Mediomastus fragilis, Lumbrineris spp. and venerid bivalves in circalittoral coarse sand or gravel

Summary

UK and Ireland classification

Description

Circalittoral gravels, coarse to medium sands, and shell gravels, sometimes with a small amount of silt and generally in relatively deep water (generally over 15-20 m), may be characterised by polychaetes such as Mediomastus fragilisLumbrineris spp., Glycera lapidum with the pea urchin Echinocyamus pusillus. Other taxa may include Nemertea spp., Protodorvillea kefersteiniOwenia fusiformisSpiophanes bombyx and Amphipholis squamata along with amphipods such as Ampelisca spinipes. This biotope may also be characterised by the presence of conspicuous venerid bivalves, particularly Timoclea ovata. Other robust bivalve species such as Moerella spp., Glycymeris glycymeris and Astarte sulcata may also be found in this biotope. Spatangus purpureus may be present especially where the interstices of the gravel are filled by finer particles, in which case, Gari tellinella may also be prevalent (Glemarec 1973). Venerid bivalves are often under-sampled in benthic grab surveys and as such may not be conspicuous in many infaunal datasets. Such communities in gravelly sediments may be relatively species-rich and they may also contain epifauna such as Hydroides norvegicus and Spirobranchus lamarcki. In sand wave areas this biotope may also contain elements of the SS.SSa.IMuSa.FfabMag biotope, particularly Magelona species. This biotope has previously been described as the 'Deep Venus Community' and the 'Boreal Off-Shore Gravel Association' (Ford 1923; Jones 1950) and may also be part of the Venus community described by Thorson (1957) and in the infralittoral stage described by Glemarec (1973). SS.SCS.CCS.MedLumVen may be quite variable over time and in fact may be closer to a biotope complex in which a number of biotopes or sub-biotopes may yet be defined. For example, Ford (1923) describes a 'Series A' and a 'Series B' characterised by Echinocardium cordatum-Chamelea gallina and Spatangus purpurea-Clausinella fasciata. Furthermore, mosaics of cobble and lag gravel often contain ridges of coarse gravelly sand and these localised patches are also characterised by robust veneriid and similar bivalves including Arcopagia crassaLaevicardium crassum and others including Glycymeris glycymeris (E.I.S. Rees pers. comm., 2002). In the presence of pebbles, cobbles or shell, in coarse sandy gravel sediment, the biotope may support encrusting fauna such as hydroids, Sertularia cupressina and Hydrallmania falcata, bryozoa including Disporella hispidaSchizomavella spp., and Escharella immersa and encrusting polychaetes, Spirobranchus triqueter and instances of Sabellaria spinulosa. In the presence of these encrusting forms, and with the transition of sediment types to more tidally swept circalittoral mixed sediment, the biotope may form a transition to SS.SMx.CMx.FluHyd. Other variants in gravel, sands and stones in circalittoral waters, from records in the east English Channel, show this biotope may support high densities of polychaetes and copepods, Nematoda and Nemertea. The biotope may be represented in moderately exposed, shallower areas, with muddy mixed gravel or sand with shell sediments and maerl (Hapalidiaceae), supporting the characteristic fauna of Mediomastus and Hilbigneris gracilis, but the absence of venerid bivalves. Furthermore, in impoverished variants of the biotopes, there may be a reduced component of Mediomastus and Hilbigneris gracilis. This biotope and variants of it make up a significant proportion of the offshore Irish Sea benthos (Mackie, Oliver & Rees 1995). MedLumVen may be quite variable over time. (Information from JNCC, 2022). 

Depth range

10-20 m, 20-30 m, 30-50 m, 50-100 m

Additional information

-

Listed By

Sensitivity reviewHow is sensitivity assessed?

Sensitivity characteristics of the habitat and relevant characteristic species

The biotope description and characterizing species are taken from JNCC (2015). This sedimentary biotope is characterized by circalittoral gravels, coarse to medium sands, and shell gravels, sometimes with a small amount of silt. The sediments and hydrodynamics are considered to be key physical factors structuring the biotope and their sensitivity is, therefore, considered for pressures that may lead to alterations. The key characterizing species are polychaetes such as Mediomastus fragilis, Lumbrineris spp., Glycera lapidum, Protodorvillea kefersteini, Owenia fusiformis and Spiophanes bombyx. Other taxa present include the echinoderms Echinocyamus pusillus, Spatangus purpureus and Amphipholis squamata along with amphipods such as Ampelisca spinipes. This biotope may also be characterized by the presence of conspicuous venerid bivalves, particularly Timoclea ovata and other robust bivalve species such as Moerella (now Tellina) spp., Glycymeris glycymeris and Astarte sulcata. The polychaetes are considered the key characterizing species and the sensitivity assessments focus on these, while evidence for the bivalves and other species are considered generally. The JNCC (2015) description notes that this biotope may be highly variable in terms of species composition (associated with sediment and hydrodynamics) and may contain elements of other biotopes such as SS.FfabMag, that are also assessed on this website.

Resilience and recovery rates of habitat

This biotope may recover from impacts via in-situ repair of damaged individuals. Adults may also be transported in the water column following washout from sediments. Storm events may lead to the displacement of large numbers of individuals. Most bivalves will be able to reposition within the sediment and some, such as Glycymeris glycymeris, are also able to move and to relocate following displacement and disturbance (Thomas, 1975). For immobile species or where depopulation has occurred over a large area, recovery will depend on recolonization by pelagic larvae.

A large number of species are recorded in the biotope and there may be large natural variation in species abundance over the course of a year or between years (see Dauvin, 1985 for Timoclea ovata). These variations may not alter the biotope classification where habitat parameters, such as sediment type, remain as described in the classification and many of the characteristic species groups are present. For many of the bivalve species studied, recruitment is sporadic and depends on a successful spat fall but recruitment by the characterizing polychaetes may be more reliable. However, due to the large number of pre and post-recruitment factors such as food supply, predation, and competition, the recruitment of venerid bivalves and other species is unpredictable (Olafsson et al., 1994). 

The life history characteristics of the characterizing polychaetes and other species were reviewed. The species that are present in the biotope can be broadly characterized as either opportunist species that rapidly colonize disturbed habitats and increase in abundance, or species that are larger and longer-lived and that may be more abundant in an established, mature assemblage. Species with opportunistic life strategies (small size, rapid maturation and short lifespan of 1-2 years with production of large numbers of small propagules), include the characterizing polychaetes Mediomastus fragilis and Spiophanes bombyx. These are likely to recolonize disturbed areas first, although the actual pattern will depend on the recovery of the habitat, season of occurrence and other factors. The recovery of bivalves that recruit episodically and the establishment of a representative age-structured population for larger, longer-lived organisms may require longer than two years. In an area that had been subjected to intensive aggregate extraction for 30 years, the abundance of juvenile and adults Nephtys cirrosa had greatly increased three years after extraction had stopped (Mouleaert & Hostens, 2007). An area of sand and gravel subject to chronic working for 25 years had not recovered after 6 years when compared to nearby reference sites unimpacted by operations (Boyd et al., 2005). The characterizing Moerella (now Tellina) spp. are a relatively long-lived genus (6-10 years; MES, 2008, 2010) and the number of eggs is likely to be fewer than genera that have planktotrophic larvae.  

Other longer-lived species that may represent a more developed and stable assemblage include the polychaete Owenia fusiformis which lives for 4 years and reproduces annually (Gentil et al., 1990). Glycera spp. are also longer-lived. Glycera spp. are monotelic having a single breeding period towards the end of their life but may recover through migration and may persist in disturbed sediments through their ability to burrow (Klawe & Dickie, 1957). Glycera spp. Have a high potential rate of recolonization of sediments, but the relatively slow growth rate and long lifespan suggest that recovery of biomass following initial recolonization by post-larvae is likely to take several years (MES Ltd, 2010). Following dredging of subtidal sands in summer and autumn to provide material for beach nourishment in the Bay of Blanes, (northwest Mediterranean sea, Spain) recovery was tracked by Sardá et al. (2000). Recolonization in the dredged habitats was rapid, with high densities of Owenia fusiformis in the spring following dredging, although most of these recruits did not survive summer.  However, Glycera spp. And Protodorvillea kefersteini had not recovered within two years (Sardá et al., 2000).

Little information was found for Moerella spp. Morton (2009) noted that despite the wide global distribution of the characterizing venerid bivalve, Timoclea ovata, little was known about its anatomy or basic biology. This appears to be the case for many of the other characterizing venerid bivalves and much more information was available for the polychaete species that occur in this biotope. Two linked factors that may explain this are the greater research effort in soft sediments with higher mud contents where sampling is easier than in coarse sediments. Venerid bivalves are also considered to be under-represented in grab samples (JNCC, 2015), so less is known of their occurrence on ecological and impact gradients.

The venerid bivalves in the biotope reach sexual maturity within two years, spawn at least once a year and have a pelagic dispersal phase (Guillou & Sauriau, 1985; Dauvin, 1985). No information was found concerning the number of gametes produced, but it is likely to be high as with other bivalves exhibiting planktotrophic development (Olafsson et al., 1994). Recruitment in venerids is likely to be episodic, some species such as Chamelea gallina may be long-lived (11-20 years). The long lifespan & slow growth rate suggest that this group is likely to take several years, even if initial recolonization were to occur rapidly (MES 2010). Dauvin (1985) reported that Timoclea ovata (studied as Venus ovata) recruitment occurred in July-August in the Bay of Morlaix. However, the population showed considerable pluriannual variations in recruitment, which suggests that recruitment is patchy and/or post-settlement processes are highly variable.

A number of studies have tracked the recovery of sand and coarse sand communities following disturbance from fisheries (Gilkinson et al., 2005) and aggregate extraction (Boyd et al., 2005). The available studies confirm the general trend that, following severe disturbance, habitats are recolonized rapidly by opportunistic species (Pearson & Rosenberg, 1978). Experimental deployment of hydraulic clam dredges on a sandy seabed on Banquereau, on the Scotian Shelf, eastern Canada showed that within 2 years of the impact, polychaetes and amphipods had increased in abundance after 1 year (Gilklinson et al., 2005). Two years after dredging, abundances of opportunistic species were generally elevated relative to pre-dredging levels while communities had become numerically dominated (50-70%) by Spiophanes bombyx (Gilkinson et al., 2005). Van Dalfsen et al. (2000) found that polychaetes recolonized a dredged area within 5-10 months (reference from Boyd et al., 2005), with biomass recovery predicted within 2-4 years. The polychaete and amphipods are therefore likely to recover more rapidly than the characterizing bivalves and the biotope classification may revert, during recovery, to a polychaete-dominated biotope.

Sardá et al. (1999) tracked annual cycles within a Spisula community in the Bay of Blanes (northwest Mediterranean sea, Spain) for four years. Macroinfaunal abundance peaked in spring, and decreased sharply throughout the summer, with low density in autumn and winter.  The observed trends were related to a number of species, including many that characterize this biotope such as Owenia fusiformis; Glycera spp.; Protodorvillea kefersteini; Mediomastus fragilis; Spisula subtruncata and Branchiostoma lanceolatum. The Spisula subtruncata populations were dominated by juveniles, with high abundances in spring followed by declines in summer, with very few survivors three months after recruitment. Inter-annual differences in recruitment of Owenia fusiformis were apparent and this species showed spring/summer increases. Mediomastus fragilis also had spring population peaks but more individuals persisted throughout the year. Protodorvillea kefersteini exhibited a similar pattern with spring recruitment and a population that persisted throughout the year.

The amphipod genus Ampelisca has some life history traits that allow them to recover quickly where populations are disturbed. They do not produce large numbers of offspring but reproduce regularly and the larvae are brooded, giving them a higher chance of survival within a suitable habitat than free-living larvae. Ampelisca has a short lifespan and reaches sexual maturity in a matter of months allowing a population to recover abundance and biomass in a very short period of time (MES, 2008). Experimental studies have shown Ampelisca abdita to be an early colonizer, in large abundances of defaunated sediments where local populations exist to support recovery (McCall, 1977) and Ampelisca abdita have been shown to migrate to, or from, areas to avoid unfavourable conditions (Nichols & Thompson, 1985). Ampelisca spp. Are very intolerant of oil contamination and the recovery of the Ampelisca populations in the fine sand community in the Bay of Morlaix took up to 15 years following the Amoco Cadiz oil spill, probably due to the amphipods' low fecundity, lack of pelagic larvae and the absence of local unperturbed source populations (Poggiale & Dauvin, 2001). 

Where impacts also alter the sedimentary habitat, recovery of the biotope will also depend on the recovery of the habitat to the former condition to support the characteristic biological assemblage. Recovery of sediments will be site-specific and will be influenced by currents, wave action and sediment availability (Desprez, 2000). Except in areas of mobile sands, the process tends to be slow (Kenny & Rees, 1996; Desprez, 2000 and references therein).  Boyd et al. (2005) found that in a site subject to long-term extraction (25 years), extraction scars were still visible after six years and sediment characteristics were still altered in comparison with reference areas, with ongoing effects on the biota.

Resilience assessment. Where resistance is ‘None’ or ‘Low’ and an element of habitat recovery is required, resilience is assessed as ‘Medium’ (2-10 years), based on evidence from aggregate recovery studies in similar habitats including Boyd et al. (2005). Where resistance of the characterizing species is ‘Low’ or ‘Medium’ and the habitat has not been altered, resilience is assessed as ‘High’ as, due to the number of characterizing species and variability in recruitment patterns, it is likely that the biotope would be considered representative and hence recovered after two years although some parameters such as species richness, abundance and biotopes may be altered. Recovery of the seabed from severe physical disturbances that alter sediment character may also take up to 10 years or longer (Le Bot et al., 2010), although extraction of gravel may result in more permanent changes and this will delay recovery.

NB: The resilience and the ability to recover from human-induced pressures is a combination of the environmental conditions of the site, the frequency (repeated disturbances versus a one-off event) and the intensity of the disturbance. Recovery of impacted populations will always be mediated by stochastic events and processes acting over different scales including, but not limited to, local habitat conditions, further impacts and processes such as larval supply and recruitment between populations. Full recovery is defined as the return to the state of the habitat that existed prior to impact. This does not necessarily mean that every component species has returned to its prior condition, abundance or extent but that the relevant functional components are present and the habitat is structurally and functionally recognizable as the initial habitat of interest. It should be noted that the recovery rates are only indicative of the recovery potential. 

Climate Change Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
Global warming (extreme) [Show more]

Global warming (extreme)

Extreme emission scenario (by the end of this century 2081-2100) benchmark of:

  • A 5°C rise in SST and NBT (coastal to the shelf seas),

  • A 6°C rise in surface air temperature (in eulittoral and supralittoral habitats).

  • A 1°C rise in Deep-sea habitats (>200 m) off the continental shelf, and

  • A 5°C rise in surface air temperature in intertidal habitats exclusive to Scotland. Further detail.

Evidence

Sea surface temperatures around the UK currently fall between 6 to 19°C (Huthnance, 2010). Under the middle emission, high emission and extreme scenarios, sea surface temperatures are expected to increase by 3, 4 and 5°C respectively, leading to temperatures increasing to between 22 to 24°C by the end of this century, although northern UK temperatures will be up to 5°C lower. Davenport & Davenport (2005) demonstrated that the limits of thermal tolerance to high and low temperatures reflect distribution of intertidal macroinvertebrate species. Species that occur highest on the shore are more tolerant of a wider range of temperatures than species that occurred low on the shore or subtidally. As subtidal biotopes are less exposed to temperature fluctuations, the characterizing species may be less able to tolerate temperature fluctuations.

Temperature cues influence the timing of gametogenesis and spawning in several species present in the biotope. Many polychaete species including Mediomastus fragilisOwenia fusiformis and Protodorvillea kefersteini recruit in spring/early summer (Sardá et al., 1999). Shell-boring polychaetes (Spionids), have been shown to exhibit shorter brooding periods, increased variability in larval stage at hatching, faster larval development, larger hatching size of larvae and energetic trade-offs for brooding females as a result of increased temperatures (Oyarzun et al., 2011, David & Simon, 2014, Riascos et al., 2011; cited from David, 2021). Riascos et al. (2011) found that an increase in sea surface temperature correlated with an increase in the infestation of surf clams Mesodesma donacium by the polychaete Polydora bioccipitalis on (David, 2021), which suggested an increase in boring behaviour as a result of increased temperatures. Madiera et al., (2021a) suggested that Hediste diversicolor was highly tolerant of long-lasting heatwaves and was able to increase its thermal tolerance, in order to survive.

However, the effects of temperature on polychaetes are probably species specific. There was limited evidence available on the thermal thresholds and thermal ranges for the characterizing polychaetes recorded in this biotope, and there is no direct evidence on effects of temperature to these species.

Polychaetes characterizing this biotope have wide global distributions and are likely to experience a wide range of temperature regimes. Mediomastus fragilis has been recorded throughout the British Isles (NBN, 2015) and in the Mediterranean (Serrano et al., 2011). Glycera lapidum is found in the North East Atlantic, Mediterranean, North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat (De Kluijver et al., 2022). Protodorvillea kefersteini can be found in the North Atlantic to North Sea and English Channel, Mediterranean and Black Sea (De Kluijver et al., 2022). Spiophanes bombyx is found in the Mediterranean, the North Pacific and the North-east and North American coasts of the Atlantic. Owenia fusiformis is widely distributed in coastal regions around British and Irish coasts and throughout northwest Europe, the Mediterranean, the Indian Ocean and the Pacific.

According to OBIS (2024), the characterizing polychaete species (Mediomastus fragilis, Lumbrineris spp., Glycera lapidum, Protodorvillea kefersteini, Owenia fusiformis and Spiophanes bombyx) are recorded between -5 to 30°C, with majority of records occurring between 10 to 15°C. This wide temperature range suggests that these polychaete species are able to tolerate a range of temperatures. For example, Owenia fusiformis is found in waters from -1 to 30°C (Dauvin & Thiebaut, 1994) globally. In the Bay of Seine, where there is a large population of Owenia fusiformis, the temperature varies between 5 and 20°C (Gentil et al., 1990).

In addition, there is also limited evidence available on the thermal thresholds and thermal ranges for the characterizing bivalves recorded in this biotope. Masanja et al., 2023 found that evidence shows bivalves are highly sensitive to temperature changes, and even minor deviations from their ideal temperature range could have an adverse impact on their physiology and behaviour. Despite some species acclimating over a long period of time, acute and rapid temperature increases may cause a more substantial stress (Masanja et al., 2023). Successful reproduction and bivalve growth depends on the preferred temperature range of 17 to 24°C (Masanja et al., 2023). Heat stress has been shown to cause cellular damage, oxidative stress, reduced growth and avoidance and deep burrowing behaviour. An increase in burial response has been recorded in bivalve Tellina tenuis and Tellina fabula (now Moerella) as a result of changes in thermal conditions (Ansell et al., 1980).

The distribution of the bivalve species characterizing this biotope show they are likely to experience a wide range of temperature regimes. Timoclea ovata has a wide distribution from northern Norway and Iceland south to west Africa. It is also recorded from the Canary Islands, the Azores and the Mediterranean and Black Sea (Morton, 2009). Glycymeris glycymeris and Astarte sulcata are found round the Shetland Islands, the Orkneys, the south and west coasts of Britain and in Ireland. Both are globally distributed from Norway to the Mediterranean and West Africa. Timoclea ovata is recorded between 5 to 25°C, Tellina (Moerella) spp. recorded between 5 to 30°C and Glycymeris glycymeris recorded between 0 to 25°C, with the majority of the records from these three species occurring between 10 to 15°C (OBIS, 2024). However, the thermal tolerances of Tellina tenuis and Tellina fabula (Moerella), differed based on geographic distribution. Mediterranean specimens were able to tolerate higher temperatures (LT50 of 31.7°C and 30°C respectively in the summer) compared to North Atlantic specimens (LT50 of 30.8°C and 26.5°C respectively in the summer) (Ansell et al., 1980; cited by Wilson & Elkaim, 1991). Despite the geographical differences, Ansell et al.,(1991)’s study suggested that their, upper lethal temperature was 26.5°C. Thermal tolerances may also be vary based on season and position on the shore (Wilson & Elkaim, 1991).

However, Astarte sulcata is recorded at lower temperatures than the other characterizing bivalves, from -5 to 20°C, with the majority of records occurring between 5 to 10°C (OBIS, 2024). This is mainly found in colder temperatures and at depths down to 800 m (Weber et al., 2001). In a study on the changes in species occurrence as temperature increased in the English Channel from 1985 to 2012, Gaudin et al. (2018) identified Astarte sulcata as a cold water stenotherm that decreased in occurrence by more than 33% in the west of the channel, where there was a small temperance increase of 0.07°C in the warmest month and 0.13°C in the coldest month per decade. The species had moved slightly to the east over the time period, where the temperature increase was greater (increase of 0.50°C in the warmest month and 0.54°C in the coldest month per decade) (Gaudin et al., 2018). This study also found that warm water bivalves, Timoclea ovata and Glycymeris glycymeris showed less than 20% change in its spatial occurrence over the time period. This shows that cold water bivalves like Astarte sulcata may be more vulnerable to increases in temperature compared to over characterizing bivalves.

Sensitivity assessment. The distribution of the important characterizing polychaetes suggests the species may be able to withstand predicted global warming temperatures. For example, all of the characteristic polychaetes occur in the Mediterranean Sea where sea surface temperatures can reach 28°C in summer months (www.seatemperature.org). However, reproduction may be impacted as most records occur between 10 -15°C (OBIS 2024), which suggests that higher temperature may be near the species’ upper thermal limit in the Mediterranean.

The distribution of the warm-water bivalve species Timoclea ovata and Glycymeris glycymeris are also likely to experience a wide range of temperature regimes due to their distribution. However, evidence suggests cold water bivalves like Astarte sulcata are stenotherms and may be more vulnerable to increases in temperature. Therefore, for all three scenarios (middle and high emission and extreme scenarios) resistance is assessed as ‘Medium’ to represent the potential loss or movement of some characteristic species and resilience is assessed as ‘Very Low’, as loss is likely to be a long-term decline, due to the long-term nature of ocean warming. Hence, sensitivity is assessed as ‘Medium’ to ocean warming under all three scenarios, albeit with ‘Low’ confidence.

Medium
Low
NR
NR
Help
Very Low
High
High
High
Help
Medium
Low
NR
NR
Help
Global warming (high) [Show more]

Global warming (high)

High emission scenario (by the end of this century 2081-2100) benchmark of:

  • A 4°C rise in SST, NBT (coastal to the shelf seas) and surface air temperature (in eulittoral and supralittoral habitats).

  • A 1°C rise in Deep-sea habitats (>200 m) off the continental shelf, and

  • A 3°C rise in surface air temperature in intertidal habitats exclusive to Scotland. Further detail.

Evidence

Sea surface temperatures around the UK currently fall between 6 to 19°C (Huthnance, 2010). Under the middle emission, high emission and extreme scenarios, sea surface temperatures are expected to increase by 3, 4 and 5°C respectively, leading to temperatures increasing to between 22 to 24°C by the end of this century, although northern UK temperatures will be up to 5°C lower. Davenport & Davenport (2005) demonstrated that the limits of thermal tolerance to high and low temperatures reflect distribution of intertidal macroinvertebrate species. Species that occur highest on the shore are more tolerant of a wider range of temperatures than species that occurred low on the shore or subtidally. As subtidal biotopes are less exposed to temperature fluctuations, the characterizing species may be less able to tolerate temperature fluctuations.

Temperature cues influence the timing of gametogenesis and spawning in several species present in the biotope. Many polychaete species including Mediomastus fragilisOwenia fusiformis and Protodorvillea kefersteini recruit in spring/early summer (Sardá et al., 1999). Shell-boring polychaetes (Spionids), have been shown to exhibit shorter brooding periods, increased variability in larval stage at hatching, faster larval development, larger hatching size of larvae and energetic trade-offs for brooding females as a result of increased temperatures (Oyarzun et al., 2011, David & Simon, 2014, Riascos et al., 2011; cited from David, 2021). Riascos et al. (2011) found that an increase in sea surface temperature correlated with an increase in the infestation of surf clams Mesodesma donacium by the polychaete Polydora bioccipitalis on (David, 2021), which suggested an increase in boring behaviour as a result of increased temperatures. Madiera et al., (2021a) suggested that Hediste diversicolor was highly tolerant of long-lasting heatwaves and was able to increase its thermal tolerance, in order to survive.

However, the effects of temperature on polychaetes are probably species specific. There was limited evidence available on the thermal thresholds and thermal ranges for the characterizing polychaetes recorded in this biotope, and there is no direct evidence on effects of temperature to these species.

Polychaetes characterizing this biotope have wide global distributions and are likely to experience a wide range of temperature regimes. Mediomastus fragilis has been recorded throughout the British Isles (NBN, 2015) and in the Mediterranean (Serrano et al., 2011). Glycera lapidum is found in the North East Atlantic, Mediterranean, North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat (De Kluijver et al., 2022). Protodorvillea kefersteini can be found in the North Atlantic to North Sea and English Channel, Mediterranean and Black Sea (De Kluijver et al., 2022). Spiophanes bombyx is found in the Mediterranean, the North Pacific and the North-east and North American coasts of the Atlantic. Owenia fusiformis is widely distributed in coastal regions around British and Irish coasts and throughout northwest Europe, the Mediterranean, the Indian Ocean and the Pacific.

According to OBIS (2024), the characterizing polychaete species (Mediomastus fragilis, Lumbrineris spp., Glycera lapidum, Protodorvillea kefersteini, Owenia fusiformis and Spiophanes bombyx) are recorded between -5 to 30°C, with majority of records occurring between 10 to 15°C. This wide temperature range suggests that these polychaete species are able to tolerate a range of temperatures. For example, Owenia fusiformis is found in waters from -1 to 30°C (Dauvin & Thiebaut, 1994) globally. In the Bay of Seine, where there is a large population of Owenia fusiformis, the temperature varies between 5 and 20°C (Gentil et al., 1990).

In addition, there is also limited evidence available on the thermal thresholds and thermal ranges for the characterizing bivalves recorded in this biotope. Masanja et al., 2023 found that evidence shows bivalves are highly sensitive to temperature changes, and even minor deviations from their ideal temperature range could have an adverse impact on their physiology and behaviour. Despite some species acclimating over a long period of time, acute and rapid temperature increases may cause a more substantial stress (Masanja et al., 2023). Successful reproduction and bivalve growth depends on the preferred temperature range of 17 to 24°C (Masanja et al., 2023). Heat stress has been shown to cause cellular damage, oxidative stress, reduced growth and avoidance and deep burrowing behaviour. An increase in burial response has been recorded in bivalve Tellina tenuis and Tellina fabula (now Moerella) as a result of changes in thermal conditions (Ansell et al., 1980).

The distribution of the bivalve species characterizing this biotope show they are likely to experience a wide range of temperature regimes. Timoclea ovata has a wide distribution from northern Norway and Iceland south to west Africa. It is also recorded from the Canary Islands, the Azores and the Mediterranean and Black Sea (Morton, 2009). Glycymeris glycymeris and Astarte sulcata are found round the Shetland Islands, the Orkneys, the south and west coasts of Britain and in Ireland. Both are globally distributed from Norway to the Mediterranean and West Africa. Timoclea ovata is recorded between 5 to 25°C, Tellina (Moerella) spp. recorded between 5 to 30°C and Glycymeris glycymeris recorded between 0 to 25°C, with the majority of the records from these three species occurring between 10 to 15°C (OBIS, 2024). However, the thermal tolerances of Tellina tenuis and Tellina fabula (Moerella), differed based on geographic distribution. Mediterranean specimens were able to tolerate higher temperatures (LT50 of 31.7°C and 30°C respectively in the summer) compared to North Atlantic specimens (LT50 of 30.8°C and 26.5°C respectively in the summer) (Ansell et al., 1980; cited by Wilson & Elkaim, 1991). Despite the geographical differences, Ansell et al.,(1991)’s study suggested that their, upper lethal temperature was 26.5°C. Thermal tolerances may also be vary based on season and position on the shore (Wilson & Elkaim, 1991).

However, Astarte sulcata is recorded at lower temperatures than the other characterizing bivalves, from -5 to 20°C, with the majority of records occurring between 5 to 10°C (OBIS, 2024). This is mainly found in colder temperatures and at depths down to 800 m (Weber et al., 2001). In a study on the changes in species occurrence as temperature increased in the English Channel from 1985 to 2012, Gaudin et al. (2018) identified Astarte sulcata as a cold water stenotherm that decreased in occurrence by more than 33% in the west of the channel, where there was a small temperance increase of 0.07°C in the warmest month and 0.13°C in the coldest month per decade. The species had moved slightly to the east over the time period, where the temperature increase was greater (increase of 0.50°C in the warmest month and 0.54°C in the coldest month per decade) (Gaudin et al., 2018). This study also found that warm water bivalves, Timoclea ovata and Glycymeris glycymeris showed less than 20% change in its spatial occurrence over the time period. This shows that cold water bivalves like Astarte sulcata may be more vulnerable to increases in temperature compared to over characterizing bivalves.

Sensitivity assessment. The distribution of the important characterizing polychaetes suggests the species may be able to withstand predicted global warming temperatures. For example, all of the characteristic polychaetes occur in the Mediterranean Sea where sea surface temperatures can reach 28°C in summer months (www.seatemperature.org). However, reproduction may be impacted as most records occur between 10 -15°C (OBIS 2024), which suggests that higher temperature may be near the species’ upper thermal limit in the Mediterranean.

The distribution of the warm-water bivalve species Timoclea ovata and Glycymeris glycymeris are also likely to experience a wide range of temperature regimes due to their distribution. However, evidence suggests cold water bivalves like Astarte sulcata are stenotherms and may be more vulnerable to increases in temperature. Therefore, for all three scenarios (middle and high emission and extreme scenarios) resistance is assessed as ‘Medium’ to represent the potential loss or movement of some characteristic species and resilience is assessed as ‘Very Low’, as loss is likely to be a long-term decline, due to the long-term nature of ocean warming. Hence, sensitivity is assessed as ‘Medium’ to ocean warming under all three scenarios, albeit with ‘Low’ confidence.

Medium
Low
NR
NR
Help
Very Low
High
High
High
Help
Medium
Low
NR
NR
Help
Global warming (middle) [Show more]

Global warming (middle)

Middle emission scenario (by the end of this century 2081-2100) benchmark of:

  • A 3°C rise in SST, NBT (coastal to the shelf seas) and surface air temperature (in eulittoral and supralittoral habitats).

  • A 1°C rise in Deep-sea habitats (>200 m) off the continental shelf.

  • A 2°C rise in surface air temperature in intertidal habitats exclusive to Scotland. Further detail.

Evidence

Sea surface temperatures around the UK currently fall between 6 to 19°C (Huthnance, 2010). Under the middle emission, high emission and extreme scenarios, sea surface temperatures are expected to increase by 3, 4 and 5°C respectively, leading to temperatures increasing to between 22 to 24°C by the end of this century, although northern UK temperatures will be up to 5°C lower. Davenport & Davenport (2005) demonstrated that the limits of thermal tolerance to high and low temperatures reflect distribution of intertidal macroinvertebrate species. Species that occur highest on the shore are more tolerant of a wider range of temperatures than species that occurred low on the shore or subtidally. As subtidal biotopes are less exposed to temperature fluctuations, the characterizing species may be less able to tolerate temperature fluctuations.

Temperature cues influence the timing of gametogenesis and spawning in several species present in the biotope. Many polychaete species including Mediomastus fragilisOwenia fusiformis and Protodorvillea kefersteini recruit in spring/early summer (Sardá et al., 1999). Shell-boring polychaetes (Spionids), have been shown to exhibit shorter brooding periods, increased variability in larval stage at hatching, faster larval development, larger hatching size of larvae and energetic trade-offs for brooding females as a result of increased temperatures (Oyarzun et al., 2011, David & Simon, 2014, Riascos et al., 2011; cited from David, 2021). Riascos et al. (2011) found that an increase in sea surface temperature correlated with an increase in the infestation of surf clams Mesodesma donacium by the polychaete Polydora bioccipitalis on (David, 2021), which suggested an increase in boring behaviour as a result of increased temperatures. Madiera et al., (2021a) suggested that Hediste diversicolor was highly tolerant of long-lasting heatwaves and was able to increase its thermal tolerance, in order to survive.

However, the effects of temperature on polychaetes are probably species specific. There was limited evidence available on the thermal thresholds and thermal ranges for the characterizing polychaetes recorded in this biotope, and there is no direct evidence on effects of temperature to these species.

Polychaetes characterizing this biotope have wide global distributions and are likely to experience a wide range of temperature regimes. Mediomastus fragilis has been recorded throughout the British Isles (NBN, 2015) and in the Mediterranean (Serrano et al., 2011). Glycera lapidum is found in the North East Atlantic, Mediterranean, North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat (De Kluijver et al., 2022). Protodorvillea kefersteini can be found in the North Atlantic to North Sea and English Channel, Mediterranean and Black Sea (De Kluijver et al., 2022). Spiophanes bombyx is found in the Mediterranean, the North Pacific and the North-east and North American coasts of the Atlantic. Owenia fusiformis is widely distributed in coastal regions around British and Irish coasts and throughout northwest Europe, the Mediterranean, the Indian Ocean and the Pacific.

According to OBIS (2024), the characterizing polychaete species (Mediomastus fragilis, Lumbrineris spp., Glycera lapidum, Protodorvillea kefersteini, Owenia fusiformis and Spiophanes bombyx) are recorded between -5 to 30°C, with majority of records occurring between 10 to 15°C. This wide temperature range suggests that these polychaete species are able to tolerate a range of temperatures. For example, Owenia fusiformis is found in waters from -1 to 30°C (Dauvin & Thiebaut, 1994) globally. In the Bay of Seine, where there is a large population of Owenia fusiformis, the temperature varies between 5 and 20°C (Gentil et al., 1990).

In addition, there is also limited evidence available on the thermal thresholds and thermal ranges for the characterizing bivalves recorded in this biotope. Masanja et al., 2023 found that evidence shows bivalves are highly sensitive to temperature changes, and even minor deviations from their ideal temperature range could have an adverse impact on their physiology and behaviour. Despite some species acclimating over a long period of time, acute and rapid temperature increases may cause a more substantial stress (Masanja et al., 2023). Successful reproduction and bivalve growth depends on the preferred temperature range of 17 to 24°C (Masanja et al., 2023). Heat stress has been shown to cause cellular damage, oxidative stress, reduced growth and avoidance and deep burrowing behaviour. An increase in burial response has been recorded in bivalve Tellina tenuis and Tellina fabula (now Moerella) as a result of changes in thermal conditions (Ansell et al., 1980).

The distribution of the bivalve species characterizing this biotope show they are likely to experience a wide range of temperature regimes. Timoclea ovata has a wide distribution from northern Norway and Iceland south to west Africa. It is also recorded from the Canary Islands, the Azores and the Mediterranean and Black Sea (Morton, 2009). Glycymeris glycymeris and Astarte sulcata are found round the Shetland Islands, the Orkneys, the south and west coasts of Britain and in Ireland. Both are globally distributed from Norway to the Mediterranean and West Africa. Timoclea ovata is recorded between 5 to 25°C, Tellina (Moerella) spp. recorded between 5 to 30°C and Glycymeris glycymeris recorded between 0 to 25°C, with the majority of the records from these three species occurring between 10 to 15°C (OBIS, 2024). However, the thermal tolerances of Tellina tenuis and Tellina fabula (Moerella), differed based on geographic distribution. Mediterranean specimens were able to tolerate higher temperatures (LT50 of 31.7°C and 30°C respectively in the summer) compared to North Atlantic specimens (LT50 of 30.8°C and 26.5°C respectively in the summer) (Ansell et al., 1980; cited by Wilson & Elkaim, 1991). Despite the geographical differences, Ansell et al.,(1991)’s study suggested that their, upper lethal temperature was 26.5°C. Thermal tolerances may also be vary based on season and position on the shore (Wilson & Elkaim, 1991).

However, Astarte sulcata is recorded at lower temperatures than the other characterizing bivalves, from -5 to 20°C, with the majority of records occurring between 5 to 10°C (OBIS, 2024). This is mainly found in colder temperatures and at depths down to 800 m (Weber et al., 2001). In a study on the changes in species occurrence as temperature increased in the English Channel from 1985 to 2012, Gaudin et al. (2018) identified Astarte sulcata as a cold water stenotherm that decreased in occurrence by more than 33% in the west of the channel, where there was a small temperance increase of 0.07°C in the warmest month and 0.13°C in the coldest month per decade. The species had moved slightly to the east over the time period, where the temperature increase was greater (increase of 0.50°C in the warmest month and 0.54°C in the coldest month per decade) (Gaudin et al., 2018). This study also found that warm water bivalves, Timoclea ovata and Glycymeris glycymeris showed less than 20% change in its spatial occurrence over the time period. This shows that cold water bivalves like Astarte sulcata may be more vulnerable to increases in temperature compared to over characterizing bivalves.

Sensitivity assessment. The distribution of the important characterizing polychaetes suggests the species may be able to withstand predicted global warming temperatures. For example, all of the characteristic polychaetes occur in the Mediterranean Sea where sea surface temperatures can reach 28°C in summer months (www.seatemperature.org). However, reproduction may be impacted as most records occur between 10 -15°C (OBIS 2024), which suggests that higher temperature may be near the species’ upper thermal limit in the Mediterranean.

The distribution of the warm-water bivalve species Timoclea ovata and Glycymeris glycymeris are also likely to experience a wide range of temperature regimes due to their distribution. However, evidence suggests cold water bivalves like Astarte sulcata are stenotherms and may be more vulnerable to increases in temperature. Therefore, for all three scenarios (middle and high emission and extreme scenarios) resistance is assessed as ‘Medium’ to represent the potential loss or movement of some characteristic species and resilience is assessed as ‘Very Low’, as loss is likely to be a long-term decline, due to the long-term nature of ocean warming. Hence, sensitivity is assessed as ‘Medium’ to ocean warming under all three scenarios, albeit with ‘Low’ confidence.

Medium
Low
NR
NR
Help
Very Low
High
High
High
Help
Medium
Low
NR
NR
Help
Marine heatwaves (high) [Show more]

Marine heatwaves (high)

High emission scenario benchmark: A marine heatwave occurring every two years, with a mean duration of 120 days, and a maximum intensity of 3.5°C. Further detail.

Evidence

Marine heatwaves due to increased air-sea heat flux are predicted to occur more frequently, last for longer and at increased intensity by the end of this century under both middle and high emission scenarios (Frölicher et al., 2018). Climate change will not only shift mean sea surface temperatures but will also increase the intensity of extreme events, exerting additional stress on ecosystems.

There is limited evidence on the upper thermal limits of the characterizing polychaete species in this biotope but these species appear to be tolerant of a wide range of temperatures (see global warming above), due to wide global distributions. For example all of the characteristic polychaetes occur in the Mediterranean Sea where sea temperatures can reach 28°C in summer months (www.seatemperature.org). In addition, the characterizing polychaete species have been recorded up to 30°C (OBIS, 2024) but most records occur between 10 -15°C, which suggests that higher temperatures may be near the species’ upper thermal limit in the Mediterranean. Madiera et al., (2021) noted that Hediste diversicolour was able to tolerance long-lasting heatwaves and increase its thermal tolerance

There is also limited evidence available on the thermal thresholds and thermal ranges for all the characterizing bivalves recorded in this biotope. Masanja et al. (2023) found that bivalves were highly sensitive to temperature changes, and even minor deviations from their ideal temperature range could have an adverse impact on their physiology and behaviour. Despite some species acclimating over a long period of time, acute and rapid temperature increases may cause more substantial stress (Masanja et al., 2023). Successful reproduction and bivalve growth depend on the preferred temperature range of 17 to 24°C (Masanja et al., 2023). Heat stress has been shown to cause cellular damage, oxidative stress, reduced growth and avoidance and deep burrowing behaviour. An increase in burial response was recorded in bivalve Tellina tenuis and Tellina fabula (Moerella) as a result of changes in thermal conditions (Ansell et al., 1980).

The distribution of warm water bivalve species Timoclea ovata and Glycymeris glycymeris characterising this biotope show they are likely to experience a wide range of temperature regimes due to their distribution (see global warming above). However, evidence suggests cold water bivalves like Astarte sulcata are stenotherms and may be more vulnerable to increases in temperature. Astarte sulcata is recorded from -5 to 20°C, with the majority of records occurring between 5 to 10°C (OBIS, 2024), which suggests it has a lower thermal threshold than other characterizing species and is more vulnerable to the effects of heatwaves. In a study on the changes in species occurrence as temperature increased in the English Channel from 1985 to 2012, Gaudin et al. (2018) found Astarte sulcata decreased in occurrence by more than 33% in the west of the channel, where there was a small temperance increase of 0.07°C in the warmest month and 0.13°C in the coldest month per decade. In the study, the species had moved slightly to the east over the time period, where the temperature increase was greater (an increase of 0.50°C in the warmest month and 0.54°C in the coldest month per decade) (Gaudin et al., 2018).

Sensitivity assessment. Under the middle emission scenario, if heatwaves occurred every three years, with a maximum intensity of 2°C for 80 days by the end of this century, summer sea temperatures could reach up to 24°C in southern England. Under the high emission scenario, if heatwaves occur every two years by the end of this century, reaching a maximum intensity of 3.5°C for 120 days, this could lead to the heatwave lasting the entire summer with temperatures reaching up to 26.5°C. As a precautionary approach, resistance is assessed as ‘Medium’. The resilience of bivalve and polychaete populations is likely to be ‘Medium’ (2-10 years), hence, recovery may be interrupted by the occurrence of a further heatwave.  Therefore, resilience has been assessed as ‘Very low’, leading to a sensitivity assessment of ‘Medium’ but with low confidence due to lack of direct evidence .

Medium
Low
NR
NR
Help
Very Low
High
High
High
Help
Medium
Low
NR
NR
Help
Marine heatwaves (middle) [Show more]

Marine heatwaves (middle)

Middle emission scenario benchmark:  A marine heatwave occurring every three years, with a mean duration of 80 days, with a maximum intensity of 2°C. Further detail.

Evidence

Marine heatwaves due to increased air-sea heat flux are predicted to occur more frequently, last for longer and at increased intensity by the end of this century under both middle and high emission scenarios (Frölicher et al., 2018). Climate change will not only shift mean sea surface temperatures but will also increase the intensity of extreme events, exerting additional stress on ecosystems.

There is limited evidence on the upper thermal limits of the characterizing polychaete species in this biotope but these species appear to be tolerant of a wide range of temperatures (see global warming above), due to wide global distributions. For example all of the characteristic polychaetes occur in the Mediterranean Sea where sea temperatures can reach 28°C in summer months (www.seatemperature.org). In addition, the characterizing polychaete species have been recorded up to 30°C (OBIS, 2024) but most records occur between 10 -15°C, which suggests that higher temperatures may be near the species’ upper thermal limit in the Mediterranean. Madiera et al., (2021) noted that Hediste diversicolour was able to tolerance long-lasting heatwaves and increase its thermal tolerance

There is also limited evidence available on the thermal thresholds and thermal ranges for all the characterizing bivalves recorded in this biotope. Masanja et al. (2023) found that bivalves were highly sensitive to temperature changes, and even minor deviations from their ideal temperature range could have an adverse impact on their physiology and behaviour. Despite some species acclimating over a long period of time, acute and rapid temperature increases may cause more substantial stress (Masanja et al., 2023). Successful reproduction and bivalve growth depend on the preferred temperature range of 17 to 24°C (Masanja et al., 2023). Heat stress has been shown to cause cellular damage, oxidative stress, reduced growth and avoidance and deep burrowing behaviour. An increase in burial response was recorded in bivalve Tellina tenuis and Tellina fabula (Moerella) as a result of changes in thermal conditions (Ansell et al., 1980).

The distribution of warm water bivalve species Timoclea ovata and Glycymeris glycymeris characterising this biotope show they are likely to experience a wide range of temperature regimes due to their distribution (see global warming above). However, evidence suggests cold water bivalves like Astarte sulcata are stenotherms and may be more vulnerable to increases in temperature. Astarte sulcata is recorded from -5 to 20°C, with the majority of records occurring between 5 to 10°C (OBIS, 2024), which suggests it has a lower thermal threshold than other characterizing species and is more vulnerable to the effects of heatwaves. In a study on the changes in species occurrence as temperature increased in the English Channel from 1985 to 2012, Gaudin et al. (2018) found Astarte sulcata decreased in occurrence by more than 33% in the west of the channel, where there was a small temperance increase of 0.07°C in the warmest month and 0.13°C in the coldest month per decade. In the study, the species had moved slightly to the east over the time period, where the temperature increase was greater (an increase of 0.50°C in the warmest month and 0.54°C in the coldest month per decade) (Gaudin et al., 2018).

Sensitivity assessment. Under the middle emission scenario, if heatwaves occurred every three years, with a maximum intensity of 2°C for 80 days by the end of this century, summer sea temperatures could reach up to 24°C in southern England. Under the high emission scenario, if heatwaves occur every two years by the end of this century, reaching a maximum intensity of 3.5°C for 120 days, this could lead to the heatwave lasting the entire summer with temperatures reaching up to 26.5°C. As a precautionary approach, resistance is assessed as ‘Medium’. The resilience of bivalve and polychaete populations is likely to be ‘Medium’ (2-10 years), hence, recovery may be interrupted by the occurrence of a further heatwave.  Therefore, resilience has been assessed as ‘Very low’, leading to a sensitivity assessment of ‘Medium’ but with low confidence due to lack of direct evidence .

Medium
Low
NR
NR
Help
Very Low
High
High
High
Help
Medium
Low
NR
NR
Help
Ocean acidification (high) [Show more]

Ocean acidification (high)

High emission scenario benchmark: a further decrease in pH of 0.35 (annual mean) and corresponding 120% increase in H+ ions , seasonal aragonite saturation of 20% of UK coastal waters and North Sea bottom waters, and the aragonite saturation horizon in the NE Atlantic, off the continental shelf, occurring at a depth of 400 m by the end of this century 2081-2100. Further detail 

Evidence

Increasing levels of CO2 in the atmosphere have led to the average pH of sea surface waters dropping from 8.25 in the 1700s to 8.14 in the 1990s (Jacobson, 2005).

Many species of polychaetes are osmoconformers and, when exposed to low salinities, swell uncontrollably. Some intertidal species can withstand short periods of stress and fluctuations in salinity (Glasby et al., 2021). Some groups of polychaetes, such as capitellids, are able to thrive in low oxygen and mineral rich environments, at hydrocarbon seeps. Capitella spp. has been shown to have an adapted physiology to exploit low oxygen and can quickly respond when favourable oxygen conditions return (Forbes et al., 1994 cited by Glasby et al., 2021). There is no direct evidence on the effects of ocean acidification on the characteristic polychaetes. However, the polychaetes are not calcifying polychaetes with calcareous tubes and therefore, might be able to withstand effects of ocean acidification.

No direct evidence on the effects of ocean acidification on the characteristic bivalves Timoclea ovata, Glycymeris glycymeris, Astarte sulcata and Tellina (Moerella) spp. was found. However, evidence suggests that bivalves are negatively impacted by ocean acidification. An increase in pCO2 decreases the calcium carbonate saturation of aragonite and calcite, which leads to negative effects on growth and calcification of bivalves (Tan & Zheng, 2020). The calcium carbonate shells of bivalves provide refuge from various stressors. Reduced calcification rate was observed at different bivalve life stages, but the greatest rate of shell dissolution was found in the larval stage, which suggests these early life stages are highly sensitive. Further evidence suggests acidification impacts growth rates, development in early life stages and survival amongst bivalve species (Tan & Zheng, 2020).

For example, Garrard et al., 2014 found a decrease in the abundance and species richness of bivalves in response to low pH levels (minimum pH was 7.1). Changes in the community was likely due to indirect effects of acidification rather than direct effects (Garrard et al., 2014).

Sensitivity assessment. Direct evidence of the impact of ocean acidification on the polychaete and bivalve species characterizing this biotope is lacking. However, Mediomastus fragilis, Lumbrineris spp., Glycera lapidum, Protodorvillea kefersteini, Owenia fusiformis and Spiophanes bombyx are non-calcifying polychaetes and are likely be tolerant of ocean acidification expected for the end of this century. However, bivalve populations may experience adverse effects of ocean acidification. Therefore, under both the middle and high emission scenarios the biotope is assessed as having ‘Medium’ resistance to ocean acidification to represent the possible loss of bivalve species Resilience is assessed as ‘Very low’, and sensitivity as  ‘Medium’ at the benchmark level with low confidence due to lack of direct evidence.

Medium
Low
NR
NR
Help
Very Low
High
High
High
Help
Medium
Low
NR
NR
Help
Ocean acidification (middle) [Show more]

Ocean acidification (middle)

Middle emission scenario benchmark: a further decrease in pH of 0.15 (annual mean) and corresponding 35% increase in H+ ions with no coastal aragonite undersaturation and the aragonite saturation horizon in the NE Atlantic, off the continental shelf, at a depth of 800 m by the end of this century 2081-2100. Further detail.

Evidence

Increasing levels of CO2 in the atmosphere have led to the average pH of sea surface waters dropping from 8.25 in the 1700s to 8.14 in the 1990s (Jacobson, 2005).

Many species of polychaetes are osmoconformers and, when exposed to low salinities, swell uncontrollably. Some intertidal species can withstand short periods of stress and fluctuations in salinity (Glasby et al., 2021). Some groups of polychaetes, such as capitellids, are able to thrive in low oxygen and mineral rich environments, at hydrocarbon seeps. Capitella spp. has been shown to have an adapted physiology to exploit low oxygen and can quickly respond when favourable oxygen conditions return (Forbes et al., 1994 cited by Glasby et al., 2021). There is no direct evidence on the effects of ocean acidification on the characteristic polychaetes. However, the polychaetes are not calcifying polychaetes with calcareous tubes and therefore, might be able to withstand effects of ocean acidification.

No direct evidence on the effects of ocean acidification on the characteristic bivalves Timoclea ovata, Glycymeris glycymeris, Astarte sulcata and Tellina (Moerella) spp. was found. However, evidence suggests that bivalves are negatively impacted by ocean acidification. An increase in pCO2 decreases the calcium carbonate saturation of aragonite and calcite, which leads to negative effects on growth and calcification of bivalves (Tan & Zheng, 2020). The calcium carbonate shells of bivalves provide refuge from various stressors. Reduced calcification rate was observed at different bivalve life stages, but the greatest rate of shell dissolution was found in the larval stage, which suggests these early life stages are highly sensitive. Further evidence suggests acidification impacts growth rates, development in early life stages and survival amongst bivalve species (Tan & Zheng, 2020).

For example, Garrard et al., 2014 found a decrease in the abundance and species richness of bivalves in response to low pH levels (minimum pH was 7.1). Changes in the community was likely due to indirect effects of acidification rather than direct effects (Garrard et al., 2014).

Sensitivity assessment. Direct evidence of the impact of ocean acidification on the polychaete and bivalve species characterizing this biotope is lacking. However, Mediomastus fragilis, Lumbrineris spp., Glycera lapidum, Protodorvillea kefersteini, Owenia fusiformis and Spiophanes bombyx are non-calcifying polychaetes and are likely be tolerant of ocean acidification expected for the end of this century. However, bivalve populations may experience adverse effects of ocean acidification. Therefore, under both the middle and high emission scenarios the biotope is assessed as having ‘Medium’ resistance to ocean acidification to represent the possible loss of bivalve species Resilience is assessed as ‘Very low’, and sensitivity as  ‘Medium’ at the benchmark level with low confidence due to lack of direct evidence.

Medium
Low
NR
NR
Help
Very Low
High
High
High
Help
Medium
Low
NR
NR
Help
Sea level rise (extreme) [Show more]

Sea level rise (extreme)

Extreme scenario benchmark: a 107 cm rise in average UK by the end of this century (2018-2100). Further detail.

Evidence

Sea-level rise is occurring through a combination of thermal expansion and ice melt. Sea levels have risen 1-3 mm/yrin the last century (Cazenave & Nerem, 2004, Church et al., 2004, Church & White, 2006). The most recent projections on sea-level rise suggest a rise of 50 cm under the middle emission scenario, 70 cm under the high emission scenario, and 107 cm under the extreme scenario. 

The characterising species in this biotope have a broad depth range, which may allow them to tolerate sea – level rise. The characterizing bivalves (Timoclea ovata, Glycymeris glycymeris and Tellina (Moerella) spp. occur from the intertidal zones down to 200 m (Oliver et al., 2016). Astarte sulcata is found at even deeper depths of 800 m (Weber et al., 2001).

Polychaetes are common in the deep sea, occurring in the water column and in sediment in deep trenches (Glasby et al., 2021). Owenia fusiformis has been found from the intertidal down to 4500 m, Mediomastus fragilis has been recorded down to around 600 m and Protodorvillea kefersteini has been recorded down to around 2000 m (OBIS, 2024). In addition, Glycera lapidum and Lumbrineris spp have been recorded down to 6000 m (OBIS, 2024).

Understanding how sea-level rise will affect tidal energy, and the tide-swept nature of a habitat, is fraught with uncertainty, although evidence appears to suggest that any alterations will be non-linear (Pickering et al., 2012, Li et al., 2016). Modelling potential outcomes of sea-level rise on the tidal and residual currents in the Bohai Sea, China showed effects were site dependent, with energy either increasing or decreasing (Li et al., 2016). Similarly, Pickering et al. (2012) found a similar pattern around the UK for tidal amplitude. The effects of sea-level rise and increased wave action may be increased further due to storms and storm surges. IPCC (2019) note that the frequency of extreme sea-level events (e.g. due to storms) are predicted to increase as sea-level rises, however there is no consensus on the future storm and, hence, wave climate around UK coasts (Mossman et al., 2015; Lowe et al., 2018; Palmer et al., 2018).

Sensitivity assessment. This habitat occurs from 10 to 100 m in relatively deep water (JNCC, 2015). The characterizing polychaete and bivalve species are abundant at depths more than 200 m, suggesting these species will be tolerant of future sea-level rise. Therefore, an increase in sea-level rise is unlikely to have a large impact on this biotope and therefore resistance to sea-level rise has been assessed as ‘High’ for the middle (50 cm), and high (70 cm) emission scenario, and for the extreme scenario (107 cm). As no recovery is deemed necessary, resilience has been assessed as ‘High’, and therefore this species has been classified as ‘Not sensitive’ to sea-level rise at each of the benchmarks.

High
Low
NR
NR
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Not sensitive
Low
NR
NR
Help
Sea level rise (high) [Show more]

Sea level rise (high)

High emission scenario benchmark: a 70 cm rise in average UK by the end of this century (2018-2100). Further detail.

Evidence

Sea-level rise is occurring through a combination of thermal expansion and ice melt. Sea levels have risen 1-3 mm/yrin the last century (Cazenave & Nerem, 2004, Church et al., 2004, Church & White, 2006). The most recent projections on sea-level rise suggest a rise of 50 cm under the middle emission scenario, 70 cm under the high emission scenario, and 107 cm under the extreme scenario. 

The characterising species in this biotope have a broad depth range, which may allow them to tolerate sea – level rise. The characterizing bivalves (Timoclea ovata, Glycymeris glycymeris and Tellina (Moerella) spp. occur from the intertidal zones down to 200 m (Oliver et al., 2016). Astarte sulcata is found at even deeper depths of 800 m (Weber et al., 2001).

Polychaetes are common in the deep sea, occurring in the water column and in sediment in deep trenches (Glasby et al., 2021). Owenia fusiformis has been found from the intertidal down to 4500 m, Mediomastus fragilis has been recorded down to around 600 m and Protodorvillea kefersteini has been recorded down to around 2000 m (OBIS, 2024). In addition, Glycera lapidum and Lumbrineris spp have been recorded down to 6000 m (OBIS, 2024).

Understanding how sea-level rise will affect tidal energy, and the tide-swept nature of a habitat, is fraught with uncertainty, although evidence appears to suggest that any alterations will be non-linear (Pickering et al., 2012, Li et al., 2016). Modelling potential outcomes of sea-level rise on the tidal and residual currents in the Bohai Sea, China showed effects were site dependent, with energy either increasing or decreasing (Li et al., 2016). Similarly, Pickering et al. (2012) found a similar pattern around the UK for tidal amplitude. The effects of sea-level rise and increased wave action may be increased further due to storms and storm surges. IPCC (2019) note that the frequency of extreme sea-level events (e.g. due to storms) are predicted to increase as sea-level rises, however there is no consensus on the future storm and, hence, wave climate around UK coasts (Mossman et al., 2015; Lowe et al., 2018; Palmer et al., 2018).

Sensitivity assessment. This habitat occurs from 10 to 100 m in relatively deep water (JNCC, 2015). The characterizing polychaete and bivalve species are abundant at depths more than 200 m, suggesting these species will be tolerant of future sea-level rise. Therefore, an increase in sea-level rise is unlikely to have a large impact on this biotope and therefore resistance to sea-level rise has been assessed as ‘High’ for the middle (50 cm), and high (70 cm) emission scenario, and for the extreme scenario (107 cm). As no recovery is deemed necessary, resilience has been assessed as ‘High’, and therefore this species has been classified as ‘Not sensitive’ to sea-level rise at each of the benchmarks.

High
Low
NR
NR
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Not sensitive
Low
NR
NR
Help
Sea level rise (middle) [Show more]

Sea level rise (middle)

Middle emission scenario benchmark: a 50 cm rise in average UK sea-level rise by the end of this century (2081-2100). Further detail.

Evidence

Sea-level rise is occurring through a combination of thermal expansion and ice melt. Sea levels have risen 1-3 mm/yrin the last century (Cazenave & Nerem, 2004, Church et al., 2004, Church & White, 2006). The most recent projections on sea-level rise suggest a rise of 50 cm under the middle emission scenario, 70 cm under the high emission scenario, and 107 cm under the extreme scenario. 

The characterising species in this biotope have a broad depth range, which may allow them to tolerate sea – level rise. The characterizing bivalves (Timoclea ovata, Glycymeris glycymeris and Tellina (Moerella) spp. occur from the intertidal zones down to 200 m (Oliver et al., 2016). Astarte sulcata is found at even deeper depths of 800 m (Weber et al., 2001).

Polychaetes are common in the deep sea, occurring in the water column and in sediment in deep trenches (Glasby et al., 2021). Owenia fusiformis has been found from the intertidal down to 4500 m, Mediomastus fragilis has been recorded down to around 600 m and Protodorvillea kefersteini has been recorded down to around 2000 m (OBIS, 2024). In addition, Glycera lapidum and Lumbrineris spp have been recorded down to 6000 m (OBIS, 2024).

Understanding how sea-level rise will affect tidal energy, and the tide-swept nature of a habitat, is fraught with uncertainty, although evidence appears to suggest that any alterations will be non-linear (Pickering et al., 2012, Li et al., 2016). Modelling potential outcomes of sea-level rise on the tidal and residual currents in the Bohai Sea, China showed effects were site dependent, with energy either increasing or decreasing (Li et al., 2016). Similarly, Pickering et al. (2012) found a similar pattern around the UK for tidal amplitude. The effects of sea-level rise and increased wave action may be increased further due to storms and storm surges. IPCC (2019) note that the frequency of extreme sea-level events (e.g. due to storms) are predicted to increase as sea-level rises, however there is no consensus on the future storm and, hence, wave climate around UK coasts (Mossman et al., 2015; Lowe et al., 2018; Palmer et al., 2018).

Sensitivity assessment. This habitat occurs from 10 to 100 m in relatively deep water (JNCC, 2015). The characterizing polychaete and bivalve species are abundant at depths more than 200 m, suggesting these species will be tolerant of future sea-level rise. Therefore, an increase in sea-level rise is unlikely to have a large impact on this biotope and therefore resistance to sea-level rise has been assessed as ‘High’ for the middle (50 cm), and high (70 cm) emission scenario, and for the extreme scenario (107 cm). As no recovery is deemed necessary, resilience has been assessed as ‘High’, and therefore this species has been classified as ‘Not sensitive’ to sea-level rise at each of the benchmarks.

High
Low
NR
NR
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Not sensitive
Low
NR
NR
Help

Hydrological Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
Temperature increase (local) [Show more]

Temperature increase (local)

Benchmark. A 5°C increase in temperature for one month, or 2°C for one year. Further detail

Evidence

Davenport & Davenport (2005) demonstrated that the limits of thermal tolerance to high and low temperatures relate to the distribution of intertidal macroinvertebrate species. Species that occur highest on the shore are more tolerant of a wider range of temperatures than species that occurred low on the shore or subtidally. As subtidal biotopes are less exposed to temperature fluctuations, the characterizing species may be less able to tolerate temperature fluctuations.

No direct evidence was found to support assessment of this pressure. Very few laboratory studies have been carried out and the sensitivity assessment is based on studies monitoring settlement and recruitment and records of species distribution. 

Kröncke et al. (1998) examined long-term changes in the macrofauna in the subtidal zone off Norderney, one of the East Frisian barrier islands. The analysis suggested that macrofauna were severely affected by cold winters whereas storms and hot summers have no impact on the benthos. A long-term increase in temperature might cause a shift in species composition. Long‐term analysis of the North Sea pelagic system has identified yearly variations in larval abundance of Echinodermata, Arthropoda, and Mollusca larvae that correlate with sea surface temperatures. Larvae of benthic echinoderms and decapod crustaceans increased after the mid‐1980s, coincident with a rise in North Sea sea surface temperature, whereas bivalve larvae underwent a reduction (Kirby et al., 2008). An increase in temperature may alter larval supply and in the long-term, and over large spatial scales, may result in changes in community composition.

Temperature cues influence the timing of gametogenesis and spawning in several species present in the biotope. Many polychaete species including Mediomastus fragilisOwenia fusiformis and Protodorvillea kefersteini recruit in spring/early summer recruitment (Sardá et al., 1999).

The characterizing bivalve Timoclea ovata has a wide distribution from northern Norway and Iceland south to west Africa.  It is also recorded from the Canary Islands, the Azores and the Mediterranean and Black Sea (Morton, 2009). Goodallia triangularis also has a widespread distribution in the Atlantic coasts of Europe to the Mediterranean and north-western Africa (Giribet & Peňas, 1999). Polychaetes and other species associated with the biotope may also have wide global distributions. Mediomastus fragilis has been recorded throughout the British Isles (NBN, 2015) and in the Mediterranean (Serrano et al., 2011). Glycera lapidum is found in the north-eastern Atlantic, Mediterranean, North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat (Marine Species Identification Portal). Protodorvillea kefersteini can be found in the north Atlantic to North Sea and English Channel, Mediterranean and Black Sea (Marine Species Identification Portal).

Sensitivity assessment. Little evidence was available to assess this pressure. Assemblages in fine sands that contain many of the characterizing species occur in the Mediterranean (see resilience section Sardá et al., 1999; Sardá et al., 2000), where temperatures are higher than experienced in the UK. It is considered likely, therefore, that a chronic change in temperature at the pressure benchmark would be tolerated by species with a wide distribution or that some species or groups of species would be resistant. An acute change may exceed thermal tolerances or lead to spawning or other biological effects. These effects may be sub-lethal or result in the removal of only a proportion of less tolerant species. Biotope resistance is therefore assessed as ‘Medium’ and resilience is assessed as ‘High’. Biotope sensitivity is therefore assessed as ‘Low’. 

Medium
High
Low
Medium
Help
High
High
Low
Medium
Help
Low
High
Low
Medium
Help
Temperature decrease (local) [Show more]

Temperature decrease (local)

Benchmark. A 5°C decrease in temperature for one month, or 2°C for one year. Further detail

Evidence

Davenport & Davenport (2005) demonstrated that the limits of thermal tolerance to high and low temperatures reflect the distribution of intertidal macroinvertebrate species. Species that occur highest on the shore are more tolerant of a wider range of temperatures than species that occurred low on the shore or subtidally. As subtidal biotopes are less exposed to temperature fluctuations the characterizing species may be less able to tolerate temperature fluctuations.

The characterizing bivalve Timoclea ovata has a wide distribution from northern Norway and Iceland south to west Africa. It is also recorded from the Canary Islands, the Azores and the Mediterranean and Black Sea (Morton, 2009). Goodallia triangularis also has a widespread distribution in the Atlantic coasts of Europe to the Mediterranean and north-western Africa (Giribet & Peňas, 1999). Polychaetes and other species associated with the biotope may also have wide global distributions. Mediomastus fragilis has been recorded throughout the British Isles (NBN, 2015) and in the Mediterranean (Serrano et al., 2011). Glycera lapidum is found in the north-eastern Atlantic, Mediterranean, North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat (Marine Species Identification Portal). Protodorvillea kefersteini can be found in the north Atlantic to North Sea and English Channel, Mediterranean and Black Sea (Marine Species Identification Portal).

Long‐term analysis of the North Sea pelagic system has identified yearly variations in larval abundance of Echinodermata, Arthropoda, and Mollusca larvae that correlate with sea surface temperatures. Larvae of benthic echinoderms and decapod crustaceans increased after the mid‐1980s, coincident with a rise in North Sea sea surface temperature, whereas bivalve larvae underwent a reduction (Kirby et al., 2008). A decrease in temperature may alter larval supply and in the long-term, and over large spatial scales, may result in changes in community composition.

Sensitivity assessment. Many of the characterizing species are found in more northern waters than the UK and may be adapted to colder temperatures. Plankton studies suggest that colder waters may favour bivalve larvae. An acute change may exceed thermal tolerances or lead to spawning or other biological effects. These effects may be sub-lethal or remove only a proportion of less tolerant species. Biotope resistance is therefore assessed as ‘Medium’ and resilience is assessed as ‘High’. Biotope sensitivity is therefore assessed as ‘Low’. 

Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Help
High
High
Low
Medium
Help
Low
High
Low
Medium
Help
Salinity increase (local) [Show more]

Salinity increase (local)

Benchmark. A increase in one MNCR salinity category above the usual range of the biotope or habitat. Further detail

Evidence

This biotope occurs in full salinity but is also found in the outer reaches of estuaries where some salinity fluctuations may be experienced so that the characterizing species may tolerate some changes in salinity. No directly relevant evidence was found to assess this pressure. A study from the Canary Islands indicates that exposure to high salinity effluents (47- 50 psu) from desalination plants alter the structure of biological assemblages, reducing species richness and abundance (Riera et al., 2012). Bivalves and amphipods appear to be less tolerant of increased salinity than polychaetes and were largely absent at the point of discharge. Polychaetes, including species or genera that occur in this biotope, such as Spio filicornis, Glycera spp. and Lumbrineris spp. were present at the discharge point (Riera et al., 2012).

The ophiuroid Amphipholis squamata has been recorded in areas of high salinity (52-55 ppt) in the Arabian Gulf (Price, 1982), indicating local acclimation may be possible.

Sensitivity assessment. High saline effluents alter the structure of biological assemblages. Polychaete species may be more tolerant than bivalves but an increase in salinity is likely to result in declines in species richness and abundance based on Riera et al. (2012). Biotope resistance is assessed as ‘Low’ and resilience as ‘Medium’, as bivalve recovery may depend on episodic recruitment. Biotope sensitivity is assessed as ‘Medium’.

Low
High
Low
NR
Help
Medium
High
Low
Medium
Help
Medium
High
Low
Low
Help
Salinity decrease (local) [Show more]

Salinity decrease (local)

Benchmark. A decrease in one MNCR salinity category above the usual range of the biotope or habitat. Further detail

Evidence

The biotope is found in open coast and estuaries with strong water movement. This biotope occurs in full salinity but is also found in the outer reaches of estuaries where some salinity fluctuations may be experienced so that the characterizing species may tolerate some changes in salinity. As this biotope occurs at the sublittoral fringe, some reductions in salinity may be experienced during periods of high rainfall that dilute seawater.

Sensitivity assessment.  A reduction in salinity may result in changes in biotope composition as some sensitive species are lost and replaced by typical estuarine species more tolerant of the changed conditions, such as Nephtys cirrosa, Macoma balthica, and Bathyporeia spp. so that the biotope may be reclassified as SS.SSa.SSaVS.NcirLim. Biotope resistance is therefore assessed as ‘Low’ and resilience as ‘Medium’, as bivalve recovery may depend on episodic recruitment. Biotope sensitivity is assessed as ‘Medium’.

Low
High
Medium
Medium
Help
Medium
High
Low
Medium
Help
Medium
High
Low
Medium
Help
Water flow (tidal current) changes (local) [Show more]

Water flow (tidal current) changes (local)

Benchmark. A change in peak mean spring bed flow velocity of between 0.1 m/s to 0.2 m/s for more than one year. Further detail

Evidence

This biotope is recorded in areas where tidal flow varies between moderately strong (0.5-1.5 m/s) and weak (>0.5 m/s) (JNCC, 2015). Sands are less cohesive than mud sediments and a change in water flow at the pressure benchmark may alter sediment transport patterns within the biotope. Hjulström (1939) concluded that fine sand (particle diameter of 0.3-0.6 mm) was easiest to erode and required a mean velocity of 0.2 m/s. Erosion and deposition of particles greater than 0.5 mm require a velocity >0.2 m/s to alter the habitat. The topography of this habitat is shaped by currents and wave action that influence the formation of ripples in the sediment. Specific fauna may be associated with troughs and crests of these bedforms and may form following an increase in water flow, or disappear following a reduction in flow.

Many of the species occur in a range of sediment types, which, given the link between hydrodynamics and sediment type, suggests that these species are not sensitive to changes in water flow at the pressure benchmark. Timoclea ovata occur in muddy sands in areas that are sheltered and where fine sediments are deposited. Glycera spp. are found in areas with strong tidal streams where sediments are mobile (Roche et al., 2007) and in extremely sheltered areas (Connor et al., 2004). Owenia fusiformis is found in front of river outlets in the Mediterranean and can be subject to a wide range of water velocities. The tubes of Owenia fusiformis and Lanice conchilega can stabilize the sediment and reduce water movement related stresses on the benthos (Somaschini, 1993).

Sensitivity assessment. This biotope occurs in areas subject to moderately strong water flows and these are a key factor maintaining the clean sand habitat. Changes in water flow may alter the topography of the habitat and may cause some shifts in abundance. However, a change at the pressure benchmark (increase or decrease)  is unlikely to affect biotopes that occur in mid-range flows and biotope sensitivity is therefore assessed as ‘High’ and resilience is assessed as ‘High’, so the biotope is considered to be ‘Not sensitive’.

High
High
Medium
High
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Not sensitive
High
Medium
High
Help
Emergence regime changes [Show more]

Emergence regime changes

Benchmark.  1) A change in the time covered or not covered by the sea for a period of ≥1 year or 2) an increase in relative sea level or decrease in high water level for ≥1 year. Further detail

Evidence

Changes in emergence are 'Not relevant' to this biotope which is restricted to fully subtidal habitats. 

Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Wave exposure changes (local) [Show more]

Wave exposure changes (local)

Benchmark. A change in near shore significant wave height of >3% but <5% for more than one year. Further detail

Evidence

As this biotope occurs in infralittoral habitats, it is not directly exposed to the action of breaking waves. Associated polychaete species that burrow are protected within the sediment but the characterizing bivalves would be exposed to oscillatory water flows at the seabed. They and other associated species may be indirectly affected by changes in water movement where these impact the supply of food or larvae or other processes. No specific evidence was found to assess this pressure. As the biotope SS.SCS.CCs.MedLumVen occurs in habitats that are exposed and moderately exposed to wave action (JNCC, 2015) and it is considered that currents and substratum, rather than wave action, are significant factors determining species composition

Sensitivity assessment. The range of wave exposures experienced by SS.SCS.CCS.MedLumVen is considered to indicate, by proxy, that the biotope would have ‘High’ resistance and by default ‘High’ resilience to a change in significant wave height at the pressure benchmark. The biotope is therefore classed as ‘Not sensitive’.

High
High
Low
NR
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Not sensitive
Low
Low
Low
Help

Chemical Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
Transition elements & organo-metal contamination [Show more]

Transition elements & organo-metal contamination

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available.

The capacity of bivalves to accumulate heavy metals in their tissues, far in excess of environmental levels, is well known. Reactions to sub-lethal levels of heavy metal stressors include siphon retraction, valve closure, inhibition of byssal thread production, disruption of burrowing behaviour, inhibition of respiration, inhibition of filtration rate, inhibition of protein synthesis and suppressed growth (see review by Aberkali & Trueman, 1985). No evidence was found directly relating to Fabulina fabula. However, inferences may be drawn from studies of a closely related species. Stirling (1975) investigated the effect of exposure to copper on Tellina tenuis. The 96 hour LC50 for Cu was 1000 µg/l. Exposure to Cu concentrations of 250 µg/l and above inhibited burrowing behaviour and would presumably result in greater vulnerability to predators. Similarly, burial of the venerid bivalve, Venerupis senegalensis, was inhibited by copper spiked sediments, and at very high concentrations, clams closed up and did not bury at all (Kaschl & Carballeira, 1999). The copper 10 day LC50 for Venerupis senegalensis was found to be 88 µg/l in sandy sediments (Kaschl & Carballeira, 1999).

Echinoderms are also regarded as being intolerant of heavy metals (e.g. Bryan, 1984; Kinne, 1984) while polychaetes are tolerant (Bryan, 1984). Owenia fusiformis from the south coast of England were found to have loadings of 1335 µg Cu per gram bodyweight and 784 µg Zn per gram bodyweight. The metals were bound in spherules within the cells of the gut (Gibbs et al., 2000). No mention was made of any ill effects of these concentrations of metal within the body and it is presumed that Owenia fusiformis is tolerant of heavy metal contamination. Rygg (1985) classified Lumbrineris spp. as non-tolerant of Cu (species only occasionally found at stations in Norwegian fjords where Cu concentrations were >200 ppm (mg/kg)).

Not Assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Hydrocarbon & PAH contamination [Show more]

Hydrocarbon & PAH contamination

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available.

Suchanek (1993) reviewed the effects of oil on bivalves. Generally, contact with oil causes an increase in energy expenditure and a decrease in feeding rate, resulting in less energy available for growth and reproduction. Sublethal concentrations of hydrocarbons also reduce byssal thread production (thus weakening attachment) and infaunal burrowing rates. Conan (1982) investigated the long-term effects of the Amoco Cadiz oil spill at St Efflam beach in France. Fabulina fabula (studied as Tellina fabula) started to disappear from the intertidal zone a few months after the spill and from then on was restricted to subtidal levels. In the following 2 years, recruitment of Fabulina fabula was very much reduced. The author commented that, in the long-term, the biotas most severely affected by oil spills are low energy sandy and muddy shores, bays and estuaries. In such places, populations of species with long and short-term life expectancies (e.g. Fabulina fabula, Echinocardium cordatum and Ampelisca sp.) either vanished or displayed long-term decline following the Amoco Cadiz oil spill. Polychaetes, however, including Nephtys hombergii, cirratulids and capitellids were largely unaffected. Mediomastus fragilis increased in abundance (Dauvin, 2000). Other studies support the conclusion that polychaetes are generally a tolerant taxa. Hiscock et al. (2004; 2005, from Levell et al., 1989) described Glycera spp. as a very tolerant taxa, found in enhanced abundances in the transitional zone along hydrocarbon contamination gradients surrounding oil platforms.

Echinoderms, seem to be especially intolerant of the toxic effects of oil, probably because of the large amount of exposed epidermis (Suchanek, 1993). The high intolerance of Echinocardium cordatum to hydrocarbons was seen by the mass mortality of animals down to about 20 m depth, shortly after the Amoco Cadiz oil spill (Cabioch et al., 1978). The amphipods, Ampelisca sp. are also very intolerant of oil contamination and the recovery of the Ampelisca populations in the fine sand community in the Bay of Morlaix took up to 15 years following the Amoco Cadiz oil spill (Poggiale & Dauvin, 2001).

Not Assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Synthetic compound contamination [Show more]

Synthetic compound contamination

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available.

The anti-parasite compound ivermectin is highly toxic to benthic polychaetes and crustaceans (Black et al., 1997; Collier & Pinn, 1998; Grant & Briggs, 1998, cited in Wildling & Hughes, 2010). OSPAR (2000) stated that, at that time, ivermectin was not licensed for use in mariculture but was incorporated into the feed as a treatment against sea lice at some farms. Ivermectin has the potential to persist in sediments, particularly fine-grained sediments at sheltered sites. Data from a farm in Galway, Ireland indicated that ivermectin was detectable in sediments adjacent to the farm at concentrations up to 6.8 μm/kg and to a depth of 9 cm (reported in OSPAR, 2000). Infaunal polychaetes have been affected by deposition rates of 78-780 mg ivermectin/m2.

Stirling (1975) investigated the effects of phenol, a non-persistent, semi-synthetic organic pollutant, on Tellina tenuis. Exposure to phenol produced a measurable effect on burrowing at all concentrations tested, i.e. 50 mg/l and stronger. Sub-lethal effects of exposure to phenol included delayed burrowing and valve adduction to exclude the pollutant from the mantle cavity. After exposure to 100 mg/l for 24 hours, the majority of animals were extended from their shells and unresponsive to tactile stimulation. Following replacement of the phenol solution with clean seawater, good recovery was exhibited after 2 days for animals exposed to 50 mg/l and some recovery occurred after 4 days for animals exposed to 100 mg/l.

Not Assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Radionuclide contamination [Show more]

Radionuclide contamination

Benchmark. An increase in 10µGy/h above background levels. Further detail

Evidence

No evidence was found to support an assessment at the pressure benchmark. Following the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident in August 2013, radioactive cesium concentrations in invertebrates collected from the seabed were assessed. Concentrations in bivalves and gastropods were lower than in polychaetes (Sohtome et al., 2014). The data does not indicate that there were mortalities.

No evidence (NEv)
NR
NR
NR
Help
No evidence (NEv)
NR
NR
NR
Help
No evidence (NEv)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Introduction of other substances [Show more]

Introduction of other substances

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed.

Not Assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
De-oxygenation [Show more]

De-oxygenation

Benchmark. Exposure to dissolved oxygen concentration of less than or equal to 2 mg/l for one week (a change from WFD poor status to bad status). Further detail

Evidence

Riedel et al. (2012) assessed the response of benthic macrofauna to hypoxia advancing to anoxia in the Mediterranean. The hypoxic and anoxic conditions were created for 3-4 days in a box that enclosed in-situ sediments. In general molluscs were more resistant than polychaetes, with 90% surviving hypoxia and anoxia, whereas only 10% of polychaetes survived. Exposed individual Timoclea ovata and Tellina serrata survived the experiment but the exposed Glycera spp. died. In general epifauna were more sensitive than infauna, mobile species more sensitive than sedentary species and predatory species more sensitive than suspension and deposit feeders. The test conditions did not lead to the production of hydrogen sulphide which may have reduced mortalities compared to some observations.

Further evidence of sensitivity was available for some of the polychaete species associated with this biotope. Rabalais et al. (2001) observed that hypoxic conditions in the north Coast of the Gulf of Mexico (oxygen concentrations from 1.5 to 1 mg/l (1 to 0.7 ml/l) led to the emergence of  Lumbrineris sp. from the substrate these then lie motionless on the surface. Glycera alba was found to be able to tolerate periods of anoxia resulting from inputs of organic rich material from a wood pulp and paper mill in Loch Eil (Scotland) (Blackstock & Barnes, 1982). Nierman et al. (1990) reported changes in a fine sand community for the German Bight in an area with regular seasonal hypoxia. In 1983, oxygen levels were exceptionally low (<3 mg O2/l) in large areas and <1 mg O2/l in some areas. Species richness decreased by 30-50% and overall biomass fell. Owenia fusiformis were reduced in abundance significantly by the hypoxia Spiophanes bombyx was found in small numbers at some, but not all areas, during the period of hypoxia. Once oxygen levels returned to normal Spiophanes bombyx increased in abundance; the evidence suggests that at least some individuals would survive hypoxic conditions.

Sensitivity assessment. Riedel et al. (2012) provide evidence on general sensitivity trends. The characterizing bivalves are likely to survive hypoxia at the pressure benchmark although the polychaetes present, particularly the mobile predatory species such as Glycera and Nephtys may be less tolerant.  As the biotope is characterized by polychaetes, resistance is assessed as ‘Low’ and resilience as ‘High’ based on migration, water transport of adults and recolonization by pelagic larvae. Biotope sensitivity is assessed as ‘Low’.

Low
High
High
High
Help
High
High
Low
Medium
Help
Low
High
Low
Low
Help
Nutrient enrichment [Show more]

Nutrient enrichment

Benchmark. Compliance with WFD criteria for good status. Further detail

Evidence

This pressure relates to increased levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and silicon in the marine environment compared to background concentrations. The pressure benchmark is set at compliance with Water Framework Directive (WFD) criteria for good status, based on nitrogen concentration (UKTAG, 2014).  

The bivalves, polychaetes and other associated invertebrate species are unlikely to be directly affected by changes in nutrient enrichment. The biotope is found in the circalittoral zone (JNCC, 2015) where light penetration is limited. 

Sensitivity assessment. As this biotope is structured by the sediments and water flow rather than nutrient enrichment, the biotope is considered to have ‘High’ resistance to this pressure and ‘High’ resilience (by default), and is assessed as ‘Not sensitive’.

High
Low
NR
NR
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Not sensitive
Low
Low
Low
Help
Organic enrichment [Show more]

Organic enrichment

Benchmark. A deposit of 100 gC/m2/yr. Further detail

Evidence

The biotope occurs in mobile sand sediments where sediment disturbance leads to particle sorting, and in-situ primary production is restricted to microphytobenthos and some macroalgae (JNCC, 2015). An input of organic matter would provide a food subsidy to the deposit feeding polychaetes and may be utilized by amphipods.

Borja et al. (2000) and Gittenberger & Van Loon (2011) assigned Glycera alba and Glycera lapidum and Spiophanes bombyx to their AMBI Group III, defined as: ‘Species tolerant to excess organic matter enrichment. These species may occur under normal conditions, but their populations are stimulated by organic enrichment (slight unbalance situations)’. Lumbrineris latreilli was characterized as AMBI Group II- 'Species indifferent to enrichment, always present in low densities with non-significant variations with time (from initial state, to slight unbalance)' (Borja et al., 2000, Gittenberger & Van Loon, 2011).

Simboura & Zenetos (2002) assigned Timoclea ovata to their Ecological Group II (GII) category for the biotic index that they developed, called BENTIX. Ecological Group II is defined as: ‘Species tolerant to disturbance or stress whose populations may respond to enrichment or other source of pollution by an increase of densities (slight unbalanced situations)’.

Sensitivity assessment.  At the pressure benchmark, organic inputs are likely to represent a food subsidy for the associated deposit feeding species and are unlikely to significantly affect the structure of the biological assemblage or impact the physical habitat. Biotope sensitivity is therefore assessed as ‘High’ and resilience as ‘High’ (by default), and the biotope is therefore considered to be ‘Not sensitive’.

High
High
Medium
High
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Not sensitive
High
Medium
High
Help

Physical Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
Physical loss (to land or freshwater habitat) [Show more]

Physical loss (to land or freshwater habitat)

Benchmark. A permanent loss of existing saline habitat within the site. Further detail

Evidence

All marine habitats and benthic species are considered to have a resistance of ‘None’ to this pressure and to be unable to recover from a permanent loss of habitat (resilience is ‘Very Low’). Sensitivity within the direct spatial footprint of this pressure is therefore ‘High’. Although no specific evidence is described, confidence in this assessment is ‘High’ due to the incontrovertible nature of this pressure.

None
High
High
High
Help
Very Low
High
High
High
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Physical change (to another seabed type) [Show more]

Physical change (to another seabed type)

Benchmark. Permanent change from sedimentary or soft rock substrata to hard rock or artificial substrata or vice-versa. Further detail

Evidence

The biotope is characterized by the sedimentary habitat (JNCC, 2015), so a change to an artificial or rock substratum would alter the character of the biotope leading to reclassification and the loss of the sedimentary community including the characterizing bivalves, polychaetes and echinoderms that live buried within the sediment.

Sensitivity assessment. Based on the loss of the biotope, resistance is assessed as ‘None’, recovery is assessed as ‘Very Low’ (as the change at the pressure benchmark is permanent), and sensitivity is assessed as ‘High’.

None
High
High
High
Help
Very Low
High
High
High
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Physical change (to another sediment type) [Show more]

Physical change (to another sediment type)

Benchmark. Permanent change in one Folk class (based on UK SeaMap simplified classification). Further detail

Evidence

This biotope is found in medium to coarse sand and gravelly sand (JNCC, 2015). The change referred to at the pressure benchmark is a change in sediment classification (based on Long, 2006) rather than a change in the finer-scale original Folk categories (Folk, 1954). For coarse sediments, resistance is assessed based on a change to either mixed sediments or mud and sandy muds. 

Sediment type is a key factor structuring the biological assemblage present in the biotope. Surveys over sediment gradients and before-and-after impact studies from aggregate extraction sites where sediments have been altered indicate patterns in change. The biotope classification (JNCC, 2015) provides information on the sediment types where biotopes are found and indicate likely patterns in change if the sediment were to alter. Long-term alteration of sediment type to finer more unstable sediments was observed six years after aggregate dredging at moderate energy sites (Boyd et al., 2005). The on-going sediment instability was reflected in a biological assemblage composed largely of juveniles (Boyd et al., 2005).

Differences in biotope assemblages in areas of different sediment type are likely to be driven by pre and post recruitment processes. Sediment selectivity by larvae will influence levels of settlement and distribution patterns. Snelgrove et al. (1999) demonstrated that Spisula solidissima, selected coarse sand over muddy sand, and capitellid polychaetes selected muddy sand over coarse sand, regardless of site. Both larvae selected sediments typical of adult habitats, however, some species were nonselective (Snelgrove et al., 1999) and presumably in unfavourable habitats post recruitment, mortality will result for species that occur in a restricted range of habitats. Holme (1966) observed that Glycymeris glycymeris was absent from areas of the English Channel with finer sediments but was abundant in tidally-swept coarse areas. Some species may, however, be present in a range of sediments. Post-settlement migration and selectivity also occurred on small scales (Snelgrove et al., 1999).

Cooper et al. (2011) found that characterizing species from sand dominated sediments were equally likely to be found in gravel dominated sediments. A reduction in sediment coarseness may not result in loss of characterizing species but biotope classification may revert to SS.ICS.MoeVen, which occurs in medium to coarse sediments (JNCC, 2015).

Desprez (2000) found that a change of habitat to fine sands, from coarse sands and gravels (from deposition of screened sand following aggregate extraction), changed the biological communities present. Tellina pygmaea and Nephtys cirrosa dominated the fine sand community. Dominant species of coarse sands, Echinocyamus pusillus and Amphipholis squamata, were poorly represented  and the characteristic species of gravels and shingles were absent (Desprez, 2000). 

Sensitivity assessment.  A change to finer, muddy and mixed sediments is likely to reduce the abundance of the characterizing Tellina spp., venerid bivalves but may favour polychaetes such as Owenia fusiformis. Changes in the sediment type may lead to biotope reclassification. Biotope resistance is therefore assessed as ‘Low’ (as some species may remain), biotope resilience is assessed as ‘Very low’ (the pressure is a permanent change), and biotope sensitivity is assessed as ‘High’.

Low
High
High
High
Help
Very Low
High
High
High
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Habitat structure changes - removal of substratum (extraction) [Show more]

Habitat structure changes - removal of substratum (extraction)

Benchmark. The extraction of substratum to 30 cm (where substratum includes sediments and soft rock but excludes hard bedrock). Further detail

Evidence

A number of studies assess the impacts of aggregate extraction on sand and gravel habitats. Most of the animals that occur in this biotope are shallowly buried, for example, Glycymerids occur at the surface with the mantle margins exposed at the surface (Thomas, 1975).

Recovery of sediments will be site-specific and will be influenced by currents, wave action and sediment availability (Desprez, 2000). Except in areas of mobile sands, the process tends to be slow (Kenny & Rees, 1996; Desprez, 2000 and references therein).  Boyd et al. (2005) found that in a site subject to long-term extraction (25 years), extraction scars were still visible after six years and sediment characteristics were still altered in comparison with reference areas with ongoing effects on the biota. The strongest currents are unable to transport gravel. A further implication of the formation of these depressions is a local drop in current strength associated with the increased water depth, resulting in deposition of finer sediments than those of the surrounding substrate (Desprez et al., 2000 and references therein). See the physical change pressure for assessment

Sensitivity assessment. Resistance is assessed as ‘None’ as extraction of the sediment swill remove the characterizing and associated species present. Resilience is assessed as ‘Medium’ as some species may require longer than two years to re-establish (see resilience section) and sediments may need to recover (where exposed layers are different). Biotope sensitivity is therefore assessed as ‘Medium’.

None
High
High
High
Help
Medium
High
High
Medium
Help
Medium
High
High
Medium
Help
Abrasion / disturbance of the surface of the substratum or seabed [Show more]

Abrasion / disturbance of the surface of the substratum or seabed

Benchmark. Damage to surface features (e.g. species and physical structures within the habitat). Further detail

Evidence

Comparative studies between disturbed and undisturbed areas indicate that abrasion and disturbance from bottom trawling on coarse gravels and sands reduce abundance of organisms, biomass and species diversity (Collie et al., 1997). Undisturbed sites contain more calcareous tube worms, bryozoans and hydroids and small fragile polychaetes and brittle stars. Thick-shelled bivalves, hermit crabs and gastropods appeared unaffected by dredging. Glycymeris is a mobile burrower (Thomas, 1975). Venerid bivalves, such as the characterizing species Timoclea ovata, live close to the surface (Morton, 2009). Burrowing species such as Glycera lapidum and Lumbrineris latreilli may be unaffected by surface abrasion. Lumbrineris latreilli was characterized as AMBI Fisheries Review Group III-'Species insensitive to fisheries in which the bottom is disturbed. Their populations do not show a significant decline or increase' (Gittenberger & Van Loon, 2011).

Sensitivity assessment. Abrasion is likely to damage epifauna and may damage a proportion of the characterizing species, biotope resistance is therefore assessed as ‘Medium’. Resilience is assessed as ‘High’ as opportunistic species are likely to recruit rapidly and some damaged characterizing species may recover or recolonize. Biotope sensitivity is assessed as ‘Low’.

Medium
High
High
NR
Help
High
High
Medium
High
Help
Low
High
Medium
Low
Help
Penetration or disturbance of the substratum subsurface [Show more]

Penetration or disturbance of the substratum subsurface

Benchmark. Damage to sub-surface features (e.g. species and physical structures within the habitat). Further detail

Evidence

Comparative studies between disturbed and undisturbed areas indicate that abrasion and disturbance from bottom trawling on coarse gravels and sands, reduce abundance of organisms, biomass and species diversity (Collie et al., 1997). Undisturbed sites contain more calcareous tube worms, bryozoans and hydroids and small fragile polychaetes and brittlestars.

Larger, fragile species are more likely to be damaged by sediment penetration and disturbance than smaller species (Tillin et al., 2006). Stomach analysis of fish caught scavenging in the tracks of beam trawls found parts of Ampelisca spp., Spatangus purpureus and Ensis spp. indicating that these had been damaged and exposed by the trawl (Kaiser & Spencer, 1994). Capasso et al. (2010) compared benthic survey datasets from 1895 and 2007 for an area in the English Channel. Although methodological differences limit direct comparison, the datasets appear to show that large, fragile urchin species including Echinus esculentusSpatangus purpureus and Psammechinus miliaris and larger bivalves had decreased in abundance. Small, mobile species such as amphipods and small errant and predatory polychaetes (NephtysGlyceraLumbrineris) appeared to have increased (Capasso et al., 2010). The area is subject to beam trawling and scallop dredging and the observed species changes would correspond with predicted changes following physical disturbance. Two small species: Timoclea ovata and Echinocyamus pusillus (both present in the SS.SCS.CCS.MedLumVen biotope) had increased in abundance between the two periods.

Experiments in shallow, wave disturbed areas, using a toothed, clam dredge, found that deposit feeding polychaetes were more impacted than carnivorous species. Dredging resulted in reductions of >90% of Spiophanes bombyx  immediately post dredging compared with before impact samples and the population reduction persisting for 90 days (although results may be confounded by storm events within the monitoring period which caused sediment mobility). Some predatory polychaete taxa were enhanced by fishing. Protodorvillea kefersteini was one of these: large increases in abundance in samples were detected post dredging and persisting over 90 days. The passage of the dredge across the sediment floor will have killed or injured some organisms that will then be exposed to potential predators/scavengers (Frid et al., 2000; Veale et al., 2000) providing a food source to mobile scavengers including these species. Protodorvillia kefersteini  also showed a rapid increase in abundance at 21 days after sediment disturbance (Thrush, 1986).

Bergman & Hup (1992) carried out a pre and post-experimental investigation using a 12 m beam trawl. The area was trawled three times over 2 days and samples taken up to 2 weeks after trawling. Some benthic species showed a 10-65% reduction in density after trawling the area three times. There was a significant lowering of densities (40-60%) of echinoderms Asterias rubens and small Echinocardium cordatum, and of polychaete worms Lanice conchilega and Spiophanes bombyx. No change in the total density of Owenia fusiformis was observed (Bergman & Hup, 1992).

Gilkinson et al. (1998) simulated the physical interaction of otter trawl doors with the seabed in a laboratory test tank using a full-scale otter trawl door model. Between 58% and 70% of the bivalves in the scour path that were originally buried were completely or partially exposed at the test bed surface.  However, only two out of a total of 42 specimens showed major damage. The pressure wave associated with the otter door pushes small bivalves out of the way without damaging them. Where species can rapidly burrow and reposition (typically within species occurring in unstable habitats) before predation mortality rates will be relatively low. These experimental observations are supported by diver observations of fauna dislodged by a hydraulic dredge used to catch Ensis spp. Small bivalves were found in the trawl tracks that had been dislodged from the sediments, including the venerid bivalves Dosinia exoletaChamelea striatula and the hatchet shell Lucinoma borealis. These were usually intact (Hauton et al., 2003a) and could potentially reburrow.

Sensitivity assessment. The trawling studies and the comparative study by Capasso et al. (2010) suggest that the biological assemblage present in this biotope is characterized by species that are relatively tolerant of penetration and disturbance of the sediments. Either species are robust or buried within sediments or are adapted to habitats with frequent disturbance (natural or anthropogenic) and recover quickly. Biotope resistance is assessed as ‘Medium’ as some species will be displaced and may be predated or injured and killed. Biotope resilience is assessed as ‘High’ as most species will recover rapidly and the biotope is likely to still be classified as SS.SCS.ICS.MedLumVen following disturbance. Biotope sensitivity is therefore assessed as ‘Low’. Chronic disturbance may lead to a change to SS.SCS.CCS.Pkef which may be an impoverished version of the assessed biotope resulting from natural or anthropogenic disturbance (JNCC, 2015).

Medium
High
High
Medium
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Low
High
High
Medium
Help
Changes in suspended solids (water clarity) [Show more]

Changes in suspended solids (water clarity)

Benchmark. A change in one rank on the WFD (Water Framework Directive) scale e.g. from clear to intermediate for one year. Further detail

Evidence

A change in turbidity at the pressure benchmark is assessed as an increase from intermediate 10-100 mg/l to medium (100-300 mg/l) and a change to clear (<10 mg/l). An increase or decrease in turbidity may affect primary production in the water column and indirectly alter the availability of phytoplankton food available to species in filter feeding mode. However, phytoplankton will also be transported from distant areas and so the effect of increased turbidity may be mitigated to some extent. According to Widdows et al. (1979), growth of filter-feeding bivalves may be impaired at suspended particulate matter (SPM) concentrations >250 mg/l.

The venerid bivalves are active suspension feeders, trapping food particles on their gill filaments (ctenidia). An increase in suspended sediment is, therefore, likely to affect both feeding and respiration by potentially clogging the ctenidia. The characterizing species Timoclea ovata, generally occurs in areas with low suspended solids and has ‘tiny' palps and a short, narrow, mid-gut, as there is little need for particle sorting (Morton, 2009). This suggests this species and other venerids may have difficulty sorting organic materials in high levels of suspended sediment. Glycymeris glycymeris is intolerant of turbidity as the palps are very simple and fine sediments or inorganic solids are not tolerated (Thomas, 1975). 

Changes in turbidity and seston are not predicted to directly affect Glycera spp. and Lumbrineris latreilli which live within sediments. Owenia fusiformis occurs in front of river outlets (Somaschini, 1993) and in areas where dredging spoil is dumped (Dauvin & Gillet, 1991), and therefore is probably tolerant of an increase in suspended sediment.

Sensitivity assessment. No direct evidence was found to assess impacts on the characterizing and associated species. The characterizing, suspension feeding bivalves are not predicted to be sensitive to decreases in turbidity and may be exposed to, and tolerant of, short-term increases in turbidity following sediment mobilization by storms and other events. An increase in suspended solids, at the pressure benchmark may have negative impacts on growth and fecundity by reducing filter feeding efficiency and imposing costs on clearing. Biotope resistance is assessed as ‘Medium’ as there may be some shift in the structure of the biological assemblage although the biotope uis likely to still be characterized as SS.CCS.MedLumVen. Biotope resilience is assessed as ‘High’ (following restoration of typical conditions) and sensitivity is assessed as ‘Low’.

Medium
High
Medium
Low
Help
High
High
Low
Medium
Help
Low
High
Low
Low
Help
Smothering and siltation rate changes (light) [Show more]

Smothering and siltation rate changes (light)

Benchmark. ‘Light’ deposition of up to 5 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single discrete event. Further detail

Evidence

Addition of fine material will alter the character of this habitat by covering it with a layer of dissimilar sediment and will reduce suitability for the species associated with this feature. Recovery will depend on the rate of sediment mixing or removal of the overburden, either naturally or through human activities. Recovery to a recognisable form of the original biotope will not take place until this has happened. In areas where the local hydrodynamic conditions are unaffected, fine particles will be removed by wave action moderating the impact of this pressure. The rate of habitat restoration would be site-specific and would be influenced by the type of siltation and rate. Long-term or permanent addition of fine particles would lead to re-classification of this biotope type (see physical change pressures). The additions of silts to a Spisula solida bed in Waterford Harbour (Republic of Ireland) from earthworks further upstream, for example, reduced the extent of the bed (Fahy et al., 2003). No information was provided on the depth of any deposits.

Bijkerk (1988, results cited from Essink, 1999) indicated that the maximal overburden through which small bivalves could migrate was 20 cm in sand for Donax and approximately 40 cm in mud for Tellina sp. and approximately 50 cm in sand.  No further information was available on the rates of survivorship or the time taken to reach the surface. Little direct evidence was found to assess the impact of this pressure at the benchmark level.  Powilleit et al., (2009) studied the response of the polychaete Nephtys hombergii to smothering. This species successfully migrated to the surface of 32-41 cm deposited sediment layer of till or sand/till mixture and restored contact with the overlying water.  The high escape potential could partly be explained by the heterogeneous texture of the till and sand/till mixture with ‘voids’.  While crawling upward to the new sediment surfaces burrowing velocities of up to 20 cm/day were recorded for Nephtys hombergii. Similarly, Bijkerk (1988, results cited from Essink 1999) indicated that the maximal overburden through which species could migrate was 60 cm through mud for Nephtys and 90 cm through sand. No further information was available on the rates of survivorship or the time taken to reach the surface.

The venerid bivalves are shallow burrowing infauna and active suspension feeders and therefore require their siphons to be above the sediment surface in order to maintain a feeding and respiration current. Kranz (1972, cited in Maurer et al., 1986) reported that shallow burying siphonate suspension feeders are typically able to escape smothering with 10-50 cm of their native sediment and relocate to their preferred depth by burrowing. Smothering will result in temporary cessation of feeding and respiration. The energetic cost may impair growth and reproduction but is unlikely to cause mortality (Raymond, 2008).

The characterizing bivalve Tellina pygmaea and the polychaetes Spio filicornis and Spiophanes bombyx were characterized by Gittenberger & Van Loon (2011) in their index of sedimentation tolerance as  Group IV species: ‘Although they are sensitive to strong fluctuations in sedimentation, their populations recover relatively quickly and even benefit. This causes their population sizes to increase significantly in areas after a strong fluctuation in sedimentation’ (Gittenberger & Van Loon, 2011).  Lumbrineris latreilli was characterized as AMBI sedimentation Group III: 'Species insensitive to higher amounts of sedimentation, but don’t easily recover from strong fluctuations in sedimentation' (Gittenberger & Van Loon, 2011). Glycera alba and Glycera lapidum were categorized as AMBI sedimentation Group II: 'Species sensitive to high sedimentation. They prefer to live in areas with some sedimentation, but don’t easily recover from strong fluctuations in sedimentation' (Gittenberger & Van Loon, 2011).

Sensitivity assessment. This biotope is exposed to tidal streams which may remove some sediments, but the bivalves and polychaetes are likely to be able to survive short periods under sediments and to reposition. However, as the pressure benchmark refers to fine material, this may be cohesive and species characteristic of sandy habitats may be less adapted to move through this than sands. Biotope resistance is assessed as 'Medium' as some mortality of characterizing and associated species may occur. Biotope resilience is assessed as 'High' and biotope sensitivity is assessed as 'Low'. 

Medium
High
High
Medium
Help
High
High
Low
Medium
Help
Low
High
Low
Medium
Help
Smothering and siltation rate changes (heavy) [Show more]

Smothering and siltation rate changes (heavy)

Benchmark. ‘Heavy’ deposition of up to 30 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single discrete event. Further detail

Evidence

Bijkerk (1988, results cited from Essink, 1999) indicated that the maximal overburden through which small bivalves could migrate was 20 cm in sand for Donax and approximately 40 cm in mud for Tellina sp. and approximately 50 cm in sand. No further information was available on the rates of survivorship or the time taken to reach the surface.

Sensitivity assessment. The character of the overburden is an important factor determining the degree of vertical migration of buried bivalves.  Individuals are more likely to escape from a covering similar to the sediments in which the species is found than a different type. Resistance is assessed as ‘Low’ as few individuals are likely to reposition. Resilience is assessed as ‘Medium’ and sensitivity is assessed as ‘Medium’.

Medium
High
High
NR
Help
Medium
High
Low
Medium
Help
Medium
High
Low
Low
Help
Litter [Show more]

Litter

Benchmark. The introduction of man-made objects able to cause physical harm (surface, water column, seafloor or strandline). Further detail

Evidence

Not assessed.

Not Assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not assessed (NA)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Electromagnetic changes [Show more]

Electromagnetic changes

Benchmark. A local electric field of 1 V/m or a local magnetic field of 10 µT. Further detail

Evidence

No evidence.

No evidence (NEv)
NR
NR
NR
Help
No evidence (NEv)
NR
NR
NR
Help
No evidence (NEv)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Underwater noise changes [Show more]

Underwater noise changes

Benchmark. MSFD indicator levels (SEL or peak SPL) exceeded for 20% of days in a calendar year. Further detail

Evidence

'Not relevant'.

Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Introduction of light or shading [Show more]

Introduction of light or shading

Benchmark. A change in incident light via anthropogenic means. Further detail

Evidence

 Invertebrate species such as the bivalves and polychaetes may possess rudimentary eyes and be able to perceive light and dark. Changes in light levels are not considered likely to affect adult stages, although little evidence is available to support this conclusion. This pressures is therefore assessed as ‘Not relevant’. 

Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Barrier to species movement [Show more]

Barrier to species movement

Benchmark. A permanent or temporary barrier to species movement over ≥50% of water body width or a 10% change in tidal excursion. Further detail

Evidence

The key characterizing bivalve species produce pelagic larvae as do many of the polychaete species. Barriers that reduce the degree of tidal excursion may alter larval supply to suitable habitats from source populations. Conversely, the presence of barriers may enhance local population supply by preventing the loss of larvae from enclosed habitats. As the bivalve species characterizing the biotope are widely distributed and produce large numbers of larvae capable of long distance transport and survival, resistance to this pressure is assessed as 'High' and resilience as 'High' by default. This biotope is therefore considered to be 'Not sensitive'. Some species such as Spio filicornis and Lumbrineris latreill that occur within the biotope have benthic dispersal strategies (via egg masses laid on the surface) and water transport is not a key method of dispersal over wide distances.

High
Low
NR
NR
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Not sensitive
Low
Low
Low
Help
Death or injury by collision [Show more]

Death or injury by collision

Benchmark. Injury or mortality from collisions of biota with both static or moving structures due to 0.1% of tidal volume on an average tide, passing through an artificial structure. Further detail

Evidence

'Not relevant’ to seabed habitats. NB. Collision by grounding vessels is addressed under ‘surface abrasion'.

Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Visual disturbance [Show more]

Visual disturbance

Benchmark. The daily duration of transient visual cues exceeds 10% of the period of site occupancy by the feature. Further detail

Evidence

'Not relevant'.

Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help

Biological Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
Genetic modification & translocation of indigenous species [Show more]

Genetic modification & translocation of indigenous species

Benchmark. Translocation of indigenous species or the introduction of genetically modified or genetically different populations of indigenous species that may result in changes in the genetic structure of local populations, hybridization, or change in community structure. Further detail

Evidence

Key characterizing species within this biotope are not cultivated or translocated. This pressure is therefore considered ‘Not relevant’ to this biotope group.

Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Not relevant (NR)
NR
NR
NR
Help
Introduction or spread of invasive non-indigenous species [Show more]

Introduction or spread of invasive non-indigenous species

Benchmark. The introduction of one or more invasive non-indigenous species (INIS). Further detail

Evidence

The American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata was introduced to the UK and Europe in the 1870s from the Atlantic coasts of North America with imports of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica. It was recorded in Liverpool in 1870 and the Essex coast in 1887-1890. It has spread through expansion and introductions along the full extent of the English Channel and into the European mainland (Blanchard, 1997, 2009; Bohn et al., 2012, 2013a, 2013b, 2015; De Montaudouin et al., 2018; Hinz et al., 2011; McNeill et al., 2010; Powell-Jennings & Calloway, 2018; Preston et al., 2020; Stiger-Pouvreau & Thouzeau, 2015).

Crepidula fornicata is recorded from shallow, sheltered bays, lagoons and estuaries or the sheltered sides of islands, in variable salinity (18 to 40) although it prefers ca 30 (Tillin et al., 2020). Larvae require hard substrata for settlement. It prefers muddy gravelly, shell-rich, substrata that include gravel, or shells of other Crepidula, or other species e.g., oysters, and mussels. It is highly gregarious and seeks out adult shells for settlement, forming characteristic ‘stacks’ of adults. But it also recorded in a wide variety of habitats including clean sands, artificial substrata, Sabellaria alveolata reefs and areas subject to moderately strong tidal streams (Blanchard, 1997, 2009; Bohn et al., 2012, 2013a, 2013b, 2015; De Montaudouin et al., 2018; Hinz et al., 2011; Powell-Jennings & Calloway, 2018; Preston et al., 2020; Stiger-Pouvreau & Thouzeau, 2015; Tillin et al., 2020). 

High densities of Crepidula fornicata cause ecological impacts on sedimentary habitats. The species can form dense carpets that can smother the seabed in shallow bays, changing and modifying the habitat structure. At high densities, the species physically smothers the sediment, and the resultant build-up of silt, pseudofaeces, and faeces is deposited and trapped within the bed (Tillin et al., 2020, Fitzgerald, 2007, Blanchard, 2009, Stiger-Pouvreau & Thouzeau, 2015). The biodeposition rates of Crepidula are extremely high and once deposited, form an anoxic mud, making the environment suitable for other species, including most infauna (Stiger-Pouvreau & Thouzeau, 2015, Blanchard, 2009). For example, in fine sands, the community is replaced by a reef of slipper limpets, that provide hard substrata for sessile suspension-feeders (e.g., sea squirts, tube worms and fixed shellfish), while mobile carnivorous microfauna occupy species between or within shells, resulting in a homogeneous Crepidula dominated habitat (Blanchard, 2009). Blanchard (2009) suggested the transition occurred and became irreversible at 50% cover of the limpet. De Montaudouin et al. (2018) suggested that homogenization occurred above a threshold of 20-50 Crepidula /m2

Impacts on the structure of benthic communities will depend on the type of habitat that Crepidula colonizes. Few invasive non-indigenous species may be able to colonize mobile sands, due to the high levels of sediment disturbance. De Montaudouin & Sauriau (1999) reported that in muddy sediment dominated by deposit-feeders, species richness, abundance and biomass increased in the presence of high densities of Crepidula (ca 562 to 4772 ind. /m2), in the Bay of Marennes-Oléron, presumably because the Crepidula bed provided hard substrata in an otherwise sedimentary habitat. In medium sands, Crepidula density was moderate (330-1300 ind./ m2) but there was no significant difference between communities in the presence of Crepidula. Intertidal coarse sediment was less suitable for Crepidula with only moderate or low abundances (11 ind./m2) and its presence did not affect the abundance or diversity of macrofauna. However, there was a higher abundance of suspension–feeders and mobile Crustacea in the absence of Crepidula (De Montaudouin & Sauriau, 1999). The presence of Crepidula as an ecosystem engineer has created a range of new niche habitats, reducing biodiversity as it modifies habitats (Fitzgerald, 2007). De Montaudouin et al. (1999) concluded that Crepidula did not influence macroinvertebrate diversity or density significantly under experimental conditions, on fine sands in Arcachon Bay, France. De Montaudouin et al. (2018) noted that the limpet reef increased the species diversity in the bed, but homogenised diversity compared to areas where the limpets were absent. In the Milford Haven Waterway (MHW), the highest densities of Crepidula were found in areas of sediment with hard substrata, e.g., mixed fine sediment with shell or gravel or both (grain sizes 16-256 mm) but, while Crepidula density increased as gravel cover increased in the subtidal, the reverse was found in the intertidal (Bohn et al., 2015). Bohn et al. (2015) suggested that high densities of Crepidula in high-energy environments were possible in the subtidal but not the intertidal, suggesting the availability of this substrata type is beneficial for its establishment. Hinz et al. (2011) reported a substantial increase in the occurrence of Crepidula off the Isle of Wight, between 1958 and 2006, at a depth of ca 60 m, on hard substrata (gravel, cobbles, and boulders), swept by strong tidal streams. Presumably, Crepidula is more tolerant of tidal flow than the oscillatory flow caused by wave action which may be less suitable (Tillin et al., 2020). 

The colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum is present in the UK but appears to be restricted to artificial surfaces such as pontoons, this species may, however, have the potential to colonize and smother offshore gravel habitats. Valentine et al. (2007) describe how Didemnum sp. have rapidly colonized gravel areas on the Georges Bank (US/Canada boundary). Colonies can coalesce to form large mats that may cover more than 50% of the seabed in parts. Areas of mobile sand, bordered communities of Didemnum sp. and these, therefore, do not appear to be suitable habitats (Valentine et al., 2007).

Although not currently established in UK waters, the whelk Rapana venosa may spread to UK habitats from Europe. Both Rapana venosa and the introduced oyster drill Urosalpinx cinerea predate on bivalves and could therefore negatively affect bivalve species.

Sensitivity assessment. The sediments characterizing this biotope are likely to be too mobile or otherwise unsuitable for most of the invasive non-indigenous species currently recorded in the UK. The above evidence suggests that Crepidula fornicata could colonize coarse sediment habitats in the subtidal, typical of this biotope. Bohn et al. (2015) demonstrated that Crepidula had a preference for gravelly habitats, while De Montaudouin & Sauriau (1999) and Bohn et al. (2015) noted that Crepidula densities were low in intertidal coarse sediments. Therefore, Crepidula has the potential to colonize, and modify the habitat and its associated community due to the introduction of Crepidula shell biomass, silt, pseudofaeces and faeces (Blanchard, 2009; Tillin et al., 2020), as occurs in maerl gravels (Grall & Hall-Spencer, 2003) resulting in the loss of the biotope. Therefore, the habitat may be more suitable for Crepidula where water movement is meditated by tidal flow rather than wave action, e.g., the deeper examples of the biotope. However, Crepidula reduced the density of suspension feeders and mobile Crustacea in coarse sediment even at low densities (De Montaudouin & Sauriau, 1999). 

Therefore, resistance is assessed as 'Low', especially in areas dominated by tidal flow. Resilience is assessed as 'Very low' as it would require the removal of Crepidula, probably by artificial means. Hence, sensitivity is assessed as 'High' based on the worst-case scenario. Crepidula has not yet been reported to occur in this biotope so the confidence in the assessment is 'Low' and further evidence is required. Didemnum sp. and non-native predatory gastropods may also emerge as a threat to this biotope, although more mobile sands may exclude Didemnum

Low
Low
NR
NR
Help
Very Low
High
High
High
Help
High
Low
NR
NR
Help
Introduction of microbial pathogens [Show more]

Introduction of microbial pathogens

Benchmark. The introduction of relevant microbial pathogens or metazoan disease vectors to an area where they are currently not present (e.g. Martelia refringens and Bonamia, Avian influenza virus, viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia virus). Further detail

Evidence

No evidence was found for the characterizing polychaete species. Populations of bivalve species may be subject to a variety of diseases and parasites but evidence for the characterizing bivalves is limited. Berilli et al. (2000) conducted a parasitological survey of the bivalve Chamelea gallina in natural beds of the Adriatic Sea, where anomalous mortalities had been observed in 1997-1999. The occurrence of protozoans belonging to the families Porosporidae, Hemispeiridae and Trichodinidae was recorded. Porosporidae of the genus Nematopsis, present with 4 species, showed a prevalence of 100%. The results suggested that severe infections of protozoans of the genus Nematopsis could cause a not negligible respiratory sufferance, with a possible role in the decline of the natural banks of Chamelea gallina (Berilli et al., 2000).

Bacterial diseases are frequently found in molluscs during their larval stages, but seem to be relatively insignificant in populations of adult animals (Lόpez-Flores et al., 2004). This may be due to the primary defence mechanisms of molluscs, phagocytosis and encapsulation, which fight against small-sized pathogens, and whose resistance may be age related (Sindermann, 1990; Lόpez-Flores et al., 2004).

Sensitivity assessments. Pathogens may cause mortality and there may be a minor decline in species richness or abundance in the biotope. As there is no evidence for mass mortalities of characterizing species that would alter biotope classification biotope resistance is assessed as ‘Medium’. Biotope resilience is assessed as ‘High’ as changes may fall within natural population variability and a recognizable biotope is likely to be present after two years. Biotope sensitivity is therefore assessed as ‘Low’.

High
High
High
Medium
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Not sensitive
High
High
Medium
Help
Removal of target species [Show more]

Removal of target species

Benchmark. Removal of species targeted by fishery, shellfishery or harvesting at a commercial or recreational scale. Further detail

Evidence

The characterizing polychaete species are not directly targeted by fishers. However, the bivalves Pecten maximus (scallop) and the small venerid bivalve Timoclea ovata may be fished. The direct physical effects of species removal is assessed through the abrasion and penetration and abrasion pressures. As the removal of the bivalves is unlikely to have direct or indirect ecological effects on the other characterizing species or to alter biotope classification biotope resilience is assessed as ‘High’, resilience is assessed as ‘High’ (by default) and the biotope is considered to be ‘Not sensitive’.

High
Low
NR
NR
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Not sensitive
Low
Low
Low
Help
Removal of non-target species [Show more]

Removal of non-target species

Benchmark. Removal of features or incidental non-targeted catch (by-catch) through targeted fishery, shellfishery or harvesting at a commercial or recreational scale. Further detail

Evidence

Species within the biotope are not functionally dependent on each other, although biological interactions will play a role in structuring the biological assemblage through predation and competition. Removal of adults may support the recruitment of juvenile bivalves by reducing competition for space and consumption of larvae. Removal of species would also reduce the ecological services provided by these species such as secondary production and nutrient cycling.

Sensitivity assessment. Species within the biotope are relatively sedentary or slow-moving, although the infaunal position may protect some burrowing species from removal. Biotope resistance is therefore assessed as ‘Low’ and resilience as ‘High’, as the habitat is likely to be directly affected by removal and some species will recolonize rapidly. Some variability in species recruitment, abundance and composition is natural and therefore a return to a recognizable biotope should occur within 2 years. Repeated chronic removal would, however, impact recovery.

Low
High
High
High
Help
High
High
High
High
Help
Low
High
High
High
Help

Bibliography

  1. Aberkali, H.B. & Trueman, E.R., 1985. Effects of environmental stress on marine bivalve molluscs. Advances in Marine Biology, 22, 101-198.

  2. Allen, P.L. & Moore, J.J. 1987. Invertebrate macrofauna as potential indicators of sandy beach instability. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 24, 109-125.

  3. Ansell, A.D., Barnett, P.R.O., Bodoy, A. & Masse, H., 1980. Upper temperature tolerances of some European molluscs. 1. Tellina fabula and T. tenuis. Marine Biology, 58, 33-39.

  4. Ballarin, L., Pampanin, D.M. & Marin, M.G., 2003. Mechanical disturbance affects haemocyte functionality in the Venus clam Chamelea gallina. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 136 (3), 631-640.

  5. Bergman, M.J.N. & Hup, M., 1992. Direct effects of beam trawling on macrofauna in a sandy sediment in the southern North Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 49, 5-11. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/49.1.5

  6. Berrilli, F., Ceschia, G., De Liberato, C., Di Cave, D. & Orecchia, P., 2000. Parasitic infections of Chamelea gallina (Mollusca, Bivalvia) from commercially exploited banks of the Adriatic Sea. Bulletin of European Association of Fish Pathologists, 20 (5), 199-205.

  7. Bijkerk, R., 1988. Ontsnappen of begraven blijven: de effecten op bodemdieren van een verhoogde sedimentatie als gevolg van baggerwerkzaamheden: literatuuronderzoek: RDD, Aquatic ecosystems.

  8. Black, K.D., Fleming, S. Nickell, T.D. & Pereira, P.M.F. 1997. The effects of ivermectin, used to control sea lice on caged farmed salmonids, on infaunal polychaetes. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 54, 276-279.

  9. Blackstock, J. & Barnes, M., 1982. The Loch Eil project: biochemical composition of the polychaete, Glycera alba (Müller), from Loch Eil. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 57 (1), 85-92.

  10. Blanchard, M., 2009. Recent expansion of the slipper limpet population (Crepidula fornicata) in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel (Western Channel, France). Aquatic Living Resources, 22 (1), 11-19. DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2009004

  11. Blanchard, M., 1997. Spread of the slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata (L.1758) in Europe. Current state and consequences. Scientia Marina, 61, Supplement 9, 109-118. Available from: http://scimar.icm.csic.es/scimar/index.php/secId/6/IdArt/290/

  12. Bohn, K., Richardson, C. & Jenkins, S., 2012. The invasive gastropod Crepidula fornicata: reproduction and recruitment in the intertidal at its northernmost range in Wales, UK, and implications for its secondary spread. Marine Biology, 159 (9), 2091-2103. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-1997-3

  13. Bohn, K., Richardson, C.A. & Jenkins, S.R., 2015. The distribution of the invasive non-native gastropod Crepidula fornicata in the Milford Haven Waterway, its northernmost population along the west coast of Britain. Helgoland Marine Research, 69 (4), 313.

  14. Bohn, K., Richardson, C.A. & Jenkins, S.R., 2013a. Larval microhabitat associations of the non-native gastropod Crepidula fornicata and effects on recruitment success in the intertidal zone. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 448, 289-297. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2013.07.020

  15. Bohn, K., Richardson, C.A. & Jenkins, S.R., 2013b. The importance of larval supply, larval habitat selection and post-settlement mortality in determining intertidal adult abundance of the invasive gastropod Crepidula fornicata. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 440, 132-140. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.12.008

  16. Borja, A., Franco, J. & Perez, V., 2000. A marine biotic index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40 (12), 1100-1114.

  17. Boyd, S., Limpenny, D., Rees, H. & Cooper, K., 2005. The effects of marine sand and gravel extraction on the macrobenthos at a commercial dredging site (results 6 years post-dredging). ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, 62 (2), 145-162.

  18. Bryan, G.W., 1984. Pollution due to heavy metals and their compounds. In Marine Ecology: A Comprehensive, Integrated Treatise on Life in the Oceans and Coastal Waters, vol. 5. Ocean Management, part 3, (ed. O. Kinne), pp.1289-1431. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  19. Cabioch, L., Dauvin, J.C. & Gentil, F., 1978. Preliminary observations on pollution of the sea bed and disturbance of sub-littoral communities in northern Brittany by oil from the Amoco Cadiz. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 9, 303-307.

  20. Capasso, E., Jenkins, S., Frost, M. & Hinz, H., 2010. Investigation of benthic community change over a century-wide scale in the western English Channel. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 90 (06), 1161-1172.

  21. Cazenave, A. & Nerem, R.S., 2004. Present-day sea-level change: Observations and causes. Reviews of Geophysics, 42 (3). DOI https://doi.org/10.1029/2003rg000139

  22. Chícharo, L., Chícharo, M., Gaspar, M., Regala, J. & Alves, F., 2002. Reburial time and indirect mortality of Spisula solida clams caused by dredging. Fisheries Research, 59, 247-257.

  23. Church, J.A. & White, N.J., 2006. A 20th century acceleration in global sea-level rise. Geophysical Research Letters, 33 (1). DOI https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gl024826

  24. Church, J.A., White, N.J., Coleman, R., Lambeck, K. & Mitrovica, J.X., 2004. Estimates of the Regional Distribution of Sea Level Rise over the 1950–2000 Period. Journal of Climate, 17 (13), 2609-2625.

  25. Collie, J.S., Escanero, G.A. & Valentine, P.C., 1997. Effects of bottom fishing on the benthic megafauna of Georges Bank. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 155, 159-172. DOI https://doi.org/10.3354/meps155159

  26. Collier, L.M. & Pinn, E.H., 1998. An assessment of the acute impact of the sea lice treatment Ivermectin on a benthic community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 230 (1), 131-147. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-0981(98)00081-1

  27. Conan, G., 1982. The long-term effects of the Amoco Cadiz oil spill. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 297, 323-333.

  28. Connor, D.W., Allen, J.H., Golding, N., Howell, K.L., Lieberknecht, L.M., Northen, K.O. & Reker, J.B., 2004. The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland. Version 04.05. ISBN 1 861 07561 8. In JNCC (2015), The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland Version 15.03. [2019-07-24]. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. Available from https://mhc.jncc.gov.uk/

  29. Cooper, K., Ware, S., Vanstaen, K. & Barry, J., 2011. Gravel seeding - A suitable technique for restoring the seabed following marine aggregate dredging? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 91 (1), 121-132.

  30. Dauvin, J.C. & Gillet, P., 1991. Spatio-temporal variability in population structure of Owenia fusiformis Delle Chiaje (Annelida: Polychaeta) from the Bay of Seine (eastern English Channel). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 152, 105-122.

  31. Dauvin, J.C. & Thiebaut, E., 1994. Is Owenia fusiformis Delle Chiaje a cosmopolitan species? Memoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 162, 383-404.

  32. Dauvin, J.C., 1985. Dynamics and production of a population of Venus ovata (Pennant) (Mollusca-Bivalvia) of Morlaix Bay (western English Channel). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 91, 109-123.

  33. Dauvin, J.C., 1988a. Structure and trophic organization of the Amphioxus lanceolatus - Venus fasciata community from the Bay of Morlaix (Brittany). Cahiers de Biologie Marine. Paris, 29, 163-185.

  34. Dauvin, J.C., 2000. The muddy fine sand Abra alba - Melinna palmata community of the Bay of Morlaix twenty years after the Amoco Cadiz oil spill. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40, 528-536.

  35. Davenport, J. & Davenport, J.L., 2005. Effects of shore height, wave exposure and geographical distance on thermal niche width of intertidal fauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 292, 41-50.

  36. David, Andrew A., 2021. Climate Change and Shell-Boring Polychaetes (Annelida: Spionidae): Current State of Knowledge and the Need for More Experimental Research. The Biological Bulletin, 241 (1), 4-15. DOI https://doi.org/10.1086/714989

  37. Davies, C.E. & Moss, D., 1998. European Union Nature Information System (EUNIS) Habitat Classification. Report to European Topic Centre on Nature Conservation from the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood, Cambridgeshire. [Final draft with further revisions to marine habitats.], Brussels: European Environment Agency.

  38. De Kluijver, M.J., van Nieuwenhuijzen, A., Ingalsuo, S. & Veldhuijzen-Van Zanten, H., 2022. Macrobenthos of the North Sea - Polychaeta. Marine Species Identification Portal. ETI Bioinformatics. [cited 2022-06-09] Available from: http://species-identification.org/species.php?species_group=macrobenthos_polychaeta&menuentry=inleiding

  39. De Montaudouin, X. & Sauriau, P.G., 1999. The proliferating Gastropoda Crepidula fornicata may stimulate macrozoobenthic diversity. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 79, 1069-1077. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315499001319

  40. De Montaudouin, X., Andemard, C. & Labourg, P-J., 1999. Does the slipper limpet (Crepidula fornicata L.) impair oyster growth and zoobenthos diversity ? A revisited hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 235, 105-124.

  41. De Montaudouin, X., Blanchet, H. & Hippert, B., 2018. Relationship between the invasive slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata and benthic megafauna structure and diversity, in Arcachon Bay. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 98 (8), 2017-2028. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315417001655

  42. Desprez, M., 2000. Physical and biological impact of marine aggregate extraction along the French coast of the Eastern English Channel: short- and long-term post-dredging restoration. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57 (5), 1428-1438.

  43. Desprez, M., Pearce, B. & Le Bot, S., 2010. The biological impact of overflowing sands around a marine aggregate extraction site: Dieppe (eastern English Channel). ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67, 270-277. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsp245

  44. Diaz-Castaneda, V., Richard, A. & Frontier, S., 1989. Preliminary results on colonization, recovery and succession in a polluted areas of the southern North Sea (Dunkerque's Harbour, France). Scientia Marina, 53, 705-716.

  45. Dittmann, S., 1999. Biotic interactions in a Lanice conchilega dominated tidal flat. In The Wadden Sea ecosystem, (ed. S. Dittmann), pp.153-162. Germany: Springer-Verlag.

  46. Emson, R.H., Jones, M. & Whitfield, P., 1989. Habitat and latitude differences in reproductive pattern and life-history in the cosmopolitan brittle-star Amphipholis squamata (Echinodermata). In: Ryland, J.S., Tyler, P.A. (Eds.), Reproduction, Genetics and Distributions of Marine Organisms, pp. 75-81. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg.

  47. Essink, K., 1999. Ecological effects of dumping of dredged sediments; options for management. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 5, 69-80.

  48. Fahy, E., Carroll, J. & O'Toole, M., 2003. A preliminary account of fisheries for the surf clam Spisula solida (L) (Mactracea) in Ireland [On-line] http://www.marine.ie, 2004-03-16

  49. FitzGerald, A., 2007. Slipper Limpet Utilisation and Management. Final Report. Port of Truro Oyster Management Group., Truro, 101 pp. Available from https://www.shellfish.org.uk/files/Literature/Projects-Reports/0701-Slipper_Limpet_Report_Final_Small.pdf

  50. Folk, R.L., 1954. The distinction between grain size and mineral composition in sedimentary-rock nomenclature. 62The Journal of Geology, 344-359.

  51. Ford, E., 1923. Animal communities of the level sea-bottom in the water adjacent to Plymouth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 13, 164-224.

  52. Fretter, V. & Graham, A., 1981. The Prosobranch Molluscs of Britain and Denmark. Part 6. Molluscs of Britain and Denmark. Part 6. Journal of Molluscan Studies, Supplement 9, 309-313.

  53. Frid, C.L., Harwood, K.G., Hall, S.J. & Hall, J.A., 2000. Long-term changes in the benthic communities on North Sea fishing grounds. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57 (5), 1303.

  54. Frölicher, T.L., Fischer, E.M. & Gruber, N., 2018. Marine heatwaves under global warming. Nature, 560 (7718), 360-364. DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0383-9

  55. Garrard, S.L., Gambi, M.C., Scipione, M.B., Patti, F.P., Lorenti, M., Zupo, V., Paterson, D.M. & Buia, M.C., 2014. Indirect effects may buffer negative responses of seagrass invertebrate communities to ocean acidification. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 461, 31-38. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2014.07.011

  56. Gaspar, M.B. & Monteiro, C.C., 1999. Gametogenesis and spawning in the subtidal white clam Spisula solida, in relation to temperature. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 79, 753-755.

  57. Gaspar, M.B., Leitão, F., Santos, M.N., Sobral, M., Chícharo, L., Chícharo, A. & Monteiro, C., 2002. Influence of mesh size and tooth spacing on the proportion of damaged organisms in the catches of the portuguese clam dredge fishery. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 59,1228-1236.

  58. Gaspar, M.B., Pereira, A.M., Vasconcelos, P. & Monteiro, C.C., 2004. Age and growth of Chamelea gallina from the Algarve coast (southern Portugal): influence of seawater temperature and gametogenic cycle on growth rate. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 70 (4), 371-377.

  59. Gaudin, François, Desroy, Nicolas, Dubois, Stanislas F, Broudin, Caroline, Cabioch, Louis, Fournier, Jérôme, Gentil, Franck, Grall, Jacques, Houbin, Céline, Le Mao, Patrick & Thiébaut, Éric, 2018. Marine sublittoral benthos fails to track temperature in response to climate change in a biogeographical transition zone. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 75 (6), 1894-1907. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy095

  60. Gentil, F., Dauvin, J.C. & Menard, F., 1990. Reproductive biology of the polychaete Owenia fusiformis Delle Chiaje in the Bay of Seine (eastern English Channel). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 142, 13-23.

  61. Gibbs, P.E., Burt, G.R., Pascoe, P.L., Llewellyn, C.A. & Ryan K.P., 2000. Zinc, copper and chlorophyll-derivates in the polychaete Owenia fusiformis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 80, 235-248.

  62. Gilkinson, K., Paulin, M., Hurley, S. & Schwinghamer, P., 1998. Impacts of trawl door scouring on infaunal bivalves: results of a physical trawl door model/dense sand interaction. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 224 (2), 291-312.

  63. Gilkinson, K.D., Gordon, D.C., MacIsaac, K.G., McKeown, D.L., Kenchington, E.L., Bourbonnais, C. & Vass, W.P., 2005. Immediate impacts and recovery trajectories of macrofaunal communities following hydraulic clam dredging on Banquereau, eastern Canada. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, 62 (5), 925-947.

  64. Giribet, G. & Peñas, A., 1999. Revision of the genus Goodallia (Bivalvia: Astartidae) with the description of two new species. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 65 (2), 251-265. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/65.2.251

  65. Gittenberger, A. & Van Loon, W.M.G.M., 2011. Common marine macrozoobenthos species in the Netherlands, their characteristics and sensitivities to environmental pressures. GiMaRIS Report no 2011.08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3135.7521

  66. Glasby, C. J., Erséus, C. & Martin, P., 2021. Annelids in Extreme Aquatic Environments: Diversity, Adaptations and Evolution. Diversity-Basel, 13 (2). DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/d13020098

  67. Glémarec, M., 1973. The benthic communities of the European North Atlantic continental shelf. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 11, 263-289.

  68. Grall J. & Hall-Spencer J.M. 2003. Problems facing maerl conservation in Brittany. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 13, S55-S64. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.568

  69. Grant, A. & Briggs, A.D., 1998. Toxicity of Ivermectin to estuarine and marine invertebrates. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 36 (7), 540-541. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(98)00012-5

  70. Guillou, J. & Sauriau, F.G., 1985. Some observations on the biology and ecology of a Venus striatula population in the Bay of Douarnenez, Brittany. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 889-900.

  71. Hauton, C., Hall-Spencer, J.M. & Moore, P.G., 2003. An experimental study of the ecological impacts of hydraulic bivalve dredging on maerl. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 60, 381-392.

  72. Hinz, H., Capasso, E., Lilley, M., Frost, M. & Jenkins, S.R., 2011. Temporal differences across a bio-geographical boundary reveal slow response of sub-littoral benthos to climate change. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 423, 69-82. DOI https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08963

  73. Hiscock, K., Langmead, O. & Warwick, R., 2004. Identification of seabed indicator species from time-series and other studies to support implementation of the EU Habitats and Water Framework Directives. Report to the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the Environment Agency from the Marine Biological Association. Marine Biological Association of the UK, Plymouth. JNCC Contract F90-01-705. 109 pp.

  74. Hiscock, K., Langmead, O., Warwick, R. & Smith, A., 2005. Identification of seabed indicator species to support implementation of the EU Habitats and Water Framework Directives. Report to the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the Environment Agency The Marine Biological Association, Plymouth, 77 pp.

  75. Hjulström, F., 1939. Transportation of detritus by moving water: Part 1. Transportation. Recent Marine Sediments, a Symposium (ed. P.D. Trask), pp. 5-31. Dover Publications, Inc.

  76. Holme, N.A., 1966. The bottom fauna of the English Channel. Part II. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 46, 401-493.

  77. Huthnance, J., 2010. Temperature and salinity, in: Charting the Progress 2: Ocean processes feeder report, section 3.2. (eds. Buckley, P., et al.): UKMMAS, Defra, London.

  78. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2019. IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland, 1170 pp. Available from https://www.ipcc.ch/srocc/home/

  79. Jacobson, M.Z., 2005. Studying ocean acidification with conservative, stable numerical schemes for nonequilibrium air-ocean exchange and ocean equilibrium chemistry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 110 (D7). DOI https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005220

  80. JNCC (Joint Nature Conservation Committee), 2022.  The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland Version 22.04. [Date accessed]. Available from: https://mhc.jncc.gov.uk/

  81. JNCC (Joint Nature Conservation Committee), 2022.  The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland Version 22.04. [Date accessed]. Available from: https://mhc.jncc.gov.uk/

  82. Joaquim, S., Gaspar, M.B., Matias, D., Ben-Hamadou, R. & Arnold, W.S., 2008. Rebuilding viable spawner patches of the overfished Spisula solida (Mollusca: Bivalvia): a preliminary contribution to fishery sustainability. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, 65 (1), 60-64.

  83. Jones, N.S., 1950. Marine bottom communities. Biological Reviews, 25, 283-313.

  84. Jones, N.S., 1951. The bottom fauna of the south of the Isle of Man. Journal of Animal Ecology, 20, 132-144.

  85. Kühne, S. & Rachor, E., 1996. The macrofauna of a stony sand area in the German Bight (North Sea). Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen, 50 (4), 433.

  86. Kaiser, M.J., & Spencer, B.E., 1994a. A preliminary assessment of the immediate effects of beam trawling on a benthic community in the Irish Sea. In Environmental impact of bottom gears on benthic fauna in relation to natural resources management and protection of the North Sea. (ed. S.J. de Groot & H.J. Lindeboom). NIOZ-Rapport, 11, 87-94.

  87. Kaschl, A. & Carballeira, A., 1999. Behavioural responses of Venerupis decussata (Linnaeus, 1758) and Venerupis pullastra (Montagu, 1803) to copper spiked marine sediments. Boletin. Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia, 15, 383-394.

  88. Kenny, A.J. & Rees, H.L., 1996. The effects of marine gravel extraction on the macrobenthos: results 2 years post-dredging. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 32 (8-9), 615-622.

  89. Kenny, A.J. & Rees, H.L., 1994. The effects of marine gravel extraction on the macrobenthos: early post dredging recolonisation. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 28, 442-447.

  90. Kinne, O. (ed.), 1984. Marine Ecology: A Comprehensive, Integrated Treatise on Life in Oceans and Coastal Waters.Vol. V. Ocean Management Part 3: Pollution and Protection of the Seas - Radioactive Materials, Heavy Metals and Oil. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

  91. Kirby, R.R., Beaugrand, G. & Lindley, J.A., 2008. Climate-induced effects on the meroplankton and the benthic-pelagic ecology of the North Sea. Limnology and Oceanography, 53 (5), 1805.

  92. Klawe, W.L. & Dickie, L.M., 1957. Biology of the bloodworm, Glycera dibranchiata Ehlers, and its relation to the bloodworm fishery of the Maritime Provinces. Bulletin of Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 115, 1-37.

  93. Kröncke, I., Dippner, J., Heyen, H. & Zeiss, B., 1998. Long-term changes in macrofaunal communities off Norderney (East Frisia, Germany) in relation to climate variability. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 167, 25-36.

  94. Kranz, P.M., 1974. The anastrophic burial of bivalves and its paleoecological significance. The Journal of Geology, 82 (2), 237-265.

  95. Le Bot, S., Lafite, R., Fournier, M., Baltzer, A. & Desprez, M., 2010. Morphological and sedimentary impacts and recovery on a mixed sandy to pebbly seabed exposed to marine aggregate extraction (Eastern English Channel, France). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science89221-233.

  96. Leitão, F., Gaspar, M.B., Santos, M.N. & Monteiro, C.C., 2009. A comparison of bycatch and discard mortality in three types of dredge used in the Portuguese Spisula solida (solid surf clam) fishery. Aquatic Living Resources, 22 (1), 1-10.

  97. Levell, D., Rostron, D. & Dixon, I.M.T., 1989. Sediment macrobenthic communities from oil ports to offshore oilfields. In Ecological Impacts of the Oil Industry, Ed. B. Dicks. Chicester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

  98. Li, Y., Zhang, H., Tang, C., Zou, T. & Jiang, D., 2016. Influence of Rising Sea Level on Tidal Dynamics in the Bohai Sea. 74 (SI), 22-31. DOI https://doi.org/10.2112/si74-003.1

  99. Long, D., 2006. BGS detailed explanation of seabed sediment modified Folk classification. Available from: http://www.emodnet-seabedhabitats.eu/PDF/GMHM3_Detailed_explanation_of_seabed_sediment_classification.pdf

  100. Lopez-Flores I., De la Herran, R., Garrido-Ramos, M.A., Navas, J.I., Ruiz-Rejon, C. & Ruiz-Rejon, M., 2004. The molecular diagnosis of Marteilia refringens and differentiation between Marteilia strains infecting oysters and mussels based on the rDNA IGS sequence. Parasitology19 (4), 411-419.

  101. Lowe, J., Bernie, D., Bett, P., Bricheno, L., Brown, S., Calvert, D., Clark, R.T., Eagle, K.E., Edwards, T., Fosser, G., Fung, F., Gohar, L., Good, P., Gregory, J., Harris, G.R., Howard, T., Kaye, N., Kendon, E.J., Krijnen, J., Maisey, P., McDonald, R.E., McInnes, R.N., McSweeney, C.F., Mitchell, J.F.B., Murphy, J.M., Palmer, M., Roberts, C., Rostron, J.W., Sexton, D.M.H., Thornton, H.E., Tinker, J., Tucker, S., Yamazaki, K. & Belcher, S., 2018. UKCP18 Science Overview Report. Meterological Office, Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK, 73 pp. Available from https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/approach/collaboration/ukcp/index

  102. Mackie, A.S.Y., James, J.W.C., Rees, E.I.S., Darbyshire, T., Philpott, S.L., Mortimer, K., Jenkins, G.O. & Morando, A., 2006. BIOMÔR 4. The Outer Bristol Channel Marine Habitat Study. Studies in marine biodiversity and systematics from the National Museum of Wales, Cardiff. BIOMÔR Reports 4: 1–249 and A1–A227, + DVD-ROM (2007).

  103. Mackie, A.S.Y., Oliver, P.G. & Rees, E.I.S., 1995. Benthic biodiversity in the southern Irish Sea. Studies in Marine Biodiversity and Systematics from the National Museum of Wales. BIOMOR Reports, no. 1.

  104. Madeira, D., Fernandes, J. F., Jerónimo, D., Ricardo, F., Santos, A., Domingues, M. R. & Calado, R., 2021. Calcium homeostasis and stable fatty acid composition underpin heatwave tolerance of the keystone polychaete Hediste diversicolor. Environmental Research, 195. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110885

  105. Martínez, B., Arenas, F., Rubal, M., Burgués, S., Esteban, R., García-Plazaola, I., Figueroa, F., Pereira, R., Saldaña, L. & Sousa-Pinto, I., 2012. Physical factors driving intertidal macroalgae distribution: physiological stress of a dominant fucoid at its southern limit. Oecologia, 170 (2), 341-353.

  106. Masanja, F., Yang, K., Xu, Y., He, G. X., Liu, X. L., Xu, X., Jiang, X. Y., Xin, L., Mkuye, R., Deng, Y. W. & Zhao, L. Q., 2023. Impacts of marine heat extremes on bivalves. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10. DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1159261

  107. Maurer, D., Keck, R.T., Tinsman, J.C., Leatham, W.A., Wethe, C., Lord, C. & Church, T.M., 1986. Vertical migration and mortality of marine benthos in dredged material: a synthesis. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie, 71, 49-63. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.19860710106

  108. McCall, P.L., 1977. Community patterns and adaptive strategies of the infaunal benthos of Long Island Sound. Journal of Marine Research, 35, 221-266.

  109. McNeill, G., Nunn, J. & Minchin, D., 2010. The slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata Linnaeus, 1758 becomes established in Ireland. Aquatic Invasions, 5 (Suppl. 1), S21-S25. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2010.5.S1.006

  110. Marine Ecological Surveys Limited (MES), 2008. Marine Macrofauna Genus Trait Handbook. Marine Ecological Surveys Limited: Bath. 

  111. MES, 2010. Marine Macrofauna Genus Trait Handbook. Marine Ecological Surveys Limited. http://www.genustraithandbook.org.uk/

  112. Morton, B., 2009. Aspects of the biology and functional morphology of Timoclea ovata (Bivalvia: Veneroidea: Venerinae) in the Azores, Portugal, and a comparison with Chione elevata (Chioninae). Açoreana, 6, 105-119.

  113. Mossman, H.L., Grant, A., Lawrence, P.J. & Davy, A.J., 2015. Biodiversity climate change impacts report card technical paper 10. Implications of climate change for coastal and inter-tidal habitats of the UK. Biodiversity climate change impacts, Living With Environmental Change, NERC, UKRI,  26 pp. Available from https://nerc.ukri.org/research/partnerships/ride/lwec/report-cards/biodiversity-source10/

  114. Moulaert, I. & Hostens, K., 2007. Post-extraction evolution of a macrobenthic community on the intensively extracted Kwintebank site in the Belgian part of the North Sea. CM Documents-ICES, (A:12).

  115. NBN, 2015. National Biodiversity Network 2015(20/05/2015). https://data.nbn.org.uk/

  116. Nichols, F.H. & Thompson, J.K., 1985. Persistence of an introduced mudflat community in South San Francisco Bay, California. Marine Ecology Progress Series24, 83-97.

  117. Niermann, U., Bauerfeind, E., Hickel, W. & Westernhagen, H.V., 1990. The recovery of benthos following the impact of low oxygen content in the German Bight. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 25 (1), 215-226. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(90)90023-A

  118. OBIS (Ocean Biodiversity Information System),  2024. Global map of species distribution using gridded data. Available from: Ocean Biogeographic Information System. www.iobis.org. Accessed: 2024-03-19

  119. Olafsson, E.B. & Persson, L.E., 1986. The interaction between Nereis diversicolor (Muller) and Corophium volutator (Pallas) as a structuring force in a shallow brackish sediment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 103, 103-117.

  120. Olafsson, E.B., Peterson, C.H. & Ambrose, W.G. Jr., 1994. Does recruitment limitation structure populations and communities of macro-invertebrates in marine soft sediments: the relative significance of pre- and post-settlement processes. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 32, 65-109

  121. Oliver, P.G., Holmes, A.M., Killeen, I.J. & Turner, J.A., 2016. Marine Bivalve Shells of the British Isles. Amgueddfa Cymru - National Museum Wales. Available from: http://naturalhistory.museumwales.ac.uk/britishbivalves [Cited:  3 July 2018].

  122. OSPAR, 2000. OSPAR decision 2000/3 on the use of organic-phase drilling fluids (OPF) and the discharge of OPF-contaminated cuttings. Summary Record OSPAR 2000. OSPAR 00/20/1-E, Annex 18. Copenhagen, 26–30 June.

  123. Palmer, M., Howard, T., Tinker, J., Lowe, J., Bricheno, L., Calvert, D., Edwards, T., Gregory, J., Harris, G., Krijnen, J., Pickering, M., Roberts, C. & Wolf, J., 2018. UKCP18 Marine Report. Met Office, The Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK, 133 pp. Available from https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/ukcp18/science-reports/UKCP18-Marine-report.pdf

  124. Pearson, T.H. & Rosenberg, R., 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 16, 229-311.

  125. Pedersen, M.F., Borum, J. & Fotel, L. F., 2009. Phosphorus dynamics and limitation of fast and slow-growing temperate seaweeds in Oslofjord, Norway. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 399, 103-115

  126. Petersen, C.G.J., 1918. The sea bottom and its production of fish food. A survey of the work done in connection with valuation of the Denmark waters from 1883-1917. Report of the Danish Biological Station, 25, 1-62.

  127. Pickering, M.D., Wells, N.C., Horsburgh, K.J. & Green, J.A.M., 2012. The impact of future sea-level rise on the European Shelf tides. Continental Shelf Research, 35, 1-15. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2011.11.011

  128. Poggiale, J.C. & Dauvin, J.C., 2001. Long term dynamics of three benthic Ampelisca (Crustacea - Amphipoda) populations from the Bay of Morlaix (western English Channel) related to their disappearance after the Amoco Cadiz oil spill. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 214, 201-209.

  129. Powell-Jennings, C. & Callaway, R., 2018. The invasive, non-native slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata is poorly adapted to sediment burial. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 130, 95-104. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.03.006

  130. Powilleit, M., Graf, G., Kleine, J., Riethmuller, R., Stockmann, K., Wetzel, M.A. & Koop, J.H.E., 2009. Experiments on the survival of six brackish macro-invertebrates from the Baltic Sea after dredged spoil coverage and its implications for the field. Journal of Marine Systems, 75 (3-4), 441-451.

  131. Preston, J., Fabra, M., Helmer, L., Johnson, E., Harris-Scott, E. & Hendy, I.W., 2020. Interactions of larval dynamics and substrate preference have ecological significance for benthic biodiversity and Ostrea edulis Linnaeus, 1758 in the presence of Crepidula fornicata. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30 (11), 2133-2149. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3446

  132. Price, H., 1982. An analysis of factors determining seasonal variation in the byssal attachment strength of Mytilus edulis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 62 (01), 147-155

  133. Rabalais, N.N., Harper, D.E. & Turner, R.E., 2001. Responses of nekton and demersal and benthic fauna to decreasing oxygen concentrations. In: Coastal Hypoxia Consequences for Living Resources and Ecosystems, (Edited by: Rabalais, N. N. and Turner, R. E.), Coastal and Estuarine Studies 58, American Geophysical Union, pp. 115–128. Washington D.C.

  134. Rhoads, D.C. & Young, D.K., 1970. The influence of deposit-feeding organisms on sediment stability and community trophic structure. Journal of Marine Research, 28, 150-178.

  135. Riedel, B., Zuschin, M. & Stachowitsch, M., 2012. Tolerance of benthic macrofauna to hypoxia and anoxia in shallow coastal seas: a realistic scenario. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 458, 39-52.

  136. Riera, R., Tuya, F., Ramos, E., Rodríguez, M. & Monterroso, Ó., 2012. Variability of macrofaunal assemblages on the surroundings of a brine disposal. Desalination, 291, 94-100.

  137. Roche, C., Lyons, D.O.,O'Connor, B. 2007. Benthic surveys of sandbanks in the Irish Sea. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 29. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.

  138. Rygg, B., 1985. Effect of sediment copper on benthic fauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 25, 83-89.

  139. Salzwedel, H., Rachor, E. & Gerdes, D., 1985. Benthic macrofauna communities in the German Bight. Verifflithungen des Institut fur Meeresforschung in Bremerhaven, 20, 199-267.

  140. Sardá, R., Pinedo, S. & Martin, D., 1999. Seasonal dynamics of macroinfaunal key species inhabiting shallow soft-bottoms in the Bay of Blanes (NW Mediterranean). Publications Elsevier: Paris.

  141. Sardá, R., Pinedo, S., Gremare, A. & Taboada, S., 2000. Changes in the dynamics of shallow sandy-bottom assemblages due to sand extraction in the Catalan Western Mediterranean Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57 (5), 1446-1453.

  142. Savina, M. & Pouvreau, S., 2004. A comparative ecophysiological study of two infaunal filter-feeding bivalves: Paphia rhomboıdes and Glycymeris glycymeris. Aquaculture, 239 (1), 289-306.

  143. Serrano, L., Cardell, M., Lozoya, J. & Sardá, R., 2011. A polychaete-dominated community in the NW Mediterranean Sea, 20 years after cessation of sewage discharges. Italian Journal of Zoology, 78 (sup1), 333-346.

  144. Simboura, N. & Zenetos, A., 2002. Benthic indicators to use in ecological quality classification of Mediterranean soft bottom marine ecosystems, including a new biotic index. Mediterranean Marine Science, 3 (2), 77-111.

  145. Sinderman, C.J., 1990. Principle diseases of marine fish and shellfish, 2nd edition, Volume 2. Diseases of marine shellfish. Academic Press, 521 pp.

  146. Smith T.B. & Keegan, B.F., 1985. Seasonal torpor in Neopentadactyla mixta (Ostergren) (Holothuroidea: Dendrochirotida). In Echinodermata. Proceedings of the Fifth International Echinoderm Conference. Galway, 24-29 September 1984. (B.F. Keegan & B.D.S O'Connor, pp. 459-464. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.

  147. Snelgrove, P.V., Grassle, J.P., Grassle, J.F., Petrecca, R.F. & Ma, H., 1999. In situ habitat selection by settling larvae of marine soft‐sediment invertebrates. Limnology and Oceanography, 44 (5), 1341-1347.

  148. Sohtome, T., Wada, T., Mizuno, T., Nemoto, Y., Igarashi, S., Nishimune, A., Aono, T., Ito, Y., Kanda, J. & Ishimaru, T., 2014. Radiological impact of TEPCO's Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident on invertebrates in the coastal benthic food web. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 138, 106-115.

  149. Somaschini, A., 1993. A Mediterranean fine-sand polychaete community and the effect of the tube-dwelling Owenia fusiformis Delle Chiaje on community structure. Internationale Revue de Gesamten Hydrobiologie, 78, 219-233.

  150. Stiger-Pouvreau, V. & Thouzeau, G., 2015. Marine Species Introduced on the French Channel-Atlantic Coasts: A Review of Main Biological Invasions and Impacts. Open Journal of Ecology, 5, 227-257. DOI https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2015.55019

  151. Stirling, E.A., 1975. Some effects of pollutants on the behaviour of the bivalve Tellina tenuis. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 6, 122-124.

  152. Suchanek, T.H., 1993. Oil impacts on marine invertebrate populations and communities. American Zoologist, 33, 510-523. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/33.6.510

  153. Tan, K. & Zheng, H. P., 2020. Ocean acidification and adaptive bivalve farming. Science of the Total Environment, 701. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134794

  154. Thomas, R., 1975. Functional morphology, ecology, and evolutionary conservatism in the Glycymerididae (Bivalvia). Palaeontology, 18 (2), 217-254.

  155. Thorson, G., 1957. Bottom communities (sublittoral or shallow shelf). Memoirs of the Geological Society of America, 67, 461-534.

  156. Tillin, H.M., Hiddink, J.G., Jennings, S. & Kaiser, M.J., 2006. Chronic bottom trawling alters the functional composition of benthic invertebrate communities on a sea-basin scale. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 318, 31-45.

  157. Tillin, H.M., Kessel, C., Sewell, J., Wood, C.A. & Bishop, J.D.D., 2020. Assessing the impact of key Marine Invasive Non-Native Species on Welsh MPA habitat features, fisheries and aquaculture. NRW Evidence Report. Report No: 454. Natural Resources Wales, Bangor, 260 pp. Available from https://naturalresourceswales.gov.uk/media/696519/assessing-the-impact-of-key-marine-invasive-non-native-species-on-welsh-mpa-habitat-features-fisheries-and-aquaculture.pdf

  158. UKTAG, 2014. UK Technical Advisory Group on the Water Framework Directive [online]. Available from: http://www.wfduk.org

  159. Vader, W.J.M., 1964. A preliminary investigation in to the reactions of the infauna of the tidal flats to tidal fluctuations in water level. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 2, 189-222.

  160. Valentine, P.C., Carman, M.R., Blackwood, D.S. & Heffron, E.J., 2007. Ecological observations on the colonial ascidian Didemnum sp. in a New England tide pool habitat. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 342 (1), 109-121.

  161. Van Dalfsen, J.A., Essink, K., Toxvig Madsen, H., Birklund, J., Romero, J. & Manzanera, M., 2000. Differential response of macrozoobenthos to marine sand extraction in the North Sea and the Western Mediterranean. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57 (5), 1439-1445.

  162. Vaudrey, J.M.P., Kremer, J.N., Branco, B.F. & Short, F.T., 2010. Eelgrass recovery after nutrient enrichment reversal. Aquatic Botany, 93 (4), 237-243.

  163. Veale, L.O., Hill, A.S., Hawkins, S.J. & Brand, A.R., 2000. Effects of long term physical disturbance by scallop fishing on subtidal epifaunal assemblages and habitats. Marine Biology, 137, 325-337.

  164. Warwick, R.M. & Davis, J.R., 1977. The distribution of sublittoral macrofauna communities in the Bristol Channel in relation to the substrate. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 5, 267-288.

  165. Weber, A., Witbaard, R. & Van Steenpaal, S., 2001. Patterns of growth and undetectable growth lines of astarte sulcata (Bivalvia) in the Faroe-Shetland Channel. 14th International Senckenberg Conference North Sea 2000, Wilhelmshaven, Germany, May 08-12, pp. 235-244 DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03043032

  166. Widdows, J., Bayne, B.L., Livingstone, D.R., Newell, R.I.E. & Donkin, P., 1979. Physiological and biochemical responses of bivalve molluscs to exposure to air. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 62A, 301-308.

  167. Wilding T. & Hughes D., 2010. A review and assessment of the effects of marine fish farm discharges on Biodiversity Action Plan habitats. Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Aquaculture Research Forum (SARF).

  168. Wilson, J.G. & Elkain, B., 1991. Tolerances to high temperature of individual bivalves and the effect of geographic distribution, position on the shore and season. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 169-177.

  169. Woodin, S.A., 1978. Refuges, disturbance and community structure: a marine soft bottom example. Ecology, 59, 274-284.

  170. Zühlke, R., 2001. Polychaete tubes create ephemeral community patterns: Lanice conchilega (Pallas, 1766) associations studied over six years. Journal of Sea Research, 46, 261-272.

  171. Zühlke, R., Blome, D., van Bernem, K.H. & Dittmann, S., 1998. Effects of the tube-building polychaete Lanice conchilega (Pallas) on benthic macrofauna and nematodes in an intertidal sandflat. Senckenbergiana Maritima, 29, 131-138.

Citation

This review can be cited as:

Tillin, H.M. & Watson, A., 2024. Mediomastus fragilis, Lumbrineris spp. and venerid bivalves in circalittoral coarse sand or gravel. In Tyler-Walters H. Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. [cited 19-03-2024]. Available from: https://www.marlin.ac.uk/habitat/detail/382

 Download PDF version


Last Updated: 02/02/2024