Distribution data supplied by the Ocean Biodiversity Information System (OBIS). To interrogate UK data visit the NBN Atlas.Map Help
Researched by | Angus Jackson & Dr Keith Hiscock | Refereed by | Prof. Steve J. Hawkins |
Authority | (Leuckart, 1849) | ||
Other common names | - | Synonyms | - |
An occasionally gregarious segmented worm that builds tubes from sand or shell fragments. Found subtidally in exposed areas. Does not form reefs over most of its range being found mostly individually but may form thin crusts or large reefs up to several metres across and 60 cm high. Quite similar to Sabellaria alveolata.
At low densities, the tubes are attached to the substratum along the entire length but at greater densities competition for space results in the tubes overlapping and may cause the tubes to be built outwards, away from the substratum.
- none -
Phylum | Annelida | Segmented worms e.g. ragworms, tubeworms, fanworms and spoon worms |
Class | Polychaeta | Bristleworms, e.g. ragworms, scaleworms, paddleworms, fanworms, tubeworms and spoon worms |
Family | Sabellariidae | |
Genus | Sabellaria | |
Authority | (Leuckart, 1849) | |
Recent Synonyms |
Typical abundance | High density | ||
Male size range | 20 - 30mm | ||
Male size at maturity | |||
Female size range | Small-medium(3-10cm) | ||
Female size at maturity | |||
Growth form | Tubicolous | ||
Growth rate | Field unresearched | ||
Body flexibility | |||
Mobility | |||
Characteristic feeding method | Active suspension feeder | ||
Diet/food source | |||
Typically feeds on | Phytoplankton | ||
Sociability | |||
Environmental position | Epifaunal | ||
Dependency | Independent. | ||
Supports | Substratum a variety of organisms. Forms a substratum for algae and shelter for small crabs etc. (particularly when forming reefs or crusts) | ||
Is the species harmful? | No |
Can be found in very high densities, for example when forming a reef. Typically found in lower densities as a crust or as individuals. At the Bristol Channel location studied by George & Warwick (1986), densities in excess of 4,000/m² for loosely aggregated Sabellaria spinulosa were recorded whilst the area sampled by Hiscock & Rostron (unpublished) on a level hard substratum had a single layer crust with 9,561 individual Sabellaria spinulosa in 1.4m². There has been considerable concern about decline in Sabellaria spinulosa reefs and shrimp fisheries have been implicated in the decline. However, Vorberg (2000) could find no damage caused after experiments with shrimp trawls in the Wadden Sea and suggests that declines might be more associated with changing patterns of currents perhaps associated with construction, dredging and dumping.
Physiographic preferences | Open coast, Offshore seabed |
Biological zone preferences | Lower infralittoral, Upper infralittoral |
Substratum / habitat preferences | Bedrock, Cobbles, Large to very large boulders, Small boulders |
Tidal strength preferences | Moderately Strong 1 to 3 knots (0.5-1.5 m/sec.), Strong 3 to 6 knots (1.5-3 m/sec.) |
Wave exposure preferences | Exposed, Moderately exposed, Very exposed |
Salinity preferences | Full (30-40 psu) |
Depth range | |
Other preferences | No text entered |
Migration Pattern | Non-migratory / resident |
Reproductive type | Gonochoristic (dioecious) | |
Reproductive frequency | Annual protracted | |
Fecundity (number of eggs) | No information | |
Generation time | Insufficient information | |
Age at maturity | ||
Season | January - March | |
Life span | 2-5 years |
Larval/propagule type | - |
Larval/juvenile development | Planktotrophic |
Duration of larval stage | 1-2 months |
Larval dispersal potential | Greater than 10 km |
Larval settlement period | March |
The MarLIN sensitivity assessment approach used below has been superseded by the MarESA (Marine Evidence-based Sensitivity Assessment) approach (see menu). The MarLIN approach was used for assessments from 1999-2010. The MarESA approach reflects the recent conservation imperatives and terminology and is used for sensitivity assessments from 2014 onwards.
Intolerance | Recoverability | Sensitivity | Evidence/Confidence | |
High | High | Moderate | High | |
The species is fixed to the substratum so substratum removal will cause mortality. Recruitment rates are high and recovery could be quite rapid (see additional information). It is often one of the first species to settle on new substrata. | ||||
Low | Immediate | Not sensitive | Moderate | |
Extrapolating from Sabellaria alveolata it is probable that Sabellaria spinulosa can tolerate smothering by sediment for up to several weeks. Feeding and growth will be curtailed. Depending on timing this may interfere with reproduction. Recovery would be almost immediate. | ||||
Low | Immediate | Not sensitive | Moderate | |
Tube growth is dependent on the presence of suspended particles, hence increase in suspended sediment could facilitate tube construction and may result in increased populations. However, an increase in siltation may also clog feeding apparatus - assumed here. Recovery occurs when the population is able to recommence feeding and growing. | ||||
Intermediate | High | Low | Moderate | |
Tube growth is dependent on the presence of suspended particles, hence a reduction in siltation may hinder tube construction and/or may favour other species to compete sucessfully with Sabellaria spinulosa. Overall, a decline in population density seems likely. Recovery would be high (see additional information). | ||||
Tolerant | Not relevant | Not sensitive | Low | |
The species is sessile and typically subtidal but is also occasionally found intertidally and so can be exposed to drying influences. If exposed to the air the worm can retract into its tube and close the operculum over the entrance reducing evaporation. | ||||
Intermediate | High | Low | Low | |
The species is sessile and typically subtidal but is also occasionally found in the low intertidal. This means the species can tolerate some emergence, however, increased emergence will reduce the amount of time available for feeding. This species is more subtidal than Sabellaria alveolata. Variability in recruitment (dependent on suitable environmental conditions) means that recovery could be quite rapid, say a year, or take several years. The presence of some remaining adults will assist in larval settlement as this is the preferred substratum (Wilson, 1929). | ||||
Tolerant* | Not relevant | Not sensitive* | High | |
The species is sessile and typically subtidal but is also occasionally found in the low intertidal. The species is likely to benefit from decrease in emergence. | ||||
Intermediate | High | Low | Low | |
The species occurs in areas with high water flow so an increase in rate is likely to have little effect on attached individuals. However, Sabellaria spinulosa typically inhabits cobbles and pebbles that are likely to become mobile if water flow rate is increased and therefore result in scour and mortality of individuals. Not all individuals are likely to be killed and an intolerance of intermediate is suggested. High levels of recruitment means that recovery could be quite rapid, say within a year (see additional information). The presence of some remaining adults will assist in larval settlement as this is the preferred substratum (Wilson, 1929). | ||||
Intermediate | High | Low | Moderate | |
The species inhabits areas with high water flow so an increase in rate is likely to have little effect. A reduction of water flow by two categories is likely to cause exposure to conditions outside the normal range for the species. This may be sufficient to reduce availability of suspended particles, hindering growth and repair and feeding. High levels of recruitment means that recovery could be quite rapid, say within a year (see additional information). The presence of some remaining adults will assist in larval settlement as this is the preferred substratum (Wilson, 1929). | ||||
Low | High | Low | Very low | |
The species does appear to thrive in conditions of cold water (for instance, it extends into arctic areas) and long-term increase in temperature may have a negative effect so that populations do not thrive. The species is highly fecund and likely to recover quickly from short-term declines that might be due to increased temperatures (see additional information). | ||||
Tolerant | Not relevant | Not sensitive | High | |
Sabellaria spinulosa did not appear to suffer mortality during the 1963-64 winter (Crisp, 1964). The species occurs north to the arctic and is therefore considered tolerant of decrease in temperature. | ||||
Tolerant | Not relevant | Not sensitive | Low | |
Sabellaria spinulosa thrives in turbid water conditions and has no reliance on visual sense for feeding, reproducing etc. | ||||
Intermediate | High | Low | Low | |
Decrease in turbidity may be sufficient to reduce availability of suspended particles, hindering growth, repair and feeding. Effects are likley to be sublethal in the short-term but may reduce viability of populations and result in decline if the turbidity decrease is chronic. The species is highly fecund and likely to recover quickly from short-term declines that might be due to increased temperatures (see additional information). | ||||
Intermediate | High | Low | Moderate | |
Where the species exists as loose crusts, death may occur through break-up due to wave action. Increased wave action may also mobilize the pebble and gravel substrata on which Sabellaria spinulosa often occurs resulting in abrasion and mortality. High levels of recruitment means that recovery could be quite rapid, say within a year (see additional information). The presence of some remaining adults will assist in larval settlement as this is the preferred substratum (Wilson, 1929). | ||||
Intermediate | High | Low | ||
Wave action may be required, in the absence of strong tidal flow, to suspend the coarse sand particles needed to build tubes. Reduced wave action may mean the population exists outside of its preferred conditions with insufficient water action to provide sand particles or food. Some reduction in the population therefore seems likely. High levels of recruitment means that recovery could be quite rapid, say within a year (see additional information). The presence of some remaining adults will assist in larval settlement as this is the preferred substratum (Wilson, 1929). | ||||
Tolerant | Not relevant | Not sensitive | Low | |
The species is unlikely to respond to noise vibrations | ||||
Tolerant | Not relevant | Not sensitive | Low | |
Most polychaetes have photoreceptors but the species is probably unable to resolve moving objects. The worms may retract into tube on disturbance. Whether this is through light detection or mechanical stimulus is uncertain. | ||||
Intermediate | High | Low | Low | |
Extrapolating from Sabellaria alveolata it is probable that Sabellaria spinulosa is quite tolerant to abrasion resulting from trawling. The ability of Sabellaria alveolata to repair tubes is well developed (Cunningham et al., 1984; Vorberg, 2000). However, abrasion resulting from substratum (cobbles and pebbles) becoming mobile is likely to cause significant damage. High levels of recruitment means that recovery could be quite rapid, say within a year (see additional information). The presence of some remaining adults will assist in larval settlement as this is the preferred substratum (Wilson, 1929). | ||||
High | High | Moderate | Low | |
Worms are not able to rebuild tubes if removed from them (Wilson, 1929). High levels of recruitment means that recovery could be quite rapid, say within a year (see additional information). The presence of some remaining adults will assist in larval settlement as this is the preferred substratum (Wilson, 1929). |
Intolerance | Recoverability | Sensitivity | Evidence/Confidence | |
Tolerant* | Not relevant | Not sensitive* | Moderate | |
Although the larvae are known to be highly intolerant of some oil dispersants, Sabellaria spinulosa has been found to thrive in polluted areas. In particular in an area with acidified halogenated effluent. It is found at higher densities near the effluent than elsewhere through the exclusion of other species (Hoare & Hiscock, 1974). The species has been assessed as tolerant* by extrapolating from these observations. It may well be that Sabellaria spinulosa has different sensitivities to other synthetic chemicals but this information is not available. | ||||
No information | No information | No information | Not relevant | |
Insufficient information | ||||
No information | No information | No information | Not relevant | |
Insufficient information | ||||
No information | No information | No information | Not relevant | |
Insufficient information | ||||
No information | No information | No information | Not relevant | |
Insufficient information | ||||
No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant | |
Intermediate | High | Low | Moderate | |
The species only occurs in fully marine environment, however, as it does occasionally occur in the intertidal, it must be able to tolerate some reduced salinity caused by precipitation run off. High levels of recruitment means that recovery could be quite rapid, say within a year (see additional information). The presence of some remaining adults will assist in larval settlement as this is the preferred substratum (Wilson, 1929). | ||||
Intermediate | High | Low | Very low | |
Cole et al. (1999) suggest possible adverse effects on marine species below 4 mg/l and probable adverse effects below 2 mg/l. There is no information about Sabellaria spinulosa tolerance to changes in oxygenation. High levels of recruitment means that recovery could be quite rapid, say within a year (see additional information). The presence of some remaining adults will assist in larval settlement as this is the preferred substratum (Wilson, 1929). |
Intolerance | Recoverability | Sensitivity | Evidence/Confidence | |
No information | No information | No information | Not relevant | |
Insufficient information | ||||
No information | No information | No information | Not relevant | |
Insufficient information | ||||
Not relevant | Not relevant | Not relevant | Low | |
Sabellaria spinulosa is unlikely to be the target of extractions (for instance, for bait). | ||||
Intermediate | High | Low | Low | |
Fisheries for the pink shrimp Pandalus montagui and brown shrimps (Crangon crangon) (often associated with areas of Sabellaria spinulosa reefs) have been implicated in the loss or damage of reefs. However, Vorberg (2000) undertook experimental and observational studies that indicated only minor damage to tubes and rapid recovery as a result of shrimp fisheries. Nevertheless, populations, especially if as loose aggregations, may be displaced by mobile fishing gear and a precautionary intolerance of intermediate is suggested. High levels of recruitment means that recovery could be quite rapid, say within a year (see additional information). The presence of some remaining adults will assist in larval settlement as this is the preferred substratum (Wilson, 1929). |
- no data -
National (GB) importance | - | Global red list (IUCN) category | - |
Native | - | ||
Origin | - | Date Arrived | - |
Cunningham, P.N., Hawkins, S.J., Jones, H.D. & Burrows, M.T., 1984. The geographical distribution of Sabellaria alveolata (L.) in England, Wales and Scotland, with investigations into the community structure of and the effects of trampling on Sabellaria alveolata colonies. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, Contract Report no. HF3/11/22., University of Manchester, Department of Zoology.
English Nature, 1998. Echoes lead to reef discoveries. http://dialspace.dial.pipex.com/town/plaza/ae094/en402.htm#Echoes, 1999-06-14
George, C.L. & Warwick, R.M., 1985. Annual macrofauna production in a hard-bottom reef community. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 713-735.
Gruet, Y., 1982. Recherches sur l'ecologie des "recifs" édifié par l'annélide polychète Sabellaria alveolata (Linnhé). , Université de Nantes.
Hayward, P., Nelson-Smith, T. & Shields, C. 1996. Collins pocket guide. Sea shore of Britain and northern Europe. London: HarperCollins.
Hayward, P.J. & Ryland, J.S. (ed.) 1995b. Handbook of the marine fauna of North-West Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoare, R. & Hiscock, K., 1974. An ecological survey of the rocky coast adjacent to the effluent of a bromine extraction plant. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 2 (4), 329-348.
Howson, C.M. & Picton, B.E., 1997. The species directory of the marine fauna and flora of the British Isles and surrounding seas. Belfast: Ulster Museum. [Ulster Museum publication, no. 276.]
Jones, L.A., Hiscock, K. & Connor, D.W., 2000. Marine habitat reviews. A summary of ecological requirements and sensitivity characteristics for the conservation and management of marine SACs. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. (UK Marine SACs Project report.). Available from: http://ukmpa.marinebiodiversity.org/uk_sacs/pdfs/marine-habitats-review.pdf
Smith, J.E. (ed.), 1968. 'Torrey Canyon'. Pollution and marine life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vorberg, R., 2000. Effects of shrimp fisheries on reefs of Sabellaria spinulosa (Polychaeta). ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57, 1416-1420.
Wilson, D.P., 1929. The larvae of the British sabellarians. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 16, 221-269.
Wilson, D.P., 1970b. The larvae of Sabellaria spinulosa and their settlement behaviour. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 33-52.
Centre for Environmental Data and Recording, 2018. Ulster Museum Marine Surveys of Northern Ireland Coastal Waters. Occurrence dataset https://www.nmni.com/CEDaR/CEDaR-Centre-for-Environmental-Data-and-Recording.aspx accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-09-25.
Environmental Records Information Centre North East, 2018. ERIC NE Combined dataset to 2017. Occurrence dataset: http://www.ericnortheast.org.ukl accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-09-38
Fenwick, 2018. Aphotomarine. Occurrence dataset http://www.aphotomarine.com/index.html Accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-10-01
Kent Wildlife Trust, 2018. Biological survey of the intertidal chalk reefs between Folkestone Warren and Kingsdown, Kent 2009-2011. Occurrence dataset: https://www.kentwildlifetrust.org.uk/ accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-10-01.
Kent Wildlife Trust, 2018. Kent Wildlife Trust Shoresearch Intertidal Survey 2004 onwards. Occurrence dataset: https://www.kentwildlifetrust.org.uk/ accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-10-01.
National Trust, 2017. National Trust Species Records. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/opc6g1 accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
NBN (National Biodiversity Network) Atlas. Available from: https://www.nbnatlas.org.
OBIS (Ocean Biodiversity Information System), 2023. Global map of species distribution using gridded data. Available from: Ocean Biogeographic Information System. www.iobis.org. Accessed: 2023-06-03
South East Wales Biodiversity Records Centre, 2018. SEWBReC Worms (South East Wales). Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/5vh0w8 accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-02.
This review can be cited as:
Last Updated: 18/03/2008