Kurtiella bidentata and Thyasira spp. in circalittoral muddy mixed sediment

Summary

UK and Ireland classification

Description

In moderately exposed or sheltered, circalittoral muddy sands and gravels a community characterized by the bivalves Thyasira spp. (often Thyasira flexuosa), Mysella bidentata and Prionospio fallax may develop. Infaunal polychaetes such as Lumbrineris gracilis, Chaetozone setosa and Scoloplos armiger are also common in this community whilst amphipods such as Ampelisca spp. and the cumacean Eudorella truncatula may also be found in some areas. The brittlestar Amphiura filiformis may also be abundant at some sites. Conspicuous epifauna may include encrusting bryozoans Escharella spp. particularly Escharella immersa and, in shallower waters, maerl (Phymatolithon calcareum), although at very low abundances and not forming maerl beds (JNCC, 2015)

Depth range

10-20 m, 20-30 m, 30-50 m, 50-100 m

Additional information

-

Listed By

Habitat review

Ecology

Ecological and functional relationships

Deposit feeding and filter feeding represent the two fundamental feeding methods among the fauna of mud and sand (Eltringham, 1971). The community associated with SS.SMx.CMx.MysThyMx is dominated by deposit feeders such as Scoloplos armiger, Prionospio fallax, Chaetozone setosa, Spiophanes bombyx and Owenia fusiformis that exploit the high levels of organic material. Polychaete worms are dominant infaunal predators that actively pursue prey and are generally opportunistic although they may have size preferences (Elliott et al., 1998). Nephtys sp. are usually considered to be carnivorous although they may also scavenge dead material. Both Nephtys spp. and Lumbrineris fragilis may feed on the larvae of Kurtiella bidentata (Ockelmann & Muus, 1978). Other carnivorous worms include Pholoe inornata and Goniada maculata. Sandier sediment will contain animals such as Amphiura filiformis, the large tube dwelling polychaete Lanice conchilega and other polychaetes such as Goniada maculata (Hughes, 1998b). Amphiura filiformis is both a suspension and deposit feeder. It feeds on suspended material in flowing water, but will change to deposit feeding in stagnant water or areas of very low water flow (Ockelmann & Muus, 1978). It feeds on faecal pellets, diatoms, zooplankton and bits of meat (Ockelmann & Muus, 1978). In coarser sediment assemblages, the proportion of suspension feeding species will increase. Other suspension feeders include the bivalves Kurtiella bidentata and Thyasira sp. which characterize the biotope. Kurtiella bidentata has also been described as an indirect deposit feeder (O'Foighill et al., 1984). Thyasira flexuosa has endosymbiotic bacteria within its gills which probably contribute to its nutrition (López-Jamar et al., 1987).

Kurtiella bidentata is a very small (ca 3 mm) bivalve. Ockelmann & Muus (1978) reported a significant association between Kurtiella bidentata and Amphiura filiformis. The bivalve lives in the oxidized layers around the brittlestar's burrow. Not only does this offer the bivalve protection from surface predators but it can steal food collected by Amphiura filiformis thereby offering it an additional food source (Ockelmann & Muus, 1978). The depth distribution of Kurtiella bidentata was found to depend on that of the Amphiura although in shallow depths in sandy bottoms, and without Amphiura, the bivalve is free-living. The authors also reported that in shallower water without the Amphiura, mortality rate was so high that the number of larvae produced was smaller than the numbers of larvae actually settling in a deeper assemblage with Amphiura. Kurtiella bidentata rarely leaves the burrow of its host. It is possible that it may survive without its normal host species but probably only if another host species is found that also benefits the commensal (Ockelmann & Muus, 1978).

Given the depth at which the biotope has been recorded, algae are limited to a few red algal species including Hildenbrandia rubra, Corallinaceae, and Phymatolithon calcareum, that may or may not be present. The maerl Phymatolithon calcareum, although at very low abundances and not forming beds (Connor et al., 2004), may nevertheless provide some complexity to the substratum (see Habitat Complexity).

Seasonal and longer term change

Given the depth of SS.SMx.CMx.MysMx it is unlikely to be greatly affected by winter storms that would significantly alter the structure of shallower mixed sediment communities. Also, because of the lack of ephemeral algal species, little change is to be expected in terms of floral growth. The most likely source of seasonal changes is species composition because many of the smaller short lived species such as Chaetozone setosa will die off over the winter months and, therefore, species diversity will be expected to decrease in winter.

Habitat structure and complexity

Physical habitat complexity:
  • The mixed nature of the substratum will provide this sedimentary biotope with some heterogeneity. Empty bivalve shells, polychaete tubes and the occasional piece of maerl will also contribute to this complexity and lead to patchiness among the biotope. However, this complexity is on a small scale and no massive structures such as boulders or large erect algal species are likely to be present.
  • Below the sediment surface, the burrows and tubes, and the bioturbating activity of various bivalve and polychaete species will result in the mixing of sediment and the transfer of oxygenated water deeper into the sediment and, hence, increased microbial activity and breakdown of organic material. The feeding tubes of Thyasira spp., for example, often extended into the anoxic layer (Oliver & Killeen, 2002).
  • Muddy sands have a high organic content resulting from the settlement of organic detritus and growth of heterotrophic autotrophic micro-organisms. They also have a high microbial population and high sediment stability due to cohesion. They clay mineral particles provide a massive surface area for microbial growth (M. Kendall, pers. comm.). Allochthonous organic material is derived from anthropogenic activity (e.g. sewerage) and natural sources (e.g. plankton, detritus). Autochthonous organic material is formed by benthic microalgae (microphytobenthos e.g. diatoms and euglenoids) and heterotrophic micro-organism production. Although the surface may be well oxygenated, poor oxygenation lower down in the muds results in low degradation rates and the accumulation of organic material. The mucilaginous secretions of microphytobenthos and bacteria may stabilize the sediment.
  • High levels of organic material support large microbial populations. The high oxygen demand of their activity, combined with the fact that much of the sediment is poorly oxygenated, means that much of the organic material undergoes anaerobic degradation releasing hydrogen sulphide, methane and ammonia, together with dissolved organic materials, which can be used by aerobic surface bacteria. Anaerobic degradation produces reducing conditions forming a 'black' layer, the depth of which depends on the depth to which oxygen can permeate (Elliot et al., 1998). Chemoautotrophs are present in the reducing layer and at depth (Libes, 1992).
Factors affecting complexity:
  • Given the depth of the biotope, biological forces, e.g. bioturbation, are the dominant factors structuring the substratum as opposed to physical factors such as wave action.
  • Decreasing wave exposure is associated with finer sediments which, in turn, support a greater proportion of deposit feeders. Deposit feeders dominate over suspension feeders in areas with high percentages of silt.
  • Competitive interactions can play a significant role in determining the temporal and spatial abundance of macrobenthos in muddy sand communities (Peterson, 1977). Organisms may compete for, for example, space and / or food and competitive exclusion may occur. Experimental manipulation revealed that the total abundance of three tube-building polychaetes negatively affected the abundance of a burrowing polychaete (Woodin, 1974). Within particular trophic guilds (feeding types), competition may result in resource partitioning (Fenchel, 1972).
  • The substratum characteristics may be modified by organisms. Spionid tubes and microphytobenthic mats, for example, may stabilize the sediment surface whereas excessive reworking of the sediment (bioturbation) by mobile infauna may destabilize the sediment. Biosedimentation may increase supply of sediment from the water column, e.g. through the activity of suspension feeders such as Thyasira flexuosa. Bioturbation by burrowing infauna such as rework sediment bringing material and nutrients to the surface while allowing oxygenated water to reach deeper sediment (Elliott et al., 1998; see Hall, 1994 for review).

Productivity

The subtidal sediments associated with SS.SMx.CMx.MysThyMx may not have particularly high productivity although no information was found. Allochthonous organic material is derived from anthropogenic activity (e.g. sewerage) and natural sources (e.g. plankton, detritus). Autochthonous organic material is formed by benthic microalgae (microphytobenthos e.g. diatoms and euglenoids) and heterotrophic micro-organism production. Organic material is degraded by micro-organisms and the nutrients recycled. The high surface area of fine particles provides a surface for microflora. Microphytobenthos, water-column phytoplankton and deep sediment chemoautotrophs provide primary productivity to sediments. However, due to the depth of SS.SMx.CMx.MysThyMx, few algal species are found and most macrofauna productivity is secondary, derived from detritus and organic material.

Recruitment processes

The main features of the key characterizing and important species have been listed below in addition to those of some other polychaetes likely to be found in this biotope.
  • The information on Kurtiella bidentata is taken entirely from O'Foighill et al. (1984) unless otherwise stated. Larvae are planktonic for about 4 weeks giving the species a high dispersal potential, depending on the local hydrographic regime. Reproduction in this species is reported to include mechanisms such as alternate hermaphroditism and brooding. In their first year, both males and hermaphrodites can be found and from the second year onwards only hermaphrodites were present. Fecundity is estimated to be approximately 1000 embryos per large individual. In the Øresund, Ockelmann & Muus (1978) reported egg development between November and February, spawning between July and September, larval release between June & October and main settlement between August and November. In Galway Bay, Ireland, Kurtiella bidentata was reported to recruit between August and October (O'Foighill et al., 1984). It is not known at what age this species becomes sexually mature.
  • Thyasira flexuosa has an extended spawning period and peak settlement was found to be between April and May in the Ría de la Coruña, north-west Spain. Thorson (1936) stated that the species produce very large eggs and that the pelagic stage was very short if not absent. In the Ría de la Coruña peak settlement occurred between April and May although there can be two peaks of recruitment per year. It is not known at what age this species becomes sexually mature.
  • O'Connor (pers. Comm. In Duineveld et al., 1987) reported that ripe female Amphiura filiformis can produce a total of 50,000 oocytes. In Galway Bay, Ireland a discrete, relatively short annual breeding period (Jun-Sep) was observed with peak activity in August (Bowmer, 1982). In the same area O'Conner & McGrath (1980) observed that all large animals spawned during August/September in two consecutive years. Buchanan (1964) reported that Amphiura filiformis breeds in July in Britain. Ockelmann & Muus (1978) reported that the species may spawn a couple of time a year. Descriptions of the life history of Amphiura filiformis vary greatly in the literature. For example, in a study of Amphiura filiformis populations in Galway Bay over a period of 2 years, O'Conner & McGrath (1980) were not able to identify discrete periods of recruitment. However, other studies suggest autumn recruitment (Buchanan, 1964) and spring and autumn (Glémarec, 1979). Muus (1981) shows the mortality of these settlers to be extremely high with less than 5% contributing to the adult population in any given year. In Galway Bay populations, small individuals make up ca. 5% of the population in any given month, which also suggests the actual level of input into the adult population is extremely low (O'Connor et al., 1983). Gerdes (1977) calculated that dispersal to a location 10 km away was within the reach of the larvae. However, dispersal is largely determined by water movements and currents. The species is thought to have a long pelagic life.
  • Spiophanes bombyx is regarded as a typical 'r' selecting species with a short lifespan, high dispersal potential and high reproductive rate (Kröncke, 1990; Niermann et al., 1990). It is often found at the early successional stages of variable, unstable habitats that it is quick to colonize following perturbation (Pearson & Rosenberg, 1978). Its larval dispersal phase may allow the species to colonize remote habitats.
  • Chaetozone setosa has annual episodic reproduction although not much else is known about it. Its reproductive period varies with location even on a small scale: spawning in Northumberland ranged from Feb-April or Nov-Jan in intertidal populations to Nov-Dec in a subtidal population (Christie, 1985). June-Sept in English Channel (Hily, 1987). Adults with eggs were found all year in Bay of Brest. Curtis (1977) suggested that a population from west Greenland had direct development. They mature within their first year.
  • Two types of development have been reported in Scoloplos armiger: a holobenthic type and a pelagic larvae. The holobenthic type crawls out from a cocoon fixed on the substratum and burrows immediately, usually associated with intertidal populations in North Sea region and adjacent waters and a pelagic larvae associated with subtidal populations (Kruse et al., 2003; Kruse et al., 2004). At the Isle of Sylt, North Sea, egg cocoons are found on intertidal flats between Feb-April (Kruse et al., 2004). Spawning varies with location. In the North Sea, the main spawning period occurs in March, with a secondary (pelagic) spawn from offshore in Oct (Kruse et al., 2004). At Whitstable, Scoloplos armiger spawned four times in one year, the main spawning period occuring from late Feb-April (Gibbs, 1968).
  • Not much is known about reproduction or recruitment in Prionospio fallax. It reproduces from March to September and the larvae spend ca 6 weeks in the plankton. Prionospio fallax is epitokous.
  • Time for community to reach maturity

    Some species associated with SS.SMx.CMx.MysThyMx, including Spiophanes bombyx, Tharyx marioni and Mediomastus fragilis are considered to be 'r' strategists that have a short lifespan, high dispersal potential and high reproductive rate. This part of the community will most probably mature within one year. However, longer lived species exist within this biotope and can take more than a year to become sexually mature such as Amphiura filiformis. Furthermore, the age at which the two key characterizing species Kurtiella bidentata and Thyasira flexuosa is no known. It is possible that the biotope will mature within about five years although in some circumstance this may take longer.

    Additional information

    -

Preferences & Distribution

Habitat preferences

Depth Range 10-20 m, 20-30 m, 30-50 m, 50-100 m
Water clarity preferencesField Unresearched
Limiting Nutrients Data deficient, Field unresearched
Salinity preferences Full (30-40 psu)
Physiographic preferences Enclosed coast or Embayment, Open coast
Biological zone preferences Circalittoral
Substratum/habitat preferences Muddy gravel, Muddy sand, Muddy sandy gravel
Tidal strength preferences Moderately strong 1 to 3 knots (0.5-1.5 m/sec.), Weak < 1 knot (<0.5 m/sec.)
Wave exposure preferences Moderately exposed, Sheltered
Other preferences

Additional Information

Species composition

Species found especially in this biotope

    Rare or scarce species associated with this biotope

    -

    Additional information

    Sensitivity review

    Sensitivity characteristics of the habitat and relevant characteristic species

    The biotope description and characterizing species are taken from JNCC (2015). The biotope is characterized by moderately exposed or sheltered, circalittoral muddy sands and gravels. The sediments are considered to be a key factors structuring and characterizing the biotope and are therefore considered in the sensitivity assessments for pressures that may lead to changes.  The biological assemblage is characterized by the bivalves Thyasira spp. (often Thyasira flexuosa), Kurtiella bidentata (now Kurtiella bidentata) and the polychaete Prionospio fallax. These are considered the key species characterizing the biotope and the sensitivity assessments concentrate on these species. Infaunal polychaetes such as Lumbrineris gracilis, Chaetozone setosa and Scoloplos armiger are also common in this community whilst amphipods such as Ampelisca spp. and the cumacean Eudorella truncatula may also be found in some areas. The sensitivity of associated species is considered generally. 

    Resilience and recovery rates of habitat

    Hydrological Pressures

    Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

    ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
    Temperature increase (local) [Show more]

    Temperature increase (local)

    Benchmark. A 5°C increase in temperature for one month, or 2°C for one year. Further detail

    Evidence

    Species are widely distributed. Kurtiella bidentata is widespread around the British Isles and its distribution ranges from Norway to west Africa and the Mediterranean (Carter, 2008). Scoloplos armiger is a species complex as is Chaetozone setosa. Both are widely distributed.  Until recently Chaetozone setosa was considered cosmopolitan with records world-wide, from the intertidal zone to the deep sea.  It is now known that there are several species of eyeless Chaetozone in the north-east Atlantic and the worldwide distribution is unclear. Chambers et al., (2007) assessed numerous records of Chaetozone setosa in the north-east Atlantic. The species is frequently found in habitats where the mean minimum winter bottom temperature is 5-10 degrees and the summer maximum is >10oC.

    Thyasira flexuosa does not occur in the southernmost part of the North Sea but is distributed from Norway to the Azores, and extends into the Mediterranean (Tillin & Tyler-Walters, 2014). However, Thyasira populations in the British Isles are restricted to areas where the bottom waters remain cool all year round (Jackson, 2007).

    No specific information concerning temperature tolerances of the biotope and the characterizing species was found, but inferences may be made. For example, Kurtiella bidentata (studied as Mysella bidentata) was recorded in Kinsale Harbour at temperatures ranging from 7.7-18.8°C (O’Brien & Keegan, 2006), and Künitzer (1989) reported that the main factor affecting the growth rate of Kurtiella bidentata (studied as Mysella bidentata) was temperature.

    Sensitivity assessment. The characterizing species of the biotopes are widely distributed and likely to occur both north and south of the British Isles, where typical surface water temperatures vary seasonally from 4-19°C (Huthnance, 2010). No information was found on the maximum temperature tolerated by the characterizing species. Elevated temperatures may affect growth of some of the characterizing species, but no mortality is expected. It is, therefore, likely that Kurtiella bidentata and Thyasira spp. are able to resist a long-term increase in temperature of 2°C. However, Thyasira spp. may suffer some mortality as a result of an acute increase in temperature so resistance is therefore assessed as ‘Medium’ (loss <25%). Resilience is likely to be ‘High’ so the biotopes are considered to have ‘Low’ sensitivity to an increase in temperature at the pressure benchmark.  

    Medium
    High
    Low
    Medium
    Help
    High
    High
    Medium
    Medium
    Help
    Low
    High
    Low
    Medium
    Help
    Temperature decrease (local) [Show more]

    Temperature decrease (local)

    Benchmark. A 5°C decrease in temperature for one month, or 2°C for one year. Further detail

    Evidence

    There is no information on the response of the biotopes to a decrease in temperature. Species are widely distributed. Kurtiella bidentata ranges from Norway to west Africa and the Mediterranean (Carter, 2008). Thyasira flexuosa does not occur in the southernmost part of the North Sea but is distributed from Norway to the Azores, and extends into the Mediterranean (Tillin & Tyler-Walters, 2014). However, Thyasira populations in the British Isles are restricted to areas where the bottom waters remain cool all year round (Jackson, 2007). No specific information on temperature tolerances of Thyasira spp. was found.

    Kurtiella bidentata (studied as Mysella bidentata) was among the species that suffered high losses that could be related to low temperatures in the Wadden Sea area in 1979, where temperature was 3 degrees below average for 3 months (Beukema, 1979).

    Scoloplos armiger is a species complex as is Chaetozone setosa. Both are widely distributed.  Until recently Chaetozone setosa was considered cosmopolitan with records world-wide, from the intertidal zone to the deep sea.  It is now known that there are several species of eyeless Chaetozone spp. in the north-east Atlantic and the worldwide distribution is unclear. Chambers et al., (2007) assessed numerous records of Chaetozone setosa in the north-east Atlantic. The species is frequently found in habitats where the mean minimum winter bottom temperature is 5-10 oC and the summer maximum is  >10 oC.

    Sensitivity assessment. The characterizing species of the biotope are widely distributed and likely to occur both north and south of the British Isles, where typical surface water temperatures vary seasonally from 4-19°C (Huthnance, 2010). Although no information was found on the minimum temperature tolerated by the characterizing species, it is likely that Kurtiella bidentata and Thyasira spp. are able to resist a long-term decrease in temperature of 2°C. However, the characterizing species Kurtiella bidentata may suffer some mortality as a result of an acute decrease in temperature so resistance is, therefore, assessed as ‘Low’ (25-75% loss) and resilience is likely to be ‘High' so the biotopes are considered to have ‘Low’ sensitivity to a decrease in temperature at the pressure benchmark level.

    Low
    High
    High
    Medium
    Help
    High
    High
    Low
    Medium
    Help
    Low
    High
    Low
    Medium
    Help
    Salinity increase (local) [Show more]

    Salinity increase (local)

    Benchmark. A increase in one MNCR salinity category above the usual range of the biotope or habitat. Further detail

    Evidence

    This biotope occurs in full salinity (JNCC, 2015). No directly relevant evidence was found to assess this pressure. A study from the Canary Islands indicates that exposure to high salinity effluents (47- 50 psu) from desalination plants alter the structure of biological assemblages, reducing species richness and abundance (Riera et al., 2012). Bivalves and amphipods appear to be less tolerant of increased salinity than polychaetes and were largely absent at the point of discharge. Polychaetes, including the genera Lumbrineris spp. and Scoloplos armiger that occur in this biotope, were present at the discharge point (Riera et al., 2012). However, in the western Baltic Sea, Scoloplos armiger abundance was greatest between 12 psu and 17 psu and reduced abundance with increasing salinity was observed (Gogina et al., 2010). As Scoloplos armiger is a species complex and is not a cosmopolitan species, there may be differences in tolerances between populations.

    Sensitivity assessment. It is likely that key components of the biotopes communities would not be resistant of an increase in salinity to >40 psu. Resistance is therefore assessed as ‘Low’ (loss of 25-75%) but with low confidence. Once normal conditions are resumed, resilience is probably ‘High’ so that sensitivity is therefore assessed as ‘Low’.

    Low
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help
    High
    High
    Low
    Medium
    Help
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Salinity decrease (local) [Show more]

    Salinity decrease (local)

    Benchmark. A decrease in one MNCR salinity category above the usual range of the biotope or habitat. Further detail

    Evidence

    According to OBIS data (OBIS, 2014), the minimum and maximum range of salinities for the characterizing species are 18.6 - 38.6 pps for Kurtiella bidentata. This data suggests Kurtiella bidentata are able to tolerate wider salinity ranges, which confirm records of Kurtiella bidentata (studied as Mysella bidentata) in Kinsale Harbour at salinities ranging from 19.3-35 (O’Brien & Keegan, 2006). However, Gogina et al. (2010a) reported that Kurtiella bidentata (studied as Mysella bidentata) showed a strong positive correlation with salinity varying at a factor of 8.30-27.10 psu.

    Thyasira spp. inhabit waters of reduced salinity with 25-30 psu being optimal. However, adults exposed to lower than optimal salinities produced non-viable or slow developing eggs (Jackson, 2007). No evidence for adult salinity tolerance was found.

    Sensitivity assessment. The evidence presented suggests that Thyasira flexuosa are unlikely to tolerate a decrease in salinity at the pressure benchmark level. Resistance is therefore assessed as 'Low' (loss of 25-75%) but with low confidence. Once normal conditions are resumed, resilience is probably 'High' so that sensitivity is therefore assessed as 'Low'.

    Low
    High
    Medium
    Low
    Help
    High
    High
    Low
    Medium
    Help
    Low
    High
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Water flow (tidal current) changes (local) [Show more]

    Water flow (tidal current) changes (local)

    Benchmark. A change in peak mean spring bed flow velocity of between 0.1 m/s to 0.2 m/s for more than one year. Further detail

    Evidence

    This biotope is recorded in areas where tidal flow varies between moderately strong (0.5-1.5 m/s) and weak (>0.5 m/s) (JNCC, 2015).

    Sensitivity assessment. This biotope occurs in areas subject to moderately strong and weak water flows, a change at the pressure benchmark (increase or decrease)  is unlikely to affect biotopes that occur in mid-range flows and biotope resistance is therefore assessed as ‘High’;  resilience is assessed as ‘High’ (by default) and the biotope is considered to be ‘Not sensitive’.

    High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Not sensitive
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Emergence regime changes [Show more]

    Emergence regime changes

    Benchmark.  1) A change in the time covered or not covered by the sea for a period of ≥1 year or 2) an increase in relative sea level or decrease in high water level for ≥1 year. Further detail

    Evidence

    'Not relevant' to sublittoral biotopes.

    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Wave exposure changes (local) [Show more]

    Wave exposure changes (local)

    Benchmark. A change in near shore significant wave height of >3% but <5% for more than one year. Further detail

    Evidence

    As this biotope occurs in circalittoral habitats, it is not directly exposed to the action of breaking waves.  Associated polychaete species that burrow are protected within the sediment but the characterizing bivalves would be exposed to oscillatory water flows at the seabed. They and other associated species may be indirectly affected by changes in water movement where these impact the supply of food or larvae or other processes. No specific evidence was found to assess this pressure.

    Sensitivity assessment. The range of wave exposures experienced by SS.SMx.CMx.MysThyMx is considered to indicate, by proxy, that the biotope would have ‘High’ resistance and by default ‘High’ resilience to a change in significant wave height at the pressure benchmark. The biotope is therefore classed as ‘Not sensitive’.

    High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Not sensitive
    High
    High
    High
    Help

    Chemical Pressures

    Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

    ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
    Transition elements & organo-metal contamination [Show more]

    Transition elements & organo-metal contamination

    Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

    Evidence

    This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available.

    No evidence was found for the key bivalve species. The capacity of bivalves to accumulate heavy metals in their tissues, far in excess of environmental levels, is well known. Reactions to sub-lethal levels of heavy metal stressors include siphon retraction, valve closure, inhibition of byssal thread production, disruption of burrowing behaviour, inhibition of respiration, inhibition of filtration rate, inhibition of protein synthesis and suppressed growth (see review by Aberkali & Trueman, 1985). Bryan (1984) states that Hg is the most toxic metal to bivalve molluscs while Cu, Cd and Zn seem to be most problematic in the field. In bivalve molluscs, Hg was reported to have the highest toxicity, mortalities occurring above 0.1-1 g/l after 4-14 days exposure (Crompton, 1997), toxicity decreasing from Hg > Cu and Cd > Zn > Pb and As > Cr ( in bivalve larvae, Hg and Cu > Zn > Cd, Pb, As, and Ni > to Cr).

    Experimental studies with various species suggests that polychaete worms are generally quite tolerant of heavy metals (Bryan, 1984). Rygg (1985) classified Prionospio cirrifera as non-tolerant of Cu (species only occasionally found at stations in Norwegian fjords where copper concentrations were >200 ppm (mg/kg). Total faunal abundance and the density of the polychaete Prionospio cirrifera also decreased significantly at experimentally enriched sediment Cu concentrations of 300 mg/kg (Olsgard, 1999). However, Prionospio malmgreni appeared to be moderately tolerant and were present at some stations in Norwegian fjords with Cu concentrations >200 ppm (mg/kg).

    Not Assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Hydrocarbon & PAH contamination [Show more]

    Hydrocarbon & PAH contamination

    Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

    Evidence

    This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available.

    Suchanek (1993) reviewed the effects of oil spills on marine invertebrates and concluded that, in general, on soft sediment habitats, infaunal polychaetes, bivalves and amphipods were particularly affected. Sub-lethal concentrations may produce substantially reduced feeding rates and/or food detection ability, probably due to ciliary inhibition. Respiration rates may increase at low concentrations and decrease at high concentrations. Generally, contact with oil causes an increase in energy expenditure and a decrease in feeding rate, resulting in less energy available for growth and reproduction. However, the Abra alba population affected by the 1978 Amoco Cadiz benefited from the nutrient enrichment caused by the oil pollution. The biomass of the fine-sand community remained low in 1979, a year after the spill, owing to the decimation of the Ampelisca amphipod population, but the biomass then doubled as a result of an increase in Abra alba abundance in 1980 and Abra alba remained a dominant species over the 20 year duration over which recovery of the community was monitored (Dauvin, 1998).

    After a major spill of fuel oil in West Virginia Capitella increased dramatically alongside large increases in Polydora ligni and Prionospio sp. (Sanders et al. 1972, cited in Gray 1979). Prionospio fallax is characteristic of sediments enriched with hydrocarbons (May & Pearson, 1975; cited in Hiscock et al., 2004).

    Not Assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Synthetic compound contamination [Show more]

    Synthetic compound contamination

    Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

    Evidence

    This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available.

    Not Assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Radionuclide contamination [Show more]

    Radionuclide contamination

    Benchmark. An increase in 10µGy/h above background levels. Further detail

    Evidence

    No evidence.

    No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Introduction of other substances [Show more]

    Introduction of other substances

    Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

    Evidence

    This pressure is Not assessed.

    Not Assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    De-oxygenation [Show more]

    De-oxygenation

    Benchmark. Exposure to dissolved oxygen concentration of less than or equal to 2 mg/l for one week (a change from WFD poor status to bad status). Further detail

    Evidence

    A number of animals have behavioural strategies to survive periodic events of reduced dissolved oxygen. These include shell closure and reduced metabolic rate in bivalve molluscs and either decreased burrowing depth or emergence from burrows for sediment dwelling crustaceans, molluscs and annelids.

    At oxygen concentrations below ca 0.4 mg O2/l, Kurtiella bidentata eventually emerged from the substratum (Ockelmann & Muus, 1978). Nilsson & Rosenberg (1994) investigated hypoxic responses of benthic communities and reported Kurtiella bidentata (studied as Mysella bidentata) leaving the sediment at oxygen concentrations of 1.7 mg/l. According to the authors, this is a behaviour that occurs at hypoxic oxygen concentrations slightly higher than those causing mortality, suggesting high levels of stress caused to the organisms. For Kurtiella bidentata (studied as Mysella bidentata), the median sub-lethal oxygen concentrations reported in experimental assessments was 1 mg/l, and for Abra spp. was 0.57 mg/l (Vaquer-Sunyer & Duarte, 2008, references therein).

    López-Jamar et al. (1987) stated that Thyasira flexuosa is adapted to living in reduced sediments and also is found in organically enriched sediments. However, Dando & Spiro (1993, cited in Riley, 2008) found that numbers of the congeners Thyasira equalis and Thyasira sarsi decreased rapidly following the de-oxygenation of bottom water in the deep basin of the Gullmar fjord in 1979-80.

    Rosenberg et al. (1991) exposed benthic species from the north east Atlantic to oxygen concentrations of around 1 mg/l for several weeks, including species of small bivalves. After 11 days in hypoxic conditions, bivalve individuals were still alive, although individuals showed increased stretching of siphons out of the sediment. In a meta-analysis study of hypoxia, median sub-lethal oxygen concentrations were reported from experimental assessments of tolerance. Although no specific data was reported for all the characterizing species of these biotopes, the thresholds of hypoxia for different benthic groups was LC50 1.42 mg/l for bivalves, and SLC50 of 1.20 mg/l for annelids (Vaquer-Sunyer & Duarte, 2008, references therein).

    Further evidence of sensitivity was available for some of the polychaete species associated with this biotope. Rabalais et al. (2001) observed that hypoxic conditions in the north Coast of the Gulf of Mexico (oxygen concentrations from 1.5 to 1 mg/l (1 to 0.7 ml/l) led to the emergence of  Lumbrineris sp. from the substrate these then lie motionless on the surface. Prionospio spp. are often dominant in areas subject to hypoxia/anoxia (Gooday et al., 2009; Ingole, 2010).

    Sensitivity assessment: Cole et al. (1999) suggest possible adverse effects on marine species below 4 mg/l and probable adverse effects below 2 mg/l. Different species in the biotope will have varying responses to de-oxygenation. Based on the evidence presented, the characterizing species are likely to only be affected by severe de-oxygenation episodes. Resistance to de-oxygenation at the pressure benchmark level is likely to be 'High'. Resilience is assessed as 'High' (by default) and the biotope is therefore considered 'Not sensitive' to exposure to dissolved oxygen concentration of less than or equal to 2 mg/l for 1 week.

    High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Not sensitive
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Nutrient enrichment [Show more]

    Nutrient enrichment

    Benchmark. Compliance with WFD criteria for good status. Further detail

    Evidence

    This pressure relates to increased levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and silicon in the marine environment compared to background concentrations. The pressure benchmark is set at compliance with Water Framework Directive (WFD) criteria for good status, based on nitrogen concentration (UKTAG, 2014).  Increased nutrients are most likely to affect abundance of phytoplankton which may include toxic algae (OSPAR, 2009b). This primary effect resulting from elevated nutrients will impact upon other biological elements or features (e.g. toxins produced by phytoplankton blooms or de-oxygenation of sediments) and may lead to ‘undesirable disturbance’ to the structure and functioning of the ecosystem. With enhanced primary productivity in the water column, organic detritus that falls to the seabed may also be enhanced, which may be utilized by the deposit feeders in the community.

    In a report to identify seabed indicator species to support implementation of the EU habitats and water framework directives Kurtiella bidentata, have been reported as likely to be favoured by nutrient enrichment.

    Sensitivity assessment. At the pressure benchmark, the biotope is considered to have ‘High’ resistance to this pressure and ‘High’ resilience, (by default) and is assessed as ‘Not sensitive’.

    High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help
    High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Not sensitive
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Organic enrichment [Show more]

    Organic enrichment

    Benchmark. A deposit of 100 gC/m2/yr. Further detail

    Evidence

    Many of the species present are deposit feeders characteristic of organically enriched areas. An input of organic matter at the pressure benchmark is likely to provide a food subsidy to these species.

    Thyasira spp. are characteristic of organically enriched offshore sediments with Capitella capitata (Connor et al., 2004) and have been identified as a ‘progressive’ species, i.e. one that shows increased abundance under slight organic enrichment (Leppakoski, 1975, cited in Gray, 1979). In the development of the AMBI index to assess disturbance (including organic enrichment), both Borja et al. (2000) and Gittenberger & Van Loon (2011) assigned Thyasira flexuosa to their Ecological Group III (defined as ‘species tolerant to excess organic matter enrichment. These species may occur under normal conditions, but their populations are stimulated by organic enrichment (slight unbalance situations)’. Kurtiella bidentata (referred to as Mysella bidnetata) was characterized as AMBI Group I - 'Species very sensitive to organic enrichment and present under unpolluted conditions (initial state)' (Gittenberger & Van Loon, 2011). The evidence for the assessments of Kurtiella bidentata was not identified.

    Spionid polychaetes are surface deposit feeders and an increase in food at the pressure benchmark could lead to an increase in abundance. Pronospio spp. has been identified as a ‘progressive’ species, i.e. one that shows increased abundance under slight organic enrichment (Leppakoski, 1975, cited in Gray, 1979). Hiscock et al. (2004) also identified Prionospio spp. as increasing under conditions of organic enrichment based on Pearson (1975), Beneath fishfarms, Prionospio spp. were among the most abundant species and in analysis were responsible for differences between those stations and the control condition (Terlizzi et al., 2010), i.e. populations were enhanced beneath stations. Elias et al. (2005) identified Prionospio spp. as an indicator species of organic enrichment in samples collected during the summer season off Mar del Plata City in Argentina. Weston (1990) found high densities of Prionospio cirrifera within organically enriched sediments directly beneath a large aquaculture (although higher densities were found at stations at greater distancesfrom the farm with lower enrichment levels). The Pearson and Black (2001) model of benthic faunal succession from sedimentary loadings (following cessation of fish farming) indicate that Prionospio fallax  would be expected to be found in moderately enriched sediments (after about 9 months).

    Chaetezone setosa and cumaceans were typical of enriched sites off the coast of Barcelona that were subject to effluents and sludge disposal from treatment plants (Corbera & Cardell, 1995).

    Borja et al. (2000) assessed relative sensitivity of Scoloplos armiger as an ABMI Ecological Group II species (indifferent/tolerant to enrichment). Identified as a ‘progressive’ species, i.e. one that shows increased abundance under slight organic enrichment (Leppakoski, 1975, cited in Gray, 1979).

    At high levels of organic input,decreases in abundance of more sensitive species such as Kurtiella bidentata may lead to shifts in community composition towards a biotope dominated by tolerant species, such as polychaete worms (Pearson & Rosenberg, 1978). This could lead to biotope reclassification to the enriched SS.SMu.OMu.CapThy. However, this is likely to occur at levels greater than the pressure benchmark. The Marine Ecosystems Research Laboratory studied the fate and effects of sewage solids added to mesocosms.  Organic loading rates less than 36 gC/m2/yr had little effect, rates between 36 and 365 gC/m2/yr  enriched the sediment community, and a loading over 548 gC/m2/yr  produced degraded conditions (Kelly & Nixon, 1984; Frithsen et al., 1987; Oviatt et al., 1987; Maughan & Oviatt, 1993, cited from Cromey et al., 1998). 

    Sensitivity assessment. The evidence presented suggests that the majority of the characterizing and associated species in the biotopes are likely to be able to utilize additional organic load as food and are present in enriched habitats. Biotope resistance is therefore assessed as ‘High’ and resilience as ‘high’ so that the biotope is assessed as ‘Not sensitive’.

    High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Not sensitive
    High
    High
    High
    Help

    Physical Pressures

    Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

    ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
    Physical loss (to land or freshwater habitat) [Show more]

    Physical loss (to land or freshwater habitat)

    Benchmark. A permanent loss of existing saline habitat within the site. Further detail

    Evidence

    All marine habitats and benthic species are considered to have a resistance of None to this pressure and to be unable to recover from a permanent loss of habitat (resilience is 'Very low'). Sensitivity within the direct spatial footprint of this pressure is,therefore, 'High'. Although no specific evidence is described confidence in this assessment is ‘High’ due to the incontrovertible nature of this pressure.

    None
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Very Low
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Physical change (to another seabed type) [Show more]

    Physical change (to another seabed type)

    Benchmark. Permanent change from sedimentary or soft rock substrata to hard rock or artificial substrata or vice-versa. Further detail

    Evidence

    If the sediment that characterizes the biotopes were replaced with rock or artificial hard substrata, this would represent a fundamental change to the physical character of the biotopes. The characterizing species would no longer be supported and the biotope would be lost and/or re-classified.

    Sensitivity assessment. Resistance to the pressure is considered to be 'None', and resilience 'Very low', as the change at the pressure benchmark is permanent. Sensitivity has been assessed as 'High'. Although no specific evidence is described, confidence in this assessment is ‘High’ due to the incontrovertible nature of this pressure and the agreement between classification schemes on the substratum type.

    None
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Very Low
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Physical change (to another sediment type) [Show more]

    Physical change (to another sediment type)

    Benchmark. Permanent change in one Folk class (based on UK SeaMap simplified classification). Further detail

    Evidence

    This biotope is found in muddy sand and gravel (JNCC, 2015). The change referred to at the pressure benchmark is a change in sediment classification (based on Long, 2006) rather than a change in the finer-scale original Folk categories (Folk, 1954).  For mixed sediments, resistance is assessed based on a change to either coarse sediments or sand and muddy sands or mud and sandy muds. The characterizing species within these biotopes have wide ranges of sediment preferences. Kurtiella bidentata lives in muddy sand or fine gravel (Carter, 2008), while Thyasira spp. prefer fine sediments including mud, muddy sand and sandy mud (Jackson, 2007).

    Sensitivity assessment:  A change in Folk class from mixed sediments to mud and sandy mud to sand or muddy sand would probably not eliminate the characterizing species which all have habitats preferences that would fall within this range. However, a change in one Folk class to coarse or fully mud sediments is likely to result in loss of some of the characterizing species due to habitat unsuitability and increased competition with species more suited to the changed habitat. A change in sediment type will result in biotope reclassification. Resistance is therefore assessed as ‘Low’ (loss of 25-75%) and resilience is considered 'Very lowgiven the permanent nature of this pressure. Sensitivity is therefore assessed as ‘High’.

    Low
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Very Low
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    High
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Habitat structure changes - removal of substratum (extraction) [Show more]

    Habitat structure changes - removal of substratum (extraction)

    Benchmark. The extraction of substratum to 30 cm (where substratum includes sediments and soft rock but excludes hard bedrock). Further detail

    Evidence

    Sedimentary communities are likely to be ‘Highly' intolerant of substratum removal, which will lead to partial or complete defaunation, expose underlying sediment which may be anoxic and/or of a different character and lead to changes in the topography of the area (Dernie et al., 2003). Any remaining species, given their new position at the sediment/water interface, may be exposed to unsuitable conditions. Newell et al. (1998) state that removal of 0.5 m depth of sediment is likely to eliminate benthos from the affected area.

    Recovery of the sedimentary habitat would occur via infilling, although some recovery of the biological assemblage may take place before the original topography is restored, if the exposed, underlying sediments are similar to those that were removed. Newell et al. (1998) indicate that local hydrodynamics (currents and wave action) and sediment characteristics (mobility and supply) strongly influence the recovery of soft sediment habitats.

    Sensitivity assessment. Extraction of 30 cm of sediment will remove the characterizing biological component of the biotopes so resistance is assessed as ‘None’, resilience is therefore judged as ‘Medium’ based on sediment and species recovery. Sensitivity has been assessed as ‘Medium’.

    None
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Medium
    High
    Low
    Medium
    Help
    Medium
    High
    Low
    Medium
    Help
    Abrasion / disturbance of the surface of the substratum or seabed [Show more]

    Abrasion / disturbance of the surface of the substratum or seabed

    Benchmark. Damage to surface features (e.g. species and physical structures within the habitat). Further detail

    Evidence

    The characterizing species are infaunal and hence have some protection against surface disturbance. Bivalves and other species require contact with the surface for respiration and feeding. Siphons and delicate polychaete feeding structures may be damaged or withdrawn as a result of surface disturbance, resulting in loss of feeding opportunities and compromised growth.

    Sensitivity assessment. Some soft-bodied organisms and a proportion of the characterizing bivalves are likely to be damaged and removed by abrasion. Resistance to abrasion is therefore considered ‘Medium’ (loss <25%). Resilience of the biotopes is likely to be ‘High’. The biotope is therefore considered to have ‘Low’ sensitivity to abrasion or disturbance of the surface of the seabed.

    Medium
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help
    High
    High
    Medium
    Medium
    Help
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Penetration or disturbance of the substratum subsurface [Show more]

    Penetration or disturbance of the substratum subsurface

    Benchmark. Damage to sub-surface features (e.g. species and physical structures within the habitat). Further detail

    Evidence

    Activities that disturb the surface and penetrate below the surface would remove /damage infaunal species such as the characterizing species within the direct area of impact. The footprint of the impact will depend on the type of gear used (Hall et al., 2008).

    Bergman & van Santbrink (2000a) estimated the direct mortality of benthic macrofauna caused by the single pass of commercial beam and otter trawls. The results showed that a single pass of a 4 m or 12 m beam trawl or an otter trawl, in shallow sandy areas and deep silty sand areas (with 3-10% silt) in the North Sea caused a mortality of 20-65% of bivalves and 5-40% of gastropods, starfish, small-medium sized crustaceans and annelid worms. The mortality of Kurtiella bidentata (studied as Mysella bidentata) was reported as 4%. Some mortality was not caused directly by the passage of the trawl, but instead by disturbance, exposure and subsequent predation. Ball et al. (2000a) reported on the short-term effects of fishing on benthos from a mud patch in the northwestern part of the Irish Sea investigated in 1994–1996 by means of samples taken both before and shortly after (ca. 24 hr) fishing activity. Kurtiella bidentata (studied as Mysella bidentata) was one of the species that was common at the inshore site and for which estimates of mortality were calculated and was uncommon or totally absent on the offshore fishing ground. Direct mortality from passage of an otter trawl was estimated as 72%. The direct mortality (percentage of initial density) of Thyasira flexuosa was estimated as 0-28%, based on samples taken with a Day grab before and 24 hours after trawling (Ball et al., 2000b). 

    The shells of Thyasira spp. are thin and fragile and penetration and disturbance of the sediment is likely to lead to damage and mortality within the population. Sparks-McConkey & Watling (2001) found that trawler disturbance resulted in a decline of Thyasira flexuosa in Penobscot Bay, Maine. However, the population recovered after 3.5 months. 

    Ferns et al. (2000) investigated the effect of tractor dredging for cockles on an intertidal muddy sand at Burry Inlet, South Wales mechanical cockle harvesting. A decline of 31% in populations of Scoloplos armiger (initial density 120 m2) was recorded  in muddy sands, Scoloplos armiger demonstrated recovery >50 days after harvesting (Ferns et al., 2000).

    Tuck et al. (1998) found that following trawl disturbance, abundances of Chaetozone setosa had recovered and became greater at treatment sites than undisturbed sites 10 months after disturbance. Scoloplos armiger, however, had declined at disturbed sites.

    Sensitivity assessment. A proportion of the characterizing species in these biotopes is likely to be lost or severely damaged, depending on the scale of the activity (see abrasion pressure). Therefore, a resistance of ‘Low’ (>75% loss) is suggested based on Mysella bidentata. Muddy sand habitats have been reported as having the longest recovery times, whilst mud habitats had an ‘intermediate’ recovery time (compared to clean sand communities which had the most rapid recovery rate) (Dernie et al., 2003). Resilience is probably High’, and therefore the biotopes’ sensitivity to this pressure if likely to be ‘Low’.

    Low
    High
    High
    Medium
    Help
    High
    High
    High
    Medium
    Help
    Low
    High
    High
    Medium
    Help
    Changes in suspended solids (water clarity) [Show more]

    Changes in suspended solids (water clarity)

    Benchmark. A change in one rank on the WFD (Water Framework Directive) scale e.g. from clear to intermediate for one year. Further detail

    Evidence

    A change in turbidity at the pressure benchmark is assessed as an increase from intermediate (10-100 mg/l) to medium (100-300 mg/l) and a change to clear (<10 mg/l). The venerid bivalves are active suspension feeders, trapping food particles on their gill filaments (ctenidia).

    Lethal effects on Kurtiella bidentata are considered unlikely given the occurrence of this species in estuaries where turbidity is frequently ‘High’ from suspended organic and inorganic matter.  As Thyasira flexuosa are buried within the sediment and are fed by symbiotic bacteria they are considered insensitive to a change in suspended solids. 

    Sensitivity assessment. No direct evidence was found to assess impacts on the characterizing bivalves and associated polychaete species. Based on infaunal position and the dominance of deposit feeders biotope resistance is likely to be 'High’. Resilience is assessed as 'High' (by default) and the biotope is therefore considered 'Not sensitive'.

    High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help
    High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Not sensitive
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Smothering and siltation rate changes (light) [Show more]

    Smothering and siltation rate changes (light)

    Benchmark. ‘Light’ deposition of up to 5 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single discrete event. Further detail

    Evidence

    Bijkerk (1988, results cited from Essink, 1999) indicated that the maximal overburden through which small bivalves could migrate was 20 cm in sand for Donax and approximately 40 cm in mud for Tellina sp. and approximately 50 cm in sand. No further information was available on the rates of survivorship or the time taken to reach the surface. This suggests that characterizing species such as Kurtiella bidentata and Thyasira spp. may be able to burrow through similar overburdens. Thyasira flexuosa have ‘highly extensible feet’ (Dando & Southward, 1986) allowing them to construct channels within the sediment and to burrow to 8 cm depth.

    Sensitivity assessment. Beyond re-establishing burrow openings or moving up through the sediment, there is evidence of synergistic effects on burrowing activity of marine benthos and mortality with changes in time of burial, sediment depth, sediment type and temperature (Maurer et al., 1986). However, the biotopes are likely to resist smothering at the benchmark level since the majority of associated fauna are burrowing infauna. Resistance is therefore assessed as ‘High’, and resilience is also ‘High’ (by default) so that the biotopes are considered 'Not Sensitive' to a ‘light’ deposition of up to 5 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single, discrete event.  

    High
    High
    Low
    NR
    Help
    High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Not sensitive
    High
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Smothering and siltation rate changes (heavy) [Show more]

    Smothering and siltation rate changes (heavy)

    Benchmark. ‘Heavy’ deposition of up to 30 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single discrete event. Further detail

    Evidence

    Bijkerk (1988, results cited from Essink, 1999) indicated that the maximal overburden through which small bivalves could migrate was 20 cm in sand for Donax and approximately 40 cm in mud for Tellina sp. and approximately 50 cm in sand. No further information was available on the rates of survivorship or the time taken to reach the surface. This suggests that characterizing species Kurtiella bidentata and Thyasira spp. may be able to burrow through similar overburdens, although sudden smothering with 30 cm of sediment would temporarily halt feeding and respiration, compromising growth and reproduction owing to energetic expenditure. Thyasira flexuosa have ‘highly extensible feet’ (Dando & Southward, 1986) allowing them to construct channels within the sediment and to burrow to 8 cm depth.

    Bijkerk (1988, results cited from Essink 1999) indicated that the maximal overburden through which Scoloplos could migrate was 50 cm in sand and mud.  No further information was available on the rates of survivorship or the time taken to reach the surface. Warner (1971) simulated the effects of dredge disposal of different thicknesses on animals in aquaria or plastic cores for 2 weeks.  In core experiments at temperatures ranging from 14 to 18°C and 20 to 21°C, there was a relationship between vertical migration distance and sediment depth for the congener Scoloplos fragilis.  This species could vertically migrate through 30 cm of sand.  In other core experiments in silt-clay at temperatures of 17oC to 18oC, there was a suggestion of reduced efficiency of burrowing in finer grained sediment where even the smallest amount of silt-clay proportion tested (20%) affected the burrowing ability of this species.

    Sensitivity assessment: Beyond re-establishing burrow openings or moving up through the sediment, there is evidence of synergistic effects on burrowing activity of marine benthos and mortality with changes in time of burial, sediment depth, sediment type and temperature (Maurer et al., 1986). Bivalve and polychaete species have been reported to migrate through depositions of sediment greater that the benchmark (30 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single discrete event) (Bijkerk, 1988; Powilleit et al., 2009; Maurer et al., 1982). However, it is not clear whether the characterizing species are likely to be able to migrate through a maximum thickness of fine sediment because muds tend to be more cohesive and compacted than sand. Some mortality of the characterizing species is likely to occur. Resistance is therefore assessed as ‘Low’ (25-75% loss) and resilience as ‘High’ and the biotopes are considered to have ‘Low’ sensitivity to a ‘heavy’ deposition of up to 30 cm of fine material in a single discrete event.

    Low
    High
    Low
    NR
    Help
    High
    High
    Low
    Medium
    Help
    Low
    High
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Litter [Show more]

    Litter

    Benchmark. The introduction of man-made objects able to cause physical harm (surface, water column, seafloor or strandline). Further detail

    Evidence

    Not assessed.

    Not Assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Electromagnetic changes [Show more]

    Electromagnetic changes

    Benchmark. A local electric field of 1 V/m or a local magnetic field of 10 µT. Further detail

    Evidence

    No evidence.

    No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Underwater noise changes [Show more]

    Underwater noise changes

    Benchmark. MSFD indicator levels (SEL or peak SPL) exceeded for 20% of days in a calendar year. Further detail

    Evidence

    Not relevant.

    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Introduction of light or shading [Show more]

    Introduction of light or shading

    Benchmark. A change in incident light via anthropogenic means. Further detail

    Evidence

     Changes in light levels are not considered likely to affect adult stages, although little evidence is available to support this conclusion. This pressure is, therefore, assessed as ‘Not relevant’. 

    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Barrier to species movement [Show more]

    Barrier to species movement

    Benchmark. A permanent or temporary barrier to species movement over ≥50% of water body width or a 10% change in tidal excursion. Further detail

    Evidence

    This pressure is considered to be 'Not relevant' to biotopes that occur only in open waters, rather than coastal bays and estuaries.

    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Death or injury by collision [Show more]

    Death or injury by collision

    Benchmark. Injury or mortality from collisions of biota with both static or moving structures due to 0.1% of tidal volume on an average tide, passing through an artificial structure. Further detail

    Evidence

    'Not relevant' to seabed habitats. NB. Collision by grounding vessels is addressed under surface abrasion.

    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Visual disturbance [Show more]

    Visual disturbance

    Benchmark. The daily duration of transient visual cues exceeds 10% of the period of site occupancy by the feature. Further detail

    Evidence

    The characterizing species of the biotopes live infaunally, so are likely to have poor or no visual perception and unlikely to be affected by visual disturbance such as shading.

    Sensitivity assessment. The characterizing species are likely to be tolerant of visual disturbance. Resistance and resilience are therefore assessed as 'High' and the biotopes judged as 'Not sensitive' to visual disturbance.

    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help

    Biological Pressures

    Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

    ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
    Genetic modification & translocation of indigenous species [Show more]

    Genetic modification & translocation of indigenous species

    Benchmark. Translocation of indigenous species or the introduction of genetically modified or genetically different populations of indigenous species that may result in changes in the genetic structure of local populations, hybridization, or change in community structure. Further detail

    Evidence

    Key characterizing species within this biotope are not cultivated or translocated. This pressure is therefore considered ‘Not relevant’ to this biotope group.

    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Introduction or spread of invasive non-indigenous species [Show more]

    Introduction or spread of invasive non-indigenous species

    Benchmark. The introduction of one or more invasive non-indigenous species (INIS). Further detail

    Evidence

    The American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata was introduced to the UK and Europe in the 1870s from the Atlantic coasts of North America with imports of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica. It was recorded in Liverpool in 1870 and the Essex coast in 1887-1890. It has spread through expansion and introductions along the full extent of the English Channel and into the European mainland (Blanchard, 1997, 2009; Bohn et al., 2012, 2013a, 2013b, 2015; De Montaudouin et al., 2018; Helmer et al., 2019; Hinz et al., 2011; McNeill et al., 2010; Powell-Jennings & Calloway, 2018; Preston et al., 2020; Stiger-Pouvreau & Thouzeau, 2015).

    Crepidula fornicata is recorded from shallow, sheltered bays, lagoons and estuaries or the sheltered sides of islands, in variable salinity (18 to 40) although it prefers ca 30 (Tillin et al., 2020). Larvae require hard substrata for settlement. It prefers muddy gravelly, shell-rich, substrata that include gravel, or shells of other Crepidula, or other species e.g., oysters, and mussels. It is highly gregarious and seeks out adult shells for settlement, forming characteristic ‘stacks’ of adults. But it also recorded in a wide variety of habitats including clean sands, artificial substrata, Sabellaria alveolata reefs and areas subject to moderately strong tidal streams (Blanchard, 1997, 2009; Bohn et al., 2012, 2013a, 2013b, 2015; De Montaudouin et al., 2018; Hinz et al., 2011; Powell-Jennings & Calloway, 2018; Preston et al., 2020; Stiger-Pouvreau & Thouzeau, 2015; Tillin et al., 2020). 

    High densities of Crepidula fornicata cause ecological impacts on sedimentary habitats. The species can form dense carpets that can smother the seabed in shallow bays, changing and modifying the habitat structure. At high densities, the species physically smothers the sediment, and the resultant build-up of silt, pseudofaeces, and faeces is deposited and trapped within the bed (Tillin et al., 2020, Fitzgerald, 2007, Blanchard, 2009, Stiger-Pouvreau & Thouzeau, 2015). The biodeposition rates of Crepidula are extremely high and once deposited, form an anoxic mud, making the environment suitable for other species, including most infauna (Stiger-Pouvreau & Thouzeau, 2015, Blanchard, 2009). For example, in fine sands, the community is replaced by a reef of slipper limpets, that provide hard substrata for sessile suspension-feeders (e.g., sea squirts, tube worms and fixed shellfish), while mobile carnivorous microfauna occupy species between or within shells, resulting in a homogeneous Crepidula dominated habitat (Blanchard, 2009). Blanchard (2009) suggested the transition occurred and became irreversible at 50% cover of the limpet. De Montaudouin et al. (2018) suggested that homogenization occurred above a threshold of 20-50 Crepidula /m2. Where slipper limpet stacks are abundant, few other bivalves can live amongst them (Fretter & Graham, 1981; Blanchard, 1997). 

    Impacts on the structure of benthic communities will depend on the type of habitat that Crepidula colonizes. De Montaudouin & Sauriau (1999) reported that in muddy sediment dominated by deposit-feeders, species richness, abundance and biomass increased in the presence of high densities of Crepidula (ca 562 to 4772 ind./m2), in the Bay of Marennes-Oléron, presumably because the Crepidula bed provided hard substrata in an otherwise sedimentary habitat. In medium sands, Crepidula density was moderate (330-1300 ind./m2) but there was no significant difference between communities in the presence of Crepidula. Intertidal coarse sediment was less suitable for Crepidula with only moderate or low abundances (11 ind./m2) and its presence did not affect the abundance or diversity of macrofauna. However, there was a higher abundance of suspension–feeders and mobile Crustacea in the absence of Crepidula (De Montaudouin & Sauriau, 1999). The presence of Crepidula as an ecosystem engineer has created a range of new niche habitats, reducing biodiversity as it modifies habitats (Fitzgerald, 2007). De Montaudouin et al. (1999) concluded that Crepidula did not influence macroinvertebrate diversity or density significantly under experimental conditions, on fine sands in Arcachon Bay, France. De Montaudouin et al. (2018) noted that the limpet reef increased the species diversity in the bed, but homogenised diversity compared to areas where the limpets were absent. In the Milford Haven Waterway (MHW), the highest densities of Crepidula were found in areas of sediment with hard substrata, e.g., mixed fine sediment with shell or gravel or both (grain sizes 16-256 mm) but, while Crepidula density increased as gravel cover increased in the subtidal, the reverse was found in the intertidal (Bohn et al., 2015). Bohn et al. (2015) suggested that high densities of Crepidula in high-energy environments were possible in the subtidal but not the intertidal, suggesting the availability of this substratum type is beneficial for its establishment. Hinz et al. (2011) reported a substantial increase in the occurrence of Crepidula off the Isle of Wight, between 1958 and 2006, at a depth of ca 60 m, on hard substrata (gravel, cobbles, and boulders), swept by strong tidal streams. Presumably, Crepidula is more tolerant of tidal flow than the oscillatory flow caused by wave action which may be less suitable (Tillin et al., 2020). 

    Sensitivity assessment. The sediments characterizing this biotope are likely to be too mobile and unsuitable for most of the invasive non-indigenous species currently recorded in the UK. However, the above evidence suggests that Crepidula could colonize mixed sediment habitats in the subtidal, typical of this biotope, due to the presence of gravel, shells, cobbles, or any other hard substrata embedded in the substratum that can be used for larvae settlement (Tillin et al., 2020). Bohn et al. (2015) demonstrated that Crepidula had a preference for gravelly habitats, while De Montaudouin & Sauriau (1999) and Bohn et al. (2015) noted that Crepidula densities were low in intertidal coarse sediments. Therefore, Crepidula has the potential to colonize, and modify the habitat and its associated community due to the introduction of Crepidula shell biomass, silt, pseudofaeces and faeces (Blanchard, 2009; Tillin et al., 2020), as occurs in maerl gravels (Grall & Hall-Spencer, 2003) resulting in the loss of the biotope. This is a moderately exposed to sheltered habitat, so storms may mobilise the sediment (JNCC, 2022), which may also mitigate or prevent colonization by Crepidula at high densities, although it has been recorded from areas of strong tidal streams (Hinz et al., 2011). Therefore, the habitat may be more suitable for Crepidula in wave sheltered areas of the biotope and where water movement is mediated by tidal flow rather than wave action, e.g., the deeper examples of the biotope. 

    Therefore, resistance is assessed as 'Medium' in examples where wave action is high and subject to storms but 'Low' in wave sheltered areas dominated by tidal flow. Resilience is assessed as 'Very low' as it would require the removal of Crepidula, probably by artificial means. Hence, sensitivity is assessed as 'High' based on the worst-case scenario. Crepidula has not yet been reported to occur in this biotope so the confidence in the assessment is 'Low' and further evidence is required.

    Low
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Very Low
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Introduction of microbial pathogens [Show more]

    Introduction of microbial pathogens

    Benchmark. The introduction of relevant microbial pathogens or metazoan disease vectors to an area where they are currently not present (e.g. Martelia refringens and Bonamia, Avian influenza virus, viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia virus). Further detail

    Evidence

    More than 20 viruses have been described for marine bivalves (Sinderman, 1990). Bacterial diseases are more significant in the larval stages and protozoans are the most common cause of epizootic outbreaks that may result in mass mortalities of bivalve populations. Parasitic worms, trematodes, cestodes and nematodes can reduce growth and fecundity within bivalves and may in some instances cause death (Dame, 1996).

    Little information specifically concerning the effects of microbial pathogens and parasites on the viability of the characterizing species was found. A viral infection of the mutualist bacterium living on the gills of Thyasira gouldii has been suggested as the reason for a major decline in the Loch Etive population (Jackson, 2007, references therein),

    Sensitivity assessment. No direct evidence of the biotopes being affected by the introduction of microbial pathogens was found to assess this pressure.

    No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Removal of target species [Show more]

    Removal of target species

    Benchmark. Removal of species targeted by fishery, shellfishery or harvesting at a commercial or recreational scale. Further detail

    Evidence

    No species within the biotope are targeted by commercial or recreational fishers or harvesters. This pressure is therefore considered ‘Not relevant’.

    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Removal of non-target species [Show more]

    Removal of non-target species

    Benchmark. Removal of features or incidental non-targeted catch (by-catch) through targeted fishery, shellfishery or harvesting at a commercial or recreational scale. Further detail

    Evidence

    Direct, physical impacts are assessed through the abrasion and penetration of the seabed pressures, while this pressure considers the ecological or biological effects of by-catch. Species in these biotopes, including the characterizing species, may be damaged or directly removed by static or mobile gears that are targeting other species (see abrasion and penetration pressures). Loss of these species would alter the character of the biotope resulting in re-classification, and would alter the physical structure of the habitat resulting in the loss of the ecosystem functions such as secondary production performed by these species.

    Sensitivity assessment. Removal of the characterizing species would result in the biotopes being lost or re-classified. As many species are relatively small and the bivalves may be displaced by sediment disturbance but survive (see physical damage pressures), the biotope is considered to have a resistance of ‘Low’ to this pressure and to have ‘High’ resilience, so that sensitivity is assessed as ‘Low’.

    Low
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help
    High
    High
    Low
    Medium
    Help
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help

    Bibliography

    1. Aberkali, H.B. & Trueman, E.R., 1985. Effects of environmental stress on marine bivalve molluscs. Advances in Marine Biology, 22, 101-198.

    2. Addy, J.M., Levell, D. & Hartley, J.P., 1978. Biological monitoring of sediments in the Ekofisk oilfield. In Proceedings of the conference on assessment of ecological impacts of oil spills. American Institute of Biological Sciences, Keystone, Colorado 14-17 June 1978, pp.514-539.

    3. Bailey-Brook, J.H., 1976. Habitats of tubicolous polychaetes from the Hawaiian Islands and Johnston Atoll. Pacific Science, 30, 69-81.

    4. Ball, B., Munday, B. & Tuck, I., 2000b. Effects of otter trawling on the benthos and environment in muddy sediments. In: Effects of fishing on non-target species and habitats, (eds. Kaiser, M.J. & de Groot, S.J.), pp 69-82. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

    5. Ball, B.J., Fox, G. & Munday, B.W., 2000. Long- and short-term consequences of a Nephrops trawl fishery on the benthos and environment of the Irish Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57, 1315-1320.

    6. Bergman, M.J.N. & Hup, M., 1992. Direct effects of beam trawling on macrofauna in a sandy sediment in the southern North Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 49, 5-11. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/49.1.5

    7. Bergman, M.J.N. & Van Santbrink, J.W., 2000a. Mortality in megafaunal benthic populations caused by trawl fisheries on the Dutch continental shelf in the North Sea in 1994. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57 (5), 1321-1331.

    8. Beukema, J.J., 1979. Biomass and species richness of the macrobenthic animals living on a tidal flat area in the Dutch Wadden Sea: effects of a severe winter. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 13, 203-223.

    9. Bijkerk, R., 1988. Ontsnappen of begraven blijven: de effecten op bodemdieren van een verhoogde sedimentatie als gevolg van baggerwerkzaamheden: literatuuronderzoek: RDD, Aquatic ecosystems.

    10. Blanchard, M., 2009. Recent expansion of the slipper limpet population (Crepidula fornicata) in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel (Western Channel, France). Aquatic Living Resources, 22 (1), 11-19. DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2009004

    11. Blanchard, M., 1997. Spread of the slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata (L.1758) in Europe. Current state and consequences. Scientia Marina, 61, Supplement 9, 109-118. Available from: http://scimar.icm.csic.es/scimar/index.php/secId/6/IdArt/290/

    12. Bohn, K., Richardson, C. & Jenkins, S., 2012. The invasive gastropod Crepidula fornicata: reproduction and recruitment in the intertidal at its northernmost range in Wales, UK, and implications for its secondary spread. Marine Biology, 159 (9), 2091-2103. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-1997-3

    13. Bohn, K., Richardson, C.A. & Jenkins, S.R., 2015. The distribution of the invasive non-native gastropod Crepidula fornicata in the Milford Haven Waterway, its northernmost population along the west coast of Britain. Helgoland Marine Research, 69 (4), 313.

    14. Bohn, K., Richardson, C.A. & Jenkins, S.R., 2013a. Larval microhabitat associations of the non-native gastropod Crepidula fornicata and effects on recruitment success in the intertidal zone. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 448, 289-297. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2013.07.020

    15. Bohn, K., Richardson, C.A. & Jenkins, S.R., 2013b. The importance of larval supply, larval habitat selection and post-settlement mortality in determining intertidal adult abundance of the invasive gastropod Crepidula fornicata. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 440, 132-140. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.12.008

    16. Borja, A., Franco, J. & Perez, V., 2000. A marine biotic index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40 (12), 1100-1114.

    17. Bowmer, T., 1982. Reproduction in Amphiura filiformis (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea): seasonality in gonad development. Marine Biology, 69, 281-290.

    18. Bradshaw, C., Veale, L.O., Hill, A.S. & Brand, A.R., 2002. The role of scallop-dredge disturbance in long-term changes in Irish Sea benthic communities: a re-analysis of an historical dataset. Journal of Sea Research, 47, 161-184. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-1101(02)00096-5

    19. Bryan, G.W., 1984. Pollution due to heavy metals and their compounds. In Marine Ecology: A Comprehensive, Integrated Treatise on Life in the Oceans and Coastal Waters, vol. 5. Ocean Management, part 3, (ed. O. Kinne), pp.1289-1431. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    20. Buchanan, J.B., 1964. A comparative study of some of the features of the biology of Amphiura filiformis and Amphiura chiajei (Ophiuroidea) considered in relation to their distribution. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 44, 565-576.

    21. Carter, M.C. 2008. Kurtiella bidentata A bivalve mollusc. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1939

    22. Chambers, S.J., Dominguez-Tejo, E.L., Mair, J.M., Mitchell, L.A. & Woodham, A., 2007. The distribution of three eyeless Chaetozone species (Cirratulidae: Polychaeta) in the north-east Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 87 (05), 1111-1114.

    23. Chauvaud, L., Jean, F., Ragueneau, O. & Thouzeau, G., 2000. Long-term variation of the Bay of Brest ecosystem: benthic-pelagic coupling revisited. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 200, 35-48. DOI https://doi.org/10.3354/meps200035

    24. Christie, G., 1985. A comparative study of the reproductive cycles of three Northumberland populations of Chaetozone setosa (Polychaeta: Cirratulidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 239-254.

    25. Cole, S., Codling, I.D., Parr, W. & Zabel, T., 1999. Guidelines for managing water quality impacts within UK European Marine sites. Natura 2000 report prepared for the UK Marine SACs Project. 441 pp., Swindon: Water Research Council on behalf of EN, SNH, CCW, JNCC, SAMS and EHS. [UK Marine SACs Project.]. Available from: http://ukmpa.marinebiodiversity.org/uk_sacs/pdfs/water_quality.pdf

    26. Connor, D.W., Allen, J.H., Golding, N., Howell, K.L., Lieberknecht, L.M., Northen, K.O. & Reker, J.B., 2004. The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland. Version 04.05. ISBN 1 861 07561 8. In JNCC (2015), The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland Version 15.03. [2019-07-24]. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. Available from https://mhc.jncc.gov.uk/

    27. Coosen, J., Seys, J., Meire, P.M. & Craeymeersch, J.A.M, 1994. Effect of sedimentological and hydrodynamical changes in the intertidal areas of the Oosterschelde estuary (SW Netherlands) on distribution, density and biomass of five common macrobenthic species… (abridged). Hydrobiologia, 282/283, 235-249.

    28. Corbera, J. & Cardell, M.J., 1995. Cumaceans as indicators of eutrophication on soft bottoms. Scientia Marina, 59, 63-69.

    29. Cromey, C., Black, K., Edwards, A. & Jack, I., 1998. Modelling the deposition and biological effects of organic carbon from marine sewage discharges. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 47 (3), 295-308.

    30. Crompton, T.R., 1997. Toxicants in the aqueous ecosystem. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    31. Curtis, M.A., 1977. Life cycles and population dynamics of marine benthic polychaetes from the Disko Bay area of W. Greenland. Ophelia, 16, 9-58.

    32. Dame, R.F.D., 1996. Ecology of Marine Bivalves: an Ecosystem Approach. New York: CRC Press Inc. [Marine Science Series.]

    33. Dando, P.R. & Southward, A.J., 1986. Chemoautotrophy in bivalve molluscs of the Genus Thyasira. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 60, 915-929.

    34. Dando, P.R. & Spiro, B., 1993. Varying nutritional dependence of the thyasirid bivalves Thyasira sarsi and Thyasira equalis on chemoautotrophic symbiotic bacteria, demonstrated by isotope ratios of tissue carbon and shell carbonate. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 92, 151-158.

    35. Dauvin, J.C., 1998. The fine sand Abra alba community of the Bay of Morlaix twenty years after the Amoco Cadiz oil spill. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 36, 669-676.

    36. Dauvin, J.C., 2000. The muddy fine sand Abra alba - Melinna palmata community of the Bay of Morlaix twenty years after the Amoco Cadiz oil spill. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40, 528-536.

    37. Davies, C.E. & Moss, D., 1998. European Union Nature Information System (EUNIS) Habitat Classification. Report to European Topic Centre on Nature Conservation from the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood, Cambridgeshire. [Final draft with further revisions to marine habitats.], Brussels: European Environment Agency.

    38. De Montaudouin, X. & Sauriau, P.G., 1999. The proliferating Gastropoda Crepidula fornicata may stimulate macrozoobenthic diversity. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 79, 1069-1077. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315499001319

    39. De Montaudouin, X., Andemard, C. & Labourg, P-J., 1999. Does the slipper limpet (Crepidula fornicata L.) impair oyster growth and zoobenthos diversity ? A revisited hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 235, 105-124.

    40. De Montaudouin, X., Blanchet, H. & Hippert, B., 2018. Relationship between the invasive slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata and benthic megafauna structure and diversity, in Arcachon Bay. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 98 (8), 2017-2028. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315417001655

    41. Dernie, K.M., Kaiser, M.J., Richardson, E.A. & Warwick, R.M., 2003. Recovery of soft sediment communities and habitats following physical disturbance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 285-286, 415-434.

    42. Desroy, N. & Retière, C., 2001. Long-term changes in muddy fine sand community of the Rance Basin: role of recruitment. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 81, 553-564.

    43. Duineveld, G.C.A., Künitzer, A. & Heyman, R.P., 1987. Amphiura filiformis (Ophiuroidea: Echinodermata) in the North Sea. Distribution, present and former abundance and size composition. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 21, 317-329.

    44. Elías, R., Palacios, J., Rivero, M. & Vallarino, E., 2005. Short-term responses to sewage discharge and storms of subtidal sand-bottom macrozoobenthic assemblages off Mar del Plata City, Argentina (SW Atlantic). Journal of Sea Research, 53 (4), 231-242.

    45. Elliot, M., Nedwell, S., Jones, N.V., Read, S.J., Cutts, N.D. & Hemingway, K.L., 1998. Intertidal sand and mudflats & subtidal mobile sandbanks (Vol. II). An overview of dynamic and sensitivity for conservation management of marine SACs. Prepared by the Scottish Association for Marine Science for the UK Marine SACs Project. Available from: http://ukmpa.marinebiodiversity.org/uk_sacs/pdfs/sandmud.pdf

    46. Eltringham, S.K., 1971. Life in mud and sand. London: The English Universities Press Ltd.

    47. Emu Ltd., 2005. Tremadog Bay Subtidal Macrobenthic Study. Report to the Countryside Council for Wales from EMU Ltd, Southampton. [CCW Report No. 04/J/1/11/0702/0484].

    48. Essink, K., 1999. Ecological effects of dumping of dredged sediments; options for management. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 5, 69-80.

    49. Fenchel, T., 1972. Aspects of decomposer food chains in marine benthos. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gellschaft, 65, 14-22.

    50. Ferns, P.N., Rostron, D.M. & Siman, H.Y., 2000. Effects of mechanical cockle harvesting on intertidal communities. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37, 464-474.

    51. FitzGerald, A., 2007. Slipper Limpet Utilisation and Management. Final Report. Port of Truro Oyster Management Group., Truro, 101 pp. Available from https://www.shellfish.org.uk/files/Literature/Projects-Reports/0701-Slipper_Limpet_Report_Final_Small.pdf

    52. Folk, R.L., 1954. The distinction between grain size and mineral composition in sedimentary-rock nomenclature. 62The Journal of Geology, 344-359.

    53. Fretter, V. & Graham, A., 1981. The Prosobranch Molluscs of Britain and Denmark. Part 6. Molluscs of Britain and Denmark. Part 6. Journal of Molluscan Studies, Supplement 9, 309-313.

    54. Frid, C.L.J., Clark, R.A. & Hall, J.A., 1999. Long-term changes in the benthos on a heavily fished ground off the NE coast of England. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 188, 13-20.

    55. Frithsen J.B., Oviatt, C.A. & Keller, A.A., 1987. A Comparison of Ecosystem and Single-species Tests of Sewage Toxicity: A Mesocosm Experiment Data Report. The University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, U.S.A., MERL series report No. 7, 187 pp.

    56. Gerdes, D., 1977. The re-establishment of an Amphiura filiformis (O.F. Müller) population in the inner part of the German Bight. In Biology of Benthic Organisms (ed. B. Keegan et al.), pp. 277-284. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    57. Gibbs, P.E., 1968. Observations on the population of Scoloplos armiger at Whitstable. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, 225-254.

    58. Gittenberger, A. & Van Loon, W.M.G.M., 2011. Common marine macrozoobenthos species in the Netherlands, their characteristics and sensitivities to environmental pressures. GiMaRIS Report no 2011.08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3135.7521

    59. Glémarec, M., 1979. Problemes d'ecologie dynamique et de succession en baie de Concarneau. Vie et Milieu, 28-29, 1-20.

    60. Gogina, M., Glockzin, M. & Zettler, M.L., 2010a. Distribution of benthic macrofaunal communities in the western Baltic Sea with regard to near-bottom environmental parameters. 1. Causal analysis. Journal of Marine Systems, 79 (1), 112-123.

    61. Gogina, M., Glockzin. M. & Zettler, M.L., 2010. Distribution of benthic macrofaunal communities in the western Baltic Sea with regard to near-bottom environmental parameters. 2. Modelling and prediction. Journal of Marine Systems, 80, 57-70. 

    62. Gooday, A., Levin, L., da Silva, A.A., Bett, B., Cowie, G., Dissard, D., Gage, J., Hughes, D., Jeffreys, R. & Lamont, P., 2009. Faunal responses to oxygen gradients on the Pakistan margin: A comparison of foraminiferans, macrofauna and megafauna. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 56 (6), 488-502.

    63. Grall J. & Hall-Spencer J.M. 2003. Problems facing maerl conservation in Brittany. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 13, S55-S64. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.568

    64. Gray, J.S., 1979. Pollution-induced changes in populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 286, 545-561.

    65. Hall, K., Paramour, O.A.L., Robinson, L.A., Winrow-Giffin, A., Frid, C.L.J., Eno, N.C., Dernie, K.M., Sharp, R.A.M., Wyn, G.C. & Ramsay, K., 2008. Mapping the sensitivity of benthic habitats to fishing in Welsh waters - development of a protocol. CCW (Policy Research) Report No: 8/12, Countryside Council for Wales (CCW), Bangor, 85 pp. 

    66. Hall, S.J. & Harding, M.J.C., 1997. Physical disturbance and marine benthic communities: the effects of mechanical harvesting of cockles on non-target benthic infauna. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34, 497-517.

    67. Hall, S.J., 1994. Physical disturbance and marine benthic communities: life in unconsolidated sediments. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 32, 179-239.

    68. Hall, S.J., Basford, D.J. & Robertson, M.R., 1990. The impact of hydraulic dredging for razor clams Ensis spp. on an infaunal community. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 27, 119-125.

    69. Hayward, P.J. & Ryland, J.S. (ed.) 1995b. Handbook of the marine fauna of North-West Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    70. Helmer, L., Farrell, P., Hendy, I., Harding, S., Robertson, M. & Preston, J., 2019. Active management is required to turn the tide for depleted Ostrea edulis stocks from the effects of overfishing, disease and invasive species. Peerj, 7 (2). DOI https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6431

    71. Hily, C., 1987. Spatio-temporal variability of Chaetozone setosa (Malmgren) populations on an organic gradient in the Bay of Brest, France. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 112, 201-216.

    72. Hinz, H., Capasso, E., Lilley, M., Frost, M. & Jenkins, S.R., 2011. Temporal differences across a bio-geographical boundary reveal slow response of sub-littoral benthos to climate change. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 423, 69-82. DOI https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08963

    73. Hiscock, K., Langmead, O. & Warwick, R., 2004. Identification of seabed indicator species from time-series and other studies to support implementation of the EU Habitats and Water Framework Directives. Report to the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the Environment Agency from the Marine Biological Association. Marine Biological Association of the UK, Plymouth. JNCC Contract F90-01-705. 109 pp.

    74. Hughes, D.J., 1998b. Subtidal brittlestar beds. An overview of dynamics and sensitivity characteristics for conservation management of marine SACs. Natura 2000 report prepared for Scottish Association of Marine Science (SAMS) for the UK Marine SACs Project., Scottish Association for Marine Science. (UK Marine SACs Project, Vol. 3). Available from: http://ukmpa.marinebiodiversity.org/uk_sacs/pdfs/britstar.pdf

    75. Huthnance, J., 2010. Ocean Processes Feeder Report. London, DEFRA on behalf of the United Kingdom Marine Monitoring and Assessment Strategy (UKMMAS) Community.

    76. Ingole, B.S., Sautya, S., Sivadas, S., Singh, R. & Nanajkar, M., 2010. Macrofaunal community structure in the western Indian continental margin including the oxygen minimum zone. Marine Ecology, 31 (1), 148-166.

    77. Jackson, A. 2007. Thyasira gouldi Northern hatchet shell. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1149

    78. JNCC (Joint Nature Conservation Committee), 2022.  The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland Version 22.04. [Date accessed]. Available from: https://mhc.jncc.gov.uk/

    79. JNCC (Joint Nature Conservation Committee), 2022.  The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland Version 22.04. [Date accessed]. Available from: https://mhc.jncc.gov.uk/

    80. Kelly, J.R. & Nixon, S., 1984. Experimental studies of the effect of organic deposition on the metabolism of a coastal marine bottom community. Marine ecology progress series. Oldendorf, 17 (2), 157-169.

    81. Kenchington, E.L.R., Prena, J., Gilkinson, K.D., Gordon, D.C., Macisaac, K., Bourbonnais, C.; Schwinghamer, P.J., Rowell, T.W., McKeown, D.L. & Vass, W.P., 2001. Effects of experimental otter trawling on the macrofauna of a sandy bottom ecosystem on the Grand Banks of Newfoundland. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58, 1043-1057.

    82. Kröncke, I., 1990. Macrofauna standing stock of the Dogger Bank. A comparison: II. 1951 - 1952 versus 1985 - 1987. Are changes in the community of the northeastern part of the Dogger Bank due to environmental changes? Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 25, 189-198.

    83. Kruse, I., Reusch, T.B.H. & Schneider, M.V., 2003. Sibling species or poecilogony in the polychaete Scoloplos armiger? Marine Biology, 142, 937-947.

    84. Kruse, I., Strasser, M. & Thiermann, F., 2004. The role of ecological divergence in speciation between intertidal and subtidal Scoloplos armiger (Polychaeta, Orbiniidae). Journal of Sea Research, 51, 53-62.

    85. Künitzer, A., 1989. Factors affecting the population dynamics of Amphiura filiformis (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) and Mysella bidentata (Bivalvia: Galeommatacea) in the North Sea. In Reproduction, genetics and distributions of marine organisms. 23rd European Marine Biology Symposium (ed. J.S. Ryland and P.A. Tyler), pp. 395-406. Denmark: Olsen and Olsen.

    86. Leppäkoski, E., 1975. Assessment of degree of pollution on the basis of macrozoobenthos in marine and brackish water environments. Acta Academiae Åboensis, Series B, 35, 1-90.

    87. Libes, S.M., 1992. An introduction to marine biogeochemistry. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons

    88. Lindeboom, H.J. & de Groot, S.J., 1998. The effects of different types of fisheries on the North Sea and Irish Sea benthic ecosystems. NIOZ Report 1998-1/RIVO-DLO, Report C003/98, p. 404., The Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Sea Research.

    89. Long, D., 2006. BGS detailed explanation of seabed sediment modified Folk classification. Available from: http://www.emodnet-seabedhabitats.eu/PDF/GMHM3_Detailed_explanation_of_seabed_sediment_classification.pdf

    90. López-Jamar, E. & Mejuto, J., 1988. Infaunal benthic recolonization after dredging operations in La Coruña Bay, NW Spain. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 29, 37-49.

    91. López-Jamar, E., González, J. & Mejuto, J., 1987. Ecology, growth and production of Thyasira flexuosa (Bivalvia, Lucinacea) from Ría de la Coruña, North-west Spain. Ophelia, 27, 111-126.

    92. Maughan, J.T. & Oviatt, C.A., 1993. Sediment and benthic response to wastewater solids in a marine mesocosm. Water Environment Research, 65 (7), 879-889.

    93. Maurer, D. & Lethem, W., 1980. Dominant species of polychaetous annelids of Georges Bank. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 3, 135-144.

    94. Maurer, D., Keck, R.T., Tinsman, J.C. & Leathem, W.A., 1982. Vertical migration and mortality of benthos in dredged material: Part III—Polychaeta. Marine Environmental Research, 6 (1), 49-68. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-1136(82)90007-1

    95. Maurer, D., Keck, R.T., Tinsman, J.C., Leatham, W.A., Wethe, C., Lord, C. & Church, T.M., 1986. Vertical migration and mortality of marine benthos in dredged material: a synthesis. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie, 71, 49-63. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.19860710106

    96. McNeill, G., Nunn, J. & Minchin, D., 2010. The slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata Linnaeus, 1758 becomes established in Ireland. Aquatic Invasions, 5 (Suppl. 1), S21-S25. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2010.5.S1.006

    97. Menesguen, A. & Gregoris, T., 2018. Modelling benthic invasion by the colonial gastropod Crepidula fornicata and its competition with the bivalve Pecten maximus. 1. A new 0D model for population dynamics of colony-forming species. Ecological Modelling, 368, 277-287. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.005

    98. Muus, K., 1981. Density and growth of juvenile Amphiura filiformis (Ophiuroidea) in the Oresund. Ophelia, 20, 153-168.

    99. Newell, R., Seiderer, L. & Hitchcock, D., 1998. The impact of dredging works in coastal waters: a review of the sensitivity to disturbance and subsequent recovery of biological resources on the sea bed. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 36, 127-178.

    100. Newton, L.C. & McKenzie, J.D., 1995. Echinoderms and oil pollution: a potential stress assay using bacterial symbionts. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 31, 453-456.

    101. Newton, L.C. & McKenzie, J.D., 1998. Brittlestars, biomarkers and Beryl: Assessing the toxicity of oil-based drill cuttings using laboratory, mesocosm and field studies. Chemistry and Ecology, 15, 143-155.

    102. Niermann, U., Bauerfeind, E., Hickel, W. & Westernhagen, H.V., 1990. The recovery of benthos following the impact of low oxygen content in the German Bight. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 25 (1), 215-226. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(90)90023-A

    103. Nilsson, H.C. & Rosenberg, R., 1994. Hypoxic response of two marine benthic communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 115, 209-217. DOI https://doi.org/10.3354/meps115209

    104. O'Brien, K. & Keegan, B., 2006. Age-related reproductive biology of the bivalve Mysella bidentata (Montagu)(Bivalvia: Galeommatacea) in Kinsale Harbour (South coast of Ireland). The Irish Naturalists' Journal, 28 (7), 284-299.

    105. O'Connor, B. & McGrath, D., 1980. The population dynamics of Amphiura filiformis (O.F. Müller) in Galway Bay, west coast of Ireland. In Echinoderms: present and past (ed. M. Jangoux) p219-222. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.

    106. O'Connor, B., Bowmer, T. & Grehan, A., 1983. Long-term assessment of the population dynamics of Amphiura filiformis (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) in Galway Bay (west coast of Ireland). Marine Biology, 75, 279-286.

    107. O'Foighill, D., McGrath, D., Conneely, M.E., Keegan, B.F. & Costelloe, M., 1984. Population dynamics and reproduction of Mysella bidentata (Bivalvia: Galeommatacea) in Galway Bay, Irish west coast. Marine Biology, 81, 283-291.

    108. OBIS 2014. Data from the Ocean Biogeographic Information System. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO. [online]. Available from: http://www.iobis.org

    109. Ockelmann, K.W. & Muus, K., 1978. The biology, ecology and behaviour of the bivalve Mysella bidentata (Montagu). Ophelia, 17, 1-93.

    110. Oliver, P.G. & Killeen, I.J., 2002. The Thyasiridae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of the British continental shelf and North Sea oil fields. An identification Manual. Studies in Marine Biodiversity and Systematics from the National Museum of Wales. BIOMÔ Reports, 3: 73pp.

    111. Olsgard, F. & Gray, J.S., 1995. A comprehensive analysis of the effects of offshore oil and gas exploration and production on the benthic communities of the Norwegian continental shelf. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 122, 277-306.

    112. Olsgard, F., 1999. Effects of copper contamination on recolonisation of subtidal marine soft sediments - an experimental field study. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 38, 448-462.

    113. OSPAR, 2009b. Background document for Intertidal mudflats. OSPAR Commission, Biodiversity Series, OSPAR Commission, London, 29 pp. http://www.ospar.org/documents?v=7186

    114. Oviatt, C.A., Quinn, J.G., Maughan, J., Ellis, J.T., Sullivan, B.K., Gearing, J.N., Gearing, P.J., Hunt, C.D., Sampou, P.A. & Latimer, J.S., 1987. Fate and effects of sewage sludge in the coastal marine environment: A mesocosm experiment. Marine ecology progress series. Oldendorf, 41 (2), 187-203.

    115. Palanques, A., Guillén, J. & Puig, P., 2001. Impact of bottom trawling on water turbidity and muddy sediment of an unfished continental shelf. Limnology and Oceanography, 46, 1100-1110.

    116. Pearson, T.H., 1975. The benthic ecology of Loch Linnhe and Loch Eil, a sea-loch system on the west coast of Scotland. IV. Changes in the benthic fauna attributable to organic enrichment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 20, 1-41.

    117. Pearson, T.H. & Black, K.D., 2001. The environmental impacts of marine fish cage culture. In Black, K.D. (ed.) Environmental impacts of aquaculture, pp. 1-31, Sheffield Academic Press.

    118. Pearson, T.H. & Rosenberg, R., 1976. A comparative study of the effects on the marine environment of wastes from cellulose industries in Scotland and Sweden. Ambio, 5, 77-79.

    119. Pearson, T.H. & Rosenberg, R., 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 16, 229-311.

    120. Pedrotti, M.L., 1993. Spatial and temporal distribution and recruitment of echinoderm larvae in the Ligurian Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 73, 513-530.

    121. Petersen, G.H., 1977. The density, biomass and origin of the bivalves of the central North Sea. Meddeleser fra Danmarks Fiskeri - Og Havundersøgelser, 7, 221-273.

    122. Powell-Jennings, C. & Callaway, R., 2018. The invasive, non-native slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata is poorly adapted to sediment burial. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 130, 95-104. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.03.006

    123. Powilleit, M., Graf, G., Kleine, J., Riethmuller, R., Stockmann, K., Wetzel, M.A. & Koop, J.H.E., 2009. Experiments on the survival of six brackish macro-invertebrates from the Baltic Sea after dredged spoil coverage and its implications for the field. Journal of Marine Systems, 75 (3-4), 441-451.

    124. Preston, J., Fabra, M., Helmer, L., Johnson, E., Harris-Scott, E. & Hendy, I.W., 2020. Interactions of larval dynamics and substrate preference have ecological significance for benthic biodiversity and Ostrea edulis Linnaeus, 1758 in the presence of Crepidula fornicata. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30 (11), 2133-2149. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3446

    125. Probert, P.K., 1981. Changes in the benthic community of china clay waste deposits is Mevagissey Bay following a reduction of discharges. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 61, 789-804. Doi https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400048219

    126. Rabalais, N.N., Harper, D.E. & Turner, R.E., 2001. Responses of nekton and demersal and benthic fauna to decreasing oxygen concentrations. In: Coastal Hypoxia Consequences for Living Resources and Ecosystems, (Edited by: Rabalais, N. N. and Turner, R. E.), Coastal and Estuarine Studies 58, American Geophysical Union, pp. 115–128. Washington D.C.

    127. Ragueneau, O., Raimonet, M., Maze, C., Coston-Guarini, J., Chauvaud, L., Danto, A., Grall, J., Jean, F., Paulet, Y. M. & Thouzeau, G., 2018. The Impossible Sustainability of the Bay of Brest? Fifty Years of Ecosystem Changes, Interdisciplinary Knowledge Construction and Key Questions at the Science-Policy-Community Interface. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5. DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00124

    128. Ramsay, K., Kaiser, M.J. & Hughes, R.N. 1998. The responses of benthic scavengers to fishing disturbance by towed gears in different habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 224, 73-89.

    129. Riera, R., Tuya, F., Ramos, E., Rodríguez, M. & Monterroso, Ó., 2012. Variability of macrofaunal assemblages on the surroundings of a brine disposal. Desalination, 291, 94-100.

    130. Riley, K. 2008. Clavelina lepadiformis Light bulb sea squirt. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1483

    131. Rosenberg, R., Hellman, B. & Johansson, B., 1991. Hypoxic tolerance of marine benthic fauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 79, 127-131. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps079127

    132. Rumohr, H. & Kujawski, T., 2000. The impact of trawl fishery on the epifauna of the southern North Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57, 1389-1394.

    133. Rygg, B., 1985. Effect of sediment copper on benthic fauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 25, 83-89.

    134. Sanchez, P., Demestre, M., Ramon, M. & Kaiser, M.J., 2000. The impact of otter trawling on mud communities in the northwestern Mediterranean. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57, 1352-1358.

    135. Sinderman, C.J., 1990. Principle diseases of marine fish and shellfish, 2nd edition, Volume 2. Diseases of marine shellfish. Academic Press, 521 pp.

    136. Sköld, M., Loo, L. & Rosenberg, R., 1994. Production, dynamics and demography of an Amphiura filiformis population. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 103, 81-90.

    137. Sparks-McConkey, P.J. & Watling, L., 2001. Effects on the ecological integrity of a soft-bottom habitat from a trawling disturbance. Hydrobiologia, 456, 73-85.

    138. Stickle, W.B. & Diehl, W.J., 1987. Effects of salinity on echinoderms. In Echinoderm Studies, Vol. 2 (ed. M. Jangoux & J.M. Lawrence), pp. 235-285. A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam.

    139. Stiger-Pouvreau, V. & Thouzeau, G., 2015. Marine Species Introduced on the French Channel-Atlantic Coasts: A Review of Main Biological Invasions and Impacts. Open Journal of Ecology, 5, 227-257. DOI https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2015.55019

    140. Suchanek, T.H., 1993. Oil impacts on marine invertebrate populations and communities. American Zoologist, 33, 510-523. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/33.6.510

    141. Terlizzi, A., De Falco, G., Felline, S., Fiorentino, D., Gambi, M.C. and Cancemi, G., 2010. Effects of marine cage aquaculture on macrofauna assemblages associated with Posidonia oceanica meadows. Italian Journal of Zoology, 77, 362-371.

    142. Thorson, G., 1936. The larval development, growth and metabolism of Arctic marine bottom invertebrates etc. Meddelelser om Gronland, 100, 1-155.

    143. Thouzeau, Gérard, Chauvaud, Laurent, Grall, Jacques & Guérin, Laurent, 2000. Rôle des interactions biotiques sur le devenir du pré-recrutement et la croissance de Pecten maximus (L.) en rade de Brest. Comptes Rendus de l#&39;Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie, 323 (9), 815-825. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4469(00)01232-4

    144. Thouzeau, G., Chavaud, L., Grall, J. & Guerin, L., 2000. Do biotic interactions control pre-recruitment and growth of Pecten maximus (L.) in the Bay of Brest ? Comptes rendus - acadamies des sciences, Paris, 323, 815-825.

    145. Tillin, H. & Tyler-Walters, H., 2014b. Assessing the sensitivity of subtidal sedimentary habitats to pressures associated with marine activities. Phase 2 Report – Literature review and sensitivity assessments for ecological groups for circalittoral and offshore Level 5 biotopes. JNCC Report No. 512B,  260 pp. Available from: www.marlin.ac.uk/publications

    146. Tillin, H.M., Kessel, C., Sewell, J., Wood, C.A. & Bishop, J.D.D., 2020. Assessing the impact of key Marine Invasive Non-Native Species on Welsh MPA habitat features, fisheries and aquaculture. NRW Evidence Report. Report No: 454. Natural Resources Wales, Bangor, 260 pp. Available from https://naturalresourceswales.gov.uk/media/696519/assessing-the-impact-of-key-marine-invasive-non-native-species-on-welsh-mpa-habitat-features-fisheries-and-aquaculture.pdf

    147. Tuck, I.D., Hall, S.J., Robertson, M.R., Armstrong, E. & Basford, D.J., 1998. Effects of physical trawling disturbance in a previously unfished sheltered Scottish sea loch. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 162, 227-242.

    148. UKTAG, 2014. UK Technical Advisory Group on the Water Framework Directive [online]. Available from: http://www.wfduk.org

    149. Vaquer-Sunyer, R. & Duarte, C.M., 2008. Thresholds of hypoxia for marine biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (40), 15452-15457.DOI https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803833105

    150. Warner, G.F., 1971. On the ecology of a dense bed of the brittle star Ophiothrix fragilis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 267-282.

    151. Weston, D.P., 1990. Quantitative examination of macrobenthic community changes along an organic enrichment gradient. Marine Ecology Progress Series61 (3), 233-244.

    152. Woodin, S.A., 1974. Polychaete abundance patterns in a marine soft-sediment environment: the importance of biological interactions. Ecological Monographs, 44, 171-187.

    Citation

    This review can be cited as:

    De-Bastos, E.S.R., Marshall, C.E. & Watson, A., 2023. Kurtiella bidentata and Thyasira spp. in circalittoral muddy mixed sediment. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. [cited 09-12-2024]. Available from: https://www.marlin.ac.uk/habitat/detail/374

     Download PDF version


    Last Updated: 04/10/2023