Crustose sponges and colonial ascidians with Dendrodoa grossularia or barnacles on wave-surged infralittoral rock

Distribution Map

Map Key

  • Orange points: Core Records
  • Pale Blue points: Non-core, certain determination
  • Black points: Non-core, uncertain determination
  • Yellow areas: Predicted habitat extent

Summary

UK and Ireland classification

Description

Vertical and overhanging, exposed to moderately exposed bedrock gullies, tunnels and cave entrances subject to wave surge, and dominated by the crustose sponges Halichondria panicea, Myxilla incrustans, Clathrina coriacea,Leucosolenia botryoides, Esperiopsis fucorum and Grantia compressa. There may also be dense aggregations of the anthozoan Cylista elegans, dwarf Metridium senile, Alcyonium digitatum, and Urticina felina, and a dense covering of the barnacle Balanus crenatus on the bare rock face. Dense aggregations of the robust hydroid Tubularia indivisa may be recorded, growing through the sponge crust. Colonial ascidians such as Polyclinum aurantium, Botryllus schlosseri,Botrylloides leachi, Aplidium nordmanni and the solitary ascidian Dendrodoa grossularia may all be recorded. The echinoderms Asterias rubens, Echinus esculentus, Henricia sp., the crab Cancer pagurus and the calcareous tubewormSpirobranchus triqueter may also be present on the rock face, along with encrusting coralline algae.

Depth range

0-5 m, 5-10 m, 10-20 m

Additional information

-

Listed By

Skip links

Further information sources

Additional information can be found through these searches:

Skip links

Sensitivity reviewHow is sensitivity assessed?

Sensitivity characteristics of the habitat and relevant characteristic species

This review addresses a group of high energy, wave exposed that occur on rock surfaces in gullies, caves and overhangs win the infralittoral.  They are dominated by crustose sponges including Halichondria panicea, Pachymastia fucorum, Amphilectus (Esperiopsis) fucorum and Clathrina coriacea.  Given the limited evidence available and the range of different sponges present across the biotope groups, assessments for this group are quite generalized.

There is a progression within this group of biotopes, with IR.FIR.SG.CrSp occurring in the areas most subject to wave surge (narrow-most gullies).  In slightly less surge affected areas, ascidians (primarily Dendrodoa grossularia) become more abundant and therefore important in defining the character of the biotopes CrSpAsAn, DenCcor and CrSpAsDenB.  A highly scoured zone of barnacles and calcareous tubeworms often form a zone below, abutting the cave/gully floor (e.g. CC.BalPom). 

Additionally, anthozoans are considered important in defining the IR.FIR.SG.CrSpAsAn biotope. A variety of anothozoans are found including Corynactis viridis, Cylista elegans, Urticina felina, Alcyonium digitatum, Metridium senile.

Other species present are considered non-characterizing or ubiquitous and the assessments, therefore, focus on the crustose sponges, ascidians and anemones.

Resilience and recovery rates of habitat

Little information on sponge longevity and resilience exists.  Reproduction can be asexual (e.g. budding) or sexual (Naylor, 2011) and individual sponges are usually hermaphrodites (Hayward & Ryland, 1994).  Short-lived ciliated larvae are released via the aquiferous system of the sponges and metamorphosis follows settlement.  Growth and reproduction are generally seasonal (Hayward & Ryland, 1994). Rejuvenation from fragments is also considered an important form of reproduction in sponges (Fish & Fish, 1996). Some sponges are known to be highly resilience to physical damage with an ability to survive severe damage, regenerate and reorganize to function fully again. However, this recoverability varies between species (Wulff, 2006). Many sponges recruit annually and growth can be rapid, with a lifespan of one to several years (Ackers, 1983). However sponge longevity and growth has been described as highly variable depending on the species and environmental conditions (Lancaster et al., 2014). It is likely that erect sponges are generally longer lived and slower growing given their more complex nature than smaller encrusting or cushion sponges. Marine sponges often harbour dense and diverse microbial communities, which can include bacteria, archaea and single-celled eukaryotes (fungi and microalgae). The microbial community can comprise up to 40% of sponge volume, and may have a profound impact on host biology (Webster & Taylor, 2012). 

Fowler & Laffoley (1993) monitored the marine nature reserves in Lundy and the Isles Scilly and found that a number of more common sponges showed great variation in size and cover during the study period.  Large colonies appeared and vanished at some locations. Some large encrusting sponges went through periods of both growth and shrinkage, with considerable changes taking place from year to year. For example, Cliona celata colonies grew extremely rapidly, doubling their size or more each year. But, in some years, an apparent shrinkage in size also took place. In contrast, there were no obvious changes in the cover of certain unidentified thin encrusting sponges.  Cliona celata occurs on rock and begins as boring sponge, but can become massive and lobose with rounded ridges up to 40 cm across.  It can withstand sediment (Ackers et al., 1992).  Hymeniacidon perleve is found in thin sheets, cushions and rarely as erect and branching.  It is found from the Arctic to the Mediterranean from the littoral to the circalittoral (Ackers et al., 1992).  Suberites ficus is encrusting to massive and lobose, firm and moderately elastic.  It is found across the Arctic and Atlantic (Ackers et al., 1992).  Raspaila ramosa is a branching sponge that is firm and elastic. However, the soft layer is easily rubbed from the strong axial core. It is found on sublittoral rock and boulders from moderately exposed sites to sheltered sites with some tidal current and it tolerates some silt (Ackers et al., 1992). Raspailia ramosa spawns in September (Lévi, 1956, cited from Van Soest, 2000).

Amphilectus fucorum (syn. Esperiopsis fucorum) is found in wide variety of situations and is distributed across the Atlantic coasts of Europe, from Norway to France (Ackers et al., 1992).   Picton & Morrow (2015) described Amphilectus fucorum as extremely polymorphic and fast growing, changing shape in just a few weeks. It may be encrusting as thin sheets or cushions, massive and lobose, or branched.  Hiscock (pers comm.) noted that Amphilectus fucorum has been found growing on short-lived ascidian tests and has shown significant seasonal variation in abundance, suggesting this sponge is highly resilient.

Halichondria panicea is very polymorphic, varying from thin sheets, massive forms and cushions to branching.  It crumbles readily and branches are brittle (breaking if bent through 20°).   An opportunistic species, it is found in wide range of niches on rock or any other hard substratum (Ackers et al., 1992).  Barthel (1986) reported that Halichondria panicea in the Kiel Bight went through annual cycles, with growth occurring between March and July.  After July, a strong decline in mean individual weight occurred until the end of September.  No change in individual weight was observed over winter, although change in biochemical composition (condition index and protein lipid and glycogen content) was noted.  Reproductive activity occurred In August and September with young colonies appearing in early autumn. Adult Halichondria panicea degenerated and disintegrated after reproduction.  Fish & Fish (1996), however, suggested a lifespan of about 3 years and Vethaak et al., (1982) reported that, unlike Halichondria bowerbanki, Halichondria panicea survives the winter in a normal, active state in the Oosterschelde.  Fell & Lewandrowski (1981) observed the population dynamics of Halichondria spp. within an eelgrass bed in an estuary in Connecticut, US over a 2 year period.  Large numbers of larval derived specimens developed on the eelgrass during the summer, and many of these sponges became sexually reproductive, further increasing the size of the population. However, mortality was high, and at the end of the summer only a relatively small sponge population remained. Sexual reproduction by larva-derived specimens of Halichondria spp. occurred primarily after breeding by the parental generation had declined. The larva-derived sponges grew rapidly, and the percentage of specimens containing large, female reproductive elements increases with specimen size. Halichondria spp. exhibited an opportunistic life strategy with a ‘high rate of turnover’.  Gaino et al. (2010) observed reproduction within two communities of Hymeniacidon perlevis (syn. Hymeniacidon perleve).   The onset of gametogenesis seemed to be triggered by environmental parameters, amongst which the water temperature constituted the most relevant factor statistically.  It was reported that differentiation and growth of the sexual elements was asynchronous, with reproduction lasting five months for the females and three months for the males in the Mar Piccolo di Tarant, Italy, from the end of spring to the late summer. Afterwards, the sponges disappeared with no recovery evident up to the end of monitoring (an additional five months up to late winter 2007).

Ackers (1992) describes Halicondria bowerbanki growing on rock or other animals, even ascidian tests.  It reaches its maximal development in harbours and estuaries, being very tolerant of muddy and brackish conditions and can be partly embedded in mud.   Sutherland (1981) investigated the fouling community in North Carolina, US using short and long-term plates to observe recruitment to artificial surfaces.  Halichondria assemblages recruited sporadically between June/July and end of October in some years, but were not observed in others.  Thomassen & Riisgard (1995) described a number of studies looking at the growth rates of Halichondria spp. with rates of between 1% and 3.3% of total volume per day.    Sebens (1985; 1986) monitored recolonization of epifauna on cleared vertical rock walls where the sponge Halichondria panicea reached pre-clearance levels of cover after two years. The reproductive period for Clathrina coriacea runs from July to October and reproduction through fragmentation has been reported in the summer (Johnson, 1978). The structure of the sponge Clathrina coriacea comprises of delicate tubes up to 1 cm in height and is common to all coasts of the British Isles.  It is found in the low littoral and shallow sublittoral (Hayward & Ryland, 1995b).

Dendrodoa grossularia is a small solitary ascidian, 1.5-2 cm diameter (Millar, 1954).  Settlement occurs from April-June, individuals reach their maximum size by the following summer. Life expectancy is expected to be 18-24 months. Sexual maturity is reached about one year after larval settlement and the release of gametes occurs from spring-autumn, with peaks in early spring and another in late summer. Gamete release is reduced at temperatures above 15°C and totally suppressed above ca 20°C (Millar, 1954).  Kenny & Rees (1994) observed Dendrodoa grossularia was able to recolonize rapidly following aggregate dredging. Following experimental dredging of a site off the English coast, which extracted an area of 1-2 m wide and 0.3-0.5 m deep, Dendrodoa grossularia was able to recolonize and attained 40% of pre-dredge abundance and 23% of biomass within eight months. This recovery rate combined with the ability of this species to reach sexual maturity within its first year suggests that Dendrodoa grossularia can recover from disturbance events within 2 years.  The species has a life expectancy of 18-24 months so that abundant populations are maintained by regular annual recruitment. 

Urticina felina is likely to be very long lived, given their ability to regenerate (Francis et al., 1976).  Urticina felina will readily repair damage to the body: removal of tentacles by clipping does not alter the behaviour and the tentacle regenerates within a few days (Mercier et al., 2011).  Urticina felina internally broods young, which when released settle close to the adult. Brooding prevents predation of juveniles and in areas of high wave action and water flows counteracts removal and supports the formation of aggregations of anemones in harsh environments (Kaliszewicz et al., 2012).  However, brooding does limit dispersal (Kaliszewicz et al., 2012) and may inhibit recovery where a population is entirely removed.  Dispersal ability is considered to be poor in the similar species Urticina eques (Solé-Cava et al., 1994).  Adults can detach from the substratum and relocate but locomotive ability is very limited.  Impacts that remove large proportions of the population over a wide area will effectively reduce the availability of colonists.  Yet Urticina felina colonized the artificial reef of HMS Scylla, in Whitsand Bay, West Cornwall, in the second year of the vessel being on the seabed and had increased in numbers four years later (Hiscock et al., 2010).   Metridium senile reproduces each year and the planulae spend months in the plankton and are likely to disperse over in excess of 10 km from parent anemones (Sebens,1985). New jetty piles at Lundy were colonized by their third year (L. Cole, pers. comm.). Settled planulae or individuals produced by basal laceration are likely to grow rapidly. Bucklin (1987a) found that, for Metridium senile from California, individuals showed rapid growth to large sizes when fed at frequent intervals. Mean size grew steadily during the first eight months then levelled off. An increase from 5 cm² pedal disk area to 45 cm² occurred within 12 months. However, in clearance experiments, Sebens (1985) found that it took 5-10 years for Metridium senile to return to pre-clearance cover. In another study, Wahl (1985) found that Metridium senile returned to rock walls only one week after oxic conditions returned following annual de-oxygenation events in the Inner Flensburg Fjord.  Shick & Hoffman (1980, cited in Sebens, 1985) reported that pedal laceration in Metridium was greater at a site with higher water flow rate compared to slower flowing areas. This is presumably because successful recruitment by the planktonic larvae may be difficult in such as wave-surged environments. As a result, many of the species capable of asexual reproduction within this biotope may rely more on this method of reproduction in colonizing newly created sapce. Growth of Metridium senile is rapid. Bucklin (1985) working in Britain found that Metridium senile f. dianthus fragments and for Metridium senile f. pallidum newly settled individuals, grew up to 0.6 mm and 0.8 mm in pedal diameter per day  respectively.

Resilience assessment. Whilst fecundity, longevity and maturation are poorly understood in sponges, several reports indicate that cushion sponges are shorter lived and faster growing than erect sponges.  Halichondria spp. are reported to be fast growing, with some examples considered fouling.  Sebens (1986) reported that Halichondria panicea reached pre-clearance levels of cover within 2 years.  Sebens (1985, 1986) found that ascidians such as Dendrodoa carnea, Molgula manhattensis and Aplidium spp. achieved significant cover in less than a year, and, together with Halichondria panicea, reached pre-clearance levels of cover after 2 years.  Dendrodoa grossularia can reach sexual maturity within 1 year of growth and can rapidly recover following severe habitat alteration.

Hydrological Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
Temperature increase (local) [Show more]

Temperature increase (local)

Benchmark. A 5°C increase in temperature for one month, or 2°C for one year (Temperature change pressure definition).

Evidence

Berman et al. (2013) monitored sponge communities off Skomer Island, UK over three years with all characterizing sponges for this biotope assessed.  seawater temperature, turbidity, photosynthetically active radiation and wind speed were all recorded during the study. It was concluded that, despite changes in species composition, primarily driven by the non-characterizing Hymeraphia stellifera and Halicnemia patera, no significant difference in sponge density was recorded in all sites studied.  Morphological changes most strongly correlated with a mixture of water visibility and temperature.  Lemoine et al. (2007) studied the effects of thermal stress on the holobiont of the sponge Halichondria bowerbanki collected from Virginia, USA.   Whilst no apparent change in density or diversity of symbionts was detected over the range of temperatures (29 °C, 30 °C and 31 °C), the presence of particular symbionts was temperature dependent.  Barthel (1986) reported that reproduction and growth in Halichondria panicea in the Kiel Bight were primarily driven by temperature, with higher temperatures corresponding with the highest growth. 

Dendrodoa grossularia gamete release occurs from spring-autumn, with peaks in early spring and another in late summer. Gamete release is reduced at temperatures above 15 °C and totally suppressed above ca 20 °C (Millar, 1954). No information was found on the upper temperature threshold of mature Dendrodoa grossularia. Whilst widespread throughout the British Isles (NBN, 2015),  Dendrodoa grossularia is close to its southern range limit and a dramatic increase in temperature that is outside the normal range for the UK may cause mortality. All characteristic sea anemones (Corynactis viridis, Cylista elegans, Urticina felina, Alcyonium digitatum, Metridium senile) are widely distributed across the British Isles (NBN, 2015).

Sensitivity assessment. Typical surface water temperatures around the UK coast vary, seasonally from 4-19°C (Huthnance, 2010). The biotope is considered to tolerate a 2°C increase in temperature for a year.  The majority of characterizing species would be unaffected by an increase in temperature at the benchmark level.  Whilst the ascidian Dendrodoa grossularia is widespread throughout the British Isles (NBN, 2015), it is close to its distribution limit and mortality may occur in dramatic temperature increases, as may some of the anemones. At the benchmark level, resistance is likely to be ‘Medium’, resilience is, therefore ‘High’ and sensitivity is assessed as ‘Low’.

Medium
Help		High
Help		Low
Help
Temperature decrease (local) [Show more]

Temperature decrease (local)

Benchmark. A 5°C decrease in temperature for one month, or 2°C for one year (Temperature change pressure definition).

Evidence

All characterizing sponges, anemones and the ascidian Dendrodoa grossularia are widely distributed across the coasts of the British Isles and are all found from the Channel Isles to Northern Scotland (NBN, 2015).  Berman et al. (2013) monitored sponge communities off Skoma Island, UK over three years with all characterizing sponges for this biotope assessed.  seawater temperature, turbidity, photosynthetically active radiation and wind speed were all recorded during the study.  It was concluded that, despite changes in species composition, primarily driven by the non-characterizing Hymeraphia Stellifera and Halicnemia patera, no significant difference in sponge density was recorded in all sites studied.  Morphological changes most strongly correlated with a mixture of visibility and temperature.

Some sponges exhibit morphological strategies to cope with winter temperatures e.g.  Halichondria bowerbanki goes into a dormant state below 4°C, characterized by major disintegration and loss of choanocyte chambers with many sponges surviving mild winters in more protected areas from where it can recolonize (Vethaak et al., 1982).

Crisp (1964) studied the effects of an unusually cold winter (1962-63) on the marine life in Britain, including porifera in North Wales.   Whilst difficulty in distinguishing between mortality and delayed development was noted, Crisp found that Pachymastia johnstonia and Halichondria panicea were wholly or partly killed by frost and several species appeared to be missing including Amphilectus fucorum. Others, including Hymeniacidon perleve were unusually rare and a few species, including Polymastia boletiformis, were not seriously affected.  It should be noted that Crisp’s general comments on all marine life state that damage decreased the deeper the habitat.  Barthel (1986) reported that Halichondria panicea in the Kiel Bight degenerated and disintegrated after reproduction before winter, however young colonies were observed from September. Dendrodoa grossularia has been recorded as an abundant component of benthic fauna in Nottinghambukta, Svalbard (Różycki & Gruszczyński, 1991).

Sensitivity assessment

There is evidence of sponge mortality at extreme low temperatures in the British Isles(Crisp, 1964a).  Given this evidence, it is likely that a cooling of 5°C for a month could potentially affect the characterizing sponges in shallow examples of this biotope. Resistance has been assessed as ‘Medium’, with a resilience of ‘High’.  Sensitivity has, therefore, been assessed as ‘Low’ at the benchmark level.

Medium
Help		High
Help		Low
Help
Salinity increase (local) [Show more]

Salinity increase (local)

Benchmark. An increase in one MNCR salinity category above the usual range of the biotope or habitat (Salinity regime change pressure definition).

Evidence

The biotope is recorded in Full salinity. An increase at the benchmark level would result in hypersaline conditions.  Marin (1998) described the presence of the ascidian Dysidea fragilis in a hypersaline coastal lagoon (42-47 g/l) in La Mar Menor, Spain.  ‘No evidence‘ for the characterizing sponges, Dendrodoa grossularia or other epifauna in hypersaline conditions was found.

No evidence (NEv)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		No evidence (NEv)
Help
Salinity decrease (local) [Show more]

Salinity decrease (local)

Benchmark. A decrease in one MNCR salinity category above the usual range of the biotope or habitat (Salinity regime change pressure definition detail).

Evidence

These biotopes have only been recorded in full salinity (Connor et al., 2004), and any low salinity events would probably be short-lived due to the high-energy conditions. 

Castric-Fey & Chassé (1991) conducted a factorial analysis of the subtidal rocky ecology near Brest, France and rated the distrubution of species from estuarine to offshore conditions.  Dysidea fragilis and Raspailia ramosa were rated as unaffected by salinity at this range.  Cliona celata and Pachymatisma johnstonia had a slight preference for more estuarine conditions. Mean salinity difference across the study was low (35.1 and 33.8 ‰ respectively) but a greater range was experienced in the Inner Rade (± 2.4‰ compared with± 0.1‰).  It should be noted that the range of salinities identified in this study do not reach the lower benchmark level.   Some of the characterizing species occur in harbours and estuaries, including Halichondria spp. and Hymeniacidon perleve (Ackers et al., 1992).  Of the characterizing sponges present in this biotope, all except Clathrina coriacea have been recorded in variable salinity of lower (Connor et al., 2004)

Dendrodoa grossularia has been recorded as an abundant component of benthic fauna in Nottinghambukta, Svalbard where salinity can range between 6 and 20‰ (Różycki & Gruszczyński, 1991).

Although Urticina felina is predominantly marine, the species does penetrate into estuaries (e.g. the Thames estuary at Mucking (NMMP, 2001) and the River Blackwater estuary (Davis, 1967). Braber & Borghouts (1977) found that Urticina (as Tealia) felina penetrated to about the 11 ppt Chlorinity (about 20 psu) isohaline at mid tide during average water discharge in the Westerschelde estuary, suggesting that during high river flow, it would be tolerant of reduced salinity conditions.

Although Metridium senile is predominantly marine, the species also penetrates into estuaries. Braber & Borghouts (1977) found that Metridium senile occurred in about 10ppt Chlorinity (about 19 psu) in the Delta Region of the Netherlands suggesting that it would be tolerant of reduced salinity conditions. Shumway (1978) found that, during exposure to 50% seawater, animals retracted their tentacles whilst animals exposed to fluctuating salinity, contracted their body wall and produced copious mucus.

Sensitivity assessment

This biotope is subtidal and characterized by high energy and any low salinity events would probably be short lived.  However, some mortality is likely, with some of the sponges (Clathrina coriacea) affected.  Resistance is assessed as ‘Medium’, resilience as ‘High’ and sensitivity is ‘Low’.

Medium
Help		High
Help		Low
Help
Water flow (tidal current) changes (local) [Show more]

Water flow (tidal current) changes (local)

Benchmark. A change in peak mean spring bed flow velocity of between 0.1 m/s and 0.2 m/s for more than one year (Water flow pressure definition). 

Evidence

These biotopes are characterized by their high energy wave surge.  There is a progression within this group of biotopes, with IR.FIR.SG.CrSp occurring in the areas most subject to wave surge (found in the narrow-most gullies).  In slightly less surge affected areas, ascidians (primarily Dendrodoa grossularia) become more abundant and therefore important in defining the character of the biotopes CrSpAsAn, DenCcor and CrSpAsDenB.

Sensitivity assessment. All the biotopes within this complex are characterized by their high energy  due to wave surge, and a change in water flow is unlikely to affect the hydrodynamics of the biotope.  Change at the benchmark level (0.1-0.2 m/s) is unlikely to be significant enough to alter the biotope and resistance is, therefore, assessed as ‘High’, resilience is ‘High’ and the biotope is ‘Not sensitive’ at the benchmark level.

High
Help		High
Help		Not sensitive
Help
Emergence regime changes [Show more]

Emergence regime changes

Benchmark.  1) A change in the time covered or not covered by the sea for a period of ≥1 year, or 2) an increase in relative sea level or decrease in high water level for ≥1 year. (Emergence regime change pressure definition).

Evidence

This biotope occurs in the infralittoral, however it has been recorded in the 0-5 m depth band and may therefore be subject to emergence.

Increased emergence may reduce habitat suitability for characterizing species through greater exposure to desiccation and reduced feeding opportunities for the faunal community while.   Given the subtidal nature of the biotope, emergence is likely to result in a significant decline in the characterizing species.  However, the topography of vertical walls, caves and gullies may afford some resistance to areas within these biotopes and resistance is therefore assessed as ‘Low’. Recovery is assessed as ‘High’, and sensitivity as 'Low'.

Low
Help		High
Help		Low
Help
Wave exposure changes (local) [Show more]

Wave exposure changes (local)

Benchmark. A change in near shore significant wave height of >3% but <5% for more than one year (Wave action pressure definition). 

Evidence

All the biotopes within this complex are defined by their exposure to wave action. As sublittoral biotopes, a change in wave height would affect the wave surge experienced by characterizing species.  A decrease in wave surge could result in succession of the IR.FIR.SG.CrSp to biotopes more dominated by ascidians and/or anemones.

Conversely, an increase in wave surge could result in loss of the IR.FIR.SG.CrSpAsAn, IR.FIR.SG.CrSpAsDenB and IR.FIR.SG.DenCcor to more impoverished or scoured biotopes. 

Sensitivity assessment. All the biotopes within this complex are characterized by their high energy and significant changes, particularly decreases would probably result in a fundamental change in the nature of the biotope and hence reclassification would be required.  However, at the benchmark level, changes are unlikely to be significant enough to alter the biotope and resistance is, therefore, assessed as ‘High’, resilience is ‘High’ and the biotope is ‘Not sensitive’ at the benchmark level.

High
Help		High
Help		Not sensitive
Help

Chemical Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
Transition elements & organo-metal contamination [Show more]

Transition elements & organo-metal contamination

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant Transitional metal or organometal (e.g. TBT) contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills (Transitional metals and organometals pressure definition).

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available.

While some sponges, such as Cliona spp. have been used to monitor heavy metals by looking at the associated bacterial community (Marques et al., 2007; Bauvais et al., 2015), no literature on the effects of transition element or organo-metal pollutants on the characterizing sponges could be found.

Mercier et al. (1998) exposed Metridium senile to tri-butyl tin contamination in surrounding water and in contaminated food. The species produced mucus 48 hours after exposure to contaminated seawater. TBT was metabolised but the species accumulated levels of butyl tins leading the authors to suggest that Metridium senile seemed vulnerable to TBT contamination. However, Mercier et al., (1998) did not indicate any mortality and, since Metridium senile is a major component of jetty pile communities immediately adjacent to large vessels coated with TBT antifouling paints.

Ascidians may be intolerant of synthetic chemicals such as tri-butyl-tin anti-foulants. Rees et al. (2001), working in the Crouch estuary, observed that six ascidian species were recorded at one station in 1997 compared with only two at the same station in 1987, shortly following the banning of TBT in antifouling paints. Also, there was a marked increase in the abundance of ascidians especially Ascidiella aspersa and Ascidia conchilega in the estuary after the ban on TBT was introduced.

Not Assessed (NA)
Help		Not assessed (NA)
Help		Not assessed (NA)
Help
Hydrocarbon & PAH contamination [Show more]

Hydrocarbon & PAH contamination

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant hydrocarbon or polyaromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills (Hydrocarbon & PAH pressure definition).

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available

Tethya lyncurium concentrated BaP (benzo[a ]pyrene )to 40 times the external concentration and no significant repair of DNA was observed in the sponges, which, in higher animal, would likely lead to cancers. As sponge cells are not organized into organs the long-term effects are uncertain (Zahn et al., 1981). No information was found on the intolerance of the characterizing sponges or barnacles to hydrocarbons. However, other littoral barnacles generally have a high tolerance to oil (Holt et al., 1995) and were little impacted by the Torrey Canyon oil spill (Smith, 1968).

Ignatiades & Becacos-Kontos (1970) found that the ascidian Ciona intestinalis can resist the toxicity of oil polluted water and ascidia are frequently found in polluted habitats such as marinas and harbours, etc. (Carver et al., 2006) as well as Ascidia mentula (Aneiros et al., 2015).

Ryland & de Putron (1998) found no detectable damage to under-boulder communities, which are similar to some overhang communities, in Watwick Bay, Pembrokeshire following the Sea Empress oil spill. Part of the resistance to effects might be because oil does not settle onto overhanging surfaces. However, some species, especially gastropods are likely to be narcotised and killed and some damage is likely. Return to a previous species composition would occur from new settlement from larval sources although some gastropods have no or only a short dispersal phase so that recovery will be slow.

Not Assessed (NA)
Help		Not assessed (NA)
Help		Not assessed (NA)
Help
Synthetic compound contamination [Show more]

Synthetic compound contamination

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more synthetic compound contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills (Synthetic compound contamination pressure definition).

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available.

Hoare & Hiscock (1974) reported that the anemone Urticina felina survived near to an acidified halogenated effluent discharge in a 'transition' zone where many other species were unable to survive, suggesting a tolerance to chemical contamination. However, Urticina felina was absent from stations closest to the effluent, which were dominated by pollution tolerant species (such as polychaetes). Those specimens closest to the effluent discharge appeared generally unhealthy.

Not Assessed (NA)
Help		Not assessed (NA)
Help		Not assessed (NA)
Help
Radionuclide contamination [Show more]

Radionuclide contamination

Benchmark. An increase in 10µGy/h above background levels (Radionuclides contamination pressure definition).

Evidence

‘No evidence’ was found.

No evidence (NEv)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		No evidence (NEv)
Help
Introduction of other substances [Show more]

Introduction of other substances

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant "other" substances (solid, liquid or gas) contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills (Introduction of other substances pressure definition). 

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed.

Not Assessed (NA)
Help		Not assessed (NA)
Help		Not assessed (NA)
Help
De-oxygenation [Show more]

De-oxygenation

Benchmark. Exposure to dissolved oxygen concentration of less than or equal to 2 mg/l for one week (a change from WFD poor status to bad status) (deoxygenation pressure definition).

Evidence

It is likely that as this biotope occurs in areas that experience significant wave surge, re-oxygenation is likely which would limit the effects of any de-oxygenation events. However, this may mean that the species present have little exposure to low oxygen and may be sensitive to this pressure.

Halichondria panicea has been reported to survive under oxygen levels as low as 0.5-4 % saturation (ca 0.05-0.4 mg/l) for up to 10 days (Mills et al., 2014).  Wahl (1984, 1985) noted that the LC50 value for Metridium senile in anoxic conditions is about three weeks and that none survive beyond six weeks. He observed that anemones detached from the substratum during the first week of deoxygenation in the Inner Flensburg Fjord and may drift away. When oxygen is lacking, Metridium senile diminishes body surface area. At the level of the benchmark, Metridium senile is not sensitive and even in extreme conditions seems able to survive for some time and then detach. No specific evidence for the other species characterizing this biotope were found.

Sensitivity assessment. The hydrodynamics of this biotope would likely mean that hypoxic events would be rare and short lived.  The available evidence suggests that Halichondria panicea and Metridium senile  are tolerant of de-oxygenation and resistance is therefore recorded as ‘High’, resilience as ‘High’ and the biotope is ‘Not sensitive’ at the benchmark level.  Lack of evidence for other characterizing species results in a ‘Low’ confidence score.

High
Help		High
Help		Not sensitive
Help
Nutrient enrichment [Show more]

Nutrient enrichment

Benchmark. Increased levels of the elements nitrogen, phosphorus, silicon, and iron in the marine environment compared to background concentrations (Nutrient enrichment pressure definition).

Evidence

This pressure relates to increased levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and silicon in the marine environment compared to background concentrations.  The benchmark is set at compliance with WFD criteria for good status, based on nitrogen concentration (UKTAG, 2014).   Therefore the biotope is assessed as 'Not sensitive' at the pressure benchmark that assumes compliance with good status as defined by the WFD.

Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not sensitive
Help
Organic enrichment [Show more]

Organic enrichment

Benchmark. A deposit of 100 gC/m2/yr (Organic enrichment pressure definition).

Evidence

Organic enrichment leads to organisms no longer being limited by the availability of organic carbon.  The consequent changes in ecosystem function can lead to the progression of eutrophic symptoms (Bricker et al., 2008), changes in species diversity and evenness (Johnston & Roberts, 2009) and decreases in dissolved oxygen and uncharacteristic microalgae blooms (Bricker et al., 1999, 2008).  Indirect adverse effects associated with organic enrichment include increased turbidity, increased suspended sediment and the increased risk of deoxygenation. 

Johnston & Roberts (2009) undertook a review and meta-analysis of the effect of contaminants on species richness and evenness in the marine environment.  Of the 49 papers reviewed relating to sewage as a contaminant, over 70% found that it had a negative impact on species diversity, <5% found increased diversity, and the remaining papers finding no detectable effect.  It was found that any single pollutant reduced species richness by 30-50% within any of the marine habitats considered (Johnston & Roberts, 2009).  Throughout their investigation there were only a few examples where species richness was increased due to the anthropogenic introduction of a contaminant.  These examples were almost entirely from the introduction of nutrients, either from aquaculture or sewage outfalls.

Rose & Risk, 1985 described an increase in abundance of the sponge Cliona delitrix in an organically polluted section of Grand Cayman fringing reef affected by the discharge of untreated faecal sewage.  Fu et al. (2007) described Hymeniacidon perleve in aquaculture ecosystems in sterilized natural seawater with different concentrations of total organic carbon (TOC), at several concentrations between 52.9 and 335.13 mg/l).   Hymeniacidon perleve removed 44–61% TOC during 24 h, with retention rates of ca. 0.19–1.06 mg/hr ·g-fresh sponge. Hymeniacidon perleve removed organic carbon excreted by Fugu rubripes with similar retention rates of ca. 0.15 mg/h · g-fresh sponge, and the sponge biomass increased by 22.8%. Some of the characterizing species occur in harbours and estuaries, including Halichondria panicea (Ackers et al., 1992).

There is some suggestion that there are possible benefits to the ascidians from increased organic content of water; 'ascidian richness’ in Algeciras Bay was found to increase in higher concentrations of suspended organic matter (Naranjo et al. 1996). 

Sensitivity assessment. These biotopes occur in high energy conditions and it is likely that the deposited organic content would be rapidly removed.  There is also evidence that the filter-feeding characterizing species would tolerate an increase in organic content.  Resistance is therefore assessed as ‘High’, resilience as ‘High’ and the biotope is ‘Not sensitive’ at the benchmark level.

High
Help		High
Help		Not sensitive
Help

Physical Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
Physical loss (to land or freshwater habitat) [Show more]

Physical loss (to land or freshwater habitat)

Benchmark. A permanent loss of existing saline habitat within the site (Physical loss pressure definition). 

Evidence

All marine habitats and benthic species are considered to have a resistance of ‘None’ to this pressure and to be unable to recover from a permanent loss of habitat (resilience is ‘Very low’). Sensitivity within the direct spatial footprint of this pressure is, therefore ‘High’. Although no specific evidence is described confidence in this assessment is ‘High’, due to the incontrovertible nature of this pressure.

None
Help		Very Low
Help		High
Help
Physical change (to another seabed type) [Show more]

Physical change (to another seabed type)

Benchmark. Permanent change from sedimentary or soft rock substrata to hard rock or artificial substrata, or vice versa (Physical change in subtratum type pressure definition).

Evidence

If rock were replaced with sediment, this would represent a fundamental change to the physical character of the biotope and the species would be unlikely to recover. The biotope would be lost.

Sensitivity assessment. Resistance to the pressure is considered ‘None’, and resilience ‘Very low’. Sensitivity has been assessed as ‘High’.

None
Help		Very Low
Help		High
Help
Physical change (to another sediment type) [Show more]

Physical change (to another sediment type)

Benchmark. Permanent change in one Folk class (based on UK SeaMap simplified classification) (Physical change in sediment type pressure definition). 

Evidence

‘Not relevant’ to biotopes occurring on bedrock.

Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help
Habitat structure changes - removal of substratum (extraction) [Show more]

Habitat structure changes - removal of substratum (extraction)

Benchmark. The extraction of substratum to 30 cm (where substratum includes sediments and soft rock but excludes hard bedrock) (Removal of substratum pressure definition). 

Evidence

The species characterizing this biotope are epifauna or epiflora occurring on rock and would be sensitive to the removal of the habitat. However, extraction of rock substratum is considered unlikely and this pressure is considered to be ‘Not relevant’ to hard substratum habitats.

Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help
Abrasion / disturbance of the surface of the substratum or seabed [Show more]

Abrasion / disturbance of the surface of the substratum or seabed

Benchmark. Damage to surface features (e.g. species and physical structures within the habitat) (Surface abrasion/disturbance pressure definition).

Evidence

The species characterizing this biotope occur on the rock and therefore have no protection from surface abrasion. For this assessment, the focus is on the effects of trampling and scour.

Halichondria panicea is compressible but crumbly in texture and easily broken (Ackers et al, 1992) and is typically found in cryptic or semi-cryptic areas (Hayward & Ryland, 1995b).  Abrasion events are therefore likely to remove the sponge, however specific evidence was not found.

Boulcott & Howell (2011) conducted experimental Newhaven scallop dredging over a circalittoral rock habitat in the sound of Jura, Scotland and recorded the damage to the resident community. The results indicated that, whilst damage to faunal crusts tended to be restricted, the sponge Pachymatisma johnstoni was highly damaged by the experimental trawl.  

The abundance of Urticina felina increased in gravel habitats on the Georges Bank, (Canada) closed to trawling by bottom gears (Collie et al., 2005) which suggested that this species was sensitive to fishing.  In a recent review, assigning species to groups based on tolerances to bottom disturbance from fisheries, the anemone Urticina felina and the sponge Halichondria panacea were assigned to AMBI Fisheries Group II, described as ‘species sensitive to fisheries in which the bottom is disturbed, but their populations recover relatively quickly’ (Gittenberger & van Loon, 2011). Urticina felina also occurs in highly scoured  habitats in the English Channel (Holme & Wilson, 1985).

Sensitivity assessment. These biotopes are defined by their high energy wave surge which prohibits succession. However they occur above cave and gully floors which experience significant scour and biotopes containing scour resistant barnacles and spirobids tend to prevail.  Any activity that physically abrades the faunal crust is likely to result in localized damage.  Increase in scour or other abrasion events are likely to remove the sponge, ascidian and anemone components. Resistance is ‘Low’, resilience is ‘High’ and sensitivity is ‘Low’.

Low
Help		High
Help		Low
Help
Penetration or disturbance of the substratum subsurface [Show more]

Penetration or disturbance of the substratum subsurface

Benchmark. Damage to sub-surface features (e.g. species and physical structures within the habitat) (Sub-surface penetration pressure definition).

Evidence

The species characterizing this biotope group are epifauna or epiflora occurring on rock which is resistant to subsurface penetration.  The assessment for abrasion at the surface only is therefore considered to equally represent sensitivity to this pressure. This pressure is thought ‘Not Relevant’ to hard rock biotopes.

Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help
Changes in suspended solids (water clarity) [Show more]

Changes in suspended solids (water clarity)

Benchmark. A change in one rank on the WFD (Water Framework Directive) scale, e.g. from clear to intermediate for one year (Suspended sediment pressure definition).

Evidence

An increase in suspended solids is unlikely to have direct effects on the characterizing species due to light penetration or clogging. However, given the high energy associated with the biotope, suspended particulates could increase the scour experienced by the characterizing species.

Despite sediment being considered to have a negative impact on suspension feeders (Gerrodette & Flechsig 1979), many encrusting sponges appear to be able survive in highly sediment conditions (Schönberg, 2015; Bell & Barnes 2000; Bell & Smith 2004).  Some of the characterizing species occur in harbours and estuaries, including Halichondria panicea (Ackers et al., 1992). 

Urticina felina is found in highly turbid areas associated with biotopes such as CR.MCR.SfR.Pol (Connor et al., 2004; Holme & Wilson, 1985) and is therefore considered to be unaffected by an increase in suspended solids at the benchmark. 

An increase in suspended sediment could result in scour due to wave action and tidal flow.  Overall, resistance is assessed as ‘Medium’, mainly due to the scour effect.  Resilience is ‘High’ and sensitivity is ‘Low’.

Medium
Help		High
Help		Low
Help
Smothering and siltation rate changes (light) [Show more]

Smothering and siltation rate changes (light)

Benchmark. ‘Light’ deposition of up to 5 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single discrete event (Smothering pressure definition).

Evidence

An increase in suspended solids is unlikely to have direct effects on the characterizing species due to light penetration or clogging. However, given the high energy associated with the biotope, suspended particulates could increase the scour experienced by the characterizing species.

Despite sediment being considered to have a negative impact on suspension feeders (Gerrodette & Flechsig 1979), many encrusting sponges appear to be able survive in highly sediment conditions (Schönberg, 2015; Bell & Barnes 2000; Bell & Smith 2004).  Some of the characterizing species occur in harbours and estuaries, including Halichondria panicea (Ackers et al., 1992). 

Urticina felina is found in highly turbid areas associated with biotopes such as CR.MCR.SfR.Pol (Connor et al., 2004; Holme & Wilson, 1985) and is therefore considered to be unaffected by an increase in suspended solids at the benchmark. 

An increase in suspended sediment could result in scour due to wave action and tidal flow.  Overall, resistance is assessed as ‘Medium’, mainly due to the scour effect.  Resilience is ‘High’ and sensitivity is ‘Low’.

Medium
Help		High
Help		Low
Help
Smothering and siltation rate changes (heavy) [Show more]

Smothering and siltation rate changes (heavy)

Benchmark. ‘Heavy’ deposition of up to 30 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single discrete event (Smothering pressure definition).

Evidence

This biotope typically occurs on vertical walls, with more scour resistant biotopes occurring on cave and gully floors.  The majority of the examples of this biotope are therefore unlikely to be affected by smothering following an increase in sediment deposition.  This being said, where the biotope does occur on the shallow or flat lower  surfaces, mortality could occur, depending on the level and rate of removal of the sediment. 

Despite sediment being considered to have a negative impact on suspension feeders (Gerrodette & Flechsig 1979), many encrusting sponges appear to be able survive in highly sedimented conditions, and in fact many species prefer such habitats (Schönberg, 2015; Bell & Barnes 2000; Bell & Smith, 2004).  Whilst complete smothering may result in loss of the sponges, the biotope often occurs on cave walls and ceilings and thus burial is unlikely. 

Dendrodoa grossularia is a small ascidian, capable of reaching a size of approx 8.5 mm (Millar, 1954) and is therefore likely to be inundated by deposition of 5 cm of sediment. If inundation is long lasting then the understorey community may be adversely affected.

Communities dominated by the anemone Urticina felina were described on tide swept seabed, exposed to high levels of suspended sediment, sediment scour and to periodic smothering by thin layers of sand, up to ca 5 cm in the central English Channel (Holme & Wilson, 1985).  Urticina felina is abundant in the sediment-scoured, silty rock communities CR.HCR.XFa.FluCoAs and CR.MCR.EcCr.UrtScr (Connor et al., 2004).

Sensitivity assessment. Overall, the biotope is unlikely to be affected by smothering, however, an increase in sediment could result in scour following re-suspension due to wave and tidal flow.  Removal of the sediment is likely to be rapid.  Overall, resistance is assessed as ‘Medium’, mainly due to the scour effect as the sediment is removed, although the risk that some parts of the biotope that exist on flat or gently sloping areas may experience burial.  Resilience is ‘High’ and sensitivity is ‘Low’.

Medium
Help		High
Help		Low
Help
Litter [Show more]

Litter

Benchmark. The introduction of man-made objects able to cause physical harm (surface, water column, seafloor or strandline) (Litter pressure definition). 

Evidence

Not assessed.

Not Assessed (NA)
Help		Not assessed (NA)
Help		Not assessed (NA)
Help
Electromagnetic changes [Show more]

Electromagnetic changes

Benchmark. A local electric field of 1 V/m or a local magnetic field of 10 µT (Electromagnetic pressure definition).

Evidence

‘No evidence’ was found.

No evidence (NEv)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		No evidence (NEv)
Help
Underwater noise changes [Show more]

Underwater noise changes

Benchmark. MSFD indicator levels (SEL or peak SPL) exceeded for 20% of days in a calendar year. Further detail

Evidence

Whilst no evidence could be found for the effect of noise or vibrations on the characterizing species of these biotopes, it is unlikely that these species have the facility for detecting or noise vibrations.

Sensitivity assessment

The characterizing sponges are unlikely to respond to noise or vibrations and resistance is therefore assessed as ‘High’, Resilience as ‘High’ and Sensitivity as ‘Not Sensitive’.

Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help
Introduction of light or shading [Show more]

Introduction of light or shading

Benchmark. A change in incident light via anthropogenic means (Introduced light or shade pressure definition).

Evidence

These biotopes have very limited algal abundance, although Connor et al. (2004) notes that kelps are unable to colonize the biotope primarily due to the level of wave surge and vertical topography.  The impact of introduction of light may therefore be of limited importance to increasing the algal component of the biotope.

 Jones et al. (2012) compiled a report on the monitoring of sponges around Skomer Island and found that many sponges, particularly encrusting species, preferred vertical or shaded bedrock to open, light surfaces.  However, it is possible that this relates to decreased competition with algae.  Whilst no evidence could be found for the effect of light on the other faunal species present within these biotopes, it is unlikely that they would be impacted. While increase in light could potentially promote algal growth, light may not be the limiting factor when considering the lack of algae.  In any case, growth ceases for a number of red algae  below ca 1.0 μmol m-2l-1 (ca 50 Lux), whereas this value is 2 μmol m-2l-1 (ca 100 Lux) for green algae (Leukart & Lüning, 1994) . 

Sensitivity assessment. A change at the benchmark level (0.1 Lux) is therefore unlikely to be significant.  Resistance to this pressure is assessed as 'High' and resilience as 'High'. This biotope is therefore considered to be 'Not sensitive' at the benchmark level.

High
Help		High
Help		Not sensitive
Help
Barrier to species movement [Show more]

Barrier to species movement

Benchmark. A permanent or temporary barrier to species movement over ≥50% of water body width or a 10% change in tidal excursion (Barrier to species movement pressure definition).

Evidence

Barriers and changes in tidal excursion are 'Not relevant' to biotopes restricted to open waters.

Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help
Death or injury by collision [Show more]

Death or injury by collision

Benchmark. Injury or mortality from collisions of biota with both static or moving structures due to 0.1% of tidal volume on an average tide, passing through an artificial structure (Death for collision pressure definition).

Evidence

'Not relevant' to seabed habitats.  NB. Collision by grounding vessels is addressed under ‘surface abrasion’.

Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help
Visual disturbance [Show more]

Visual disturbance

Benchmark. The daily duration of transient visual cues exceeds 10% of the period of site occupancy by the feature (Visual disturbance pressure definition). 

Evidence

'Not relevant'

Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help

Biological Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
Genetic modification & translocation of indigenous species [Show more]

Genetic modification & translocation of indigenous species

Benchmark. Translocation of indigenous species or the introduction of genetically modified or genetically different populations of indigenous species may result in changes in the genetic structure of local populations, hybridization, or a change in community structure (Translocation pressure definition).

Evidence

No evidence’ was found.

No evidence (NEv)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		No evidence (NEv)
Help
Introduction of microbial pathogens [Show more]

Introduction of microbial pathogens

Benchmark. The introduction of relevant microbial pathogens or metazoan disease vectors to an area where they are currently not present (e.g. Martelia refringens and Bonamia, Avian influenza virus, viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia virus) (pathogen or disease pressure definition).

Evidence

Gochfeld et al. (2012) found that diseased sponges hosted significantly different bacterial assemblages compared to healthy sponges, with diseased sponges also exhibiting significant decline in sponge mass and protein content.  Sponge disease epidemics can have serious long-term effects on sponge populations, especially in long-lived, slow-growing species (Webster, 2007).  Numerous sponge populations have been brought to the brink of extinction including cases in the Caribbean (with 70-95% disappearance of sponge specimens) (Galstoff,1942) and  the Mediterranean (Vacelet, 1994; Gaino et al., 1992).  Decaying patches and white bacterial film were reported in Haliclona oculata and Halichondria panicea in North Wales, 1988-89 (Webster, 2007).  Specimens of Cliona spp. exhibited blackened damage since 2013 in Skomer. Preliminary results have shown that clean, fouled and blackened Cliona all have very different bacterial communities. The blackened Cliona are effectively dead and have a bacterial community similar to marine sediments. The fouled Cliona have a very distinct bacterial community that may suggest a specific pathogen caused the effect (Burton, pers comm; Preston & Burton, 2015).  Hydroids exhibit astonishing regeneration and rapid recovery from injury (Sparks, 1972) and the only inflammatory response is active phagocytosis (Tokin & Yaricheva, 1959;1961, as cited in Sparks, 1972).  No record of diseases in the characterizing hydroids could be found.  There appears to be little research into ascidian diseases particularly in the Atlantic.  The parasite Lankesteria ascidiae targets the digestive tubes and can cause ‘long faeces syndrome’ in Ciona intestinalis (although it has also been recorded in other species). Mortality occurs in severely affected individuals within about a week following first symptoms. (Mita et al., 2012).

Sensitivity assessment. Whilst evidence for disease in ascidians and sponges exists, ‘No evidence’ for mortality in the characterizing species was found.

No evidence (NEv)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		No evidence (NEv)
Help
Removal of target species [Show more]

Removal of target species

Benchmark. Removal of species targeted by fishery, shellfishery or harvesting at a commercial or recreational scale (targeted removal pressure definition).

Evidence

No evidence of targeting of the characterizing species could found and the pressure is ‘Not relevant’ to this biotope group.

Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help
Removal of non-target species [Show more]

Removal of non-target species

Benchmark. Removal of features or incidental non-targeted catch (by-catch) through targeted fishery, shellfishery or harvesting at a commercial or recreational scale (non-targeted removed pressure definition).

Evidence

The characteristic species probably compete for space within the biotope, so that loss of one species would probably have little if any effect on the other members of the community. However, the incidental removal of the characteristic epifauna is likely to remove a proportion of the biotope and change the biological character of the biotope. These direct, physical impacts are assessed through the abrasion and penetration of the seabed pressures. The sensitivity assessment for this pressure considers any biological/ecological effects resulting from the removal of non-target species on this biotope. 

Sensitivity assessment. Based on broad agreement  of trawl impacts on sponge communities and the likely disturbance to the sessile epifaunal species, resistance is recorded as ‘Low’, resilience is recorded as ‘High’ and Sensitivity is ‘Low’

Low
Help		High
Help		Low
Help

Introduction or spread of invasive non-indigenous species (INIS) Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
Other INIS [Show more]

Other INIS

Evidence

Wave surge in this biotope will probably limit establishment of all but the most surge resistant invasive non-indigenous species (INIS) and no direct evidence was found for effects of INIS on this biotope.  The low levels of light within this biotope, particularly the rear walls of caves, are considered to also inhibit invasive algal species.

The Australasian barnacle Elminius modestus was introduced to British waters on ships during the second World War. The species does well in estuaries and bays, where it can displace Semibalanus balanoides. However, on exposed shores the native species out-compete this invasive species (Raffaelli & Hawkins, 1999).

Two non-native spirobids – Dexiospira oshoroensis and Pileolaria rosepigmentata - were found on the non-native algae Sargassum muticum in Portsmouth (Knight-Jones et al., 1975). Invasive tubeworms are reported from UK harbours (Thorp et al., 1986)  and are likely to be well established in areas with large volumes of ship traffic.

Didemnum vexillum is an invasive colonial sea squirt native to Asia which was first recorded in the UK in Darthaven Marina, Dartmouth in 2005. Didemnum vexillum can form extensive mats over the substrata it colonizes; binding boulders, cobbles and altering the host habitat (Griffith et al., 2009). Didemnum vexillum can also grow over and smother the resident biological community. Recent surveys within Holyhead Marina, North Wales have found Didemnum vexillum growing on and smother native tunicate communities (Griffith et al., 2009). Due to the rapid-re-colonization of Didemnum vexillum eradication attempts have to date failed. 

Presently Didemnum vexillum is isolated to several sheltered locations in the UK (NBN, 2015), however, Didemnum vexillum has successfully colonized the offshore location of the Georges Bank, USA (Lengyel et al., 2009) which is more exposed than the locations which Didemnum vexillum have colonized in the UK. It is, therefore, possible that Didemnum vexillum could colonize more exposed locations within the UK and could, therefore, pose a threat to these biotopes. 

There was ‘No evidence’ regarding known invasive species that may pose a threat to IR.FIR.SG.CrSpAsAn, IR.FIR.SG.CrSpAsDenB, IR.FIR.SG.DenCcor or IR.FIR.SG.CrSp.  Due to the constant risk of new invasive species, the literature for this pressure should be revisited.  Due to the constant risk of new invasive species, the literature for this pressure should be revisited.

No evidence (NEv)
Help		Not relevant (NR)
Help		No evidence (NEv)
Help

Bibliography

  1. Ackers, R.G., 1983. Some local and national distributions of sponges. Porcupine Newsletter, 2 (7).

  2. Ackers, R.G.A., Moss, D. & Picton, B.E. 1992. Sponges of the British Isles (Sponges: V): a colour guide and working document. Ross-on-Wye: Marine Conservation Society.

  3. Ager, O.E.D. 2007. Alcyonidium diaphanum, Sea chervil. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1738

  4. Albert, L., Deschamps, F., Jolivet, A., Olivier, F., Chauvaud, L. & Chauvaud, S., 2020. A current synthesis on the effects of electric and magnetic fields emitted by submarine power cables on invertebrates. Marine Environmental Research, 159. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104958

  5. Althaus, F., Williams, A., Schlacher, T., Kloser, R., Green, M., Barker, B., Bax, N., Brodie, P. & Schlacher-Hoenlinger, M., 2009. Impacts of bottom trawling on deep-coral ecosystems of seamounts are long-lasting. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 397, 279-294. DOI https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08248

  6. Aneiros, F., Rubal, M., Troncoso, J.S. & Bañón, R., 2015. Subtidal benthic megafauna in a productive and highly urbanised semi-enclosed bay (Ría de Vigo, NW Iberian Peninsula). Continental Shelf Research, 110, 16-24.

  7. Barthel, D., 1986. On the ecophysiology of the sponge Halichondria panicea in Kiel Bight. I. Substrate specificity, growth and reproduction. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 32, 291-298.

  8. Bauvais, C., Zirah, S., Piette, L., Chaspoul, F., Domart-Coulon, I., Chapon, V., Gallice, P., Rebuffat, S., Pérez, T. & Bourguet-Kondracki, M.-L., 2015. Sponging up metals: bacteria associated with the marine sponge Spongia officinalis. Marine Environmental Research, 104, 20-30.

  9. Becker, L., Bartholomä, A., Singer, A., Bischof, K., Coers, S. & Kröncke, I., 2020. Small-scale distribution modeling of benthic species in a protected natural hard ground area in the German North Sea (Helgolander Steingrund). Geo-Marine Letters, 40 (2), 167–181. DOI http://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-019-00598-8

  10. Bell, J.J. & Barnes, D.K., 2000. The distribution and prevalence of sponges in relation to environmental gradients within a temperate sea lough: inclined cliff surfaces. Diversity and Distributions, 6 (6), 305-323.

  11. Bell, J.J. & Smith, D., 2004. Ecology of sponge assemblages (Porifera) in the Wakatobi region, south-east Sulawesi, Indonesia: richness and abundance. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK, 84 (3), 581-591.

  12. Bell, J.J., McGrath, E., Biggerstaff, A., Bates, T., Bennett, H., Marlow, J. & Shaffer, M., 2015. Sediment impacts on marine sponges. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 94 (1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.03.030

  13. Bell, J.J., Bennett, H.M., Rovellini, A. & Webster, N.S., 2018. Sponges to Be Winners under Near-Future Climate Scenarios. BioScience, 68 (12), 955–968. DOI http://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy142

  14. Bell, J., Micaroni, V., Wood, G., Hughes, M., Donnelly, A. & McAllen, R., 2024. Contrasting patterns of decadal stability for shallow water sponge boulder assemblages and subtidal rocky cliffs at Lough Hyne, Ireland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 104. DOI http://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315424000493

  15. Berman, J., Burton, M., Gibbs, R., Lock, K., Newman, P., Jones, J. & Bell, J., 2013. Testing the suitability of a morphological monitoring approach for identifying temporal variability in a temperate sponge assemblage. Journal for Nature Conservation, 21 (3), 173-182. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.12.003

  16. Betti, F., Bavestrello, G., Fravega, L., Bo, M., Coppari, M., Enrichetti, F., Cappanera, V., Venturini, S. & Cattaneo-Vietti, R., 2019. On the effects of recreational SCUBA diving on fragile benthic species: The Portofino MPA (NW Mediterranean Sea) case study. Ocean & Coastal Management, 182. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104926

  17. Bishop, J. D. D., Wood, C. A., Yunnie, A. L. E. & Griffiths, C. A., 2015. Unheralded arrivals: non-native sessile invertebrates in marinas on the English coast. Aquatic Invasions, 10 (3), 249-264. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2015.10.3.01

  18. Blanchard, M., 2009. Recent expansion of the slipper limpet population (Crepidula fornicata) in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel (Western Channel, France). Aquatic Living Resources, 22 (1), 11-19. DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2009004

  19. Blanchard, M., 1997. Spread of the slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata (L.1758) in Europe. Current state and consequences. Scientia Marina, 61, Supplement 9, 109-118. Available from: http://scimar.icm.csic.es/scimar/index.php/secId/6/IdArt/290/

  20. Bohn, K., Richardson, C. & Jenkins, S., 2012. The invasive gastropod Crepidula fornicata: reproduction and recruitment in the intertidal at its northernmost range in Wales, UK, and implications for its secondary spread. Marine Biology, 159 (9), 2091-2103. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-1997-3

  21. Bohn, K., Richardson, C.A. & Jenkins, S.R., 2015. The distribution of the invasive non-native gastropod Crepidula fornicata in the Milford Haven Waterway, its northernmost population along the west coast of Britain. Helgoland Marine Research, 69 (4), 313.

  22. Bohn, K., Richardson, C.A. & Jenkins, S.R., 2013a. Larval microhabitat associations of the non-native gastropod Crepidula fornicata and effects on recruitment success in the intertidal zone. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 448, 289-297. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2013.07.020

  23. Bohn, K., Richardson, C.A. & Jenkins, S.R., 2013b. The importance of larval supply, larval habitat selection and post-settlement mortality in determining intertidal adult abundance of the invasive gastropod Crepidula fornicata. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 440, 132-140. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.12.008

  24. Boulcott, P. & Howell, T.R.W., 2011. The impact of scallop dredging on rocky-reef substrata. Fisheries Research (Amsterdam), 110 (3), 415-420.

  25. Braber, L. & Borghouts, C.H., 1977. Distribution and ecology of Anthozoa in the estuarine region of the rivers Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt. Hydrobiologia, 52, 15-21.

  26. Bradshaw, C., Veale, L.O., Hill, A.S. & Brand, A.R., 2000. The effects of scallop dredging on gravelly seabed communities. In: Effects of fishing on non-target species and habitats (ed. M.J. Kaiser & de S.J. Groot), pp. 83-104. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

  27. Bricker, S.B., Clement, C.G., Pirhalla, D.E., Orlando, S.P. & Farrow, D.R., 1999. National estuarine eutrophication assessment: effects of nutrient enrichment in the nation's estuaries. NOAA, National Ocean Service, Special Projects Office and the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Silver Spring, MD, 71 pp.

  28. Bricker, S.B., Longstaff, B., Dennison, W., Jones, A., Boicourt, K., Wicks, C. & Woerner, J., 2008. Effects of nutrient enrichment in the nation's estuaries: a decade of change. Harmful Algae, 8 (1), 21-32.

  29. Broadribb, M., Bell, J. & Rovellini, A., 2021. Rapid acclimation in sponges: seasonal variation in the organic content of two intertidal sponge species. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 101 (7), 983–989. DOI http://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315421000928

  30. Bucklin, A., 1985. Biochemical genetic variation, growth and regeneration of the sea anemone, Metridium, of British shores. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 141-157.

  31. Bucklin, A., 1987. Growth and asexual reproduction of the sea anemone Metridium: comparative laboratory studies of three species. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 110, 41-52.

  32. Budd, G.C. 2008. Alcyonium digitatum Dead man's fingers. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1187

  33. Bullard, S. G., Lambert, G., Carman, M. R., Byrnes, J., Whitlatch, R. B., Ruiz, G., Miller, R. J., Harris, L., Valentine, P. C., Collie, J. S., Pederson, J., McNaught, D. C., Cohen, A. N., Asch, R. G., Dijkstra, J. & Heinonen, K., 2007. The colonial ascidian Didemnum sp. A: Current distribution, basic biology and potential threat to marine communities of the northeast and west coasts of North America. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 342 (1), 99-108. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.020

  34. Carman, M.R. & Grunden, D.W., 2010. First occurrence of the invasive tunicate Didemnum vexillum in eelgrass habitat. Aquatic Invasions, 5 (1), 23-29. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2010.5.1.4

  35. Carver, C., Mallet, A. & Vercaemer, B., 2006. Biological synopsis of the solitary tunicate Ciona intestinalis. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, No. 2746, v + 55 p. Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia.

  36. Castège, I., Milon, E. & Pautrizel, F., 2014. Response of benthic macrofauna to an oil pollution: Lessons from the “Prestige” oil spill on the rocky shore of Guéthary (south of the Bay of Biscay, France). Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 106, 192-197.

  37. Castric-Fey, A. & Chassé, C., 1991. Factorial analysis in the ecology of rocky subtidal areas near Brest (west Brittany, France). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 515-536.

  38. Chimienti, G., Di Nisio, A. & Lanzolla, A.M.L., 2020. Size/Age Models for Monitoring of the Pink Sea Fan Eunicella verrucosa (Cnidaria: Alcyonacea) and a Case Study Application. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8 (11). DOI http://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8110951

  39. Cinar, M. E. & Ozgul, A., 2023. Clogging nets Didemnum vexillum (Tunicata: Ascidiacea) is in action in the eastern Mediterranean. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 103. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315423000802

  40. Collie, J.S., Hermsen, J.M., Valentine, P.C. & Almeida, F.P., 2005. Effects of fishing on gravel habitats: assessment and recovery of benthic megafauna on Georges Bank.  American Fisheries Society Symposium, American Fisheries Society, 41, pp. 325.

  41. Connor, D.W., Allen, J.H., Golding, N., Howell, K.L., Lieberknecht, L.M., Northen, K.O. & Reker, J.B., 2004. The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland. Version 04.05. ISBN 1 861 07561 8. In JNCC (2015), The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland Version 15.03. [2019-07-24]. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. Available from https://mhc.jncc.gov.uk/

  42. Coolen, J., Bittner, O., Driessen, F., van Dongen, U., Siahaya, M., de Groot, W., Mavraki, N., Bolam, S. & van der Weide, B., 2020b. Ecological implications of removing a concrete gas platform in the North Sea. Journal of Sea Research, 166. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2020.101968

  43. Coolen, Joop W. P., Lengkeek, Wouter, Lewis, Gareth, Bos, Oscar G., Van Walraven, Lodewijk & Van Dongen, Udo, 2015. First record of Caryophyllia smithii in the central southern North Sea: artificial reefs affect range extensions of sessile benthic species. Marine Biodiversity Records, 8, e140. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755267215001165

  44. Costa, G., Betti, F., Nepote, E., Cattaneo-Vietti, R., Pansini, M., Bavestrello, G. & Bertolino, M., 2018. Sponge community variations within two semi-submerged caves of the Ligurian Sea (Mediterranean Sea) over a half-century time span. The European Zoological Journal, 85 (1), 381–391. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2018.1525439

  45. Coutts, A.D.M. & Forrest, B.M., 2007. Development and application of tools for incursion response: Lessons learned from the management of the fouling pest Didemnum vexillum. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 342 (1), 154-162. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.042

  46. Crisp, D.J. (ed.), 1964. The effects of the severe winter of 1962-63 on marine life in Britain. Journal of Animal Ecology, 33, 165-210.

  47. Davies, J.S., Howell, K.L., Stewart, H.A., Guinan, J. & Golding, N., 2014. Defining biological assemblages (biotopes) of conservation interest in the submarine canyons of the South West Approaches (offshore United Kingdom) for use in marine habitat mapping. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 104, 208-229

  48. Davies, T.W., McKee, D., Fishwick, J., Tidau, S. & Smyth, T., 2020. Biologically important artificial light at night on the seafloor. Scientific Reports, 10 (1). DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69461-6

  49. Davies, T.W., Coleman, M., Griffith, K.M. & Jenkins, S.R., 2015. Night-time lighting alters the composition of marine epifaunal communities. Biology Letters, 11 (4), 20150080. DOI https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0080

  50. Davis, D.S., 1967. The marine fauna of the Blackwater Estuary and adjacent waters. Essex Naturalist, 32, 1-60.

  51. Davison, J.J., van Haren, H., Hosegood, P., Piechaud, N. & Howell, K.L., 2019. The distribution of deep-sea sponge aggregations (Porifera) in relation to oceanographic processes in the Faroe-Shetland Channel. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 146, 55–61. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2019.03.005

  52. de Castro, M., Vance, T., Yunnie, A., Fileman, T. & Hall-Spencer, J., 2018. Low salinity as a biosecurity tool for minimizing biofouling on ship sea chests. Ocean Science, 14 (4), 661–667. DOI http://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-661-2018

  53. De Kluijver, M.J., 1993. Sublittoral hard-substratum communities off Orkney and St Abbs (Scotland). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 73 (4), 733-754.

  54. De Montaudouin, X., Blanchet, H. & Hippert, B., 2018. Relationship between the invasive slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata and benthic megafauna structure and diversity, in Arcachon Bay. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 98 (8), 2017-2028. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315417001655

  55. De Vos, L., Rútzler K., Boury-Esnault, N., Donadey C., Vacelet, J., 1991. Atlas of Sponge Morphology. Atlas de Morphologie des Éponges. Washington, Smithsonian Institution Press.

  56. Diaz, R.J. & Rosenberg, R., 1995. Marine benthic hypoxia: a review of its ecological effects and the behavioural responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 33, 245-303.

  57. Dijkstra, J. A. & Nolan, R., 2011. Potential of the invasive colonial ascidian, Didemnum vexillum, to limit escape response of the sea scallop, Placopecten magellanicus. Aquatic Invasions, 6 (4), 451-456. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2011.6.4.10

  58. Dijkstra, J., Harris, L.G. & Westerman, E., 2007. Distribution and long-term temporal patterns of four invasive colonial ascidians in the Gulf of Maine. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 342 (1), 61-68. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.015

  59. Dunlop, K., Harendza, A., Bannister, R. & Keeley, N., 2021. Spatial response of hard- and mixed-bottom benthic epifauna to organic enrichment from salmon aquaculture in northern Norway. Aquaculture Environment Interactions, 13, 455–475. DOI https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00419

  60. Edwards, R.V. 2008. Tubularia indivisa Oaten pipes hydroid. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1967

  61. Eerkes-Medrano, Dafne, Drewery, Jim, Burns, Finlay, Cárdenas, Paco, Taite, Morag, Mkay, David W., Stirling, David & Neat, Francis, 2020. A community assessment of the demersal fish and benthic invertebrates of the Rosemary Bank Seamount marine protected area (NE Atlantic). Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 156, 103180. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2019.103180

  62. Ereskovsky, A., Kovtun, O., Pronin, K., Apostolov, A., Erpenbeck, D. & Ivanenko, V., 2018. Sponge community of the western Black Sea shallow water caves: diversity and spatial distribution. PeerJ, 6. DOI http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4596

  63. Evcen, A. & Çinar, M., 2020. Sponge species from ports of the inner and middle parts of Izmir Bay (Aegean Sea, Eastern Mediterranean). Su Urunleri Dergisi, 37 (2), 149–155. DOI http://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.37.2.05

  64. Fell, P.E. & Lewandrowski, K.B., 1981. Population dynamics of the estuarine sponge, Halichondria sp., within a New England eelgrass community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 55 (1), 49-63.

  65. Ferretti, M., Rossi, F., Benedetti-Cecchi, L. & Maggi, E., 2025. Ecological consequences of artificial light at night on coastal species in natural and artificial habitats: a review. Marine Biology, 172 (1). DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-024-04568-2

  66. Fish, J.D. & Fish, S., 1996. A student's guide to the seashore. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  67. Fletcher, L. M., Forrest, B. M., Atalah, J. & Bell, J. J., 2013a. Reproductive seasonality of the invasive ascidian Didemnum vexillum in New Zealand and implications for shellfish aquaculture. Aquaculture Environment Interactions, 3 (3), 197-211. DOI https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00063

  68. Fowler, S. & Laffoley, D., 1993. Stability in Mediterranean-Atlantic sessile epifaunal communities at the northern limits of their range. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 172 (1), 109-127. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(93)90092-3

  69. Francis, L., 1976. Social organization within clones of the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. The Biological Bulletin, 150 (3), pp.361-376.

  70. Freese, J.L., 2001. Trawl-induced damage to sponges observed from a research submersible. Marine Fisheries Review, 63 (3), 7-13.

  71. Freese, L., Auster, P.J., Heifetz, J. & Wing, B.L., 1999. Effects of trawling on seafloor habitat and associated invertebrate taxa in the Gulf of Alaska. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 182, 119-126.

  72. Fu, W., Wu, Y., Sun, L. & Zhang, W., 2007. Efficient bioremediation of total organic carbon (TOC) in integrated aquaculture system by marine sponge Hymeniacidon perleve. Biotechnology and bioengineering, 97 (6),1387-1397.

  73. Gaino, E., Frine, C. & Giuseppe, C., 2010. Reproduction of the intertidal sponge Hymeniacidon perlevis (Montagu) along a bathymetric gradient. Open Marine Biology Journal, 4, 47-56.

  74. Gaino, E., Pronzato, R., Corriero, G. & Buffa, P., 1992. Mortality of commercial sponges: incidence in two Mediterranean areas. Italian Journal of Zoology, 59 (1), 79-85.

  75. Galstoff, P., 1942. Wasting disease causing mortality of sponges in the West Indies and Gulf of Mexico.  Proceedings 8th American Scientific Congress, pp. 411-421.

  76. Gastaldi, M., Firstater, F., Daleo, P. & Narvarte, M., 2016. Abundance of the sponge Hymeniacidon cf. perlevis in a stressful environment of Patagonia: relationships with Ulva lactuca and physical variables. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 96 (2), 465–472. DOI http://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315415001198

  77. Gaston, K.J., Davies, T.W., Nedelec, S.L. & Holt, L.A., 2017. Impacts of artificial light at night on biological timings. In Futuyma, D.J. (eds.). Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, Vol 48 (1), pp. 49-68. DOI https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316-022745

  78. Gavazzi, G.M., Kapasakali, D.-A. & Degraer, S., 2024. The ecological status of subtidal natural hard substrate biotopes in Belgian waters. MSFD Assessment of the Belgian marine waters – Indicator ANS-BE-BENTH-COND-2024,   1–39 pp. 

  79. Gentric, C., Rehel, K., Dufour, A. & Sauleau, P., 2016. Bioaccumulation of metallic trace elements and organic pollutants in marine sponges from the South Brittany Coast, France. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part a-Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 51 (3), 213–219. DOI http://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2015.1094327

  80. Gerrodette, T. & Flechsig, A., 1979. Sediment-induced reduction in the pumping rate of the tropical sponge Verongia lacunosa. Marine Biology, 55 (2), 103-110.

  81. Gittenberger, A, Rensing, M, Dekker, R, Niemantsverdriet, P, Schrieken, N & Stegenga, H, 2015. Native and non-native species of the Dutch Wadden Sea in 2014. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, The Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority.

  82. Gittenberger, A. & Van Loon, W.M.G.M., 2011. Common marine macrozoobenthos species in the Netherlands, their characteristics and sensitivities to environmental pressures. GiMaRIS Report no 2011.08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3135.7521

  83. Giusti, M., Canese, S., Fourt, M., Bo, M., Innocenti, C., Goujard, A., Daniel, B., Angeletti, L., Taviani, M., Aquilina, L. & Tunesi, L., 2019. Coral forests and Derelict Fishing Gears in submarine canyon systems of the Ligurian Sea. Progress in Oceanography, 178. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2019.102186

  84. Glon, H., Costa, M., de Lecea, A., Goodwin, C., Cartwright, S., Díaz, A., Brickle, P. & Brewin, P., 2020. First record of the plumose sea anemone, Metridium senile (Linnaeus, 1761), from the Falkland Islands. Bioinvasions Records, 9 (3), 461–470. DOI http://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2020.9.3.02

  85. Glon, H.E., Haruka, Y., Daly, M. & Nakaoka, M., 2019. Temperature and salinity survival limits of the fluffy sea anemone, Metridium senile (L.), in Japan. Hydrobiologia, 830, 303–315. DOI http://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3879-2

  86. Gochfeld, D., Easson, C., Freeman, C., Thacker, R. & Olson, J., 2012. Disease and nutrient enrichment as potential stressors on the Caribbean sponge Aplysina cauliformis and its bacterial symbionts. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 456, 101-111.

  87. Goldstein, J. & Funch, P., 2022. A Review on Genus Halichondria (Demospongiae, Porifera). Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10 (9), 1312. DOI http://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10091312

  88. Goodwin, C.E., Strain, E.M., Edwards, H., Bennett, S.C., Breen, J.P. & Picton, B.E., 2013. Effects of two decades of rising sea surface temperatures on sublittoral macrobenthos communities in Northern Ireland, UK. Marine Environmental Research, 85, 34-44. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.12.008

  89. Graves, K. (2022) The Application of Habitat Suitability Modelling to Mapping VME Distribution in the Deep Sea to Inform Spatial Management. Thesis. University of Plymouth. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.24382/876

  90. Graves, K., Bridges, A., Dabrowski, T., Furey, T., Lyons, K. & Howell, K., 2023. Oceanographic variability drives the distribution but not the density of the aggregation forming deep-sea sponge Pheronema carpenteri. Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers, 191. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2022.103917

  91. Griffith, K., Mowat, S., Holt, R.H., Ramsay, K., Bishop, J.D., Lambert, G. & Jenkins, S.R., 2009. First records in Great Britain of the invasive colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002. Aquatic Invasions, 4 (4), 581-590.

  92. Groner, F., Lenz, M., Wahl, M. & Jenkins, S.R., 2011. Stress resistance in two colonial ascidians from the Irish Sea: The recent invader Didemnum vexillum is more tolerant to low salinity than the cosmopolitan Diplosoma listerianum. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 409 (1), 48-52. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.08.002

  93. Häussermann, V., Molinet, C., Gómez, M., Försterra, G., Henríquez, J., Cea, K., Ascencio, T., Hüne, M., Cárdenas, C., Glon, H., Toledo, N. & Mena, D., 2022. Recent massive invasions of the circumboreal sea anemone Metridium senile in North and South Patagonia. Biological Invasions, 24 (12), 3665–3674. DOI http://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02878-4

  94. Riisgård, H.U., Thomassen, S., Jakobsen, H., Weeks, J.M. and Larsen, P.S., 1993. Suspension feeding in marine sponges Halichondria panicea and Haliclona urceolus: effects of temperature on filtration rate and energy cost of pumping. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 96, pp.177-188.

  95. Hartnoll, R.G., 1975. The annual cycle of Alcyonium digitatum. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 3, 71-78.

  96. Hartnoll, R.G., 1998. Circalittoral faunal turf biotopes: an overview of dynamics and sensitivity characteristics for conservation management of marine SACs, Volume VIII. Scottish Association of Marine Sciences, Oban, Scotland, 109 pp. [UK Marine SAC Project. Natura 2000 reports.] Available from: http://ukmpa.marinebiodiversity.org/uk_sacs/pdfs/circfaun.pdf

  97. Hatcher, A.M., 1998. Epibenthic colonization patterns on slabs of stabilised coal-waste in Poole Bay, UK. Hydrobiologia, 367, 153-162.

  98. Hayward, P.J. & Ryland, J.S. 1994. The marine fauna of the British Isles and north-west Europe. Volume 1. Introduction and Protozoans to Arthropods. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  99. Hayward, P.J. & Ryland, J.S. (ed.) 1995b. Handbook of the marine fauna of North-West Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  100. Helmer, L., Farrell, P., Hendy, I., Harding, S., Robertson, M. & Preston, J., 2019. Active management is required to turn the tide for depleted Ostrea edulis stocks from the effects of overfishing, disease and invasive species. Peerj, 7 (2). DOI https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6431

  101. Herbert, R.J.H., Humphreys, J., Davies, C.J., Roberts, C., Fletcher, S. & Crowe, T.P., 2016. Ecological impacts of non-native Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) and management measures for protected areas in Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation, 25 (14), 2835-2865. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1209-4

  102. Herbert, R.J.H., Roberts, C., Humphreys, J., & Fletcher, S. 2012. The Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in the UK: economic, legal and environmental issues associated with its cultivation, wild establishment and exploitation. Available from: https://www.daera-ni.gov.uk/publications/pacific-oyster-uk-issues-associated-its-cultivation-wild-establishment-and-exploitation

  103. Herborg, L.M., O’Hara, P. & Therriault, T.W., 2009. Forecasting the potential distribution of the invasive tunicate Didemnum vexillum. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46 (1), 64-72. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01568.x

  104. Herreid, C.F., 1980. Hypoxia in invertebrates. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology, 67 (3), 311-320. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9629(80)80002-8

  105. Hill, A.S., Brand, A.R., Veale, L.O. & Hawkins, S.J., 1997. Assessment of the effects of scallop dredging on benthic communities. Final Report to MAFF, Contract CSA 2332, Liverpool: University of Liverpool

  106. Hinz, H., Tarrant, D., Ridgeway, A., Kaiser, M.J. & Hiddink, J.G., 2011a. Effects of scallop dredging on temperate reef fauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 432, 91-102.

  107. Hiscock, K., 1983. Water movement. In Sublittoral ecology. The ecology of shallow sublittoral benthos (ed. R. Earll & D.G. Erwin), pp. 58-96. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  108. Hiscock, K., Sharrock, S., Highfield, J. & Snelling, D., 2010. Colonization of an artificial reef in south-west England—ex-HMS ‘Scylla’. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 90 (1), 69-94. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315409991457

  109. Hiscock, K., Southward, A., Tittley, I. & Hawkins, S., 2004. Effects of changing temperature on benthic marine life in Britain and Ireland. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 14 (4), 333-362.

  110. Hitchin, B., 2012. New outbreak of Didemnum vexillum in North Kent: on stranger shores. Porcupine Marine Natural History Society Newsletter, 31, 43-48.

  111. Hoare, R. & Hiscock, K., 1974. An ecological survey of the rocky coast adjacent to the effluent of a bromine extraction plant. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 2 (4), 329-348.

  112. Hoeke, J., Wasson, K. & Kahn, A., 2025. Temporal patterns of the introduced sponge Hymeniacidon perlevis (Montagu, 1814) in the Elkhorn Slough, California, USA. Aquatic Invasions, 20 (1), 33–51. DOI http://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2025.20.1.145912

  113. Holland, L., Jenkins, T. & Stevens, J., 2017. Contrasting patterns of population structure and gene flow facilitate exploration of connectivity in two widely distributed temperate octocorals. Heredity, 119, 35–48. DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2017.14

  114. Holme, N.A. & Wilson, J.B., 1985. Faunas associated with longitudinal furrows and sand ribbons in a tide-swept area in the English Channel. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 1051-1072.

  115. Holt, R., 2024. GB Non-native organism risk assessment for Didemnum vexillum. GB Non-native Species Information Portal, GB Non-native Species Secretariat. Available from: https://www.nonnativespecies.org/assets/Uploads/Didemnum-vexillum-final_forwebsite.pdf

  116. Holt, T.J., Jones, D.R., Hawkins, S.J. & Hartnoll, R.G., 1995. The sensitivity of marine communities to man induced change - a scoping report. Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor, Contract Science Report, no. 65.

  117. Hutchison, Z.L., Secor, D.H. & Gill, A.B., 2020. The interaction between resource species an electromagnetic fields associated with electricity production by offshore wind farms. Oceanography, 33 (4), 96–107. DOI https://doi/org/10.5670/oceanog.2020.409

  118. Ignatiades, L. & Becacos-Kontos, T., 1970. Ecology of fouling organisms in a polluted area. Nature 225, 293 - 294

  119. Jenkins, T.L. & Stevens, J.R., 2022. Predicting habitat suitability and range shifts under projected climate change for two octocorals in the north-east Atlantic. Peerj, 10. DOI http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13509

  120. Jennings, S. & Kaiser, M.J., 1998. The effects of fishing on marine ecosystems. Advances in Marine Biology, 34, 201-352.

  121. Jensen, A.C., Collins, K.J., Lockwood, A.P.M., Mallinson, J.J. & Turnpenny, W.H., 1994. Colonization and fishery potential of a coal-ash artificial reef, Poole Bay, United Kingdom. Bulletin of Marine Science, 55, 1263-1276.

  122. JNCC (Joint Nature Conservation Committee), 2022.  The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland Version 22.04. [Date accessed]. Available from: https://mhc.jncc.gov.uk/

  123. Johnston, E.L. & Roberts, D.A., 2009. Contaminants reduce the richness and evenness of marine communities: a review and meta-analysis. Environmental Pollution, 157 (6), 1745-1752.

  124. Jones, J., Bunker, F., Newman, P., Burton, M., Lock, K., 2012. Sponge Diversity of Skomer Marine Nature Reserve. CCW Regional Report,  CCW/WW/12/3.

  125. Kaiser, M.J., Hormbrey, S., Booth, J.R., Hinz, H. & Hiddink, J.G., 2018. Recovery linked to life history of sessile epifauna following exclusion of towed mobile fishing gear. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55 (3), 1060–1070. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13087

  126. Kaliszewicz, A., Panteleeva, N., Olejniczak, I., Boniecki, P. and Sawicki, M., 2012. Internal brooding affects the spatial structure of intertidal sea anemones in the Arctic-boreal region. Polar biology, 35 (12), pp.1911-1919.

  127. Karlsson, R., Tivefälth, M., Duranovic, I., Martinsson, S., Kjolhamar, A. & Murvoll, K., 2022. Artificial hard-substrate colonisation in the offshore Nywind Scotland Pilot Park. Wind Energy Science, 7 (2), 801–814. DOI http://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-801-2022

  128. Kazanidis, G., Vad, J., Henry, L.-A., Neat, F., Berx, B., Georgoulas, K. & Roberts, J.M., 2019. Distribution of Deep-Sea Sponge Aggregations in an Area of Multisectoral Activities and Changing Oceanic Conditions. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6 (163). DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00163

  129. Kazanidis, G., van Oevelen, D., Veuger, B. & Witte, U., 2018. Unravelling the versatile feeding and metabolic strategies of the cold-water ecosystem engineer Spongosorites coralliophaga (Stephens, 1915). Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers, 141, 71–82. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2018.07.009

  130. Khalaman, V. & Komendantov, A., 2016. Experimental Study of the Ability of the Sponge Halichondria panicea (Porifera: Demospongiae) to Compete for a Substrate in Shallow-Water Fouling Communities of the White Sea. Biology Bulletin, 43 (1), 69–74. DOI http://doi.org/10.1134/s1062359015060059

  131. Klautau, M., Lopes, M., Guarabyra, B., Folcher, E., Ekins, M. & Debitus, C., 2020. Calcareous sponges from the French Polynesia (Porifera: Calcarea). Zootaxa, 4748 (2), 261–295. DOI https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4748.2.3

  132. Klautau, M., Lopes, M., Tavares, G., Rizzieri, R., Sorokin, S., Fromont, J., Goudie, L., Crowther, A., Mccormack, S., George, A. & Wahab, M., 2025. Calcinean sponges (Porifera: Calcarea) from the shelf edge of the Great Australian Bight. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 203 (3). DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlae041

  133. Kleeman, S.N., 2009. Didemnum vexillum - Feasibility of Eradication and/or Control. CCW Contract Science report, 53 pp. Available from: https://www.nonnativespecies.org/assets/Management-documents/Kleeman_2009-1.pdf

  134. Knight-Jones, P., Knight-Jones, E.W. & Kawahara, T., 1975. A review of the genus Janua, including Dexiospira (Polychaeta: Spirorbinae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 56 (2), 91-129.

  135. Koukouras, A., 2010. Check-list of marine species from Greece. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Assembled in the framework of the EU FP7 PESI project. 

  136. Lambert, G., 2009. Adventures of a sea squirt sleuth: unraveling the identity of Didemnum vexillum, a global ascidian invader. Aquatic Invaders, 4(1), 5-28. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2009.4.1.2

  137. Lancaster, J. (ed), McCallum, S., A.C., L., Taylor, E., A., C. & Pomfret, J., 2014. Development of Detailed Ecological Guidance to Support the Application of the Scottish MPA Selection Guidelines in Scotland’s seas. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No.491 (29245), Scottish Natural Heritage, Inverness, 40 pp.

  138. Langton, R., Stirling, D. & Boulcott, P., 2023. Using regional-scale predictive habitat models to assess protection and identify potential locations for additional management or monitoring for a species of conservation interest. Aquatic conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 33 (11), 1263–1280. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4021

  139. Lemoine, N., Buell, N., Hill, A. & Hill, M., 2007. Assessing the utility of sponge microbial symbiont communities as models to study global climate change: a case study with Halichondria bowerbanki. Porifera research: biodiversity, innovation, and sustainability. Série livros, 28, 239-246.

  140. Lengyel, N.L., Collie, J.S. & Valentine, P.C., 2009. The invasive colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum on Georges Bank - Ecological effects and genetic identification. Aquatic Invasions, 4(1), 143-152. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2009.4.1.15

  141. Leukart, P. & Lüning, K., 1994. Minimum spectral light requirements and maximum light levels for long-term germling growth of several red algae from different water depths and a green alga. European Journal of Phycology, 29 (2), 103-112.

  142. Long, H. A. & Grosholz, E. D., 2015. Overgrowth of eelgrass by the invasive colonial tunicate Didemnum vexillum: Consequences for tunicate and eelgrass growth and epifauna abundance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 473, 188-194. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2015.08.014

  143. Longo, C., Cardone, F., Corriero, G., Licciano, M., Pierri, C. & Stabili, L., 2016. The co-occurrence of the demosponge Hymeniacidon perlevis and the edible mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis as a new tool for bacterial load mitigation in aquaculture. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23 (4), 3736–3746. DOI http://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5587-z

  144. Lynn, K.D., Quintanilla-Ahumada, D., Duarte, C. & Quijon, P. A., 2022. Hemocyanin as a biological indicator of artificial light at night stress in sandy beach amphipods. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 184. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114147

  145. Lynn, K.D., Quintanilla-Ahumada, D., Duarte, C. & Quijón, P.A., 2024. Artificial light at night alters the feeding activity and two molecular indicators in the plumose sea anemone Metridium senile (L.). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 202. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116352

  146. Magorrian, B.H. & Service, M., 1998. Analysis of underwater visual data to identify the impact of physical disturbance on horse mussel (Modiolus modiolus) beds. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 36 (5), 354-359. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-326x(97)00192-6

  147. Manoylina, P., Komendantov, A., Shaposhnikova, T. & Khalaman, V., 2025. Intraspecific space competition in Halichondria panicea (Porifera: Demospongiae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 105. DOI http://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315425100313

  148. Manuel, R.L., 1988. British Anthozoa. Synopses of the British Fauna (New Series) (ed. D.M. Kermack & R.S.K. Barnes). The Linnean Society of London [Synopses of the British Fauna No. 18.]. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.19810660505

  149. Marangoni, L.F.B., Davies, T., Smyth, T., Rodríguez, A., Hamann, M., Duarte, C., Pendoley, K., Berge, J., Maggi, E. & Levy, O., 2022. Impacts of artificial light at night in marine ecosystems - A review. Global Change Biology, 28 (18), 5346–5367. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16264

  150. Marin, A., Lopez, M., Esteban, M., Meseguer, J., Munoz, J. & Fontana, A., 1998. Anatomical and ultrastructural studies of chemical defence in the sponge Dysidea fragilis. Marine Biology, 131 (4), 639-645.

  151. MarLIN, 2015. MarLIN (Marine Life Network). (13-10-2015). http://www.marlin.ac.uk

  152. Marques, D., Almeida, M., Xavier, J. & Humanes, M., 2007. Biomarkers in marine sponges: acetylcholinesterase in the sponge Cliona celata. Porifera Research: Biodiversity, Innovation and Sustainability. Série Livros, 28, 427-432.

  153. Matthews, A., 1917. The development of Alcyonium digitatum with some notes on early colony formation. Quarterly Journal of Microscopial Science, 62, 43-94.

  154. McKenzie, C.H, Reid, V., Lambert, G., Matheson, K., Minchin, D., Pederson, J., Brown, L., Curd, A., Gollasch, S., Goulletquer, P, Occphipinti-Ambrogi, A., Simard, N. & Therriault, T.W., 2017. Alien species alert: Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002: Invasion, impact, and control. ICES Cooperative Research Reports (CRR), 33 pp. DOI http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.2138

  155. Mercer, J.M, Whitlatch, R.B, & Osman, R.W. 2009. Potential effects of the invasive colonial ascidian (Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002) on pebble-cobble bottom habitats in Long Island Sound, USA. Aquatic Invasions, 4, 133-142. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2009.4.1.14

  156. Mercurio, M., Longo, C., Pierri, C., Cardone, F., Corriero, G., Lazic, T., Zupa, W. & Carbonara, P., 2023. Life-cycle traits in the demosponge Hymeniacidon perlevis in a land-based fish farm. PeerJ, 11. DOI http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14685

  157. Micaroni, V., McAllen, R., Rovellini, A., Strano, F., Morrow, C., Picton, B., Turner, J., Harman, L. & Bell, J.J., 2025. Slow recovery in temperate mesophotic communities following disturbance: An example from Lough Hyne (Ireland). Marine Environmental Research, 210, 107341. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2025.107341

  158. Millar, R.H., 1954. The annual growth and reproductive cycle of the ascidian Dendrodoa grossularia (van Beneden). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 33 (1), 33-48. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400003453

  159. Miller, C.R. & Rice, N., 2023. A synthesis of the risks of marine light pollution across organismal and ecological scales. Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 33 (12), 1590–1602. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4011

  160. Mills, D.B., Ward, L.M., Jones, C., Sweeten, B., Forth, M., Treusch, A.H. & Canfield, D.E., 2014. Oxygen requirements of the earliest animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (11), 4168-4172.

  161. Minchin, D.M & Nunn, J.D., 2013. Rapid assessment of marinas for invasive alien species in Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland Environment Agency Research and Development Series, Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

  162. Mita, K., Kawai, N., Rueckert, S. & Sasakura, Y., 2012. Large-scale infection of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis by the gregarine Lankesteria ascidiae in an inland culture system. Diseases of aquatic organisms, 101 (3), 185-195.

  163. Molinet, C., Häussermann, V., Astorga, M., Barahona, N., Espinoza, K., Diaz, M., Díaz, P., Henríquez, J., Matamala, T. & Soto, D., 2023. Population expansion of the invasive sea anemone Metridium senile in the spatial mesoscale of a sea urchin bed in north-western Patagonia. Biological Invasions, 25 (4), 1101–1118. DOI http://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02965-6

  164. Morrison, K.M., Meyer, H.K., Roberts, E.M., Rapp, H.T., Colaço, A. & Pham, C.K., 2020. The First Cut Is the Deepest: Trawl Effects on a Deep-Sea Sponge Ground Are Pronounced Four Years on. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7. DOI http://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.605281

  165. Naranjo, S.A., Carballo, J.L., & Garcia-Gomez, J.C., 1996. Effects of environmental stress on ascidian populations in Algeciras Bay (southern Spain). Possible marine bioindicators? Marine Ecology Progress Series, 144 (1), 119-131.

  166. Naylor. P., 2011. Great British Marine Animals, 3rd Edition. Plymouth. Sound Diving Publications.

  167. NBN, 2015. National Biodiversity Network 2015(20/05/2015).https://data.nbn.org.uk/

  168. NBN, 2024. National Biodiversity Network 2024(20/05/2024).https://data.nbn.org.uk/

  169. O'Reilly, L., Fentimen, R., Butschek, F., Titschack, J., Lim, A., Moore, N., O'Connor, O., Appah, J., Harris, K., Vennemann, T. & Wheeler, A., 2022. Environmental forcing by submarine canyons: Evidence between two closely situated cold-water coral mounds (Porcupine Bank Canyon and Western Porcupine Bank, NE Atlantic). Marine Geology, 454. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2022.106930

  170. OBIS 2025. Data from the Ocean Biogeographic Information System. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO. [online]. Available from: http://www.obis.org

  171. Oliva, M., De Marchi, L., Cuccaro, A., Fumagalli, G., Freitas, R., Fontana, N., Raugi, M., Barmada, S. & Pretti, C., 2023. Introducing energy into marine environments: A lab-scale static magnetic field submarine cable simulation and its effects on sperm and larval development on a reef forming serpulid*. Environmental Pollution, 328. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121625

  172. Orani, A., Barats, A., Vassileva, E. & Thomas, O., 2018. Marine sponges as a powerful tool for trace elements biomonitoring studies in coastal environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 131, 633–645. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.04.073

  173. Palladino, G., Biagi, E., Rampelli, S., Musella, M., D'Amico, F., Turroni, S., Brigidi, P., Luna, G. & Candela, M., 2021. Seasonal Changes in Microbial Communities Associated With the Jewel Anemone Corynactis viridis. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8. DOI http://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.627585

  174. Pham, C.K., Murillo, F.J., Lirette, C., Maldonado, M., Colaço, A., Ottaviani, D. & Kenchington, E., 2019. Removal of deep-sea sponges by bottom trawling in the Flemish Cap area: conservation, ecology and economic assessment. Scientific Reports, 9 (1), 15843. DOI http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52250-1

  175. Piazzi, L., Kaleb, S., Ceccherelli, G., Montefalcone, M. & Falace, A., 2019. Deep coralligenous outcrops of the Apulian continental shelf: Biodiversity and spatial variability of sediment-regulated assemblages. Continental Shelf Research, 172, 50–56. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2018.11.008

  176. Picton, B. & Goodwin, C., 2007. Sponge biodiversity of Rathlin Island, Northern Ireland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 87 (06), 1441-1458. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315407058122

  177. Picton, B.E. & Morrow, C.C., 2015b. Amphilectus fucorum (Esper, 1794). [In] Encyclopedia of Marine Life of Britain and Ireland. [accessed 24/06/16] http://www.habitas.org.uk/marinelife/species.asp?item=C5960

  178. Pikesley, S.K., Godley, B.J., Latham, H., Richardson, P.B., Robson, L.M., Solandt, J.-L., Trundle, C., Wood, C. & Witt, M.J., 2016. Pink sea fans (Eunicella verrucosa) as indicators of the spatial efficacy of Marine Protected Areas in southwest UK coastal waters. Marine Policy, 64, 38–45. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.10.010

  179. Piló, D., Pereira, F., Carvalho, A., Vasconcelos, P., Cunha, A. & Gaspar, M., 2021. Are non-indigenous species hitchhiking offshore farmed mussels? A biogeographic and functional approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 171. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112776

  180. Polo, C., Moreno, B., Arroyo, Y. & Cóndor-Luján, B., 2022. On some cryptic sponges associated with Lessonia trabeculata holdfasts in the South-eastern Pacific. Marine Biology Research, 18 (5-6), 326–334. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2022.2123521

  181. Powell-Jennings, C. & Callaway, R., 2018. The invasive, non-native slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata is poorly adapted to sediment burial. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 130, 95-104. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.03.006

  182. Prentice, M. B., Vye, S. R., Jenkins, S. R., Shaw, P. W. & Ironside, J. E., 2021. Genetic diversity and relatedness in aquaculture and marina populations of the invasive tunicate Didemnum vexillum in the British Isles. Biological Invasions, 23 (12), 3613-3624. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02615-3

  183. Preston J. & Burton, M., 2015. Marine microbial assemblages associated with diseased Porifera in Skomer Marine Nature Reserve (SMNR), Wales. Aquatic Biodiversity and Ecosystems, 30th August – 4th September,  Liverpool.,  pp. p110.

  184. Preston, J., Fabra, M., Helmer, L., Johnson, E., Harris-Scott, E. & Hendy, I.W., 2020. Interactions of larval dynamics and substrate preference have ecological significance for benthic biodiversity and Ostrea edulis Linnaeus, 1758 in the presence of Crepidula fornicata. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30 (11), 2133-2149. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3446

  185. Raffaelli, D.G.  & Hawkins, S.J., 1999. Intertidal Ecology 2nd edn.. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  186. Ramos, M., 2010. IBERFAUNA. The Iberian Fauna Databank, 2015(2015/12/21). http://iberfauna.mncn.csic.es/

  187. Rees, H.L., Waldock, R., Matthiessen, P. & Pendle, M.A., 2001. Improvements in the epifauna of the Crouch estuary (United Kingdom) following a decline in TBT concentrations. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42, 137-144. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00119-3

  188. Reinhardt, J.F., Gallagher, K.L., Stefaniak, L.M., Nolan, R., Shaw, M.T. & Whitlatch, R. B., 2012. Material properties of Didemnum vexillum and prediction of tendril fragmentation. Marine Biology, 159 (12), 2875-2884. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-2048-9

  189. Renn, C., Rees, S., Rees, A., Davies, B.F.R., Cartwright, A.Y., Fanshawe, S., Attrill, M.J., Holmes, L.A. & Sheehan, E.V., 2024. Lessons from Lyme Bay (UK) to inform policy, management, and monitoring of Marine Protected Areas. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 81 (2), 276–292. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsad204

  190. Ribeiro, B., Padua, A., Paiva, P., Custodio, M. & Klautau, M., 2018. Exploitation of micro refuges and epibiosis: survival strategies of a calcareous sponge. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 98 (3), 495–503. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s002531541600151x

  191. Riisgård, H., 2024. Oxygen Extraction Efficiency and Tolerance to Hypoxia in Sponges. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12 (1). DOI http://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12010138

  192. Roberts, D., Cummins, S., Davis, A. & Chapman, M., 2006a. Structure and dynamics of sponge-dominated assemblages on exposed and sheltered temperate reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 321, 19-30.

  193. Rose, C.S. & Risk, M.J., 1985. Increase in Cliona delitrix infestation of Montastrea cavernosa heads on an organically polluted portion of the Grand Cayman fringing reef. Marine Ecology, 6 (4), 345-363.

  194. Rosenberg, R., Hellman, B. & Johansson, B., 1991. Hypoxic tolerance of marine benthic fauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 79, 127-131. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps079127

  195. Rouse, S., Lacey, N., Hayes, P. & Wilding, T., 2019. Benthic Conservation Features and Species Associated With Subsea Pipelines: Considerations for Decommissioning. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6. DOI http://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00200

  196. Różycki, O. & Gruszxyński, M., 1991. On the infauna of an Arctic estuary Nottinghambukta, Svalbard. Polish Polar Research, 12 (3), 433-444.

  197. Ryland, J.S. & De Putron, S., 1998. An appraisal of the effects of the Sea Empress oil spillage on sensitive invertebrate communities. Countryside Council for Wales Sea Empress Contract Report, no. 285, 97pp.

  198. Samuelsen, A., Schrum, C., Yumruktepe, V.Ç., Daewel, U. & Roberts, E.M., 2022. Environmental Change at Deep-Sea Sponge Habitats Over the Last Half Century: A Model Hindcast Study for the Age of Anthropogenic Climate Change. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9. DOI http://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.737164

  199. Sanamyan, N., Sanamyan, K., Mercier, A., Hamel, J. & Bocharova, E., 2020. Morphological and molecular assessment of large sea anemones (Actiniaria: Actiniidae) in Newfoundland (eastern Canada). Polar Biology, 43 (5), 495–509. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-020-02652-z

  200. Santín, A., Grinyó, J., Ambroso, S., Uriz, M., Gori, A., Dominguez-Carrió, C. & Gili, J., 2018. Sponge assemblages on the deep Mediterranean continental shelf and slope (Menorca Channel, Western Mediterranean Sea). Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers, 131, 75–86. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2017.11.003

  201. Schönberg, C.H.L., 2015. Happy relationships between marine sponges and sediments–a review and some observations from Australia. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 1-22.

  202. Schaefer, N., Hoey, A.S., Bishop, M.J., Bugnot, A.B., Herbert, B., Mayer-Pinto, M., Sherman, C.D.H., Foster-Thorpe, C., Vozzo, M.L. & Dafforn, A., 2025. Shining the light on marine infrastructure: The use of artificial light to manipulate benthic marine communities. Journal of Applied Ecology, 62 (2), 220–230. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14843

  203. Schiavo, A., Costantino, G., Carbonara, P., Trani, R. & Longo, C., 2024. Data on the distribution of the uncommon Mediterranean sponge Pachymatisma johnstonia (Porifera: Demospongiae). European Zoological Journal, 91 (2), 1160–1166. DOI http://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2024.2415661

  204. Sebens, K.P., 1985. Community ecology of vertical rock walls in the Gulf of Maine: small-scale processes and alternative community states. In The Ecology of Rocky Coasts: essays presented to J.R. Lewis, D.Sc. (ed. P.G. Moore & R. Seed), pp. 346-371. London: Hodder & Stoughton Ltd.

  205. Sebens, K.P., 1986. Spatial relationships among encrusting marine organisms in the New England subtidal zone. Ecological Monographs, 56, 73-96. DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/2937271

  206. Service, M. & Magorrian, B.H., 1997. The extent and temporal variation of disturbance to epibenthic communities in Strangford Lough, Northern Ireland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 77, 1151-1164.

  207. Service, M., 1998. Recovery of benthic communities in Strangford Lough following changes in fishing practice. ICES Council Meeting Paper, CM 1998/V.6, 13pp., Copenhagen: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES).

  208. Sheehan, E.V., Rees, A., Bridger, D., Williams, T. & Hall-Spencer, J.M., 2017. Strandings of NE Atlantic gorgonians. Biological Conservation, 209, 482–487. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.020

  209. Shumway, S., 1978. Respiration, pumping activity and heart rate in Ciona intestinalis exposed to fluctuating salinities. Marine Biology, 48 (3), 235-242.

  210. Smith, J.E. (ed.), 1968. 'Torrey Canyon'. Pollution and marine life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  211. Smyth, T.J., Wright, A.E., McKee, D., Tidau, S., Tamir, R., Dubinsky, Z., Iluz, D. & Davies, T.W., 2021. A global atlas of artificial light at night under the sea. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 9 (1). DOI https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00049

  212. Solé-Cava, A.M., Thorpe, J.P. & Todd, C.D., 1994. High genetic similarity between geographically distant populations in a sea anemone with low dispersal capabilities. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 74, 895-902.

  213. Sparks, A., 1972. Invertebrate Pathology Noncommunicable diseases: Elsevier.

  214. Stefaniak, L. M. & Whitlatch, R. B., 2014. Life history attributes of a global invader: factors contributing to the invasion potential of Didemnum vexillum. Aquatic Biology, 21 (3), 221-229. DOI https://doi.org/10.3354/ab00591

  215. Stefaniak, L., Zhang, H., Gittenberger, A., Smith, K., Holsinger, K., Lin, S. & Whitlatch, R.B., 2012. Determining the native region of the putatively invasive ascidian Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 422-423, 64-71. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.04.012

  216. Tagliapietra, D., Keppel, E., Sigovini, M. & Lambert, G., 2012. First record of the colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002 in the Mediterranean: Lagoon of Venice (Italy). Bioinvasions Records, 1 (4), 247-254. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/bir.2012.1.4.02

  217. Teng, G., Chen, W., Shan, X., Zhu, Q. & Jin, X., 2025. Heat Stress and Anthropogenic Substrates: Molecular and Behavioral Adaptation of Metridium senile in Human-Modified Marine Environments. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26 (17). DOI http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178415

  218. Teng, G., Jin, X., Fu, C., Guan, L., Jin, Y., Chen, Y., Yang, T., Ding, Q. & Shan, X., 2021. Is seafloor litter contributing to sea anemone blooms? Science of the Total Environment, 759. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143479

  219. Thomassen, S. & Riisgård, H.U., 1995. Growth and energetics of the sponge Halichondria panicea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 128, 239-246.

  220. Thorp, C., Jones-Knight, P. & Jones-Knight, E., 1986. New records of tubeworms established in British harbours. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 66 (04), 881-888.

  221. Tidau, S., Smyth, T., McKee, D., Wiedenmann, J., D'Angelo, C., Wilcockson, D., Ellison, A., Grimmer, A.J., Jenkins, S.R., Widdicombe, S., Queiros, A.M., Talbot, E., Wright, A. & Davies, T.W., 2021. Marine artificial light at night: An empirical and technical guide. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 12 (9), 1588–1601. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13653

  222. Tillin, H.M., Kessel, C., Sewell, J., Wood, C.A. & Bishop, J.D.D., 2020. Assessing the impact of key Marine Invasive Non-Native Species on Welsh MPA habitat features, fisheries and aquaculture. NRW Evidence Report. Report No: 454. Natural Resources Wales, Bangor, 260 pp. Available from https://naturalresourceswales.gov.uk/media/696519/assessing-the-impact-of-key-marine-invasive-non-native-species-on-welsh-mpa-habitat-features-fisheries-and-aquaculture.pdf

  223. Tilmant, J.T., 1979. Observations on the impact of shrimp roller frame trawls operated over hard-bottom communities, Biscayne Bay, Florida: National Park Service.

  224. Todd, V., Lavallin, E. & Macreadie, P., 2018. Quantitative analysis of fish and invertebrate assemblage dynamics in association with a North Sea oil and gas installation complex. Marine Environmental Research, 142, 69–79. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.09.018

  225. Trethewy, M., Mayer-Pinto, M. & Dafforn, K.A., 2023. Urban shading and artificial light at night alter natural light regimes and affect marine intertidal assemblages. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 193. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115203

  226. Turner, T., 2020. The marine sponge Hymeniacidon perlevis is a globally-distributed exotic species. Aquatic Invasions, 15 (4), 542–561. DOI http://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2020.15.4.01

  227. UKTAG, 2014. UK Technical Advisory Group on the Water Framework Directive [online]. Available from: http://www.wfduk.org

  228. Vacelet, J., 1994. Control of the severe sponge epidemic—Near East and Europe: Algeria, Cyprus, Egypt, Lebanon, Malta, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey. Yugoslavia. Technical Report–the struggle against the epidemic which is decimating Mediterranean sponges FI: TCP/RAB/8853. Rome, Italy. 1–39 p,  pp.

  229. Vad, J., Kazanidis, G., Henry, L.-A., Jones, D.O.B., Tendal, O.S., Christiansen, S., Henry, T.B. & Roberts, J.M., 2018. Chapter Two - Potential Impacts of Offshore Oil and Gas Activities on Deep-Sea Sponges and the Habitats They Form. In Sheppard, C. (ed.) Advances in Marine Biology: Academic Press, pp. 33–60. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.amb.2018.01.001

  230. Valentine, P.C., Carman, M.R., Blackwood, D.S. & Heffron, E.J., 2007a. Ecological observations on the colonial ascidian Didemnum sp. in a New England tide pool habitat. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 342 (1), 109-121. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.021

  231. Valentine, P.C., Collie, J.S., Reid, R.N., Asch, R.G., Guida, V.G. & Blackwood, D.S., 2007b. The occurrence of the colonial ascidian Didemnum sp. on Georges Bank gravel habitat — Ecological observations and potential effects on groundfish and scallop fisheries. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 342 (1), 179-181. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.038

  232. Van Dolah, R.F., Wendt, P.H. & Nicholson, N., 1987. Effects of a research trawl on a hard-bottom assemblage of sponges and corals. Fisheries Research, 5 (1), 39-54.

  233. Van Soest, R.W.M., Picton, B. & Morrow, C., 2000. Sponges of the North East Atlantic. [CD-ROM] Windows version 1.0. Amsterdam: Biodiversity Center of ETI, Multimedia Interactive Software. [World Biodiversity Database CD-ROM Series.]

  234. Vaquer-Sunyer, R. & Duarte, C.M., 2008. Thresholds of hypoxia for marine biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 15452.

  235. Veale, L.O., Hill, A.S., Hawkins, S.J. & Brand, A.R., 2000. Effects of long term physical disturbance by scallop fishing on subtidal epifaunal assemblages and habitats. Marine Biology, 137, 325-337.

  236. Vercaemer, B., Sephton, D., Clément, P., Harman, A., Stewart-Clark, S. & DiBacco, C., 2015. Distribution of the non-indigenous colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum (Kott, 2002) in the Bay of Fundy and on offshore banks, eastern Canada. Management of Biological Invasions, 6, 385-394. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2015.6.4.07

  237. Vethaak, A.D., Cronie, R.J.A. & van Soest, R.W.M., 1982. Ecology and distribution of two sympatric, closely related sponge species, Halichondria panicea (Pallas, 1766) and H. bowerbanki Burton, 1930 (Porifera, Demospongiae), with remarks on their speciation. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 52, 82-102.

  238. Voet, H.E.E., Van Colen, C. & Vanaverbeke, J., 2022. Climate change effects on the ecophysiology and ecological functioning of an offshore wind farm artificial hard substrate community. Science of the Total Environment, 810. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152194

  239. Wahl, M., 1984. The fluffy sea anemone Metridium senile in periodically oxygen depleted surroundings. Marine Biology, 81, 81-86.

  240. Wahl, M., 1985. The recolonization potential of Metridium senile in an area previously depopulated by oxygen deficiency. Oecologia, 67, 255-259.

  241. Webster, N.S., 2007. Sponge disease: a global threat? Environmental Microbiology, 9 (6), 1363-1375.

  242. Webster, N.S. & Taylor, M.W., 2012. Marine sponges and their microbial symbionts: love and other relationships. Environmental Microbiology, 14 (2), 335-346.

  243. Webster, N.S., Botté, E.S., Soo, R.M. & Whalan, S., 2011. The larval sponge holobiont exhibits high thermal tolerance. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 3 (6), 756-762.

  244. Webster, N.S., Cobb, R.E. & Negri, A.P., 2008. Temperature thresholds for bacterial symbiosis with a sponge. The ISME Journal, 2 (8), 830-842.

  245. Whomersley, P. & Picken, G., 2003. Long-term dynamics of fouling communities found on offshore installations in the North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK, 83 (5), 897-901.

  246. Wood. C., 2005. Seasearch guide to sea anemones and corals of Britain and Ireland. Ross-on-Wye: Marine Conservation Society.

  247. Wulff, J., 2006. Resistance vs recovery: morphological strategies of coral reef sponges. Functional Ecology, 20 (4), 699-708.

  248. Zahn, R., Zahn, G., Müller, W., Kurelec, B., Rijavec, M., Batel, R. & Given, R., 1981. Assessing consequences of marine pollution by hydrocarbons using sponges as model organisms. Science of The Total Environment, 20 (2), 147-169.

Citation

This review can be cited as:

Readman, J.A.J. 2016. Crustose sponges and colonial ascidians with Dendrodoa grossularia or barnacles on wave-surged infralittoral rock. In Tyler-Walters H. Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. [cited 12-07-2026]. Available from: https://www.marlin.ac.uk/habitat/detail/1140

 Download PDF version

Last Updated: 07/07/2016