F., Lorenzo, G., Peyret, P., Audemard, C., Figueras, A., Vivares, C., Gouy, M. & Berthe, F., 2001. Molecular evidence for the existence of two species of Marteilia in Europe. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 48 (4), 449-454.
    124. Liddle, M.J., 1997. Recreational ecology. The ecological impact of outdoor recreation and ecotourism. London: Chapman & Hall.

    125. Lindahl, O. & Kollberg, S., 2008. How mussels can improve coastal water quality. Bioscience Explained, 5 (1), 1-14.
    126. Liu, D.H.W. & Lee, J.M., 1975. Toxicity of selected pesticide to the bay mussel (Mytilus edulis). United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-660/3-75-016.
    127. Livingstone, D.R. & Pipe, R.K., 1992. Mussels and environmental contaminants: molecular and cellular aspects. In The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture, (ed. E.M. Gosling), pp. 425-464. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ. [Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science, no. 25]
    128. Long, D., 2006. BGS detailed explanation of seabed sediment modified Folk classification. Available from: http://www.emodnet-seabedhabitats.eu/PDF/GMHM3_Detailed_explanation_of_seabed_sediment_classification.pdf
    129. Loo, L-O., 1992. Filtration, assimilation, respiration and growth of Mytilus edulis L. at low temperatures. Ophelia 35: 123-31
    130. Loo, L.-O. & Rosenberg, R., 1983. Mytilus edulisculture: Growth and production in western Sweden. Aquaculture, 35, 137-150.
    131. Loosanoff, V.L., 1962. Effects of turbidity on some larval and adult bivalves.  Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute14, 80-95.
    132. Lopez-Flores I., de la Herran, R., Garrido-Ramos, M.A., Navas, J.I., Ruiz-Rejon, C. & Ruiz-Rejon, M., 2004. The molecular diagnosis of Marteilia refringens  and differentiation between Marteilia nbsp;strains infecting oysters and mussels based on the rDNA IGS sequence. Parasitology, nbsp;1 9 (4), 411-419.
    133. Lutz, R.A. & Kennish, M.J., 1992. Ecology and morphology of larval and early larval postlarval mussels. In The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture, (ed. E.M. Gosling), pp. 53-85. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ. [Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science, no. 25]
    134. Maddock, A., 2008. UK Biodiversity Action Plan; Priority Habitat Descriptions. UK Biodiversity Action Plan, 94pp
    135. Mainwaring, K., Tillin, H. & Tyler-Walters, H., 2014. Assessing the sensitivity of blue mussel beds to pressures associated with human activities. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, JNCC Report No. 506., Peterborough, 96 pp.
    136. Mann, R. & Harding, J.M., 2000. Invasion of the North American Atlantic coast by a large predatory Asian mollusc. Biological Invasions, 2 (1), 7-22.
    137. Mann, R. & Harding, J.M., 2003. Salinity tolerance of larval Rapana venosa: implications for dispersal and establishment of an invading predatory gastropod on the North American Atlantic coast. The Biological Bulletin, 204 (1), 96-103.
    138. McGrorty, S., Clarke, R.T., Reading, C.J. & Goss, C.J.D., 1990. Population dynamics of the mussel Mytilus edulis: density changes and regulation of the population in the Exe Estuary, Devon. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 67, 157-169.
    139. Minchin, D. 2007. Rapid coastal survey for targeted alien species associated with floating pontoons in Ireland. Aquatic Invasions, 2(1), 63-70.
    140. Minchin, D. & Sides, E., 2006. Appearance of a cryptogenic tunicate, a Didemnum sp. fouling marina pontoons and leisure craft in Ireland Aquatic Invasions, 1(3), 143-147.
    141. Minchin, D., 1995. Recovery of a population of the flame shell, Lima hians, in an Irish bay previously contaminated with TBT. Environmental Pollution, 90, 259-262.
    142. Moore, P.G., 1977a. Inorganic particulate suspensions in the sea and their effects on marine animals. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 15, 225-363.

    143. Morgan, S.G., 1995. Life and death in the plankton: Larval mortality and adaptation. In Ecology of marine invertebrate larvae, (ed. L. McEdward), pp.279-322. Florida, USA, CRC Press.
    144. Mudge, S.M., Salgado, M.A. & East, J., 1993. Preliminary investigations into sunflower oil contamination following the wreck of the M.V. Kimya. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 26, 40-44.
    145. Myrand, B., Guderley, H. & Himmelman, J.H., 2000. Reproduction and summer mortality of blue mussels Mytilus edulis in the Magdalen Islands, southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. Marine Ecology Progress Series 197: 193-207
    146. Narvarte, M., González, R., Medina, A. & Avaca, M.S., 2011. Artisanal dredges as efficient and rationale harvesting gears in a Patagonian mussel fishery. Fisheries Research, 111 (1), 108-115.
    147. Nehls, G. & Thiel, M., 1993. Large-scale distribution patterns of the mussel Mytilus edulis in the Wadden Sea of Schleswig-Holstein: Do storms structure the ecosystems? Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 31, 181-187.
    148. Nenonen, N.P., Hannoun, C., Horal, P., Hernroth, B. & Bergström, T., 2008. Tracing of norovirus outbreak strains in mussels collected near sewage effluents. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74 (8), 2544-2549.
    149. Newell, R.C., 1979. Biology of intertidal animals. Faversham: Marine Ecological Surveys Ltd.
    150. Newell, R.I.E., 1989. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (North - Mid-Atlantic). Blue Mussel. [on-line] http://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/wdb/pub/0169.pdf, 2001-02-15
    151. Olafsson, E.B., Peterson, C.H. & Ambrose, W.G. Jr., 1994. Does recruitment limitation structure populations and communities of macro-invertebrates in marine soft sediments: the relative significance of pre- and post-settlement processes. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 32, 65-109
    152. Orton, J.H., 1914. Preliminary account of a contribution to an evaluation of the sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, X, 312-320.
    153. Padilla, D.K., 2010. Context-dependent impacts of a non-native ecosystem engineer, the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 50 (2), 213-225.
    154. Page, H. & Hubbard, D., 1987. Temporal and spatial patterns of growth in mussels Mytilus edulis on an offshore platform: relationships to water temperature and food availability. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 111: 159-79
    155. Paine, R.T. & Levin, S.A., 1981. Intertidal landscapes: disturbance and the dynamics of pattern. Ecological Monographs, 51, 145-178.
    156. Paine, R.T., 1976. Biological observations on a subtidal Mytilus californianus bed. Veliger, 19, 125-130.
    157. Palmer, D.L., Burnett, K., Whelpdale, P., 2007. Baseline Survey of Shellfish Resources in Lough Foyle. CEFAS,  C2697, pp
    158. Parry, H., & Pipe, R., 2004. Interactive effects of temperature and copper on immunocompetence and disease susceptibility in mussels (Mytilus edulis). Aquatic Toxicology 69: 311-25
    159. Pernet, F., Tremblay, R. & Bourget E., 2003. Settlement success, spatial pattern and behavior of mussel larvae Mytilus spp. in experimentaldownwelling'systems of varying velocity and turbulence. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 260, 125-140.
    160. Price, H., 1982. An analysis of factors determining seasonal variation in the byssal attachment strength of Mytilus edulis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 62 (01), 147-155
    161. Purchon, R.D., 1937. Studies on the biology of the Bristol Channel. Proceedings of the Bristol Naturalists' Society, 8, 311-329.
    162. Purchon, R.D., 1937. Studies on the biology of the Bristol Channel. Proceedings of the Bristol Naturalists' Society, 8, 311-329.
    163. Ramsay, K., Kaiser, M.J. & Hughes, R.N. 1998. The responses of benthic scavengers to fishing disturbance by towed gears in different habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 224, 73-89.
    164. Rankin, C.J. & Davenport, J.A., 1981. Animal Osmoregulation. Glasgow & London: Blackie. [Tertiary Level Biology].
    165. Rayment W.J., 2007. Crepidula fornicata. Slipper limpet. [online]. Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Sub-programme [On-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.  Available from: <http://www.marlin.ac.uk>
    166. Read, K.R.H. & Cumming, K.B., 1967. Thermal tolerance of the bivalve molluscs Modiolus modiolus (L.), Mytilus edulis (L.) and Brachidontes demissus (Dillwyn). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 22, 149-155.
    167. Reid, G., Liutkus, M., Bennett, A., Robinson, S., MacDonald, B. & Page, F., 2010. Absorption efficiency of blue mussels (Mytilus edulis and M. trossulus) feeding on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) feed and fecal particulates: implications for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. Aquaculture, 299 (1), 165-169.
    168. Riemann B. & Hoffmann E., 1991. Ecological consequences of dredging and bottom trawling in the Limfjord, Denmark. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 69(1), 171-178.
    169. Riisgård, H.U., Bøttiger, L. & Pleissner, D.  2012. Effect of salinity on growth of mussels, Mytilus edulis, with special reference to Great Belt (Denmark). Open Journal of Marine Science, 2, 167-176
    170. Riisgård, H.U., Lüskow, F., Pleissner, D., Lundgreen, K. & López, M., 2013. Effect of salinity on filtration rates of mussels Mytilus edulis with special emphasis on dwarfed mussels from the low-saline Central Baltic Sea. Helgoland Marine Research, 67, 591-8
    171. Robertson, A., 1991. Effects of a toxic bloom of Chrysochromulina polylepis, on the Swedish west coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 569-578.
    172. Robledo, J.A.F., Santarem, M.M., Gonzalez, P. & Figueras, A., 1995. Seasonal variations in the biochemical composition of the serum of Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk. and its relationship to the reproductive cycle and parasitic load. Aquaculture, 133 (3-4), 311-322.
    173. Saier, B., 2002. Subtidal and intertidal mussel beds (Mytilus edulis L.) in the Wadden Sea: diversity differences of associated epifauna. Helgoland Marine Research, 56, 44-50
    174. Seed, R. & Suchanek, T.H., 1992. Population and community ecology of Mytilus. In The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture, (ed. E.M. Gosling), pp. 87-169. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ. [Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science, no. 25.]
    175. Seed, R., 1976. Ecology. In Marine mussels: their ecology and physiology, (ed. B.L. Bayne), pp. 81-120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    176. Seed, R., 1993. Invertebrate predators and their role in structuring coastal and estuarine populations of filter feeding bivalves. In Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, Renesse, The Netherlands, November 30- December 4, 1992. Bivalve Filter Feeders in Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystem Processes, (ed. R.F. Dame), pp. 149-195. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    177. Sewell, J., Pearce, S., Bishop, J. & Evans, J.L., 2008. Investigations to determine the potential risk for certain non-native species to be introduced to North Wales with mussel seed dredged from wild seed beds. CCW Policy Research Report, 835, 82 pp., Countryside Council for Wales
    178. Shumway, S.E., 1990. A review of the effects of algal blooms on shellfish and aquaculture. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 21, 65-104.
    179. Smaal, A.C., 2002. European mussel cultivation along the Atlantic coast: production status, problems and perspectives. Hydrobiologia, 484 (1-3), 89-98.
    180. Smaal, A.C. & Twisk, F., 1997. Filtration and absorption of Phaeocystis cf.  globosa by the mussel Mytilus edulis L. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 209, 33-46
    181. Smith, J.E. (ed.), 1968. 'Torrey Canyon'. Pollution and marine life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    182. Smith, J.R. & Murray, S.N., 2005. The effects of experimental bait collection and trampling on a Mytilus californianus mussel bed in southern California. Marine Biology, 147, 699-706
    183. Stickle, W.B. & Diehl, W.J., 1987. Effects of salinity on echinoderms. In Echinoderm Studies, Vol. 2 (ed. M. Jangoux & J.M. Lawrence), pp. 235-285. A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam.

    184. Suchanek, T.H., 1978. The ecology of Mytilus edulis L. in exposed rocky intertidal communities. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 31, 105-120.
    185. Suchanek, T.H., 1985. Mussels and their role in structuring rocky shore communities. In The Ecology of Rocky Coasts: essays presented to J.R. Lewis, D.Sc., (ed. P.G. Moore & R. Seed), pp. 70-96.
    186. Suchanek, T.H., 1993. Oil impacts on marine invertebrate populations and communities. American Zoologist, 33, 510-523.
    187. Svåsand, T., Crosetti, D., García-Vázquez, E. & Verspoor, E., 2007. Genetic impact of aquaculture activities on native populations. Genimpact final scientific report (EU contract n. RICA-CT-2005-022802).
    188. Tangen K., 1977. Blooms of Gyrodinium aureolum  (Dinophygeae) in North European waters, accompanied by mortality in marine organisms.  Sarsia, 6 , 123-33.
    189. Theede, H., Ponat, A., Hiroki, K. & Schlieper, C., 1969. Studies on the resistance of marine bottom invertebrates to oxygen-deficiency and hydrogen sulphide. Marine Biology, 2, 325-337.
    190. Theisen, B.F., 1982. Variation in size of gills, labial palps, and adductor muscle in Mytilus edulis L.(Bivalvia) from Danish waters. Ophelia, 21, 49-63.
    191. Thieltges, D.W., 2005. Impact of an invader: epizootic American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata reduces survival and growth in European mussels. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 286, 13-19.
    192. Thieltges, D.W., Strasser, M. &  Reise, K., 2003. The American slipper-limpet Crepidula fornicata (L.) in the Northern Wadden Sea 70 years after its introduction. Helgoland Marine Research57, 27-33
    193. Thiesen, B.F., 1972. Shell cleaning and deposit feeding in Mytilus edulis L. (Bivalvia). Ophelia, 10, 49-55.
    194. Thompson, I.S., Richardson, C.A., Seed, R. & Walker, G., 2000. Quantification of mussel (Mytilus edulis) growth from power station cooling waters in response to chlorination procedures. Biofouling, 16, 1-15.
    195. Thompson, I.S., Seed, R., Richardson, C.A., Hui, L. & Walker, G., 1997. Effects of low level chlorination on the recruitment, behaviour and shell growth of Mytilus edulis Linnaeus in power station cooling water. Scientia Marina, 61 (Suppl. 2), 77-85.
    196. Tracey, G.A., 1988. Effects of inorganic and organic nutrient enrichment on growth and bioenergetics of the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Journal of Shelfish Research, 7, 562.
    197. Tsuchiya, M., 1983. Mass mortality in a population of the mussel Mytilus edulis L. Caused by high temperature on rocky shores. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 66: 101-11

    198. Tsuchiya, M. & Nishihira, M., 1985. Islands of Mytilus as a habitat for small intertidal animals: effect of island size on community structure. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 25, 71-81.
    199. Tsuchiya, M. & Nishihira, M., 1986. Islands of Mytilus edulis as a habitat for small intertidal animals: effect of Mytilus age structure on the species composition of the associated fauna and community organization. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 31, 171-178.
    200. Tyler-Walters, H., 2002. Mytilus edulis and Fucus vesiculosus on moderately exposed mid eulittoral rock. [online]. Plymouth, Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/habitatbenchmarks.php?habitatid=46&code=2004 [Accessed: 05/03/2014]
    201. Tyler-Walters, H. & Arnold, C., 2008. Sensitivity of Intertidal Benthic Habitats to Impacts Caused by Access to Fishing Grounds. Report to Cyngor Cefn Gwlad Cymru / Countryside Council for Wales from the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN) [Contract no. FC 73-03-327], Marine Biological Association of the UK, Plymouth, pp.
    202. Tyler-Walters, H. & Durkin, O., 2001. Mytilus edulis beds on variable salinity infralittoral mixed sediment. Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Sub-programme Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. (05/03/2014).
    203. UKTAG, 2014. UK Technical Advisory Group on the Water Framework Directive [online]. Available from: http://www.wfduk.org
    204. Valentine, P.C., Carman, M.R., Blackwood, D.S. & Heffron, E.J., 2007. Ecological observations on the colonial ascidian Didemnum sp. in a New England tide pool habitat. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 342 (1), 109-121.
    205. Van De Werfhorst L.C. & Pearse J.S., 2007. Trampling in the rocky intertidal of central California: a follow-up study. Bulletin of Marine Science, 81(2), 245-254.
    206. Vevers, H.G., 1951. The biology of Asterias rubens L. II. Parasitization of the gonads by the ciliate Orchitophrya stellarum Cepede. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 29, 619-624.
    207. Wang, W. & Widdows, J., 1991. Physiological responses of mussel larvae Mytilus edulis to environmental hypoxia and anoxia. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 70, 223-36
    208. Westerbom, M. & Jattu, S., 2006. Effects of wave exposure on the sublittoral distribution of blue mussels Mytilus edulis in a heterogeneous archipelago. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 306, 191-200.
    209. Widdows J., Lucas J.S., Brinsley M.D., Salkeld P.N. & Staff F.J., 2002. Investigation of the effects of current velocity on mussel feeding and mussel bed stability using an annular flume. Helgoland Marine Research, 56(1), 3-12.
    210. Widdows, J. & Donkin, P., 1992. Mussels and environmental contaminants: bioaccumulation and physiological aspects. In The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture, (ed. E.M. Gosling), pp. 383-424. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ. [Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science, no. 25]
    211. Widdows, J., 1991. Physiological ecology of mussel larvae. Aquaculture, 94, 147-163.
    212. Widdows, J., Bayne, B.L., Livingstone, D.R., Newell, R.I.E. & Donkin, P., 1979a. Physiological and biochemical responses of bivalve molluscs to exposure to air. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 62A, 301-308.
    213. Widdows, J., Donkin, P. & Evans, S.V., 1987. Physiological responses of Mytilus edulis during chronic oil exposure and recovery. Marine Environmental Research, 23, 15-32.
    214. Widdows, J., Donkin, P., Brinsley, M.D., Evans, S.V., Salkeld, P.N., Franklin, A., Law, R.J. & Waldock, M.J., 1995. Scope for growth and contaminant levels in North Sea mussels Mytilus edulis. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 127, 131-148.
    215. Widdows, J., Moore, M., Lowe, D. & Salkeld, P., 1979b. Some effects of a dinoflagellate bloom (Gyrodinium aureolum) on the mussel, Mytilus edulis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59 (2), 522-524.
    216. Williams, R.J., 1970. Freezing tolerance in Mytilus edulis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 35, 145-161
    217. Winter, J., 1972. Long-term laboratory experiments on the influence of ferric hydroxide flakes on the filter-feeding behaviour, growth, iron content and mortality in Mytilus edulis L. Marine pollution and sea life. (ed. Ruvio, M.) London, England, pp. 392-396.
    218. Witman, J.D. & Suchanek, T.H., 1984. Mussels in flow: drag and dislodgement by epizoans. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 16 (3), 259-268.
    219. Young, G.A., 1985. Byssus thread formation by the mussel Mytilus edulis: effects of environmental factors. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 24, 261-271.
    220. Zandee, D.I., Holwerda, D.A., Kluytmans, J.H. & De Zwaan, A., 1986. Metabolic adaptations to environmental anoxia in the intertidal bivalve mollusc Mytilus edulis L. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 36(3), 322-343.
    221. Zander, C.D., 1986. Tripterygiidae. In Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, Vol. 3. (ed. P.J.P. Whitehead, M.L. Bauchot, J.C. Hureau, J. Nielsen & E. Tortonese), pp. 1118-1121. Paris: UNESCO
    222. Zwaan de, A. & Mathieu, M., 1992. Cellular biochemistry and endocrinology. In The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture, (ed. E.M. Gosling), pp. 223-307. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ. [Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science, no. 25]

    Citation

    This review can be cited as:

    Hiscock, K. 2001. Mytilus edulis beds on reduced salinity tide-swept infralittoral rock. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/habitat/detail/259

    Last Updated: 30/11/2001