Caryophyllia (Caryophyllia) smithii, sponges and crustose communities on wave-exposed circalittoral rock

Distribution Map

Map Key

  • Orange points: Core Records
  • Pale Blue points: Non-core, certain determination
  • Black points: Non-core, uncertain determination
  • Yellow areas: Predicted habitat extent

Summary

UK and Ireland classification

Description

This biotope typically occurs on the upper and vertical faces of wave-exposed, moderately strong to weakly tide-swept, circalittoral bedrock or boulders, with a water depth range of 20-30m. This often silty biotope has a typically sparse fauna, appearing grazed, and is characterized by common cup corals Caryophyllia smithii, frequent Alcyonium digitatum and occasional urchins Echinus esculentus. There may be occasional large growths of the sponge Cliona celata, Haliclona viscosaPachymatisma johnstonia and the axinellid sponge Stelligera stuposa. Echinoderms form a prominent feature of the fauna within this biotope, with species such as Marthasterias glacialisAsterias rubensLuidia ciliarisHenricia oculataHolothuria forskaliAntedon bifida and Aslia lefevrei present. Bryozoan crusts such as Parasmittina trispinosa and encrusting red algae cover the rock/boulder surface. The bryozoan Porella compressa may also be recorded occasionally. Isolated clumps of hydroids feature species such as Nemertesia antenninaNemertesia ramosa, Abietinaria abietinaHalecium halecinum and Sertularella gayi. Other species observed include the anemone Corynactis viridisUrticina felinaCylista elegansCalliostoma zizyphinumBalanus crenatus and Spirobranchus triqueter. Two variants within this biotope have been distinguished: CarSp.PenPcom and CarSp.Bri. While CarSp.PenPcom tends to have the bryozoans Pentapora foliacea and Porella compressa, while CarSp.Bri features a dynamic community of brittlestars covering the seabed in a dense mat. Ophiothrix fragilis is usually the dominant species in shallow water but tends to be replaced by Ophiocomina nigra in deeper water. (Information from Connor et al., 2004; JNCC, 2015).

Depth range

20-30 m, 30-50 m

Additional information

-

Sensitivity reviewHow is sensitivity assessed?

Sensitivity characteristics of the habitat and relevant characteristic species

This often silty biotope (CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp) has a typically sparse fauna, appearing grazed, and is characterized by frequent cup corals Caryophyllia smithii, Alcyonium digitatum and Cliona celata, with occasional urchins Echinus esculentus and starfish. There may be occasional large growths of the sponges Haliclona viscosa, Pachymatisma johnstonia and the axinellid sponge Stelligera stuposa (Connor et al., 2004; JNCC, 2022). Although grazed, it also supports a diverse range of bryozoans, hydroids, and anemones. Grazing by the sea urchin Echinus esculentus (and possibly other echinoderms) is considered significant in preserving the nature of this biotope, and loss of this species is likely to significantly affect the biotope to the extent that reclassification would be necessary. 

For this sensitivity assessment, Caryophyllia smithii, Alcyonium digitatum, and Echinus esculentus are the primary research focus, together with Cliona celata, as sponges are also an important characterizing component of (Connor et al., 2004; JNCC, 2022). Other sponges occur occasionally within EcCr.CarSp (e.g. Haliclona viscosa, Pachymatisma johnstonia and the axinellid sponge Stelligera stuposa), however, they are not subject to specific research. Other species present in these biotopes are considered transient, mobile, or ubiquitous and are therefore not considered significant to the assessment of the sensitivity of these biotopes.

Resilience and recovery rates of habitat

Alcyonium digitatum is a colonial species of soft coral with a wide distribution in the North Atlantic, recorded from Portugal (41°N) to Northern Norway (70°N) as well as on the east coast of North America (Hartnoll, 1975; Budd, 2008). Colonies consist of stout “finger-like” projections (Hartnoll, 1975) which can reach up to 20 cm tall (Budd, 2008) and can dominate circalittoral rock habitats (as in CR.HCR.FaT.CTub.Adig; Connor et al., 2004). Alcyonium digitatum colonies are likely to have a lifespan that exceeds 20 years, as colonies have been followed for 28 years in marked plots (Lundälv, pers. comm., in Hartnoll, 1998; Gavazzi, Kapasakali & Degraer, 2024). Colonies that were 10 to 15 cm in height were aged between five and ten years old (Hartnoll, unpublished). Most colonies are unisexual, with the majority of individuals being female. Sexual maturity is predicted, at its earliest, when the colony reaches its second year of growth. However, the majority of colonies are not predicted to reach maturity until their third year (Hartnoll, 1975). 

Alcyonium digitatum spawns from December to January. Gametes are released into the water, where fertilization occurs. The embryos are neutrally buoyant and float freely for seven days when they give rise to actively swimming lecithotrophic planulae, which may have an extended pelagic life before they eventually settle (usually within one or two further days) and metamorphose to polyps (Matthews, 1917; Hartnoll, 1975; Budd, 2008). Larvae have been reported to survive for up to 35 weeks as non-feeding planulae and may favour the dispersal and eventual discovery of a site suitable for settlement (Hartnoll, 1975). The combination of spawning in winter and the long pelagic lifespan may allow a considerable length of time for the planulae to disperse, settle, and metamorphose ahead of the spring plankton bloom. Young Alcyonium digitatum will consequently be able to take advantage of an abundant food resource in spring and be well developed before the appearance of other organisms that may otherwise compete for the same substrata. In addition, because the planulae do not feed whilst in the pelagic zone, they do not suffer from being released at the time of minimum plankton density. They may also benefit from the scarcity of predatory zooplankton, which would otherwise feed upon them (Hartnoll, 1975). However, reduced heterozygosity and impaired sexual reproduction have been reported in another cnidarian species subjected to trawling damage, and reduced colony numbers and size have been reported for Alcyonium digitatum in Lyme Bay, southern England, in trawled areas (Holland, Jenkins & Stevens, 2017). Alcyonium digitatum can recruit onto bare surfaces within two years but may take up to five years to fully recover following significant mortality (Whomersley & Picken, 2003; Hiscock et al., 2010).

Caryophyllia smithii is a small (max 3 cm across) solitary coral, common within tide-swept sites of the UK (Wood, 2005) but was common on the cliffs within Lough Hyne that experience little water movement (Hiscock, pers comm.). It is distributed from Greece (Koukouras, 2010) to the Shetland Islands and southern Norway (Wilson, 1975; NBN, 2015). In Sweden, Caryophyllia smithii are reported to dominate shallower depths, with the national depth distribution of the species between 25 and 50 m (Nilsson et al., 2025). It was suggested by Fowler & Laffoley (1993) that Caryophyllia smithii was a slow-growing species (0.5 to 1 mm in horizontal dimension of the corallum per year), which in turn suggested that inter-specific spatial competition with colonial faunal or algal species were important factors in determining the local abundance of Caryophyllia smithii (Bell & Turner, 2000). Analysis by Rodolfo‐Metalpa et al. (2015) reported that the growth rate of Caryophyllia smithii was 0.070 to 0.073%/day. Caryophyllia smithii adults develop their gametes between January and March, with spawning occurring from March to June (Tranter et al., 1982). The pelagic stage of the larvae may last up to 10 weeks, which provides this species with a good dispersal capability (Tranter et al., 1982). Asexual reproduction and division are also commonly observed (Hiscock & Howlett, 1976). Bell (2002) reported that juvenile Caryophyllia smithii have variable morphology, which gives them an advantage in colonizing a wide range of habitats. Aggregations of cup coral can form cup coral meadows, which are classed as a vulnerable marine ecosystem and, although there is no commonly agreed density threshold, a density of 0.1 to 0.9 /m² in proposed for Caryophyllia cup corals on mixed substrata at depths of 1069 to 769 m in the North East Atlantic (Long et al., 2021).

Cliona celata occurs on rock and begins boring but can become massive and lobose with rounded ridges up to 40 cm across (Ackers et al., 1992) and may be able to withstand the harsher environments of intertidal reefs that experience exposure twice a day (Stubler et al., 2017). Cliona celata is considered a hardy sponge, tolerant of environmental stressors such as high nutrient loads, low salinity, and large temperature variation (Duckworth & Peters, 2013). Cliona celata is a physically distinctive species of sponge that can bore into soft rock (e.g. limestone) or, in hard rock areas, has a massive form (Wood, 2007), which occurs in this biotope (JNCC, 2022). The boring form is recognizable as yellow papillae sticking out of limestone (calcareous rock, mollusc shells). The massive form has raised, rounded ridges up to 40 cm across. Large oscules with raised rims are found along the tops of the ridges. It often forms a thick plate-like structure standing on its edge with large specimens growing up to 1 m across and 50 cm high (Snowden, 2007). According to the World Register of Marine Species, Cliona celata has a relatively cosmopolitan distribution, being found as far north as the White Sea to as far south as New Zealand, and primarily being recorded throughout the Atlantic Ocean (WoRMS, 2026).

Reproduction of Cliona celata occurs between April and November, with peak reproduction occurring from August to September, which suggests that temperature may be the most reliable predictor of timing for recruitment events in this species (Stubler et al., 2017). Piscitelli et al. (2011) observed an annual peak in reproductive activity in April to May from individuals in the Mediterranean, and suggested this was a result of a sharp seasonal increase in water temperature. However, Carver et al. (2010) suggested Cliona celata specimens from New Brunswick, Canada, spawned from June to July. Recruitment can occur via larval settlement as well as through transfer/contact (i.e. sponge colonies can spread to new/virgin substrata if it comes in contact with existing colonies) (Duckworth & Peterson, 2013). Warburton (1966) documented the spawning of Cliona celata under laboratory conditions and reported the production of motile larvae that settled after two days (Carver et al., 2010). Cliona celata are also regarded as a long-lived species, with an individual sponge at Lough Hyne, Ireland, being recorded for nearly 50 years (Wood et al., 2025).

Information concerning colonization rates are scare; however, tropical clionid sponges (the same taxonomic family as Cliona celata) can colonize dead coral within “a few weeks” and live coral within two to three months (Schönberg & Wilkinson, 2001). Furthermore, the short larval period (two days) plus observation from Carver et al. (2010) indicates Cliona celata can colonize virgin surfaces within a year. Cliona celata is a pest species in scallop aquaculture, Carver et al. (2010) demonstrated that contact between shells colonized with Cliona celata and those that were not colonized results in the rapid spread of Cliona celata throughout scallop farms. Once settled, Cliona celata colonies have a rapid growth rate of up to 15 cm2/yr (Carver et al., 2010). Van Dolah et al. (1987) reported that, following an experimental trawl, 32% of sponges suffered damage, with Cliona spp. the most affected. However, the abundance of sponges had increased to pre-trawl densities or greater 12 months after trawling.

The sponge Pachymatisma johnstonia is one of the most common and well-known sponges throughout the North East Atlantic coasts, recorded from the Orkneys to Spain and is ubiquitous across the western and southern coasts of Britain, and it is mainly found in the littoral and sublittoral zones (Ackers et al., 1992; Schiavo et al., 2024). Pachymatisma johnstonia can be massive-lobose, hemispherical to irregularly rounded and up to 30 cm or more across (Picton & Morrow, 2015).

Fowler & Laffoley (1993) monitored the marine nature reserves in Lundy and the Isles of Scilly and found that a number of more common sponges showed great variation in size and cover during the study period. However, in deeper water sponges, the growth rates for branching sponges were irregular, but generally very slow, with apparent shrinkage in some years (notably between 1985 and 1986) (Fowler & Laffoley, 1993). Large colonies appeared and vanished at some locations. Some large encrusting sponges went through periods of both growth and shrinkage, with considerable changes taking place from year to year. For example, Cliona celata colonies generally grew extremely rapidly, doubling their size or more each year. In some years, an apparent shrinkage in size also took place. In contrast, there were no obvious changes in the cover of certain unidentified thin encrusting sponges.

Axinellid sponges have been described as very slow-growing, and little to no recovery has been observed over long periods of monitoring (Fowler & Laffoley, 1993; Hiscock, 1994, 2002). Monitoring studies at Lundy (Hiscock, 1994, 2002; Hiscock, pers comm) suggested that the growth of Axinellid sponges was no more than about 2 mm a year (up to a height of ca 300 mm) and that all branching sponges included in photographic monitoring over a period of four years exhibited very little or no growth over the study. In addition, no recruitment of Axinellia dissimilis or Axinellia infundibuliformis was observed, although ‘several more’ Axinella damicornis were noted between 2010 compared to 1985 during monitoring in Lundy (Hiscock, 2011). 

Axinellid sponges are oviparous and gonochoric. Idan et al. (2020) provided the first description of the reproduction cycle in Axinellid sponges, more specifically shallow-water (28 to 32 m) and mesophotic (95 to 120 m) populations of Axinella polypoides off the Israeli coast. The mesophotic populations reproduced sexually year-round and showed no seasonality. In contrast, the shallow-water population reproduced sexually in a seasonal pattern, linked closely with seasonal temperature changes. The results suggested that the mesophotic population invested more in sexual reproduction than the shallow-water population. Nutrient availability did not account for this difference in the different habitats. Instead, Idan et al. (2020) concluded that the stability of the mesophotic environment could provide and allow a surplus of energy to be spent on continual sexual reproduction. Asexual reproduction by fragmentation is widely observed in Porifera. Fragments of Axinella polypoides did not seem to re-attach to substrata and, therefore, it does not appear well suited to asexual reproduction (Idan et al., 2020).

Parasmittina trispinosa is an encrusting bryozoan described as having a “cosmopolitan” distribution by Powell (1971), in the North East Atlantic, recorded from all coasts of the British Isles (NBN, 2015) to the Iberian Peninsula (Ramos, 2010). Parasmittina trispinosa is also recorded from the Panama Canal (Powell, 1971) to the Gulf of Alaska (Soule, 2002) in the Pacific Ocean. At the time of writing, sparse information was available regarding the life history traits of Parasmittina trispinosa. Eggleston (1972) noted that in the Isle of Man, a peak in reproductive and vegetative growth was not well marked in Parasmittina trispinosa, and the number of embryos present was fairly constant throughout the year (Eggleston, 1972), indicating that Parasmittina trispinosa could potentially reproduce annually within the UK. However, due to the lack of available literature regarding Parasmittina trispinosa, its resilience cannot be assessed with sufficient confidence.

Pentapora foliacea is an erect perennial bryozoan recorded in the Atlantic from Britain to Morocco, and the western Mediterranean, typically below 20 to 30 m depth (Eggleston, 1972; Hayward & Ryland, 1995; Reverter-Gil, Souto & Trigo, 2019). Whilst Hayward & Ryland (1999) conflated Pentapora foliacea and Pentapora fascialis, Lombardi et al. (2010) concluded that Pentapora foliacea and Pentapora fascialis were distinct species and that Pentapora foliacea was the resident species in the North East Atlantic, while Pentapora fascialis was included in the Mediterranean clade. Given the similarity between these two species and the taxonomic confusion in the literature, this assessment uses information on both Pentapora foliacea and Pentapora fascialis.

Bryozoans can be up to 50 years old, but most longer-lived bryozoans are limited to 10 to 20 years (Smith, 2014). Bryozoan growth rates vary, with radial extension in flat encrusting bryozoans generally on the order of 1 to 5 mm/year. Erect calcified species generally grow vertically 2 to 15 mm/year, though articulated species such as Cellaria may reach rates of 40 mm/year (Smith, 2014). Pentapora fascialis was recorded to recover within 3.5 years after the almost total loss of a local population (Cocito et al., 1998). The species was reported to repair damage to the colony through regrowth of new zooids and strengthening of the base by thickening of lower zooid walls (Hayward & Ryland, 1979). Colonies are typically 20 cm in diameter but can grow up to 2 m in diameter and reach a height of 30 cm in the British Isles (Hayward & Ryland, 1979). Colonies of Pentapora fascialis as small as 2.8 cm have been recorded as having ovicells, with reproduction possible from an early stage of colony development (Cocito et al., 1998 cited in Jackson, 2016). Lock et al. (2006) described the growth of Pentapora foliacea off Skomer Island, UK, as highly variable, with some colonies growing 800 cm² in a year, whilst other large colonies completely disappeared. In 2024, Lock et al. (2025) observed that Pentapora foliacea populations were at their highest recorded abundance in the Skomer Marine Conservation Zone, UK. There were more healthy growing colonies than degraded ones, and the smaller size classes observed showed good levels of recruitment to the population. Pentapora foliacea, found in the Mediterranean, experiences a mean growth rate of 9.8 cm per year (Pagès-Escolà et al., 2020). Recovery to pre-disturbance levels following a severe heat event, which resulted in the decline of 86% in the live colony portion of Pentapora fascialis in the Mediterranean, took four years (Cocito & Sgorbini, 2014). Pentapora foliacea was first observed colonizing ex-HMS Scylla 20 months after the vessel was placed on the seabed, and colonies had grown to ca. 20 cm in diameter within three years of colonization (Hiscock et al., 2010). The recovery of Pentapora foliacea is expected to be variable. However, evidence of recovery has been observed for Pentapora foliacea, as well as other vulnerable benthic taxa such as Eunicella verrucosa, Phallusia mammillata, and Axinella sponges once demersal towed fishing equipment was excluded from an area of sea (Pikesley et al., 2016; Chimienti, Nisio, & Lanzolla, 2020; Kaiser et al., 2018).

Whomersley & Picken (2003) documented epifauna colonization of offshore oil platforms in the North Sea from 1989 to 2000. On all platforms, Mytilus edulis dominated the near-surface community. For the first three years, hydroids and tubeworms dominated the community below the mussel band. However, the hydroid community were later out-competed by other, more climax communities. Recruitment of Alcyonium digitatum and Metridium senile began at two to five years (dependent on the oil rig). The community structure and zonation differed between the four rigs, however, generally after four years, Metrdium senile had become the dominant organism below the mussel zone to approximately 60 to 80 m Below Sea Level (BSL). Zonation differed between oil rigs, however, from approximately 60 to 90 m BSL, Alcyonium digitatum was the dominant organism.

Studies by Edyvean & Ford (1984a; 1986; 1987) of populations of coralline crusts, namely Lithophyllum incrustans, suggest that reproduction may be sexual or asexual (on average, early in the third year), and spores are released throughout the year, with seasonal variation as fewer spores were produced in the summer. The authors also found that spore survival was extremely low and young mortality was high, but individuals after the age of ten appear relatively long-lived (up to 30 years). Some repair of damaged encrusting coralline occurs through vegetative growth, so recolonization by propagules may also be an important mechanism for rapid recovery (Chamberlain, 1996; Airoldi, 2000).

The recolonization of epifauna on vertical rock walls was investigated by Sebens (1985, 1986). He reported that rapid colonizers such as encrusting corallines, encrusting bryozoans, amphipods and tubeworms recolonized within one to four months. Ascidians such as Dendrodoa carnea, Molgula manhattensis and Aplidium spp. achieved significant cover in less than a year, and, together with Halichondria panicea, reached pre-clearance levels of cover after two years. A few individuals of Alcyonium digitatum colonized within four years (Sebens, 1986) and would probably take longer to reach pre-clearance levels. Jensen et al. (1994) reported the colonization of an artificial reef in Poole Bay, England. They noted that erect bryozoans began to appear within six months, reaching a peak in the following summer, 12 months after the reef was constructed.

The HMS Scylla was intentionally sunk on the 27th of March 2004 in Whitsand Bay, Cornwall, to act as an artificial reef. Hiscock et al. (2010) recorded the succession of the biological community on the wreck for five years following the sinking of the ship. The wreck was initially colonized by opportunistic species/taxa, filamentous algae, hydroids, serpulid worms and barnacles. Tubularia sp. were early colonizers, appearing within a couple of months after the vessel was sunk. Metridium senile appeared late in the summer of the first year but didn’t become visually dominant until 2007 (three years after the vessel was sunk). Cylista elegans was recorded in the summer of 2005, and by the end of 2006 was well established. Corynactis viridis was first recorded in the summer of the first year and quickly formed colonies via asexual reproduction. Caryophyllia smithii was first observed colonizing the wreck of the ex-HMS Scylla in September 2005, eighteen months after the vessel was placed on the seabed near Plymouth. The coral was still only occasional on the reef after five years (Hiscock et al., 2010). Alcyonium digitatum was first recorded in early summer 2005, a year after the vessel was sunk. Within one year of growth colonies had grown to nearly full size, however, they did not become a visually dominant component of the community until 2009 (five years after the vessel had been sunk). The authors noted that erect branching Bryozoa (such as Securiflustra securifrons) are not a common part of rocky reef communities to the west of Plymouth and at the time of writing had not colonized to any great extent on ‘Scylla’ by the end of the study, although several species of erect bryozoans were recorded, which included Chartella papyracea in August 2006 (two years after the vessel was sunk).

Deep sponges and corals are sessile benthic organisms, and recovery would be aided by the exclusion of demersal towed fishing equipment (Pikesley et al., 2016; Chimienti, Nisio, & Lanzolla, 2020; Kaiser et al., 2018). Kaiser et al. (2018) specifically studied the recovery of sessile epifauna following the exclusion of towed mobile fishing gear in Lyme Bay, UK. Their estimates suggest that no recovery occurred within the timescale of the study (10 years), and that some biogenic habitats (particularly sponges and soft corals) could require up to, or more than, 20 to 30 years before signs of recolonization and recovery may occur. The maximum recovery time modelled was 51 years for yellow branched sponges, while Eunicella verrucosa and Pentapora foliacea increased in abundance, but had not fully recovered, with their projected recovery time being 17 to 20 years (Kaiser et al., 2018). Therefore, recovery rates of biota depend on life-history factors and habitat-specific requirements, with the longer-lived species that require specific habitats and have low dispersal potential taking longer to recover (Kaiser et al., 2018). A 15-year review of the Lyme Bay trawling ban by Renn et al. (2024) highlighted definitive evidence of recovery, in terms of increased species richness. Key sessile taxa (Pentapora foliacea and Phallusia mammillata) showed signs of early recovery between 2008 and 2013. Renn et al. (2024) concluded that the evidence of recovery recorded in Lyme Bay broadly aligned with the wider literature by detecting early stages of recovery within the first few years of MPA establishment. However, full recovery was thought to occur over decadal timescales, and measuring full recovery rates in-situ remained a priority for future research in Lyme Bay.

Prolonged recovery timescales, in terms of sponge communities following disturbance events, were also estimated in other parts of the world. In Lough Hyne, a small (approx. 0.5 km2) lough on the southwest coast of Ireland, an unknown disturbance event caused a large decline of sponges, averaging a 35% reduction in coverage, with some communities experiencing reductions exceeding 95%, which prompted local habitat recovery monitoring (Micaroni et al., 2025). This decrease was documented from surveys conducted in 2010 and 2015, with healthy sponge assemblages observed in 2010 and severely depleted populations in 2015 (Micaroni et al., 2025). Since 2015, continued monitoring of Lough Hyne (6 to 11 years post-2015) has shown minimal signs of community reassembly and limited population recovery for key habitat-forming species, and it is estimated that recovery times are on the order of at least decades for communities dominated by long-lived species (Micaroni et al., 2025). This means that the recovery of benthic communities was either not happening or was occurring too slowly to be detected by the monitoring study. Micaroni et al. (2025) estimated that at the current Lough Hyne population growth rate, papillate polymastid sponges will reach their pre-impact cover at Glannafeen in 5 to 8 years, while erect sponges will take longer (18 to 30 years, at both Glannafeen and Labhra Cliff). However, the absence of recovery at the innermost sites 6 to 10 years after the disturbance event(s) suggests that lough-wide recovery could take even longer. Yet one of the monitoring sites within Lough Hyne, Glannafeen, showed greater signs of recovery. This is possibly due to the site experiencing the greatest water movement among the internal sites, and sponges may be using ambient currents to reduce the high energy costs associated with their filtration activity, thus having more energy reserves for growth, leading to a more rapid recovery of their populations (Micaroni et al., 2025). Furthermore, the dispersal ability of sponge larvae is generally low, which can slow the recolonization rates in disturbed areas, and it is possible that the very slow current speed in the most internal sites (West Cliff and Goleen) could have reduced larvae supply to these sites (Micaroni et al., 2025).

Echinus esculentus is a sea urchin found within the North East Atlantic, recorded from the Murmansk Coast, Russia, to Portugal, and around Iceland (Hansson, 1998; OBIS, 2026). Echinus esculentus is an important algal grazer and is thought, combined with low light levels, to control red algal growth within the CR.MCR.EcCr.FaAlCr biotopes (Connor et al., 2004; JNCC, 2022). Echinus esculentus is estimated to have a lifespan of 8 to 16 years (Nichols, 1979; Gage, 1992) and reaches sexual maturity within 1 to 3 years (Tyler-Walters, 2008). Maximum spawning occurs in spring, although individuals may spawn over a protracted period throughout the year. Gonad weight is at its maximum in February/March in the English Channel (Comely & Ansell, 1988; Hamed et al., 2024) but decreases during spawning in spring and then increases again through summer and winter until the next spawning season. Spawning occurs just before the seasonal rise in temperature in temperate zones, but is probably not triggered by rising temperature (Bishop, 1985). Echinus esculentus is a broadcast spawner, with a complex larval life history which includes a blastula, gastrula and a characteristic four-armed echinopluteus stage, which forms an important component of the zooplankton. MacBride (1914) observed that planktonic larval development could take 45 to 60 days in captivity.

Recruitment is sporadic or variable depending on locality. For example, Millport populations showed annual recruitment, whereas few recruits were found in Plymouth populations during Nichols’ studies between 1980 and 1981 (Nichols, 1984). Bishop & Earll (1984) suggested that the population of Echinus esculentus at St Abbs had a high density and recruited regularly, whereas the Skomer (Wales) population was sparse, ageing and had probably not successfully recruited larvae in the previous six years (Bishop & Earll, 1984). Comely & Ansell (1988) noted that the largest number of Echinus esculentus occurred below the kelp forest.

Echinus esculentus is a mobile species and could therefore migrate and re-populate an area quickly if removed. For example, Lewis & Nichols (1979a) found that adults were able to colonize an artificial reef in small numbers within three months, and the population steadily grew over the following year. If completely removed from a site and local populations are naturally sparse, then recruitment may be dependent on larval supply, which can be highly variable. As suggested by Bishop & Earll (1984), the Skomer, Wales Echinus esculentus population had most likely not successfully recruited for six years, which would suggest the mature population would be highly sensitive to removal and may not return for several years. However, recent (2019) surveys at Skomer have documented continual Echinus esculentus population increases from past surveys. For example, in 2019, the highest Echinus esculentus density was recorded at Castle Bay, as was found in 2011 and 2015, with the mean density in 2019 of 28.33 urchins per 100 m2, a significant increase from 2015 of 23.3 urchins per 100 m2 and from 2011 of 17.67 urchins per 100 m2 (Lock et al., 2020).

The Prestige oil tanker spilt 63,000 t of fuel 130 nautical miles off Galicia, Spain in November 2002. High wave action and strong weather systems increased the mixing of the oil to ‘some’ depth within the water column, causing sensitive faunal communities to be affected. The biological community of Guéthary, France, was monitored preceding and for nine years following the oil spill. Following the oil spill, taxonomic richness decreased significantly from 57 recorded species to 41, which included the loss of Echinus esculentus from the site. Two to three years after the oil spill, taxonomic richness had increased to pre-spill levels and Echinus esculentus had returned (Castège et al., 2014).

Resilience assessment

Echinus esculentus can reportedly reach sexual maturity within one to two years (Tyler-Walters, 2008), however, as highlighted by Bishop & Earll (1984) and Castège et al. (2014), recovery may take two to six years (possibly more if local recruitment is poor).

The faunal crust is grazed by Echinus esculentus and, together with the evidence presented, is likely to be quite resilient. A few individuals of Caryophyllia smithii and Alcyonium digitatum colonized within two to five years during clearance experiments (Sebens, 1986; Hiscock et al., 2010). Alcyonium digitatum can recruit onto bare surfaces within two years, however, it may take up to five years to become a dominant component of the community (Whomersley & Picken, 2003; Hiscock et al., 2010). 

Sebens (1985, 1986) found that the sponge Halichondria panicea reached pre-clearance levels of cover after two years. However, some sponges have a very slow rate of growth, such as axinellids or yellow branched sponges, with recovery expected to take decades (Kaiser et al., 2018; Micaroni et al., 2025). Slow-growing sponges would probably take longer to reach pre-clearance levels (Samuelsen et al., 2022). Some of the faster-growing, smaller sponges would colonize new sites relatively quickly (such as Cliona celata within a year).

Therefore, the resistance of the EcCr.CarSp biotope is assessed as ‘High’ (<2 years) (where resistance is Medium) and ‘Medium’ (2 to 10 years) (where resistance is Low or None) based on the worst-case recovery rates of Caryophyllia sp. and Alcyonium sp. However, the communities are dependent on grazing and pressures that remove grazers, in particular Echinus, could result in significant changes to the community. Therefore, where Echinus suffers significant or severe mortality (resistance is Low or None), the biotope resilience is probably ‘Medium’ (2 to 10 years).

Hydrological Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
Temperature increase (local) [Show more]

Temperature increase (local)

Benchmark. A 5°C increase in temperature for one month, or 2°C for one year (Temperature change pressure definition).

Evidence

CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp is distributed across the west coasts of Scotland, Ireland, and England. Sea surface temperature across this distribution ranges from northern to southern Sea Surface Temperature (SST) of 8 to 16°C in summer and 6 to 13°C in winter (Beszczynska-Möller & Dye, 2013). 

Alcyonium digitatum is described as a northern species by Hiscock et al. (2004) but is distributed from Northern Norway (70°N) to Portugal (41°N) in the North East Atlantic (Hartnoll, 1975; Budd, 2008; OBIS, 2026). Temperature at the seafloor is an important predictor of Alcyonium digitatum, yet there are no published studies that explore the thermal minima or maxima for the species, so the only current evidence that gives insight into the thermal niches of this species is the sea temperatures at the locations where they are observed (Jenkins & Stevens, 2022). Currently, Alcyonium digitatum is commonly found in inshore and offshore areas of northwest and northern France, the Channel Islands, most of the British Isles, including the Shetland Islands, parts of the southern North Sea, parts of southern Norway, and along the Atlantic slope (Jenkins & Stevens, 2022). Alcyonium digitatum can be found alongside Eunicella verrucosa, and in Britain and Ireland, Eunicella verrucosa has been observed in waters where 9.2°C was the lowest average seafloor temperature, the median temperature was 10.5°C, and the highest temperature was 11.4°C (Jenkins & Stevens, 2022). While trying to understand the impact of climate change on Alcyonium digitatum distribution, Jenkins & Stevens (2022) noted that there will likely be a shift north as more suitable habitat becomes available in higher latitudes. However, suitability predictions in the southern portion of their study area decreased.

Caryophyllia smithii is found across the British Isles (NBN, 2015; Coolen et al., 2015) and has been recorded in Greece (Koukouras, 2010). In the Mediterranean, Caryophyllia smithii has been recorded in seawater between 13 and 14°C (Rodolfo‐Metalpa et al., 2015). It is therefore unlikely to be significantly affected by an increase at the benchmark level. However, Tranter et al. (1982) suggested Caryophyllia smithii reproduction was cued by seasonal increases in seawater temperature. Therefore, unseasonal increases in temperature may disrupt natural reproductive processes and negatively influence recruitment patterns. Holt (pers. comm.) also suggested that long-term increases in temperature due to climate change may allow the parasitic barnacle Adna anglica to extend its range northwards and overlap the range of this biotope. Adna anglica is a southern species, limited to the southwest of Britain, where it parasitizes Caryophillia and has probably contributed to the decrease in abundance of Leptopsammia (Holt pers. comm.). It may impact the abundance of Caryophyllia if climate change allows it to extend its range northwards (Holt pers. comm.).

There is little information available about the tolerance of the characterizing sponges in this biotope. However, Kazanidis et al. (2019) reported how water temperature and salinity explained a significant amount of variation in sponge density, and in the North Atlantic, the highest density values were found where temperature and salinity ranged from 6.52 to 8.98°C and 34.91 to 35.13 psu, respectively. In Lough Hyne, a small (approx. 0.5 km2) lough on the southwest coast of Ireland, sponge communities are observed in waters where temperatures range from 7 to 9°C in winter and 14 to 18°C in summer (Micaroni et al., 2025). Long-term temperature increases may cause extension of the British Isles sponge populations, and decreases in temperature may result in population shrinkage. Goodwin et al. (2013) noted increases in the abundance of Axinella damicornis and Axinella dissimilis in Northern Ireland over a 20-year period and suggested the increase was due to sea temperature warming (relating to a 0.3 to 0.5°C increase in Northern Irish sea surface temperature between 1850 and 2007).

The sponge Pachymatisma johnstonia is one of the most common and well-known sponges throughout the North East Atlantic coasts, recorded from the Orkneys to Spain and is ubiquitous across the western and southern coasts of Britain, and it is mainly found in the littoral and sublittoral zones (Ackers et al., 1992; Schiavo et al., 2024).

The sponge Cliona celata is found throughout the Atlantic between 1 and 200 m deep and has been recorded from Sweden to the Mediterranean in Europe, across the southeastern USA in North America, and off Argentina in South America (Ackers et al., 1992; Stubler et al., 2024; Novarin et al., 2025). Cliona celata have been recorded in waters with a temperature range of 23.19 to 35.11°C off southeastern USA (Stubler et al., 2024), and in a similar boring sponge, Pione truitti, growth was documented to decrease as temperatures dropped below 20°C (Pomponi & Meritt, 1985 cited in Stubler et al., 2024). One way in which sponges respond to increases in temperature is with higher respiration rates, and Cliona celata has been recorded as having a significant change in respiration rate as a stress response (Wood et al., 2025). However, Cliona celata have been reported to be resistant to temperatures up to 4 to 5°C higher than ambient temperatures (Bosch-Belmar et al., 2024). Duckworth & Peters (2013) demonstrated that an increase in water temperature to 26 and 31°C had no detectable effect on the boring activity of Cliona celata. Whereas cold winter temperatures (<5°C) can cause boring activity to cease, the incurrent papillae to withdraw and the excurrent papillae constrict (Fell et al., 1984; Carver et al., 2010), which indicate that cold temperatures are more limiting to Cliona celata than hot temperatures. Piscitelli et al. (2011) observed an annual peak in reproductive activity in April to May from individuals in the Mediterranean, and suggested this was a result of a sharp seasonal increase in water temperature, which suggests variable temperatures could affect larval recruitment processes, but not otherwise negatively affect Cliona celata.

The effect of temperature on the sponge Haliclona viscosa was tested on samples from Moorea, French Polynesia, between the 22nd of September and the 15th of November 2023. Evans (2024) collected Haliclona sp. at a depth of 1.1 m in waters where average ocean temperature was 28.4°C, after which samples were placed into temperature tanks where the average water bath temperatures were 26.9°C, 28.9°C, and 31.6°C. Although the Haliclona sp. displayed cytotoxic properties (damage, death, or disruption to living cells) in totality (becoming discoloured and malodorous at 31.6°C), temperature did not have a statistically significant effect on toxicity (not primarily affecting the regulation of secondary metabolites present in the extracts, which would have, in turn, killed brine shrimp at three statistically distinct rates) and failed to cause upregulation, as hypothesized (Evans, 2024). Despite a surprising finding, Evans (2024) concluded that warming water temperatures do not seem to damage Haliclona sponges’ ability to produce chemical defences and did not ultimately cause differences between the antimicrobial or cytotoxic properties of different treatments. Marra (2019) also studied the biological mechanisms underlying the bioactivity detected in several Irish and Mediterranean sponge species currently placed into the genus Haliclona. As part of the study, specimens of Haliclona sp. were collected for lab analysis from multiple areas with differing temperatures, including: the coasts of Ireland (14.8 to 15.6°C in August and September 2014 and 2015), the UK (10°C in May 2014), and France (14.7°C in April 2015).

Berman et al. (2013) monitored sponge communities off Skomer Island, UK, over four years, with all characterizing sponges for this biotope assessed. Seawater temperature, turbidity, photosynthetically active radiation, and wind speed were all recorded during the study. They concluded that, despite changes in species composition, primarily driven by the non-characterizing Hymeraphia stellifera and Halicnemia patera, no significant difference in sponge density was recorded in all sites studied. Morphological changes most strongly correlated with a mixture of water visibility and temperature. Research by Webster et al. (2008, 2011), Webster & Taylor (2012) and Preston & Burton (2015) suggested that many sponges rely on a holobiont of many synergistic microbes. Webster et al. (2011) described a much higher thermal tolerance of sponge larval holobiont when compared with adult sponges. 

Bishop (1985) suggested that Echinus esculentus cannot tolerate high temperatures for prolonged periods due to increased respiration rate and resultant metabolic stress. Ursin (1960) reported that Echinus esculentus occurred at temperatures between 0 and 18°C in Limfjord, Denmark. Bishop (1985) noted that gametogenesis occurred at 11 to 19°C, however, continued exposure to 19°C disrupted gametogenesis. Embryos and larvae developed abnormally after 24 hr exposure to 15°C but normally at 4, 7 and 11°C (Tyler & Young 1998). In addition, maximum spawning occurs in spring, although individuals may spawn over a protracted period throughout the year. Gonad weight is at its maximum in February/March in the English Channel (Comely & Ansell, 1988; Hamed et al., 2024) but decreases during spawning in spring and then increases again through summer and winter until the next spawning season.

Sensitivity assessment

The characterizing species are widely distributed across the British Isles. Morphological changes were observed in sponge communities, with temperature as a factor, but the characterizing sponges assessed display a level of tolerance to increasing temperature (Bosch-Belmar et al., 2024; Evans, 2024). An increase in sea surface temperature of 2°C for a period of one year, combined with high temperatures, may approach the upper temperature threshold of Alcyonium digitatum and Echinus esculentus, and may, therefore, cause minor declines in abundance (Bishop, 1985; Jenkins & Stevens, 2022). Biotopes in the North of the UK are unlikely to be affected at the benchmark level. Therefore, resistance has been assessed as ‘Medium’, and resilience has been assessed as ‘High’. Sensitivity has been assessed as ‘Low’.

Medium
Help
High
Help
Low
Help
Temperature decrease (local) [Show more]

Temperature decrease (local)

Benchmark. A 5°C decrease in temperature for one month, or 2°C for one year (Temperature change pressure definition).

Evidence

CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp is distributed across the west coasts of Scotland, Ireland, and England. Sea surface temperature across this distribution ranges from northern to southern Sea Surface Temperature (SST) of 8 to 16°C in summer and 6 to 13°C in winter (Beszczynska-Möller & Dye, 2013). 

Alcyonium digitatum is described as a northern species by Hiscock et al. (2004) but is distributed from Northern Norway (70°N) to Portugal (41°N) in the North East Atlantic (Hartnoll, 1975; Budd, 2008; OBIS, 2026). Across this latitudinal gradient, both species are likely to experience a range of temperatures from approximately 5 to 18°C. Alcyonium digitatum was also reported to be apparently unaffected by the severe winter of 1962 to 1963, when air temperature reached -5.8°C (Crisp, 1964). Temperature at the seafloor is an important predictor of Alcyonium digitatum, yet there are no published studies that explore the thermal minima or maxima for the species, so the only current evidence that gives insight into the thermal niches of this species is the sea temperatures at the locations where they are observed (Jenkins & Stevens, 2022). Currently, Alcyonium digitatum is commonly found in inshore and offshore areas of northwest and northern France, the Channel Islands, most of the British Isles, including the Shetland Islands, parts of the southern North Sea, parts of southern Norway, and along the Atlantic slope (Jenkins & Stevens, 2022). Alcyonium digitatum can be found alongside Eunicella verrucosa, and in Britain and Ireland, Eunicella verrucosa has been observed in waters where 9.2°C was the lowest average seafloor temperature, the median temperature was 10.5°C, and the highest temperature was 11.4°C (Jenkins & Stevens, 2022).

Caryophyllia smithii is a southern species (Fish & Fish, 1996) with a northern range limit in the Shetland Isles (NBN, 2015). It is therefore likely to be close to its northerly range limit and therefore likely to be negatively affected by a decrease in temperature at the benchmark level in northern examples of the biotope.

There is little information available about the tolerance of the characterizing sponges in this biotope. However, Kazanidis et al. (2019) reported how water temperature and salinity explained a significant amount of variation in sponge density, and in the North Atlantic, the highest density values were found where temperature and salinity ranged from 6.52 to 8.98°C and 34.91 to 35.13 psu, respectively. In Lough Hyne, a small (approx. 0.5 km2) lough on the southwest coast of Ireland, sponge communities are observed in waters where temperatures range from 7 to 9°C in winter and 14 to18°C in summer (Micaroni et al., 2025). Long-term temperature increases may cause extension of the British Isles sponge populations, and decreases in temperature may result in population shrinkage. Goodwin et al. (2013) noted increases in the abundance of Axinella damicornis and Axinella dissimilis in Northern Ireland over a 20-year period and suggested the increase was due to sea temperature warming (relating to a 0.3 to 0.5°C increase in Northern Irish sea surface temperature between 1850 and 2007). 

The sponge Pachymatisma johnstonia is one of the most common and well-known sponges throughout the North East Atlantic coasts, recorded from the Orkneys to Spain and is ubiquitous across the western and southern coasts of Britain, and it is mainly found in the littoral and sublittoral zones (Ackers et al., 1992; Schiavo et al., 2024).

The sponge Cliona celata is found throughout the Atlantic between 1 and 200 m deep and has been recorded from Sweden to the Mediterranean in Europe, across the southeastern USA in North America, and off Argentina in South America (Ackers et al., 1992; Stubler et al., 2024; Novarin et al., 2025). Cliona celata have been recorded in waters with a temperature range of 23.19 to 35.11°C off southeastern USA (Stubler et al., 2024), and in a similar boring sponge, Pione truitti, growth was documented to decrease as temperatures dropped below 20°C (Pomponi & Meritt, 1985 cited in Stubler et al., 2024). Duckworth & Peters (2013) demonstrated that an increase in water temperature to 26 and 31°C had no detectable effect on the boring activity of Cliona celata. Whereas cold winter temperatures (<5°C) can cause boring activity to cease, the incurrent papillae to withdraw and the excurrent papillae constrict (Fell et al., 1984; Carver et al., 2010), which indicate that cold temperatures are more limiting to Cliona celata than hot temperatures.

Marra (2019) studied the biological mechanisms underlying the bioactivity detected in several Irish and Mediterranean sponge species currently placed into the genus Haliclona. As part of the study, specimens of Haliclona sp. were collected for lab analysis from multiple areas with differing temperatures, including: the coasts of Ireland (14.8 to 15.6°C in August and September 2014 and 2015), the UK (10°C in May 2014), and France (14.7°C in April 2015).

Berman et al. (2013) monitored sponge communities off Skomer Island, UK, over four years, with all characterizing sponges for this biotope assessed. Seawater temperature, turbidity, photosynthetically active radiation, and wind speed were all recorded during the study. They concluded that, despite changes in species composition, primarily driven by the non-characterizing Hymeraphia stellifera and Halicnemia patera, no significant difference in sponge density was recorded in all sites studied. Morphological changes most strongly correlated with a mixture of water visibility and temperature. Research by Webster et al. (2008, 2011), Webster & Taylor (2012) and Preston & Burton (2015) suggested that many sponges rely on a holobiont of many synergistic microbes. Webster et al. (2011) described a much higher thermal tolerance of sponge larval holobiont when compared with adult sponges. 

Ursin (1960) reported that Echinus esculentus occurred at temperatures between 0 and 18°C in Limfjord, Denmark. Bishop (1985) noted that gametogenesis occurred at 11 to 19°C, however, continued exposure to 19°C disrupted gametogenesis. Embryos and larvae developed abnormally after 24 hr exposure to 15°C but normally at 4, 7 and 11°C (Tyler & Young 1998). Echinus esculentus has been recorded from the Murmansk Coast, Russia. Due to the high latitude at which Echinus esculentus can occur, it is unlikely to be affected by a decrease in temperature at the pressure benchmark. In addition, maximum spawning occurs in spring, although individuals may spawn over a protracted period throughout the year. Gonad weight is at its maximum in February/March in the English Channel (Comely & Ansell, 1988; Hamed et al., 2024) but decreases during spawning in spring and then increases again through summer and winter until the next spawning season.

Sensitivity assessment

Alcyonium digitatum, Porella compressa, and Echinus esculentus have northern/boreal distributions and are unlikely to be affected at the benchmark level. Long-term decreases in temperature may cause population shrinkage of the British Isles distributions of sponges (Berman et al., 2013). Apparent shrinkage of individual Axinella dissimilis (negative growth rate) was observed in Lundy in some years and was attributed to particularly cold winters, notably between 1985 and 1986 (Hiscock, 1993). However, limited information on the characterizing sponges was found, but they are widely distributed across the British Isles. Caryophyllia smithii could experience reduced growth rates in colder temperatures, but is likely to be less affected by short-term decreases in temperature. In addition, the depth of the biotope probably protects it from short-term acute decreases in temperature. The important characterizing Caryophyllia smithii is close to its northern distribution limit within the British Isles, and a decrease at the benchmark level may result in some mortality in northern examples of the biotope. Therefore, resistance is ‘Medium’, resilience is ‘High’, and sensitivity is ‘Low’.

Medium
Help
High
Help
Low
Help
Salinity increase (local) [Show more]

Salinity increase (local)

Benchmark. An increase in one MNCR salinity category above the usual range of the biotope or habitat (Salinity regime change pressure definition).

Evidence

Alcyonium digitatum’s distribution and the depth at which it occurs also suggest it would not likely experience regular salinity fluctuations and therefore would not tolerate significant increases in salinity.

Kazanidis et al. (2019) reported how water temperature and salinity explained a significant amount of variation in sponge density, and in the North Atlantic, the highest density values were found where temperature and salinity ranged from 6.52 to 8.98°C and 34.91 to 35.13 psu, respectively. 

Cliona celata is tolerant of higher salinities and is found in more polyhaline (e.g. >20 psu) parts of waterbodies, such as the Chesapeake Bay, USA, where it was differentially distributed along the Bay’s salinity gradient, peaking in the mid-salinity sites (spanning from mesohaline to low polyhaline, approx. 5 to 22 psu) (Anchondo et al., 2024). However, when Choptank in Chesapeake Bay experienced a high-salinity event pre-2017, clionid populations apparently thrived but then subsequently decreased over the next two years until 2019 due to a freshet (the flood of a river from heavy rain or melted snow) (Anchondo et al., 2024). Marin (1998) describes the presence of Dysidea fragilis in a hypersaline coastal lagoon (at 42 to47 g/l; 42 to 47 ppt) in La Mar Menor, Spain. 

Echinoderms are generally stenohaline and possess no osmoregulatory organ (Boolootian, 1966; Russell, 2013). Therefore, an increase in salinity may cause Echinus esculentus mortality.

Sensitivity assessment

CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp is restricted to full salinity (Connor et al., 2004; JNCC, 2022), it therefore seems likely that an increase in salinity from ‘full’ to hypersaline ( >40‰) at the benchmark level may cause a decline in the abundance of characterizing species. Furthermore, a reduction in Echinus esculentus may cause an increase in faunal turf and red algae growth, which would change the character of the biotope. Therefore, resistance has been assessed as ‘Low’, resilience as ‘Medium’ and sensitivity as ‘Medium’. Due to the lack of information regarding salinity effects on Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii, and Echinus esculentus, confidence in this assessment has been assessed as Low.

Low
Help
Medium
Help
Medium
Help
Salinity decrease (local) [Show more]

Salinity decrease (local)

Benchmark. A decrease in one MNCR salinity category above the usual range of the biotope or habitat (Salinity regime change pressure definition detail).

Evidence

Alcyonium digitatum inhabits situations such as the entrances to sea lochs (Budd, 2008) or the entrances to estuaries (Braber & Borghouts, 1977) where salinity may vary occasionally. However, its distribution and the depth at which it occurs suggest that Alcyonium digitatum would not likely often experience salinity fluctuations and therefore is unlikely to survive significant reductions in salinity (Budd, 2008).

Kazanidis et al. (2019) reported how water temperature and salinity explained a significant amount of variation in sponge density, and in the North Atlantic, the highest density values were found where temperature and salinity ranged from 6.52 to 8.98°C and 34.91 to 35.13 psu, respectively. 

Castric-Fey & Chassé (1991) conducted a factorial analysis of the subtidal rocky ecology near Brest, France and rated the distribution of species from estuarine to offshore conditions. Dysidea fragilis and Raspailia ramosa were rated as indifferent to this range. Cliona celata and Pachymatisma johnstonia had a slight preference for more estuarine conditions. Mean salinity difference between the two farthest zones was low (35.1 and 33.8‰, respectively), but with a greater range being experienced in the Inner Rade (±2.4‰ compared with ±0.1‰). It should be noted that the range of salinities identified in this study does not reach the lower benchmark level, and at least some of the characterizing sponges are likely to be affected at the benchmark level. 

Carver et al. (2010) suggested Cliona celata can function efficiently in salinities as low as 20‰ and can withstand exposure to 15‰ for brief periods, but prevailing salinities less than 10 to 15‰ are likely to be lethal (Hartman 1958, Hopkins 1962). Cliona celata is found in more polyhaline (e.g. >20 psu) parts of waterbodies, such as the Chesapeake Bay, USA, where it was differentially distributed along the Bay’s salinity gradient, peaking in the mid-salinity sites (spanning from mesohaline to low polyhaline, approx. 5 to 22 psu) (Anchondo et al., 2024). However, when Choptank in Chesapeake Bay experienced a high-salinity event pre-2017, clionid populations apparently thrived but then subsequently decreased over the next two years until 2019 due to a freshet (the flood of a river from heavy rain or melted snow) (Anchondo et al., 2024).

Echinoderms are generally unable to tolerate low salinity (stenohaline) and possess no osmoregulatory organ (Boolootian, 1966; Russell, 2013). At low salinity, urchins gain weight, and the epidermis loses its pigment as patches are destroyed; prolonged exposure is fatal. However, within Echinus esculentus, there is some evidence to suggest intracellular regulation of osmotic pressure due to increased amino acid concentrations. Barrett et al. (2024) studied the effect of low salinity on Echinus esculentus. Experiments were conducted on populations of Echinus esculentus originally collected from Loch Linnhe, Scotland, and were exposed to low salinity over the short term (11‰, 16, 21, 26 and 31‰ for 24 h) and long term (21, 26 and 31‰ for 25 days). Over the short term, oxygen consumption, activity coefficient and coelomic fluid osmolality were directly correlated with reduced salinity, with 100% survival at ≥21‰ and 0% at ≤16‰ (Barrett et al., 2024). Over the long term at 21‰ (25 days), oxygen consumption was significantly higher, feeding was significantly reduced, and activity coefficient values were significantly lower than at control salinity (31‰) (Barrett et al., 2024). Furthermore, beneficial functional resistance (righting ability and metabolic capacity) to acute low salinity was observed at 26‰. Barrett et al. (2024) concluded that Echinus esculentus demonstrated phenotypic plasticity that enabled acclimation to reduced salinity around 26‰. However, 21‰ represented a lower acclimation threshold, potentially limiting its distribution in coastal areas prone to high freshwater input. In addition, Echinus esculentus is recovered within several variable and reduced salinity biotopes, e.g. IR.LIR.KVS. (Connor et al., 2004; JNCC, 2022).

Sensitivity review

CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp is recorded exclusively in full marine conditions (30 to 40 ‰) (Connor et al., 2004; JNCC, 2022). The lack of records within “Reduced” salinity (18 to 30‰) suggests the community would not persist/be recognisable if salinity was reduced.  Records from the MNCR suggest Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii, and Echinus esculentus can occur in reduced salinity habitats. However, the evidence suggests that these species would decrease in abundance. Some of the characterizing sponges and bryozoans are likely to be adversely affected by a reduction in salinity. Therefore, resistance has been assessed as ‘Low’, resilience as ‘Medium’, and sensitivity assessed as ‘Medium’.

 

Low
Help
Medium
Help
Medium
Help
Water flow (tidal current) changes (local) [Show more]

Water flow (tidal current) changes (local)

Benchmark. A change in peak mean spring bed flow velocity of between 0.1 m/s and 0.2 m/s for more than one year (Water flow pressure definition). 

Evidence

Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii, sponges, bryozoans and hydroids are suspension feeders, relying on water currents to supply food (Hiscock, 1983; O’Reilly et al., 2022). These taxa therefore thrive in conditions of vigorous water flow, e.g. around Orkney and St Abbs, Scotland, where Alcyonium digitatum-dominated biotopes may experience tidal currents of 3 and 4 knots (approximately 1.5 m/sec) during spring tides (De Kluijver, 1993; Coolen et al., 2015). 

In flume experiments, Hiscock (1983) noted that the tentacles of Caryophyllia smithii were displaced by currents over ca 0.5 m/s but withdrawn at 0.75 m/s and took several hours to re-emerge after cessation of strong flow. Hiscock (1983) noted that Caryophyllia smithii was most abundant in semi-exposed and sheltered habitats. Other cup corals (Balanophyllia regia, Hoplangia durotrix and Leptopsammia pruvoti) were recorded from weak and very weak tidal streams in cave and overhang biotopes (Connor et al., 2004). 

The life cycle of Caryophyllia smithii includes a larval planktotrophic stage with a duration of 8 to 10 weeks, and during this time, the released larvae float freely in the water column and are transported in the direction of net water movement, which is driven by tidal currents and wind. These residual currents in the North Sea, UK, range between 0.02 and 0.08 cm/s (Coolen et al., 2015). Caryophyllia smithii is described as favouring sites with a high tidal flow (Bell & Turner, 2000; Wood, 2005; Coolen et al., 2015). Caryophyllia smithii has been recorded in biotopes from negligible to strong water flow (0 to 6 knots; 0 to >3 m/s) (Connor et al., 2004). Rodolfo‐Metalpa et al. (2015) noted that Caryophyllia smithii was recorded in waters with a tidal current of 24 cm/s (±15) off the coast of Italy. This biotope consists mainly of species firmly attached to the substratum, which would be unlikely to be displaced by an increase in the strength of tidal streams at the benchmark level.

Riisgard et al. (1993) discussed the low energy cost of filtration for sponges and concluded that passive current-induced filtration may be insignificant for sponges. Pumping and filtering occur in choanocyte cells, which generate water currents in sponges using flagella (de Vos et al., 1991). The sponges Pachymatisma johnstonia and Dysidea fragilis have been recorded in biotopes from very weak to very strong water flow (0 to >3 m/s). Some studies have also stated how massive and encrusting sponge morphotypes are more abundant at high-flow areas in the sublittoral zone, due to a high basal area-to-volume ratio, which decreases removal from the substrata (Kazanidis et al., 2019). In northern Norway, large-growth sponges, Phakellia ventilabrum and Axinella infundibuliformis, were primarily observed at sites with a relatively slower horizontal current velocity (0.02 to 0.03 m/s) (Dunlop et al., 2020). 

In Lough Hyne, a small (approx. 0.5 km2) lough on the southwest coast of Ireland, sponge communities experience currents reaching >300 cm/s (>3 m/s), and greater sponge growth/recovery was observed at sites with greater water movement, possibly due to sponges using ambient currents to reduce the high energy costs associated with their filtration activity (Micaroni et al., 2025). Furthermore, the dispersal ability of sponge larvae is generally low, which can slow the recolonization rates in areas, and it is possible that very slow current speeds could reduce the larvae supply to sites (Micaroni et al., 2025). However, this biotope occurs in wave-exposed conditions, and although ameliorated by depth, wave action might be a more important source of water movement than tidal streams. Bell (2002) documented Cliona celata regeneration, following artificial damage, at two sites within Lough Hyne. The study demonstrated that 80% of Cliona celata were fully regenerated at the site which received high water flow (2 m/sec) within 100 days, whereas no Cliona celata were found in slower water velocities (0.1 m/sec) had fully regenerated. The author suggested an increase in water flow may increase food availability and therefore be of benefit to Cliona celata, whereas slow water flow (0.1 m/sec) may limit food supply and therefore slow regeneration if damaged.

Echinus esculentus is recorded in kelp beds on the west coast of Scotland in currents of about 0.5 m/sec. Outside the beds, specimens were occasionally seen being rolled by the current (Comely & Ansell, 1988), which may have been up to 1.4 m/sec. Urchins are removed from the stipe of kelps by wave and current action. Echinus esculentus are also displaced by storm action. After disturbance, Echinus esculentus migrates up the shore, an adaptation to being washed to deeper water by wave action (Lewis & Nichols, 1979). Therefore, increased water flow may remove the population from the affected area, probably to deeper water, although individuals would probably not be killed in the process and could recolonize the area quickly.

Sensitivity assessment

CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp is recorded from moderately strong to negligible tidal currents (<1.5m/sec) (Connor et al., 2004; JNCC, 2022). The characteristic sponges are recorded in biotopes with both stronger and weaker tidal flow and are, therefore, unlikely to be affected by a change in water flow at the benchmark level. Echinus esculentus may become dislodged, but are unlikely to be killed and may recolonize quickly. The abundance of the characterizing species may be affected by a large-scale increase/decrease in water flow (e.g. >1m/sec). However, a change in tidal velocity of 0.1 to 0.2 m/s is not likely to have a significant effect. Therefore, resistance has been assessed as ‘High’, resilience as ‘High’, and sensitivity as ‘Not sensitive’.

High
Help
High
Help
Not sensitive
Help
Emergence regime changes [Show more]

Emergence regime changes

Benchmark.  1) A change in the time covered or not covered by the sea for a period of ≥1 year, or 2) an increase in relative sea level or decrease in high water level for ≥1 year. (Emergence regime change pressure definition).

Evidence

Changes in emergence are 'Not relevant' to CR.MCR.EcCr.FaAlCr.Adig, CR.MCR.EcCr.FaAlCr.Pom & CR.MCR.EcCr.FaAlCr.Sec, which are restricted to fully subtidal/circalittoral conditions. The pressure benchmark is relevant only to littoral and shallow sublittoral fringe biotopes.

Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Wave exposure changes (local) [Show more]

Wave exposure changes (local)

Benchmark. A change in near shore significant wave height of >3% but <5% for more than one year (Wave action pressure definition). 

Evidence

Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii, and sponges are suspension feeders relying on water currents to supply food. These taxa, therefore, thrive in conditions of vigorous water flow. Jenkins & Stevens (2022) noted how seabed slope, temperature at the seafloor, and wave orbital velocity were important predictors of distribution in Alcyonium digitatum, and that, specifically, wave orbital velocity is more important than tidal velocity for bringing in fresh nutrients and oxygen, both for polyps to feed on and for exporting waste products.

Caryophyllia smithii has been recorded in very sheltered to extremely exposed biotopes (Connor et al., 2004; JNCC, 2015). Bell (2002) reported that Caryophyllia smithii near Lough Hyne (Ireland), exposed to strong wave action on open coasts, were relatively small, possibly due to juvenile morphological variability, as Caryophyllia smithii found deeper and in sediment were thinner and taller.

In northern Norway, large-growth sponges, such as Phakellia ventilabrum and Axinella infundibuliformis, have been observed to dominate sponge communities on wave-exposed circalittoral rock habitat (Dunlop et al., 2020). Similarly, in the Faroe-Shetland Channel, sponge abundance was noted to be highest in the region of internal wave activity at the seabed (Eerkes-Medrano et al., 2020). High sponge diversity and aggregations are likely found in areas of high-wave activity, such as near shelf breaks, due to the wave activity providing an abundant and stable food supply to them, with diversity and densities of sponges decreasing away from such areas (Santín et al., 2018). In contrast, Roberts et al. (2006) studied deep sponge reef communities (18 to 20 m) in sheltered and exposed locations in Australia. They reported greater diversity and cover (>40% cover) of sponges in wave-sheltered areas compared with a sparser and more temporal cover in exposed sites (25% cover).

Echinus esculentus occurred in kelp beds on the west coast of Scotland in currents of about 0.5 m/sec. Outside the beds, specimens were occasionally seen being rolled by the current (Comely & Ansell, 1988), which may have been up to 1.4 m/sec. Urchins are removed from the stipe of kelps by wave and current action. Echinus esculentus are also displaced by storm action. After disturbance, Echinus esculentus migrates up the shore, an adaptation to being washed to deeper water by wave action (Lewis & Nichols, 1979). Keith Hiscock (pers. comm.) reported that Echinus esculentus occurred in significant numbers as shallow as 15m below low water at the extremely wave-exposed site of Rockall, Scotland. Therefore, localised increases in wave height may remove the population from the affected area, probably to deeper water, although individuals would probably not be killed in the process and could recolonize the area quickly.

Sensitivity assessment

CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp is recorded from the upper and vertical faces of extremely wave-exposed to moderately wave-exposed, moderately strong to weakly tide-swept sites, on circalittoral bedrock or boulders (Connor et al., 2004; JNCC, 2022). Wave action is a fundamental environmental variable controlling the biological community of sublittoral biotopes. A large and significant change in wave height may fundamentally alter the character of CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.

An increase in one wave exposure category is unlikely to be significant, since the biotope can occur in extremely exposed conditions. However, a reduction in wave exposure may transition moderately wave-exposed examples of the biotope to sheltered conditions and more sheltered conditions overall. This reduction may result in an increase in grazing pressure, especially from Echinus, resulting in a transition to the severely grazed CR.MCR.EcCr.FaAlCr biotope. Most of the characteristic species are long-lived, so unlikely to be lost during one year (the benchmark duration), but opportunistic species may be able to increase in abundance while the faunal turf species reduce in abundance due to grazing. Hence, resistance is assessed as Medium to reflect some changes in the biotope. Resilience is probably ‘High’, so sensitivity is assessed as ‘Low’. A prolonged decrease in wave exposure (greater than one year) would result in loss of the biotope.

Medium
Help
High
Help
Low
Help

Chemical Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
Transition elements & organo-metal contamination [Show more]

Transition elements & organo-metal contamination

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant Transitional metal or organometal (e.g. TBT) contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills (Transitional metals and organometals pressure definition).

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed, but evidence is presented where available.

No information on the direct biological effects of heavy metal contamination on Alcyonium digitatum. Possible sub-lethal effects of exposure to heavy metals, may result in a change in morphology, growth rate or disruption of the reproductive cycle. The vulnerability of this species to concentrations of pollutants may also depend on variations in other factors, e.g. temperature and salinity conditions outside the normal range.

Based on the available evidence for several species, Bryan (1984) suggested that polychaetes are fairly resistant to heavy metals.

Little is known about the effects of heavy metals on echinoderms. Bryan (1984) reported that early work had shown that echinoderm larvae were sensitive to heavy metals contamination, for example, Migliaccio et al. (2014) reported that exposure of Paracentrotus lividis larvae to increased levels of cadmium and manganese caused abnormal larval development and skeletal malformations. Kinne (1984) reported developmental disturbances in Echinus esculentus exposed to waters containing 25 µg / l of copper (Cu).

At the time of writing, no information could be found relating to the sensitivity of Caryophyllia smithii to heavy metal contamination.

Cliona celata is known to be a hardy sponge, tolerant to a number of abiotic stressors (Duckworth & Peters, 2013), however, at the time of writing, no information could be gathered concerning the effects of heavy metal contamination on Cliona celata.

Not Assessed (NA)
Help
Not assessed (NA)
Help
Not assessed (NA)
Help
Hydrocarbon & PAH contamination [Show more]

Hydrocarbon & PAH contamination

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant hydrocarbon or polyaromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills (Hydrocarbon & PAH pressure definition).

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed, but evidence is presented where available.

CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp is a sub-tidal biotope (Connor et al., 2004). Oil pollution is mainly a surface phenomenon, its impact upon circalittoral turf communities is likely to be limited. However, as in the case of the Prestige oil spill off the coast of France, high swell and winds can cause oil pollutants to mix with the seawater and potentially negatively affect sub-littoral habitats (Castège et al., 2014). Smith (1968) reported dead colonies of Alcyonium digitatum at a depth of 16m in the locality of Sennen Cove, Cornwall, which was likely a result of toxic detergents sprayed along the shoreline to disperse oil from the Torrey Cannon tanker spill (Budd, 2008).

Large numbers of dead polychaetes and other fauna were washed up at Rulosquet marsh near Isle de Grand following the Amoco Cadiz oil spill in 1978 (Cross et al., 1978). However, no information was found relating to Spirobranchus triqueter in particular.

Echinus esculentus is subtidal and unlikely to be directly exposed to oil spills. However, as with the ‘Prestige’ oil spill, rough seas can cause mixing with the oil and the seawater, and therefore sub-tidal habitats can be affected by the oil spill. Castège et al., (2014) recorded the recovery of rocky shore communities following the Prestige oil spill, which impacted the French Atlantic coast. Rough weather at the time of the spill increased mixing between the oil and seawater, causing sub-tidal communities/habitats to be affected. The urchin Echinus esculentus was reported absent after the oil spill however returned after 2-5 years. Large numbers of dead Echinus esculentus were found between 5.5 and 14.5 m in the vicinity of Sennen Cove, presumably due to a combination of wave exposure and heavy spraying of dispersants following the ‘Torrey canyon’ oil spill (Smith 1968). Smith (1968) also demonstrated that 0.5 -1ppm of the detergent BP1002 resulted in developmental abnormalities in its echinopluteus larvae. Echinus esculentus populations in the vicinity of an oil terminal in A Coruna Bay, Spain, showed developmental abnormalities in the skeleton. The tissues contained high levels of aliphatic hydrocarbons, naphthalenes, pesticides and heavy metals (Zn, Hg, Cd, Pb, and Cu) (Gomez & Miguez-Rodriguez 1999).

Cliona celata is known to be a hardy sponge, tolerant to a number of abiotic stressors (Duckworth & Peters, 2013). Bustamante et al. (2010) suggested intertidal Cliona celata were negatively affected by the Prestige’ oil spill. However, at the time of writing, no other information could be gathered on the effects of oil contamination on Cliona celata.

At the time of writing, no information could be found relating to the sensitivity of Caryophyllia smithii to hydrocarbon contamination.

Not Assessed (NA)
Help
Not assessed (NA)
Help
Not assessed (NA)
Help
Synthetic compound contamination [Show more]

Synthetic compound contamination

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more synthetic compound contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills (Synthetic compound contamination pressure definition).

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed, but evidence is presented where available.

Smith (1968) reported dead colonies of Alcyonium digitatum at a depth of 16 m in the locality of Sennen Cove, Cornwall, resulting from the offshore spread and toxic effect of detergents (a mixture of a surfactant and an organic solvent), e.g. BP 1002 sprayed along the shoreline to disperse oil from the Torrey Canyon tanker spill. Possible sub-lethal effects of exposure to synthetic chemicals may result in a change in morphology, growth rate or disruption of the reproductive cycle. The vulnerability of this species to concentrations of pollutants may also depend on variations in other factors, e.g. temperature and salinity conditions outside the normal range (Budd, 2008).

Large numbers of dead Echinus esculentus were found between 5.5 and 14.5 m in the vicinity of Sennen, presumably due to a combination of wave exposure and heavy spraying of dispersants in that area following the Torrey Canyon oil spill (Smith 1968). Smith (1968) also demonstrated that 0.5 -1ppm of the detergent BP1002 resulted in developmental abnormalities in echinopluteus larvae of Echinus esculentus. Echinus esculentus populations in the vicinity of an oil terminal in A Coruna Bay, Spain, showed developmental abnormalities in the skeleton. The tissues contained high levels of aliphatic hydrocarbons, naphthalenes, pesticides and heavy metals (Zn, Hg, Cd, Pb, and Cu) (Gomez & Miguez-Rodriguez 1999).

At the time of writing, no information could be found relating to the sensitivity of Caryophyllia smithii to heavy metal contamination.

Cliona celata is known to be a hardy sponge, tolerant to a number of abiotic stressors (Duckworth & Peters, 2013), however, at the time of writing, no information could be gathered concerning the effects of synthetic compound contamination of Cliona celata.

Not Assessed (NA)
Help
Not assessed (NA)
Help
Not assessed (NA)
Help
Radionuclide contamination [Show more]

Radionuclide contamination

Benchmark. An increase in 10µGy/h above background levels (Radionuclides contamination pressure definition).

Evidence

'No Evidence'.

No evidence (NEv)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
No evidence (NEv)
Help
Introduction of other substances [Show more]

Introduction of other substances

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant "other" substances (solid, liquid or gas) contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills (Introduction of other substances pressure definition). 

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed.

Not Assessed (NA)
Help
Not assessed (NA)
Help
Not assessed (NA)
Help
De-oxygenation [Show more]

De-oxygenation

Benchmark. Exposure to dissolved oxygen concentration of less than or equal to 2 mg/l for one week (a change from WFD poor status to bad status) (deoxygenation pressure definition).

Evidence

In general, respiration in most marine invertebrates does not appear to be significantly affected until extremely low concentrations are reached. For many benthic invertebrates, this concentration is about 2 ml/l, or even less (Herreid, 1980; Rosenberg et al., 1991; Diaz & Rosenberg, 1995).

Alcyonium digitatum mainly inhabits environments in which the oxygen concentration usually exceeds 5 ml/l, and respiration is aerobic (Budd, 2008). In August 1978, a dense bloom of a dinoflagellate, Gyrodinium aureolum, occurred surrounding Geer Reef in Penzance Bay, Cornwall and persisted until September that year. Observations by local divers indicated a decrease in underwater visibility (<1 m) from below 8 m Below Sea Level. It was also noted that many of the faunal species appeared to be affected, e.g. no live Echinus esculentus were observed, whereas on surveys prior to August they were abundant; Alcyonium sp. and bryozoans were also in an impoverished state. Caryophyllia smithii were also in a contracted state, apparently dead. During follow-up surveys conducted in early September, Alcyonium sp. was noted to be much healthier and feeding. It was suggested that the decay of Gyrodinium aureolum either reduced oxygen levels or physically clogged faunal feeding mechanisms. Adjacent reefs were also surveyed during the same time period, and the effects of the Gyrodinium aureolum bloom were less apparent. It was suggested that higher water agitation in shallow water on reefs more exposed to wave action were less affected by the phytoplankton bloom (Griffiths, 1979).

Demosponges maintained under laboratory conditions can tolerate hypoxic conditions for brief periods. Gunda & Janapala (2009) investigated the effects of variable dissolved oxygen (DO) levels on the survival of the marine sponge, Haliclona pigmentifera. Under hypoxic conditions (1.5 to 2.0 ppm O2; 1.5 to 2 mg/l), Haliclona pigmentifera with intact ectodermal layers and subtle oscula survived for 42 ± 3 days. Sponges with prominent oscula, foreign material, and damaged pinacoderm exhibited poor survival (of 1 to 9 days) under similar conditions. Complete mortality of the sponges occurred within two days under anoxic conditions (<0.3 ppm O2; <0.3 mg/l). Schiaparelli et al. (2007) described the decline of the cup-coral Leptopsammia pruvoti by 85% following an anoxic event caused by decomposing mucilage, due to an unexpected bloom of the brown alga Acinetospora crinite because of a summer heatwave in 2003 in the Mediterranean.

Bell et al. (2024) studied the stability of shallow water sponges at Lough Hyne, Ireland, and concluded that changes to the deeper subtidal sponge assemblages were possibly driven by local processes associated with deeper water, potentially related to the seasonal oxythermocline that forms within Lough Hyne. This low-oxygen layer is thought to have a strong influence on the ecology and biology of organisms in the deeper areas of the lough, with a marked decline in the biodiversity of sponges and other organisms below approximately 25 m (Bell et al., 2024). However, explicit testing of Lough Hyne sponges’ oxygen tolerance found sponges to be resilient to short-term oxygen stress, with the focus now being on the presence of hydrogen sulphide as the main driver of change (Bell et al., 2024). Bell (2002) also reported that an oxycline at Lough Hyne (<5% surface concentration; ca 0.5 mg/l) limited vertical colonization by Caryophillia smithii.

Micaroni et al. (2022) examined oxygenation tolerance in Cliona celata and Suberites carnosus from Lough Hyne and Polymastia crocea and Suberites australiensis from New Zealand. The sponges were exposed to a total of five hypoxic treatments, with increasing severity (3.3, 1.6, 0.5, 0.4 and 0.13 mg O2/l) over seven days. They concluded that sponges were very tolerant of hypoxia, as all sponges survived the experiments, except Polymastia crocea, which experienced significant mortality at the lowest concentration of 0.13 mg O2/l (LT50 = 286 hours). Respiration rate in the sponges was not significantly affected down to 0.4 mg O2/l, except in Suberites carnosus. However, the species exhibited a range of physiological responses to hypoxia. Micaroni et al. (2022) concluded that sponges showed generally high tolerance to hypoxia compared with other sessile species.

Hiscock & Hoare (1975) reported an oxycline (between 1.5 and 78% oxygen saturation between 0 and 25 m) forming in the summer months (June to September) in a quarry lake (Abereiddy, Pembrokeshire) from close to full oxygen saturation at the surface to <5% saturation (ca 0.5 mg/l O2) below ca 10 m. No sponges, including Tethya aurantia, Hymeniacidon pereleve, Polymastia boletiformis, nor the cup coral Caryophyllia smithii, the hydroid Kirchenpaueria pinnata, or the sea squirt Ascidia mentula were recorded at depths below 10 to 11 m. Other example species observed included the tubeworms Protula tubular (14 m deep in late summer – 4% oxygen saturation) and Apomatus similis (16 m deep in early autumn – 3% oxygen saturation), and the bamboo worm Micromaldane ornithochaeta (20 m deep in spring – 1.5% oxygen saturation) (Hiscock & Hoare, 1975).

Sensitivity assessment

CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp is recorded from moderately strong to negligible tidal streams (<0.5 m/sec) and in extremely to moderately wave-exposed sites (Connor et al., 2004; JNCC, 2022). Therefore, water movement (through wave action and/or tidal flow) could potentially cause mixing with surrounding oxygenated water and may therefore decrease the effects of de-oxygenation rapidly. The evidence suggests that sponges are very resistant to hypoxia for short periods (Gunda & Janapala, 2009; Micaroni et al., 2022; Bell et al., 2024) but may be excluded or die during prolonged hypoxic episodes due to seasonal oxythermoclines. Caryophyllia smithii was excluded below <5% saturation (ca 0.5 mg/l O2) in Lough Hyne (Bell, 2002) and Abereiddy (Hiscock & Hoare, 1975), but probably due to the seasonal oxythermocline rather than a short-term hypoxia.

However, Echinus esculenta, Caryophyllia smithii, and Alcyonium sp. were adversely affected or killed by short-term (ca one month) hypoxia (un-quantified) due to an algal bloom (Griffiths et al., 1979). Therefore, resistance has been assessed as ‘Low’ as a precaution, albeit with ‘’Low’ confidence in the absence of quantified evidence. Hence, resilience is assessed as ‘Medium’, and sensitivity as ‘Medium’.

Low
Help
Medium
Help
Medium
Help
Nutrient enrichment [Show more]

Nutrient enrichment

Benchmark. Increased levels of the elements nitrogen, phosphorus, silicon, and iron in the marine environment compared to background concentrations (Nutrient enrichment pressure definition).

Evidence

Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii, and sponges are suspension feeders. Nutrient enrichment of coastal waters that enhances the population of phytoplankton may be beneficial to Alcyonium digitatum and Caryophyllia smithii in terms of an increased food supply, but the effects are uncertain (Hartnoll, 1998). The survival of Alcyonium digitatum and Caryophyllia smithii may be influenced indirectly. High primary productivity in the water column combined with high summer temperatures and the development of thermal stratification (which prevents mixing of the water column) can lead to hypoxia of the bottom waters, which faunal species are likely to be highly intolerant of (see de-oxygenation pressure).

Kazanidis et al. (2019) studied the nitrogen assimilation rates in the deep-sea sponge Spongosorites coralliophaga and cluster anemone Parazoanthus anguicomus. They found that Spongosorites coralliophaga preferentially assimilated particulate organic nitrogen over particulate organic carbon. This was not the case for Parazoanthus anguicomus. They suggested that the metabolic flexibility of Spongosorites coralliophaga played an important role in its survival under the food-limited conditions in the deep sea. Therefore, it seems that Spongosorites coralliophaga can cope with high levels of nitrogen. Kazanidis et al. (2019) reported that this species has been observed in concentrations of ammonium from 30, 100, and 200 μM (from depths of 2 to 15 m).

Gochfeld et al. (2012) studied the effect of nutrient enrichment (≤0.05 to 0.07 μM for nitrate and ≤0.5 μM for phosphate) as a potential stressor in the sponge Aplysina caulifornis and its bacterial symbionts and found that nutrient enrichment had no effects on sponge or symbiont physiology when compared to the control. This study does contradict findings in Gochfeld et al. (2007), in which Aplysina spp. sponges were virtually absent from a site of anthropogenic stress in Bocas del Toro, Panama, which experienced high rainfall and terrestrial runoff. The author suggested that whilst this site did include elevated nutrient concentrations, other pressures and stresses could be contributing.

Wood et al. (2025) exposed North East Atlantic sponges (Cliona celata, Stelligera stuposa, Axinella dissimilis, and Suberites carnosus) from Lough Hyne to nitrogenous fertiliser (4 to 6 mg/l NO₃-N (286 to 426 μM NO₃), and 16 to 19 mg/l NO₃-N (1143 to 1357 μM NO₃) for 13 days and SW Pacific Ocean sponges (Crella incrustans, Suberites australiensis, and Tethya bergquistae) for 10 days at 1 mg/l NO₃-N (71 μM NO₃), and 5 to 7 mg/l NO₃-N (357 to 500 μM NO₃) and found that sponges showed high survival rates (>95%) and only one species, Cliona celata, showed evidence of health effects. Cliona celata exhibited both a significant change in respiration rates, coupled with visible changes in surface colouration, but only at the highest fertilizer concentration. Only two Suberites carnosus exposed to 16 to 19 mg/l NO3-N concentrations showed necrosis after 13 days of exposure. Another two specimens died in the controls.

Lough Hyne has experienced major shifts in intertidal and subtidal communities in the last two decades, and in particular, a large decline in the abundance of subtidal sponges at some sites in the lough (Micaroni et al., 2021 cited in Micaroni et al., 2025). Excess nitrogen was proposed as a possible cause of these changes in the subtidal sponges (Micaroni et al., 2021 cited in Micaroni et al., 2025), including a decline in Cliona celata.

In contrast, Stubler et al. (2024) evaluated the impacts of nitrate and phosphate addition (ranging from 7.6+/-3.4 µmol/l nitrate and 1.7+/-0.6 µmol/l phosphate in aquaria to 2.9+/-0.9 µmol/l nitrate and 0.95+/-0.2 µmol/l phosphate in field experiments) on the bioerosion of Cliona celata inhabiting carbonate substrata in the subtropical southeastern USA. Overall, there were no differences in loss of calcium carbonate substratum among treatments in any of the experiments, though very high rates of bioerosion (up to 0.11 g CaCO3/day) were observed in the field experiments. Cliona celata is known to thrive under nutrient-replete conditions and presents high adaptive plasticity to environmental variables, and it is likely that the sponges were generally unimpacted by the nutrient treatments (Stubler et al., 2024). However, previous studies have shown a positive correlative relationship between organic nutrient loading and abundance of clionid boring sponges in the Caribbean and Mediterranean (Rose and Risk, 1985; Ward-Paige et al., 2005; Chaves-Fonnegra et al., 2007; and Muricy, 1991 cited in Stubler et al., 2024). Rose & Risk (1985) described an increase in the abundance of Cliona delitrix in an organically polluted section of the Grand fringing reef affected by the discharge of untreated faecal sewage. Ward-Paige et al. (2005) described that the greatest size and biomass of clionids corresponded with the highest nitrogen, ammonia and δ15N levels. Dissolved organic matter has been demonstrated to be an important component of nutrition in tropical encrusting and boring sponges, and a higher amount of organic nutrients may directly benefit boring sponges (Stubler et al., 2024).

Cliona celata is considered a hardy sponge, tolerant of environmental stressors such as high nutrient loads, low salinity, and large temperature variation (Duckworth & Peters, 2013). Carballo et al. (1994) suggested Cliona celata was a good indicator species of pollution and noted its abundance at polluted sites that receive sewage discharge within Algeciras Bay, Spain.

Echavarri-Erasun et al. (2007) described the effects of deep-water sewage discharge on the relative abundance of rocky reef communities. Species typical of hard substrata (including Caryophyllia smithii and bryozoans) increased in total richness and abundance near the outfall.

It was suggested by Comely & Ansell (1988) that Echinus esculentus could absorb dissolved organic material for the purposes of nutrition. Nutrient enrichment may encourage the growth of ephemeral and epiphytic algae and therefore increase sea-urchin food availability. Lawrence (1975) reported that sea urchins had persisted over 13 years on barren grounds near sewage outfalls, presumably feeding on dissolved organic material, detritus, plankton, and microalgae, although individuals died at an early age.

Sensitivity assessment

Most of the evidence suggests that sponges, including Cliona celata, are resistant to nutrient or organic enrichment. In experiments, Cliona celata demonstrated health impacts but only at high nutrient levels of 16 to 19 mg/l (1,143 to 1,357 μM NO₃) (Wood et al., 2025). However, high nutrient levels are significantly higher (100-fold) than those tested by Stubler et al. (2024) and two-fold higher than the nutrient levels defined as ‘Poor’ under the Water Framework Directive (2015). However, the evidence on the important characteristic species is limited, but the presence of Caryophyllia and Echinus in the vicinity of sewage outfalls suggests resistance. However, the evidence is probably ‘insufficient’ to form the basis of an assessment for the whole community.

Insufficient evidence (IEv)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Insufficient evidence (IEv)
Help
Organic enrichment [Show more]

Organic enrichment

Benchmark. A deposit of 100 gC/m2/yr (Organic enrichment pressure definition).

Evidence

Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii and Spirobranchus triqueter are suspension feeders of phytoplankton and zooplankton. Organic enrichment of coastal waters that enhances the population of phytoplankton may be beneficial to Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii and Spirobranchus triqueter in terms of an increased food supply, but the effects are uncertain (Hartnoll, 1998). The survival of Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii and Spirobranchus triqueter may be influenced indirectly. High primary productivity in the water column combined with high summer temperature and the development of thermal stratification (which prevents mixing of the water column) can lead to hypoxia of the bottom waters, which faunal species are likely to be highly intolerant of (see de-oxygenation pressure).

Cliona celata is considered a hardy sponge, tolerant of environmental stressors such as high nutrient loads, low salinity, and large temperature variation (Duckworth & Peters, 2013). Carballo et al. (1994) suggested Cliona celata was a good indicator species of pollution, and noted its abundance at polluted sites which receive sewage discharge within Algeciras Bay, Spain.

Johnston & Roberts (2009) conducted a meta-analysis, which reviewed 216 papers to assess how a variety of contaminants (including sewage and nutrient loading) affected 6 marine habitats (including subtidal reefs). A 30-50% reduction in species diversity and richness was identified in all habitats exposed to the contaminant types.

It was suggested by Comely & Ansell (1988) that Echinus esculentus could absorb dissolved organic material for the purposes of nutrition. Organic enrichment may encourage the growth of ephemeral and epiphytic algae and therefore increase sea-urchin food availability. Lawrence (1975) reported that sea urchins had persisted over 13 years on barren grounds near sewage outfalls, presumably feeding on dissolved organic material, detritus, plankton and microalgae, although individuals died at an early age.

Sensitivity assessment

Organic enrichment is not likely to directly negatively affect the characterizing species within this biotope, however, chronic organic enrichment may cause secondary effects such as hypoxia (refer to de-oxygenation pressure). Resistance has been assessed as ‘Low’, Resilience as ‘Medium’. Sensitivity is ‘Medium’.

Low
Help
Medium
Help
Medium
Help

Physical Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
Physical loss (to land or freshwater habitat) [Show more]

Physical loss (to land or freshwater habitat)

Benchmark. A permanent loss of existing saline habitat within the site (Physical loss pressure definition). 

Evidence

All marine habitats and benthic species are considered to have a resistance of ‘None’ to this pressure and to be unable to recover from a permanent loss of habitat (resilience is ‘Very Low’). Sensitivity within the direct spatial footprint of this pressure is therefore ‘High’. Although no specific evidence is described, confidence in this assessment is ‘High due to the incontrovertible nature of this pressure.

None
Help
Very Low
Help
High
Help
Physical change (to another seabed type) [Show more]

Physical change (to another seabed type)

Benchmark. Permanent change from sedimentary or soft rock substrata to hard rock or artificial substrata, or vice versa (Physical change in subtratum type pressure definition).

Evidence

The characterizing species (except Echinus esculentus) require a hard substratum to attach to, such as rock, steel, and other coralligenous or hard formations (Langhamer, 2016; Chava & Mokievsky, 2022; Jenkins & Stevens, 2022).

Alcyonium digitatum prefers hard substrata but is capable of settling on other substrata, including shells, cobble, and other (unstable) coarse substrata (Jenkins & Stevens, 2022). High terrain ruggedness index (TRI) values are often associated with hard substrata, which may explain the positive relationship between the density of records and TRI. Areas with a high TRI would indicate a more complex seabed with local topographic highs, which coral species have been found to prefer (Langton, Stirling & Boulcott, 2023). A study by Becker et al. (2020) focusing on the German North Sea (Helgoländer Steingrund between 9 and 18 m deep) noted how Alcyonium digitatum had a significant positive correlation with hard ground greater than 22%. Becker et al. (2020) also stated that Flustra foliacea dominated the surface structure of bottom waters (meaning coverage of nearly 100%), being significantly positively correlated with hard ground (25%) more than and shell <2 mm more than 0.05 weight% (Becker et al., 2020); in the same region, Michaelis et al. (2019) noted how Flustra foliacea largely colonized boulder-sized stones. In addition, the probability of occurrence of Echinus esculentus was highest in areas with hard ground greater than 19%, and shell >2 mm, more than 0.04 weight% (Becker et al., 2020). While observing an undersea pipeline in the North Sea, Rouse et al. (2019) reported that Alcyonium digitatum was present in the highest densities on pipelines located on mud, while Echinus esculentus were more common on pipelines in sand. 

In northern Norway, large-growth sponges, such as Phakellia ventilabrum and Axinella infundibuliformis, were primarily observed at sites with hard substratum, including sandy-gravels and cobbles, and dominate sponge communities on wave-exposed circalittoral rock habitat (Dunlop et al. 2020). This biotope is also characteristic of circalittoral rock (JNCC, 2022). Kazanidis et al. (2019) found that the type of substratum explained a significant amount of variation in sponge density, with the highest densities found in cobble with boulders.

Sensitivity assessment

If rock were replaced with sediment, this would represent a fundamental change to the physical character of the biotope, and the species would be unlikely to recover. The biotope would be lost. Resistance to the pressure is considered ‘None’, and resilience is ‘Very low’. Sensitivity has been assessed as ‘High’.

None
Help
Very Low
Help
High
Help
Physical change (to another sediment type) [Show more]

Physical change (to another sediment type)

Benchmark. Permanent change in one Folk class (based on UK SeaMap simplified classification) (Physical change in sediment type pressure definition). 

Evidence

Not relevant

Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Habitat structure changes - removal of substratum (extraction) [Show more]

Habitat structure changes - removal of substratum (extraction)

Benchmark. The extraction of substratum to 30 cm (where substratum includes sediments and soft rock but excludes hard bedrock) (Removal of substratum pressure definition). 

Evidence

The species characterizing this biotope are epifauna or epiflora occurring on rock and would be sensitive to the removal of the habitat. However, extraction of rock substratum is considered unlikely, and this pressure is considered to be ‘Not relevant’ to hard substratum habitats.

Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Abrasion / disturbance of the surface of the substratum or seabed [Show more]

Abrasion / disturbance of the surface of the substratum or seabed

Benchmark. Damage to surface features (e.g. species and physical structures within the habitat) (Surface abrasion/disturbance pressure definition).

Evidence

In the subtidal, abrasion is most likely to be a result of bottom or pot fishing gear, cable laying, etc., which may cause localised mobility of the substrata and mortality of the resident community. The effect would be situation-dependent; however, if bottom fishing gear were towed over a site, it may mobilise a high proportion of the rock substrata and cause high mortality in the resident community.

The characterizing species are likely to be affected by physical disturbances. Physical disturbance by fishing gear has been shown to adversely affect sessile benthic, slow-moving, and emergent epifaunal communities, with hydroid and bryozoan matrices reported to be greatly reduced in fished areas and increase when fishing activity is removed (Jennings & Kaiser, 1998; Sheehan et al., 2017; Kaiser et al., 2018; Long et al., 2021; Langton, Stirling & Boulcott, 2023). Also, heavy mobile gears could also result in the movement of boulders (Bullimore, 1985; Jennings & Kaiser, 1998). All characterizing sponge species for this biotope are sessile or slow-moving epifauna, being either branching or cup-like. The species that create biogenic habitats, such as sponges and corals, often form complex ecological associations and tend to be long-lived, slow-growing, and fragile, sensitive to disturbance and vulnerable to damage (Kaiser et al. 2018; Graves et al., 2023). Fishing disturbance is one of the largest pressures for these characterizing species (Kaiser et al. 2018; Kazanidis et al., 2019; Graves et al., 2023). Less ‘aggressive’ fishing practices can still be damaging, such as some large Pentapora foliacea individuals being badly smashed by potting (Eno et al., 2001). However, they are also vulnerable to other anthropogenic physical disturbances, such as those from oil and gas exploration, deep-sea mining, and recreational SCUBA diving (Vad et al., 2018; Betti et al., 2019; Graves et al., 2023).

Picton & Goodwin (2007) noted that an area of boulders with a rich fauna of sponges and hydroids on the east coast of Rathlin Island, Northern Ireland, was significantly altered since the 1980s. Scallop dredging had begun in 1989, and boulders were observed to have been turned and the gravel harrowed. In addition, many of the boulders had disappeared, and rare hydroid communities were greatly reduced (Picton & Goodwin, 2007). Prior records indicated the presence of large sponges, mainly Axinella infundibuliformis (Picton & Goodwin, 2007). Hiscock (2014) identified Axinella dissimilis as being very susceptible to towed fishing gear. Hinz et al. (2011) studied the effects of scallop dredging in Lyme Bay, UK, and found that the presence of the erect sponge Axinella dissimilis was significantly higher at non-fished sites (33% occurrence) compared to fished sites (15% occurrence). Similarly, these results were observed by Kazanidis et al. (2019), who found that variation in sponge density was strongly explained by fisheries pressure, with higher densities of sponges found in the areas with lowest values of demersal landings, while densities were significantly lower in the areas with higher demersal landings.

Van Dolah et al. (1987) studied the effects on sponges and corals of one trawl event over a low-relief hard bottom habitat off Georgia, US. The densities of individuals taller than 10 cm of three species of sponges in the trawl path and in the adjacent control area were assessed by divers and were compared before, immediately after and 12 months after trawling. Of the total number of sponges remaining in the trawled area, 32% were damaged. Most of the affected sponges were the barrel sponges Cliona spp., whereas Haliclona oculata and Ircina campana were not significantly affected. Twelve months after trawling, the abundance of sponges had increased to pre-trawl densities or greater. Tilmant (1979) found that, following a shrimp trawl in Florida, US, over 50% of sponges, including NeopetrosiaSpheciospongiaSpongia and Hippiospongia, were torn loose from the bottom. The highest damage incidence occurred to the finger sponge Neopetrosia longleyi. Size did not appear to be important in determining whether a sponge was affected by the trawl. Recovery was ongoing, but not complete, 11 months after the trawl, although no specific data was provided.

Freese et al. (1999) studied the effects of trawling on seafloor habitats and associated invertebrates in the Gulf of Alaska. They found that a transect following a single trawling event showed a significant reduction in ‘vase’ sponges (67% expressed damage) and ‘morel’ sponges (total damage could not be quantified as their brittle nature meant that these sponges were completely torn apart and scattered). The ‘finger’ sponges, the smallest and least damaged of the sponges assessed (14%), were damaged by being knocked over. Freese (2001) studied deep cold-water sponges in Alaska a year after a trawl event; 46.8% of sponges exhibited damage, with 32.1% having been torn loose. None of the damaged sponges displayed signs of regrowth or recovery. This was in stark contrast to early work by Freese (1999) on warm shallow sponge communities. Impacts of trawling activity in Alaska were more persistent due to the slower growth/regeneration rates of deep, cold-water sponges. Given the slow growth rates and long lifespans of the rich, diverse fauna, it was considered likely to take many years for deep sponge communities to recover if adversely affected by physical damage (Freese, 2001).

Boulcott & Howell (2011) conducted experimental Newhaven scallop dredging over a circalittoral rock habitat in the Sound of Jura, Scotland and recorded the damage to the resident community. The results indicated that the sponge Pachymatisma johnstoni was highly damaged by the experimental trawl. However, only 13% of photographic samples showed visible damage to Alcyonium digitatum. Where Alcyonium digitatum damage was evident, it tended to be small colonies that were ripped off the rock. The authors highlight that physical damage to faunal turfs (erect bryozoans and hydroids) was difficult to quantify in the study. However, the faunal turf communities did not show large signs of damage and were only damaged by the scallop dredge teeth, which was often limited in extent (approximately 2 cm wide tracts). The authors indicated that species such as Alcyonium digitatum and faunal turf communities were not as vulnerable to damage through trawling as sedimentary fauna, and whilst damage to circalittoral rock fauna did occur, it was of an incremental nature, with loss of species such as Alcyonium digitatum and faunal turf communities increasing with repeated trawls.

Alcyonium digitatum has been documented as locally depleted (reductions in colony numbers and size) in some areas due to benthic trawling, such as Lyme Bay, before the trawling ban (Holland, Jenkins & Stevens, 2017). Magorrian & Service (1998) reported that trawling for queen scallops resulted in the removal of emergent epifauna and damage to horse mussel beds in Strangford Lough. They suggested that the emergent epifauna, such as Alcyonium digitatum, were more intolerant than the horse mussels themselves and reflected early signs of damage (Service & Magorrian, 1997; Magorrian & Service, 1998; Service, 1998). Veale et al. (2000) reported that the abundance, biomass, and production of epifaunal assemblages, including Alcyonium digitatum, decreased with increasing fishing effort. However, the fact that Alcyonium digitatum is more abundant on high fishing effort grounds suggests that this seemingly fragile species is more resistant to abrasive disturbance than might be assumed (Bradshaw et al., 2000), presumably owing to the ability for the replacement of senescent cells and regeneration of damaged tissue, in addition to the early larval colonization of available substrata.

Kaiser et al. (2018) specifically studied the recovery of sessile epifauna following the exclusion of towed mobile fishing gear in Lyme Bay, UK. Their estimates suggest that no recovery occurred within the timescale of the study, and that some biogenic habitats (particularly sponges and soft corals) could require up to, or more than, 20 to 30 years before signs of recolonization and recovery may occur. The maximum recovery time modelled was 51 years for yellow branched sponges, while species such as Eunicella verrucosa and Pentapora foliacea increased in abundance but had not fully recovered, with their projected recovery time being 17 to 20 years (Kaiser et al., 2018). Therefore, recovery rates of biota depend on life-history factors and habitat-specific requirements, with the longer-lived species that require specific habitats and have low dispersal potential taking longer to recover (Kaiser et al., 2018). A 15-year review of the Lyme Bay trawling ban by Renn et al. (2024) highlighted definitive evidence of recovery, in terms of increased species richness, with key sessile taxa (Pentapora foliacea and Phallusia mammillata) showing signs of early recovery between 2008 and 2013. In terms of exploited species, between 2008 and 2019, fish experienced a 430% increase in taxon richness and a 370% increase in total abundance inside the Marine Protected Area (MPA), but invertebrates (crab, lobster, cuttlefish, and whelk) exhibited no signs of recovery (Renn et al., 2024). Renn et al. (2024) concluded that the evidence of recovery recorded in Lyme Bay broadly aligned with the wider literature by detecting early stages of recovery within the first few years of MPA establishment. However, full recovery is thought to occur over decadal timescales, and measuring full recovery rates in-situ remains a priority for future research in Lyme Bay.

Species with fragile tests, such as Echinus esculentus, were reported to suffer badly due to scallop or queen scallop dredging (Bradshaw et al., 2000; Hall-Spencer & Moore, 2000). Kaiser et al. (2000) reported that Echinus esculentus were less abundant in areas subject to high trawling disturbance in the Irish Sea. Jenkins et al. (2001) conducted experimental scallop trawling in the North Irish Sea and recorded the damage caused to several conspicuous megafauna species, both when caught as by-catch and when left on the seabed. The authors predicted 16.4% of Echinus esculentus were crushed/dead, 29.3% would have >50% spine loss/minor cracks, 1.1% would have <50% spine loss, and the remaining 53.3% would be in good condition. Sea urchins can rapidly regenerate spines; e.g. Psammechinus miliaris were found to re-grow all spines within a period of two months (Hobson, 1930).

The trawling examples mentioned above were conducted on sedimentary habitats, and thus the evidence is not directly relevant to the rock-based biotopes

Sensitivity assessment

Given the sessile, emergent nature of the biotopes characterizing epifauna, damage and mortality following a physical disturbance are likely to be significant, however, some studies have brought into question the extent of damage to the faunal turf. The physiology of the bryozoans affords some protection in the event of abrasion events, and recovery is likely to be rapid if stolons remain undamaged. Mortality amongst the characterizing species Alcyonium digitatum and Echinus esculentus is likely to be ‘Medium’ (<25% loss), but this is dependent on the abrasion activity, and heavier gears may well cause more damage. However, based on the damage to sponges, resistance has been assessed as ‘Medium’, and resilience has been assessed as ‘High’. Sensitivity has been assessed as ‘Low

Please note Boulcott & Howell (2011) did not mention the abrasion caused by fully loaded collection bags on the Newhaven dredges. A fully loaded Newhaven dredge may cause higher damage to the community, as indicated in their study.

Medium
Help
High
Help
Low
Help
Penetration or disturbance of the substratum subsurface [Show more]

Penetration or disturbance of the substratum subsurface

Benchmark. Damage to sub-surface features (e.g. species and physical structures within the habitat) (Sub-surface penetration pressure definition).

Evidence

The species characterizing this biotope group are epifauna or epiflora occurring on rock which is resistant to subsurface penetration. The assessment for abrasion at the surface only is therefore considered to equally represent sensitivity to this pressure. This pressure is 'Not relevant' to hard rock biotopes.

Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Changes in suspended solids (water clarity) [Show more]

Changes in suspended solids (water clarity)

Benchmark. A change in one rank on the WFD (Water Framework Directive) scale, e.g. from clear to intermediate for one year (Suspended sediment pressure definition).

Evidence

Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii and sponges are not thought to be highly susceptible to changes in water clarity because they are suspension-feeding organisms and are not directly dependent on sunlight for nutrition. Alcyonium digitatum has been shown to be tolerant of high levels of suspended sediment. Hill et al. (1997) demonstrated that Alcyonium digitatum sloughed off settled particles with a large amount of mucous. Alcyonium digitatum is also known to inhabit the entrances to sea lochs (Budd, 2008) or the entrances to estuaries (Braber & Borghouts, 1977) where water clarity is likely to be highly variable.

Bell & Turner (2000) studied populations of Caryophyllia smithii at three sites of differing sedimentation regimes in Lough Hyne, Ireland. Calyx size was largest at the site of least sedimentation and smallest at the site of most sedimentation. In contrast, the height of individuals was greatest at the site of most sedimentation and smallest at the site of least sedimentation. The height of individuals correlated with the level of surrounding sediment. High density was correlated with high sedimentation and depth (Bell & Turner, 2000).

Schönberg (2015) reviewed and observed the interactions between sediments and marine sponges in Australia and described the lack of research on Porifera. Bell et al. (2015) reviewed the effects and interactions of sponges with sediment in suspension and after deposition. Whilst many sponges are disadvantaged by sedimentation (as would be expected, being sessile filter feeders) (Gerrodette & Flechsig, 1979), many examples exist of sponges adapting to sediment presence (Bell et al., 2015; Schönberg, 2015) and many encrusting sponges appear to be able to survive in highly sedimented conditions, and, in fact, many species prefer such habitats (Bell & Barnes, 2001; Bell & Smith, 2004). Adaptations included sediment incorporation, sediment encrusting, structural modification (such as reduction in numbers of oscula, or repositioning of inhalant and exhalant openings), soft sediment anchoring using spicules, modification of spicules to shield the body from sediment, backwashing, mucus production, morphology (e.g. upright forms intercept less settling sediment) and living, at least partially, embedded within the sediment (Bell et al., 2015; Schönberg, 2015). 

Among the sponges, Schönberg (2015) found that Axinellids frequently formed external crusts and sediment interaction was observed in 5.8 ± 4.8% of observations, but required rock substrata under the sediment for attachment. Ackers et al. (1992) describe Axinella dissimilis as preferring clean oceanic water but tolerating silt. Sanchez et al. (2009) described finding communities composed primarily of Phakellia ventilabrum and Dendrophyllia cornigera in circalittoral rocky habitats in the Cantabrian Seanorthern Spain. Phakellia ventilabrum showed greater tolerance to sedimentation pressures than the coral. The authors concluded that Phakellia ventilabrum preferred a mixed rock–sand habitat where deposition processes predominate, and hence sedimentation, together with hard substrata where it settles (Sanchez et al., 2009). Axinella dissimilis is mainly found on upward-facing clean or silty rock, and whilst it tends to prefer clean oceanic water, it is tolerant of silt (Ackers et al., 1992).

Castric-Fey & Chassé (1991) conducted a factorial analysis of the subtidal rocky ecology near Brest, France, and rated the distribution of species in varying turbidity (corroborated by the depth at which laminarians disappeared). Cliona celata and Stelligera rigida were classed as indifferent to turbidity, Tethya citrinaPachymatisma johnstonia and Polymastia boletiformis (as Polymastia robusta) had a slight preference for clearer water, while Dysidea fragilisPolymastia mamillaris, and Raspailia ramosa had a strong preference for turbid water.

Bell et al. (2015) noted that upright forms intercepted a smaller amount of settling sediment than encrusting forms. For example, Bell & Barnes (2002; cited in Bell et al., 2015) reported considerable variation in the branching characteristics of Raspaillia ramosa and Stelligera stuposa across a sediment gradient in Lough Hyne, Northern Ireland, although the patterns were due to the interaction between sedimentation and water flow. Raspailia ramosa and Stelligera stuposa have a reduced maximum size in areas of high sedimentation (Bell et al., 2002). Storr (1976) observed the sponge Sphecispongia vesparium backwashing to eject sediment and noted that other sponges (such as Condrilla nucula) use secretions to remove settled material. Tjensvoll et al. (2013) found that Geodia barretti physiologically shuts down when exposed to sediment concentrations of 100 mg /l that caused an 86% reduction in respiration. Rapid recovery to initial respiration levels directly after the exposure indicated that Geodia barretti can cope with a single short exposure to elevated sediment concentrations. However, it should be noted that a laboratory study on the impact of elevated sedimentation rates on deep-water sponges found that a sediment load of 30 mg sed./l resulted in significantly higher sponge mortality compared with sponges exposed to 5 and 10 mg sed./l, although no additional information was provided (Hoffman & Tore Rapp, pers comm. cited in Lancaster et al., 2014).

Pineda et al. (2017a) examined the effect of suspended sediments in three species of sponge from New Zealand: two phototrophic (due to symbiotic algae) (Cliona orientalis and Carteriospongia foliascens) and one heterotrophic (Ianthella basta) under laboratory conditions. All sponges exhibited a short-term response to suspended sediment, e.g. closed oscula, mucus production, and tissue regression. Most survived low to medium turbidity (≤33 mg/l) for up to 28 days, but at high turbidity (≤76 mg/l), Cliona orientalis, and Carteriospongia foliascens experienced 20-90% mortality, and Ianthella basta showed tissue regression. Pineda et al. (2017a) suggested that suspended sediment combined with low light due to turbidity increased mortality in the phototrophic species, but noted that there was considerable interspecies variation in their response. In addition, Kazanidis et al. (2018) noted that cold-water sponges exclusively feed on dissolved organic matter particles smaller than 10 μm, and that suspended Particulate Organic Matter (POM) concentration decreased, along with its quality, with depth. For example, in surface waters, 0 to 150 m water depth, the average concentration of suspended POM is about four times higher than between 150 and 4,000 m water depth.

Moore (1977) suggested that Echinus esculentus was unaffected by turbid conditions. Echinus esculentus is an important grazer of red macro-algae within CR.MCR.EcCr. Increased turbidity and resultant reduced light penetration is likely to negatively affect algal growth. However, Echinus esculentus can feed on alternative prey, detritus or dissolved organic material (Lawrence, 1975; Comely & Ansell, 1988).

Sensitivity assessment

Most of the characteristic species are probably adapted to the silty conditions experienced in this biotope (JNCC, 2022) and resistant to suspended sediment. Therefore, resistance has been assessed as ‘High’, and resilience as ‘High’. Sensitivity has been assessed as ‘Not Sensitive’.

High
Help
High
Help
Not sensitive
Help
Smothering and siltation rate changes (light) [Show more]

Smothering and siltation rate changes (light)

Benchmark. ‘Light’ deposition of up to 5 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single discrete event (Smothering pressure definition).

Evidence

Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii, and sponges are sessile and thus would be unable to avoid the deposition of a smothering layer of sediment. Some Alcyonium digitatum colonies can attain a height of up to 20 cm (Edwards, 2008), so they would still be able to feed in the event of sediment deposition. Smothering by 5 cm of sediment is likely to prevent feeding, and hence growth and reproduction, as well as respiration in the bryozoans. In addition, associated sediment abrasion may remove the bryozoan colonies. A layer of sediment will probably also interfere with larval settlement (Tyler-Walters, 2005c).

Caryophyllia smithii is a small (approx. <3 cm in height from the seabed) species and would therefore likely be inundated in a “light” sedimentation event. Coolen et al. (2015) noted how a low abundance of Caryophyllia smithii was typically observed at locations with low tidal current strength and high sedimentation. For example, in the Skomer Island, UK, Marine Conservation Zone, higher numbers of Caryophyllia smithii were observed on vertical walls, likely due to less surface sediment accumulating there (Lock et al., 2025). However, Bell & Turner (2000) reported that Caryophyllia smithii was abundant at sites of “moderate” sedimentation (7 mm ± 0.5 mm) in Lough Hyne. It is therefore likely that Caryophyllia smithii would be resistant to periodic sedimentation. If 5 cm of sediment were removed rapidly, via tidal currents, Caryophyllia smithii would likely remain within the biotope. Lock et al. (2006) partly attributed fluctuations in Caryophyllia smithii abundance at Skomer Island to surface sediment cover. Bell (2002) reported that juvenile Caryophyllia smithii are morphologically variable and initially undergo rapid growth with tall and thin forms in deeper, sheltered, relatively sedimented conditions near Lough Hyne, Ireland. It was concluded that this was to escape the thin layer of sediment present. Coolen et al. (2015) noted that a low abundance of Caryophyllia smithii was typically observed at locations with low tidal current strength and high sedimentation. Hiscock (1983) reported that Caryophyllia smithii was able to survive for five days smothered by fine sediment (mud) (Hiscock, 1983).

Schönberg (2015) reviewed and observed the interactions between sediments and marine sponges in Australia and described the lack of research on Porifera. Bell et al. (2015) reviewed the effects and interactions of sponges with sediment in suspension and after deposition. Despite sediment being considered to have a negative impact on suspension feeders (Gerrodette & Flechsig, 1979), many encrusting sponges appear to be able to survive in highly sedimented conditions, and, in fact, many species prefer such habitats (Bell & Barnes, 2001; Bell & Smith, 2004). While studying coralligenous assemblages of the Apulian continental shelf in the Mediterranean Sea, Piazzi et al. (2019) found that sedimentation was higher on deep outcrops and suggested that it was the main driver of differences between shallow and deep assemblages. Furthermore, in these areas of high sedimentation, an abundance of stress-tolerant organisms was observed, such as the anemone Parazoanthus axinellae (Piazzi et al., 2019).

Cliona celata can either have a boring life form (it bores into rock) or a massive form (grows on top of rock). With the boring form, only inhalant and exhalent papillae are visible just above the rock surface (Wood, 2007). The massive form has raised, rounded ridges with large specimens growing up to 1 m across and 50 cm high (Snowden, 2007). Haliclona viscosa is described as a cushion-forming species, which forms a thick crust which may reach a diameter of 30 to 40 cm and a height of 1.5 to 5cm (Topsent, 1888). Pachymatisma johnstonia can reach up to 15 cm in diameter and a height of up to 10 cm (Neish, 2007).

Pineda et al. (2017b) exposed three phototrophic (due to symbiotic algae) and two heterotrophic sponges from New Zealand to repeated deposition events and sediment cover over 80 to 100% of sponge surface to a depth of ca 0.5 mm for up to 30 days in laboratory conditions. All five species survived with minimal physiological effects. However, Wulff (2006) described mortality in three sponge groups following four weeks of complete burial under sediment; 16% of Amphimedon biomass died compared with 40% and 47% in Iotrochota and Aplysina, respectively. In Lough Hyne, a small (approx. 0.5 km2) lough on the southwest coast of Ireland, sponge communities experience varying levels of sedimentation, from negligible levels (3 ± 0.2 mm) to higher rates (18 to 34 g /m/ day), and sponges have been continually recorded in these areas under these levels of sedimentation (Micaroni et al., 2025). The complete disappearance of the ‘sponges associated’ with the sea squirt Ascidiella aspersa in the Black Sea near the Kerch Strait was attributed to siltation (Terent'ev, 2008 cited in Tillin & Tyler-Walters, 2014). It should also be noted that some of the characterizing sponges are likely to be buried by 5 cm of sediment deposition.

Bell et al. (2015) noted that upright forms intercepted a smaller amount of settling sediment than encrusting forms. For example, Bell & Barnes (2002; cited in Bell et al., 2015) reported considerable variation in the branching characteristics of Raspaillia ramosa and Stelligera stuposa across a sediment gradient in Lough Hyne, Northern Ireland, although the patterns were due to the interaction between sedimentation and water flow. Raspailia ramosa and Stelligera stuposa have a reduced maximum size in areas of high sedimentation (Bell et al., 2002). 

Hiscock & Jones (2004) reported that Axinella dissimilis (as Axinella polypoides) grew up to a height of ca. 30 cm. Axinella sponges are commonly found alongside Eunicella verrucosa and can therefore tolerate a similar/high level of smothering (Canessa et al., 2022). Ackers et al. (1992) described Axinella dissimilis as preferring clean oceanic water but tolerating silt. No evidence of smothering of axinellids was found.

Echinus esculentus are mobile, large globular urchins which can reach a diameter of 17 cm (Tyler-Walters, 2008). Comely & Ansell (1988) recorded large Echinus esculentus from kelp beds on the west coast of Scotland in which the substratum was seasonally covered with "high levels" of silt. This suggests that Echinus esculentus is unlikely to be killed by smothering. However, smaller specimens and juveniles may be less resistant. A layer of sediment may interfere with larval settlement. If retained within the host biotope for extended periods, a layer of 5 cm of sediment may negatively affect successive recruitment events.

Sensitivity assessment

CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp is recorded from moderately strong to negligible tidal currents (<1.5m/sec) in extremely exposed to moderately wave-exposed conditions (Connor et al., 2004; JNCC, 2022). Therefore, water movement (through wave action and/or tidal flow) would be expected to clear 5 cm of deposited sediment within a few tidal cycles. Smothering by 5 cm would cover the majority of Caryophyllia smithii and the smallest examples of the other characterizing species and could result in limited mortality. Caryophyllia smithii has been reported as quite tolerant of temporary burial, and the biotope occurs in moderate energy conditions, and the sediment would likely be removed rapidly. Therefore, resistance has been assessed as ‘High’, and resilience as ‘High’. Sensitivity has therefore been assessed as ‘Not Sensitive’.

High
Help
High
Help
Not sensitive
Help
Smothering and siltation rate changes (heavy) [Show more]

Smothering and siltation rate changes (heavy)

Benchmark. ‘Heavy’ deposition of up to 30 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single discrete event (Smothering pressure definition).

Evidence

Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii, and sponges are sessile and thus would be unable to avoid the deposition of a smothering layer of sediment. Some Alcyonium digitatum colonies can attain a height of up to 20 cm (Edwards, 2008), so they would still be able to feed in the event of sediment deposition. Smothering by 30 cm of sediment is likely to prevent feeding, and hence growth and reproduction, as well as respiration in the bryozoans. In addition, associated sediment abrasion may remove the bryozoan colonies. A layer of sediment will probably also interfere with larval settlement (Tyler-Walters, 2005c).

Caryophyllia smithii is a small (approx. <3 cm in height from the seabed) species and would therefore likely be inundated in a “light” sedimentation event. Coolen et al. (2015) noted how a low abundance of Caryophyllia smithii was typically observed at locations with low tidal current strength and high sedimentation. For example, in the Skomer Island, UK, Marine Conservation Zone, higher numbers of Caryophyllia smithii were observed on vertical walls, likely due to less surface sediment accumulating there (Lock et al., 2025). However, Bell & Turner (2000) reported that Caryophyllia smithii was abundant at sites of “moderate” sedimentation (7 mm ± 0.5 mm) in Lough Hyne. It is therefore likely that Caryophyllia smithii would be resistant to periodic sedimentation. If 30 cm of sediment were removed rapidly, via tidal currents, Caryophyllia smithii would likely remain within the biotope. Lock et al. (2006) partly attributed fluctuations in Caryophyllia smithii abundance at Skomer Island to surface sediment cover. Bell (2002) reported that juvenile Caryophyllia smithii are morphologically variable and initially undergo rapid growth with tall and thin forms in deeper, sheltered, relatively sedimented conditions near Lough Hyne, Ireland. It was concluded that this was to escape the thin layer of sediment present. Coolen et al. (2015) noted that a low abundance of Caryophyllia smithii was typically observed at locations with low tidal current strength and high sedimentation. Hiscock (1983) reported that Caryophyllia smithii was able to survive for five days smothered by fine sediment (mud) (Hiscock, 1983).  

Schönberg (2015) reviewed and observed the interactions between sediments and marine sponges in Australia and described the lack of research on Porifera. Bell et al. (2015) reviewed the effects and interactions of sponges with sediment in suspension and after deposition. Despite sediment being considered to have a negative impact on suspension feeders (Gerrodette & Flechsig, 1979), many encrusting sponges appear to be able to survive in highly sedimented conditions, and, in fact, many species prefer such habitats (Bell & Barnes, 2001; Bell & Smith, 2004). While studying coralligenous assemblages of the Apulian continental shelf in the Mediterranean Sea, Piazzi et al. (2019) found that sedimentation was higher on deep outcrops and suggested that it was the main driver of differences between shallow and deep assemblages. Furthermore, in these areas of high sedimentation, an abundance of stress-tolerant organisms was observed, such as the anemone Parazoanthus axinellae (Piazzi et al., 2019).

Cliona celata can either have a boring life form (it bores into rock) or a massive form (grows on top of rock). With the boring form, only inhalant and exhalant papillae are visible just above the rock surface (Wood, 2007). The massive form has raised, rounded ridges with large specimens growing up to 1 m across and 50 cm high (Snowden, 2007). Haliclona viscosa is described as a cushion-forming species, which forms a thick crust which may reach a diameter of 30 to 40 cm and a height of 1.5 to 5cm (Topsent, 1888). Pachymatisma johnstonia can reach up to 15 cm in diameter and a height of up to 10 cm (Neish, 2007).

Pineda et al. (2017b) exposed three phototrophic (due to symbiotic algae) and two heterotrophic sponges from New Zealand to repeated deposition events and sediment cover over 80 to 100% of sponge surface to a depth of ca 0.5 mm for up to 30 days in laboratory conditions. All five species survived with minimal physiological effects. However, Wulff (2006) described mortality in three sponge groups following four weeks of complete burial under sediment; 16% of Amphimedon biomass died compared with 40% and 47% in Iotrochota and Aplysina, respectively. In Lough Hyne, a small (approx. 0.5 km2) lough on the southwest coast of Ireland, sponge communities experience varying levels of sedimentation, from negligible levels (3 ± 0.2 mm) to higher rates (18 to 34 g /m/ day), and sponges have been continually recorded in these areas under these levels of sedimentation (Micaroni et al., 2025). The complete disappearance of the ‘sponges associated’ with the sea squirt Ascidiella aspersa in the Black Sea near the Kerch Strait was attributed to siltation (Terent'ev, 2008 cited in Tillin & Tyler-Walters, 2014). It should also be noted that most of the characterizing sponges are likely to be buried by 30 cm of sediment deposition.

Bell et al. (2015) noted that upright forms intercepted a smaller amount of settling sediment than encrusting forms. For example, Bell & Barnes (2002; cited in Bell et al., 2015) reported considerable variation in the branching characteristics of Raspaillia ramosa and Stelligera stuposa across a sediment gradient in Lough Hyne, Northern Ireland, although the patterns were due to the interaction between sedimentation and water flow. Raspailia ramosa and Stelligera stuposa have a reduced maximum size in areas of high sedimentation (Bell et al., 2002). 

Hiscock & Jones (2004) reported that Axinella dissimilis (as Axinella polypoides) grew up to a height of ca 30 cm. Axinella sponges are commonly found alongside Eunicella verrucosa and can therefore tolerate a similar/high level of smothering (Canessa et al., 2022). Ackers et al. (1992) described Axinella dissimilis as preferring clean oceanic water but tolerating silt. No evidence of smothering of axinellids was found.

Echinus esculentus are mobile, large globular urchins which can reach a diameter of 17 cm (Tyler-Walters, 2008). Comely & Ansell (1988) recorded large Echinus esculentus from kelp beds on the west coast of Scotland in which the substratum was seasonally covered with "high levels" of silt. This suggests that Echinus esculentus is unlikely to be killed by smothering, however, smaller specimens and juveniles may be less resistant. A layer of sediment may interfere with larval settlement. If retained within the host biotope for extended periods, a layer of 30 cm of sediment may negatively affect successive recruitment events.

Sensitivity assessment

CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp is recorded from moderately strong to negligible tidal currents (<1.5m/sec) in extremely exposed to moderately wave-exposed conditions (Connor et al., 2004; JNCC, 2022). Smothering by 30 cm of sediment could cause mortality amongst most characterizing species of this biotope if it remained on the surface of the seabed. In addition, only upward-facing areas within the biotope are likely to be affected, while vertical faces would be unaffected. Hence, the damage to the resident community would depend on the time taken for the deposited sediment to be removed. The biotope occurs in moderate energy environments, and it is likely that the sediment would be removed rapidly. Therefore, resistance has been assessed as ‘Medium’, and resilience as ‘High’. Sensitivity has therefore been assessed as ‘Low’.

Medium
Help
High
Help
Low
Help
Litter [Show more]

Litter

Benchmark. The introduction of man-made objects able to cause physical harm (surface, water column, seafloor or strandline) (Litter pressure definition). 

Evidence

All characterizing species for this biotope are sessile epifauna or slow-moving, being either encrusting, branching or cup-like, or having a fragile test. Physical disturbance by fishing gear has been shown to adversely affect sessile benthic and emergent epifaunal communities, with hydroid and bryozoan matrices reported to be greatly reduced in fished areas and increased when fishing activity is removed (Jennings & Kaiser, 1998; Sheehan et al., 2017; Kaiser et al., 2018). Both Sheehan et al. (2017) and Giusti et al. (2019) highlight how, in addition to the direct damage from fishing, ghost fishing may also be responsible for some coral mortality, Eunicella verrucosa in this case, either through direct damage or making them more vulnerable to removal from their anchorage to the sea floor, particularly during storms.

There are no records of ghost fishing affecting the characterizing species for this biotope. However, epifaunal communities are vulnerable to damage from fishing gear and are likely vulnerable to being dislodged or damaged through lost fishing gear, and possibly certain types of marine litter. At present, there is 'Insufficient evidence' to complete a sensitivity assessment on the effect of litter on this biotope.

Insufficient evidence (IEv)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Insufficient evidence (IEv)
Help
Electromagnetic changes [Show more]

Electromagnetic changes

Benchmark. A local electric field of 1 V/m or a local magnetic field of 10 µT (Electromagnetic pressure definition).

Evidence

Evidence on the effect of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) on benthic organisms is still severely lacking. Some studies have investigated the effect of anthropogenically induced EMFs on benthic invertebrates at intensities ranging between 2 nT and 40 mT, which is often much higher than in-situ measurements from subsea cables. While some report changes to behaviour, physiology, reproduction, development, immunology, cytotoxicity and orientation, others demonstrate no effect from exposure to the EMF (Albert et al., 2020; Hutchison et al., 2020), depending on the study species and duration and intensity of exposure. There have been no studies investigating the effect of EMFs at the population or community level for benthic organisms. 

One study exists on the effect of EMFs on Echinus esculentus. Chapman et al. (2023) simulated an EMF of 500 μT, as modelled for an export cable over a rocky shore, where the industry standard cable burial would not be possible; however, no significant differences were found in either behavioural or physiological responses in Echinus esculentus. A similar study was performed on the reef-forming annelid, Ficopomatus enigmaticus (Oliva et al., 2023). Sperm cells from this species were exposed to 0.5 and 1.0 mT of a static magnetic field. After only three hours of exposure, sperm fertilization rate was reduced, and significant increases in DNA damage and mitochondrial activity, indicative of a stress response, were reported. However, there is ‘Insufficient evidence’ on which to base an assessment of the likely sensitivity of this biotope to EMFs.

Insufficient evidence (IEv)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Insufficient evidence (IEv)
Help
Underwater noise changes [Show more]

Underwater noise changes

Benchmark. MSFD indicator levels (SEL or peak SPL) exceeded for 20% of days in a calendar year. Further detail

Evidence

Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii, Echinus esculentus, and sponges have no hearing perception, but vibrations may cause an impact; however, no studies exist to support an assessment (where relevant).

Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Introduction of light or shading [Show more]

Introduction of light or shading

Benchmark. A change in incident light via anthropogenic means (Introduced light or shade pressure definition).

Evidence

Although no evidence was found for the effect of light on the characterizing species, it is well understood that light influences the spawning of tropical corals, along with other environmental cues such as solar insolation, day length, and temperature (Davies et al., 2023; Egger et al., 2025). However, for temperate and intermediate-water species, some of these cues may be absent or differ significantly. Many cold-water corals live beyond the reach of moonlight, but the species in this biotope, Caryophyllia smithii, can be found within the first 200 m of depth where light, both natural and artificial, would reach (Holland, Jenkins & Stevens, 2017; Egger et al., 2025). In addition, shading of light or the introduction of light within the first 50 m could influence marine organisms, such as triggering early coral spawning or affecting the opening and reproduction rhythm of bivalves (Charifi et al., 2023; Davies et al., 2023; Smyth et al.,2021). Below 200 m, it is unlikely that these species would be impacted, as the light level that reaches beyond this point is very low and unsuitable for photosynthesis.

Jones et al. (2012) compiled a report on the monitoring of sponges around Skomer Island and found that many sponges, particularly encrusting species, preferred vertical or shaded bedrock to open, light surfaces, presumably due to a lack of competition from algae.

Sensitivity assessment

Whilst no evidence could be found for the effect of light on the characterizing species of these biotopes, it is unlikely that these species would be impacted. As a circalittoral biotope, a decrease in light (due to shading) is unlikely to be important as growth ceases for several red algae (such as Chondrus crispus) below ca. 1.0 μmol /m2/s (ca 50 Lux). However, an increase in light could be significant if it duplicated sunlight.

Although there is some evidence that the basiepithelial nerve plexus below the entire outer skin of echinoderms is sensitive to light (Hill, 2008), there is no evidence to suggest the impact of artificial light on echinoderms.

CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp is a circalittoral biotope and is thus by definition a naturally shaded environment with low light levels. Increased shading (e.g. by construction of a pontoon, pier, etc.) could be beneficial to the characterizing species within these biotopes. However, given the rapid expansion of the evidence base and the continuing lack of data at the level of individual biotopes, resistance and resilience cannot be robustly assessed. Sensitivity is therefore recorded as ‘Insufficient evidence’.

Insufficient evidence (IEv)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Insufficient evidence (IEv)
Help
Barrier to species movement [Show more]

Barrier to species movement

Benchmark. A permanent or temporary barrier to species movement over ≥50% of water body width or a 10% change in tidal excursion (Barrier to species movement pressure definition).

Evidence

Barriers and changes in tidal excursion are 'Not relevant' to biotopes restricted to open waters.

Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Death or injury by collision [Show more]

Death or injury by collision

Benchmark. Injury or mortality from collisions of biota with both static or moving structures due to 0.1% of tidal volume on an average tide, passing through an artificial structure (Death for collision pressure definition).

Evidence

'Not relevant' to seabed habitats. NB. Collision by grounding vessels is addressed under ‘surface abrasion’.

Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Visual disturbance [Show more]

Visual disturbance

Benchmark. The daily duration of transient visual cues exceeds 10% of the period of site occupancy by the feature (Visual disturbance pressure definition). 

Evidence

'Not relevant'

Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help

Biological Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
Genetic modification & translocation of indigenous species [Show more]

Genetic modification & translocation of indigenous species

Benchmark. Translocation of indigenous species or the introduction of genetically modified or genetically different populations of indigenous species may result in changes in the genetic structure of local populations, hybridization, or a change in community structure (Translocation pressure definition).

Evidence

Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii, Spirobranchus triqueter and sponges are not commercially cultivated within the UK or likely to be translocated. Xavier et al. (2010) suggested Cliona celtata was in fact a species complex of potentially four morphologically indistinct species. Cliona celata is also a “pest” species within scallop mariculture (Carver et al., 2010), where Cliona celata bores into reared scallop shells. It is therefore conceivable that separate species within the Cliona celata species complex could be transported outside of its traditional range, however, at the time of writing, there is no evidence to suggest translocation would negatively affect CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp. Echinus esculentus was identified by Kelly & Pantazis (2001) as a species suitable for culture for the urchin Roe industry. However, at the time of writing, no evidence could be found to suggest that significant Echinus esculentus mariculture was present in the UK. If industrially cultivated, it is feasible that Echinus esculentus individuals could be translocated. This pressure is therefore considered ‘Not relevant’ at the time of writing.

Translocation also has the potential to transport pathogens to uninfected areas (see pressure ‘introduction of microbial pathogens’). The sensitivity of the ‘donor’ population to harvesting to supply stock for translocation is assessed for the pressure ‘removal of target species’.

Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Introduction of microbial pathogens [Show more]

Introduction of microbial pathogens

Benchmark. The introduction of relevant microbial pathogens or metazoan disease vectors to an area where they are currently not present (e.g. Martelia refringens and Bonamia, Avian influenza virus, viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia virus) (pathogen or disease pressure definition).

Evidence

‘No evidence’ was found to suggest that any of the characterizing species within CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp are sensitive to current/known microbial pathogens.

Alcyonium digitatum acts as the host for the endoparasitic species Enalcyonium forbesi and Enalcyonium rubicundum (Stock, 1988). Parasitisation may reduce the viability of a colony but not to the extent of killing them but no further evidence was found to substantiate this suggestion. Thomas (1940) recorded parasites of Spirobranchus triqueter. Trichodina pediculus (a ciliate) was observed in high numbers moving over the branchial crown. However, this relationship is symbiotic, not parasitic. Parasites found in the worm include gregarines & ciliated protozoa, and parasites that had the appearance of sporozoan cysts. However, no information was found about the effects of microbial pathogens on Spirobranchus triqueter. Echinus esculentus is susceptible to 'Bald-sea-urchin disease', which causes lesions, loss of spines, tube feet, pedicellariae, destruction of the upper layer of skeletal tissue and death. It is thought to be caused by the bacteria Vibrio anguillarum and Aeromonas salmonicida. Bald sea-urchin disease was recorded from Echinus esculentus on the Brittany Coast. Although associated with mass mortalities of Strongylocentrotus franciscanus in California and Paracentrotus lividus in the French Mediterranean, it is not known whether the disease induces mass mortality (Bower, 1996). At the time of writing, there was no evidence concerning microbial pathogens that may affect Cliona celata.

No evidence (NEv)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
No evidence (NEv)
Help
Removal of target species [Show more]

Removal of target species

Benchmark. Removal of species targeted by fishery, shellfishery or harvesting at a commercial or recreational scale (targeted removal pressure definition).

Evidence

At the time of writing, none of the characterizing species within CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp are commercially exploited. This pressure is considered ‘Not Relevant’.

Echinus esculentus was identified by Kelly & Pantazis (2001) as a species suitable for culture for the urchin Roe industry. However, at the time of writing, no evidence could be found to suggest that significant Echinus esculentus mariculture was present in the UK. Removal of Echinus esculentus from CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp could cause an increase in algal growth, which may limit the growth of faunal species (Bell & Turner, 2000; Connor et al., 2004).

Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Removal of non-target species [Show more]

Removal of non-target species

Benchmark. Removal of features or incidental non-targeted catch (by-catch) through targeted fishery, shellfishery or harvesting at a commercial or recreational scale (non-targeted removed pressure definition).

Evidence

Faunal turf communities are probably resistant to abrasion through bottom fishing (see abrasion pressure).

Alcyonium digitatum goes through an annual cycle, From Febuary to July, all Alcyonium digitatum colonies are feeding, from July to November, an increasing number of colonies stop feeding. During this period, a large number of polyps can retract, and a variety of filamentous algae, hydroids and amphipods can colonize the surface of colonies epiphytically. From December-February the epiphytic community is, however, sloughed off (Hartnoll, 1975). If Alcyonium digitatum were removed, the epiphytic species would likely colonize rock surfaces and are therefore not dependent on Alcyonium digitatum.

Within CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii, Spirobranchus triqueter and sponges spatially compete, however, at the time of writing, there isn’t any evidence to suggest other interspecific relationships or dependencies between these species. Therefore, removal of 1 or a number of these species would provide colonization space and most likely benefit the species with rapid colonization rates (e.g. Spirobranchus triqueter). Echinus esculentus is an important red algae grazer within CR.MCR.EcCr (Connor et al., 2004), without which the abundance of red algae may increase and possibly displace some of the faunal turf species. If Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii, Spirobranchus triqueter and sponges were removed, this would alter the character of the biotope.

Sensitivity assessment

Resistance has been assessed as ‘Medium’, resilience has been assessed as ’High’. Sensitivity has been assessed as ‘Low’.

Medium
Help
High
Help
Low
Help

Introduction or spread of invasive non-indigenous species (INIS) Pressures

Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
The American slipper limpet, Crepidula fornicata [Show more]

The American slipper limpet, Crepidula fornicata

Evidence

Crepidula fornicata larvae require hard substrata for settlement. It prefers muddy, gravelly, shell-rich substrata that include gravel, the shells of other Crepidula, or other species, e.g., oysters and mussels. It is highly gregarious and seeks out adult shells for settlement, forming characteristic ‘stacks’ of adults. But it also recorded from rock, artificial substrata, and Sabellaria alveolata reefs (Blanchard, 1997, 2009; Bohn et al., 2012, 2013a, 2013b, 2015; De Montaudouin et al., 2018; Hinz et al., 2011; Helmer et al., 2019; Powell-Jennings & Calloway, 2018; Preston et al., 2020; Tillin et al., 2020). Close examination of the literature (2023) shows that evidence of its colonization and density on bedrock in the infralittoral or circalittoral was lacking. Tillin et al. (2020) suggested that Crepidula could colonize circalittoral rock due to its presence on tide-swept rough grounds at 60 metres in the English Channel (Hinz et al., 2011). However, Hinz et al. (2011) reported that Crepidula fornicata only dominated one assemblage (with an average of 181 individuals per trawl) on a gravel substratum with boulders. Bohn et al. (2015) noted that Crepidula occurred at low density or was absent in areas dominated by boulders. Bohn et al. (2013a, 2013b, 2015) and Preston et al. (2020) showed that while Crepidula could settle on slate panels or ‘stone’, it preferred shell, especially that of conspecifics. In addition, no evidence was found of the effect of Crepidula populations on faunal turf-dominated habitats. It was only recorded at low density (0.1-0.9/m2) in one faunal turf biotope (CR.MCR.CFaVS.CuSpH.As) (JNCC, 2015). Faunal turfs are dominated by suspension feeders, so larval predation is probably high, which may prevent colonization by Crepidula. Also, faunal turf species actively compete for space, and many are fast-growing and opportunistic, so they may out-compete Crepidula for space even if it gained a foothold in the community. 

Sensitivity assessment

The wave-exposed circalittoral rock characterizing this biotope is likely to be unsuitable for the colonization by Crepidula fornicataCrepidula has been recorded from areas of strong tidal streams (Hinz et al., 2011), and has been recorded from the lower intertidal to ca 160 m in depth, but it is most common in the shallow subtidal above 50 m (Blanchard, 1997; Thieltges et al., 2003; Bohn et al., 2012, 2015; Hinz et al., 2011; OBIS, 2023; Tillin et al., 2020). Therefore, colonization of Crepidula would be limited to low densities in deeper examples of the biotope. However, no evidence was found of the effect of Crepidula populations on faunal turf-dominated habitats or circalittoral rock habitats. At present, there is 'Insufficient evidence' to suggest that the circalittoral rock biotopes are sensitive to colonization by Crepidula fornicata; further evidence is required.

Insufficient evidence (IEv)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Insufficient evidence (IEv)
Help
The carpet sea squirt, Didemnum vexillum [Show more]

The carpet sea squirt, Didemnum vexillum

Evidence

The carpet sea squirt Didemnum vexillum (syn. Didemnum vestitum; Didemnum vestum) is a colonial ascidian with rapidly expanding populations that have invaded most temperate coastal regions around the world (Kleeman, 2009; Stefaniak et al., 2012; Tillin et al., 2020). It is an ‘ecosystem engineer’ that can change or modify invaded habitats and alter biodiversity (Griffith et al., 2009; Mercer et al., 2009). Didemnum vexillum has colonized and established populations in the northeast Pacific, Canadian and USA coast; New Zealand; France, Spain, and the Wadden Sea, Netherlands; the Mediterranean Sea and Adriatic Sea (Bullard et al., 2007; Coutts & Forrest, 2007; Dijkstra et al., 2007; Valentine et al., 2007a; Valentine et al., 2007b; Lambert, 2009; Hitchin, 2012; Tagliapietra et al., 2012; Gittenberger et al., 2015; Vercaemer et al., 2015; McKenzie et al., 2017; Cinar & Ozgul, 2023; Holt, 2024). In the UK, Didemnum vexillum has colonized Holyhead marina and Milford Haven, Wales; the west coast of Scotland (marinas around Largs, Clyde, Loch Creran and Loch Fyne), South Devon (Plymouth, Yealm, and Dartmouth estuaries), the Solent, northern Kent, Essex, and Suffolk coasts (Griffith et al., 2009; Lambert, 2009; Hitchin, 2012; Minchin & Nunn, 2013; Bishop et al., 2015; McKenzie et al., 2017; Tillin et al., 2020, Holt, 2024; NBN, 2024).

Although a widespread invader, Didemnum vexillum has a limited ability for natural dispersal since the pelagic larvae remain in the water column for a short time (up to 36 hours). Therefore, it has a short dispersal phase that can allow the species to build localized populations (Herborg et al., 2009; Vercaemer et al., 2015; Holt, 2024). However, Bullard et al. (2007) suggested that Didemnum vexillum can form new colonies asexually by fragmentation. Colonies can produce long tendrils from an encrusting colony, which can fragment, disperse and settle, attaching to suitable hard substrata elsewhere (Bullard et al., 2007; Lambert, 2009; Stefaniak & Whitlatch, 2014). A fragmented colony can spread naturally for up to three weeks, transported by ocean currents, attached to floating seaweed, seagrass or other floating biota, or as free-floating spherical colonies (Bullard et al., 2007; Lengyel et al., 2009; Stefaniak & Whitlatch, 2014; Holt, 2024). Fragments can reattach to suitable substrata within six hours of contact. Fragments have the potential to disperse around 20 km before reattachment (Lengyel et al., 2009). Valentine et al. (2007a) reported that colonies of Didemnum vexillum enlarged by 6 to 11 times by asexual budding after 15 days and enlarged 11 to 19 times after 30 days. Valentine et al. (2007a) concluded fragments could successfully grow, survive, and help to spread Didemnum vexillum.

While natural fragmentation of tendrils is thought to allow Didemnum vexillum to invade longer distances and increase its dispersal potential, Stefaniak & Whitlatch (2014) found that only one tendril out of 80 reattached to the flat, bare substrata used in their study, because tendrils required an extensive (at least eight-hour) period of contact to reattach. Stefaniak & Whitlatch (2014) suggested that once fragmented from a colony, the success of tendril reattachment was limited, and reattachment was not a major contributor to the invasive success of Didemnum vexillum. However, Stefaniak & Whitlatch (2014) also found that larvae-packed tendril fragments may increase natural dispersal distance, reproduction, and invasive success of Didemnum vexillum, and increase the distance larvae can travel. Not all colonies produce tendrils at all locations.

Human-mediated transport via aquaculture facilities, boat hulls, commercial fishing vessels, and ballast water is probably the most important vector that has aided the long-distance dispersal of Didemnum vexillum and explains its prevalence in harbours and marinas (Bullard et al., 2007; Dijkstra et al., 2007; Griffith et al., 2009; Herborg et al., 2009). Fragmentation of colonies during transport or human disturbance (such as trawling or dredging) could indirectly disperse the species and enable it to find suitable conditions for establishment (Herborg et al., 2009). For example, in oyster farms in British Columbia, large fragments of Didemnum sp. come off oyster strings when they are pulled out of water, and other fragments can be pulled off oysters and mussels and thrown back into the water, which is likely to aid dispersal of the invasive species (Bullard et al., 2007). Dijkstra et al. (2007) hypothesised that Didemnum sp. was introduced to the Gulf of Maine with oyster aquaculture in the Damariscotta River and transported via Pacific oysters.

Didemnum vexillum was likely introduced into the UK from northern Europe or Ireland via poorly maintained or not antifouled vessels, movement of contaminated shellfish stock and aquaculture equipment, or via marine industries such as oil, gas, renewables, and dredging (Holt, 2024). Recent evidence from genetic material suggests that human-mediated dispersal between marinas and shellfish culture sites is the most likely pathway for connectivity of Didemnum vexillum populations throughout Ireland and Britain (Prentice et al., 2021; Holt, 2024). Didemnum vexillum can disperse away from artificial substrata, invading and colonizing natural substrata in surrounding areas (Tillin et al., 2020). Holt (2024) noted that Didemnum vexillum had not spread as far as feared in the UK since it was first recorded. The current evidence of Didemnum vexillum’s ability to spread on natural habitats in this area is sparse and often conflicting, complicated by genetics, its apparent variable habitat preferences and tolerances and its variable ability to adapt to ‘new’ conditions (Holt 2024).

Didemnum vexillum has a seasonal growth cycle that is influenced by temperature (Valentine et al., 2007a). In warmer months (June and July), colonies may be large and well-developed encrusting mats. Populations experience more rapid growth from July to September, sometimes continuing into December. Colonies begin to decline in health and ‘die-off’ when temperatures drop below 5°C during winter months from around October to April (Gittenberger, 2007; Valentine et al., 2007a; Herborg et al., 2009). Cold-water months cause colonies to regress and reduce in size, yet they often regenerate as temperatures warm (Griffith et al., 2009; Kleeman, 2009; Mercer et al., 2009), although some populations may not survive winter at all (Dijkstra et al., 2007). The early growth phase, from May to July, is initiated by smaller colonies developing from remnants of colonies that survived the cold water (Valentine et al., 2007a). The seasonal growth cycle is also likely influenced by location. For example, the Didemnum sp. growth cycle for colonies in Sandwich tide pool (temperature range from -1 °C to 24 °C, with daily fluctuations) probably does not occur in deep offshore subtidal habitats in Georges Bank (annual temperature range from 4 °C to 15°C, and daily fluctuations are minimal) (Valentine et al., 2007a). Larval release and recruitment typically occur between 14 and 20°C and slow or cease below 9 to 11°C as summer ends (Griffith et al., 2009; McKenzie et al., 2017). In New Zealand, recruitment occurs from November to July, where the highest average temperatures were recorded in February (18 to 22°C), and the lowest average temperatures were recorded in July (9 to 10°C) (Fletcher et al., 2013a). In this New Zealand study, higher water temperatures were associated with a higher level of recruitment (Fletcher et al., 2013a).

Didemnum vexillum requires suitable hard substrata for successful settlement and the establishment of colonies. It can grow quickly and establish large colonies of dense encrusting mats on a variety of hard substrata (Valentine et al., 2007a; Griffith et al., 2009; Lambert, 2009; Groner et al., 2011; Cinar & Ozgul, 2023). Gittenberger (2007) stated that invasive Didemnum sp. was a threat to native ecosystems because of its ability to overgrow virtually all hard substrata present. Suitable hard substrata can include rocky substrata such as bedrock, gravel, pebble, cobble, or boulders or artificial substrata such as a variety of maritime structures, such as pontoons, docks, wood and metal pilings, chains, ropes and moorings, plastic and ship hulls and at aquaculture facilities (Valentine et al., 2007a&b; Bullard et al., 2007; Griffith et al., 2009; Lambert, 2009; Tagliapietra et al., 2012; Tillin et al., 2020). Didemnum vexillum has been reported colonizing these types of hard substrata in the USA, Canada, northern Kent, and the Solent (Bullard et al., 2007; Valentine et al., 2007a; Valentine et al., 2007b; Hitchin, 2012; Vercaemer et al., 2015; Tillin et al., 2020).

Didemnum vexillum has the ability to rapidly overgrow and displace on other sessile organisms such as other colonial ascidians (Ciona intestinalis, Styela clava, Ascidiella aspera, Botrylloides violaceus, Botryllus schlosseri, Diplosoma listerianium and Aplidium spp.), bryozoan, hydroids, sponges (Clione celata and Halichrondria sp.), anemone (Diadumene cincta), calcareous tube worms, eelgrass (Zostera marina), kelp (Laminaria spp. and Agarum sp.), green algae (Codium fragile subsp. fragile), red algae (Plocamium, Chondrus crispus and bush weed Agardhiella subulata), brown algae (Ascophyllum nodosum, Sargassum, Halidrys, Fucus evanescens and Fucus serratus), calcareous algae (Corallina officinalis), mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis, Perna canaliculus  and Mytilus edulis), barnacles, oysters (Magallana gigas, Ostrea edulis and Crassostrea virginica), sea scallops (Placopecten magellanicus), or dead shells (Dijkstra et al., 2007; Gittenberger, 2007; Valentine et al., 2007a; Valentine et al., 2007b; Griffith et al., 2009; Carman & Grunden, 2010; Dijkstra & Nolan, 2011; Groner et al., 2011; Hitchin, 2012; Tagliapietra et al., 2012; Minchin & Nunn, 2013; Gittenberger et al., 2015; Long & Groholz, 2015; Vercaemer et al., 2015).

In contrast, Didemnum vexillum ​​​​​​has a preference for sheltered conditions, as established colonies observed in Georges Bank and Long Island Sound were exposed to moderately strong tidal currents (1 to 2 knots; ca 0.5 to 1 m/s recorded at both sites) that may mobilise sediment (Valentine et al., 2007b; Mercer et al., 2009; Tillin et al., 2020). However, Valentine et al. (2007b) describe the substratum as immobile, presumably consolidated, gravel, cobbles, and pebbles. Kleeman (2009) stated that the presence of a consistent mild wave action or ‘swash zone’ appears to favour Didemnum sp. establishment in the intertidal. Although some evidence suggests that waves and currents can facilitate the fragmentation and spread of Didemnum vexillum (McKenzie et al., 2017), the tidal current velocities at some sites where Didemnum vexillum has been reported (for example, New England, where current velocities reach up to around 3 m/s) is lower than the current velocity required for the dislodgement of Didemnum vexillum fragments (around 7.6 m/s) (Reinhardt et al., 2012). This suggests that not all tidal currents are likely to dislodge Didemnum vexillum fragments. When on boat hulls, the species can experience higher current velocities, which are enough to cause dislodgement (Reinhardt et al., 2012).

Sensitivity assessment

Didemnum vexillum has been recorded in the sublittoral to depths of 81 m in Georges Bank and 30 m in Long Island, USA (Bullard et al., 2007; Valentine et al., 2007b; Mercer et al., 2009). This biotope, and child biotopes, occurs on bedrock, which could provide a suitable hard substratum for colonization by Didemnum sp. Didemnum vexillum is reported to prefer sheltered conditions but has also been recorded in moderately strong currents (Valentine et al., 2007b; Mercer et al., 2009; Tillin et al., 2020) and is predicted to survive stronger currents, as the current velocity which will dislodge Didemnum vexillum is around 7.6 m/s (Reinhardt et al., 2012). This biotope, and child biotopes, experiences very weak to moderately strong water flow (1 to 3 m/s) and moderately exposed to extremely exposed wave exposure. However, the effect of wave action reduces with depth, so it is possible that only the most wave-exposed examples of the biotope could be unsuitable for DidemnumDidemnum vexillum regresses as temperatures decline in winter, so shallow examples may be able to recover their condition in winter (Gittenberger, 2007; Valentine et al., 2007a; Herborg et al., 2009). However, deeper examples may not experience enough temperature change to trigger the decline in Didemnum vexillum (Valentine et al., 2007a). The EcCR.CarSp biotopes are characterized by grazing, primarily due to Echinus esculentus, a general forager and grazer of faunal and floral turfs. Switzer et al. (2011) reported that green (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) and red (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) sea urchins consumed this tunicate, but concluded that Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis was an ineffective biological control for the tunicate in oyster culture. No evidence was found to suggest that Echinus could not consume Didemnum, but the sea squirt’s ability to produce acidic secretions suggests it could be unpalatable. If Didemnum sp. could gain a 'foothold', it might overgrow, smother or cause mortality of epifauna. Holt (2024) noted that Didemnum vexillum had not spread as far as feared in the UK since it was first recorded. Therefore, a resistance of 'Medium' (some, <25% mortality) is suggested as a precaution in case Didemnum vexillum could colonize the biotope, but with 'Low' confidence due to the lack of direct evidence. Resilience is assessed as 'Very low' as recovery would require the physical removal of Didemnum sp., so sensitivity is assessed as 'Medium'. 

Medium
Help
Very Low
Help
Medium
Help
The Pacific oyster, Magallana gigas [Show more]

The Pacific oyster, Magallana gigas

Evidence

Most of the evidence indicates that circalittoral rock and other habitats that occur at depths more than 10 m are unlikely to be suitable for Magallana gigas because it is considered an intertidal and shallow subtidal species rarely recorded below extreme low water (Herbert et al., 2012, 2016; Tillin et al., 2020). Therefore, this biotope is probably 'Not sensitive to this INIS.

High
Help
High
Help
Not sensitive
Help
Wireweed, Sargassum muticum [Show more]

Wireweed, Sargassum muticum

Evidence

The depth and sedimentation probably exclude macroalgae from this biotope. Hence, it is unlikely to be colonized by Sargassum. Therefore, this biotope is probably 'Not sensitive to this INIS.

High
Help
High
Help
Not sensitive
Help
Wakame, Undaria pinnatifida [Show more]

Wakame, Undaria pinnatifida

Evidence

The depth and sedimentation probably exclude macroalgae from this biotope. Hence, it is unlikely to be colonized by Undaria. Therefore, this biotope is probably 'Not sensitive’ to this INIS.

High
Help
High
Help
Not sensitive
Help
Other INIS [Show more]

Other INIS

Evidence

This biotope is classified as circalittoral, and therefore no algal species have been considered. Several invasive bryozoans are of concern, including Bugula neritina (Porter et al., 2017), Schizoporella japonica (Ryland et al., 2014) and Tricellaria inopinata (Dyrynda et al., 2000; Cook et al., 2013b), however, evidence of potential effects is sparse. Limited evidence exists for Bugula neritina in the UK; however, it was found in Northern Ireland for the first time in 2006, then seen again in both 2008 and 2013 in abundance and attached to buoys and kelp stipes throughout Carrickfergus Marina (Porter et al., 2017). Tricellaria inopinata has been reported to colonize the byssal threads of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialisHymeniacidon perleve and the ascidian Styela plicata (Dyrynda et al., 2000). Tricellaria inopinata dominated the fouling community in the Lagoon of Venice, within seven years of being introduced (Ambrogi, 2000). At present, there is 'Insufficient evidence' to suggest that the circalittoral biotopes are sensitive to colonization by algal or other invasive species; further evidence is required.

Insufficient evidence (IEv)
Help
Not relevant (NR)
Help
Insufficient evidence (IEv)
Help

Bibliography

  1. Abelouah, M., Ben-Haddad, M., Hajji, S., Nouj, N., Ouheddou, M., Mghili, B., De-la-Torre, G., Costa, L., Banni, M. & Alla, A., 2024. Exploring marine biofouling on anthropogenic litter in the Atlantic coastline of Morocco. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 199. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115938

  2. Ackers, R.G.A., Moss, D. & Picton, B.E. 1992. Sponges of the British Isles (Sponges: V): a colour guide and working document. Ross-on-Wye: Marine Conservation Society.

  3. Airoldi, L., 2000. Responses of algae with different life histories to temporal and spatial variability of disturbance in subtidal reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 195 (8), 81-92.

  4. Albert, L., Deschamps, F., Jolivet, A., Olivier, F., Chauvaud, L. & Chauvaud, S., 2020. A current synthesis on the effects of electric and magnetic fields emitted by submarine power cables on invertebrates. Marine Environmental Research, 159. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104958

  5. Alexander, W., Southgate, B.A. & Bassindale, R., 1935. Survey of the River Tees: The Estuary, Chemical and Biological. HM Stationery Office.

  6. Allen, J., Slinn, D., Shummon, T., Hurtnoll, R. & Hawkins, S., 1998. Evidence for eutrophication of the Irish Sea over four decades. Limnology and Oceanography, 43 (8), 1970-1974.

  7. Althaus, F., Williams, A., Schlacher, T., Kloser, R., Green, M., Barker, B., Bax, N., Brodie, P. & Schlacher-Hoenlinger, M., 2009. Impacts of bottom trawling on deep-coral ecosystems of seamounts are long-lasting. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 397, 279-294. DOI https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08248

  8. Ambrogi, A.O., 2000. Biotic invasions in a Mediterranean lagoon. Biological Invasions, 2 (2), 165-176.

  9. Anchondo, Z., Tracy, A., Raza, A., Meckler, K. & Ogburn, M., 2024. Reefs in no-take reserves host more oysters, macroparasites, and macrofauna than harvested reefs across an estuarine salinity gradient. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 739, 65–83. DOI http://doi.org/10.3354/meps14615

  10. Antoniadou, C., Voultsiadou, E. & Chintiroglou, C., 2010. Benthic colonization and succession on temperate sublittoral rocky cliffs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 382 (2), 145-153.

  11. Ayling, A.L., 1983. Factors affecting the spatial distributions of thinly encrusting sponges from temperate waters. Oecologia, 60 (3), 412-418.

  12. Bacescu, M.C., 1972. Substratum: Animals. In: Marine Ecology: A Comprehensive Treatise on Life in Oceans and Coastal Waters. Volume 1 Environmental Factors Part 3. (ed. O. Kinne ). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

  13. Balazy, P. & Kuklinski, P., 2018. Year-to-year variability of epifaunal assemblages on a mobile hard substrate-Case study from high latitudes. Marine Ecology-an Evolutionary Perspective, 39 (6). DOI http://doi.org/10.1111/maec.12533

  14. Barrett, N., Harper, E., Last, K., Reinardy, H. & Peck, L., 2024. Behavioural and physiological impacts of low salinity on the sea urchin Echinus esculentus. Journal of Experimental Biology, 227 (2). DOI http://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.246707

  15. Becker, L., Bartholomä, A., Singer, A., Bischof, K., Coers, S. & Kröncke, I., 2020. Small-scale distribution modeling of benthic species in a protected natural hard ground area in the German North Sea (Helgolander Steingrund). Geo-Marine Letters, 40 (2), 167–181. DOI http://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-019-00598-8

  16. Bell, J.J. & Barnes, D.K., 2001. Sponge morphological diversity: a qualitative predictor of species diversity? Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 11 (2), 109-121.

  17. Bell, J.J. & Smith, D., 2004. Ecology of sponge assemblages (Porifera) in the Wakatobi region, south-east Sulawesi, Indonesia: richness and abundance. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK, 84 (3), 581-591.

  18. Bell, J.J. & Turner, J.R., 2000. Factors influencing the density and morphometrics of the cup coral Caryophyllia smithii in Lough Hyne. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 80, 437-441. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400002137

  19. Bell, J.J., 2002. Morphological responses of a cup coral to environmental gradients. Sarsia, 87, 319-330. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/00364820260400825

  20. Bell, J.J., McGrath, E., Biggerstaff, A., Bates, T., Bennett, H., Marlow, J. & Shaffer, M., 2015. Sediment impacts on marine sponges. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 94 (1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.03.030

  21. Bell, J., Micaroni, V., Wood, G., Hughes, M., Donnelly, A. & McAllen, R., 2024. Contrasting patterns of decadal stability for shallow water sponge boulder assemblages and subtidal rocky cliffs at Lough Hyne, Ireland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 104. DOI http://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315424000493

  22. Berman, J., Burton, M., Gibbs, R., Lock, K., Newman, P., Jones, J. & Bell, J., 2013. Testing the suitability of a morphological monitoring approach for identifying temporal variability in a temperate sponge assemblage. Journal for Nature Conservation, 21 (3), 173-182. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.12.003

  23. Beszczynska-Möller, A., & Dye, S.R., 2013. ICES Report on Ocean Climate 2012. In ICES Cooperative Research Report, vol. 321 pp. 73.

  24. Betti, F., Bavestrello, G., Fravega, L., Bo, M., Coppari, M., Enrichetti, F., Cappanera, V., Venturini, S. & Cattaneo-Vietti, R., 2019. On the effects of recreational SCUBA diving on fragile benthic species: The Portofino MPA (NW Mediterranean Sea) case study. Ocean & Coastal Management, 182. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104926

  25. Bishop, G.M. & Earll, R., 1984. Studies on the populations of Echinus esculentus at the St Abbs and Skomer voluntary Marine Nature Reserves. Progress in Underwater Science, 9, 53-66.

  26. Bishop, G.M., 1985. Aspects of the reproductive ecology of the sea urchin Echinus esculentus L. Ph.D. thesis, University of Exeter, UK.

  27. Bishop, J. D. D., Wood, C. A., Yunnie, A. L. E. & Griffiths, C. A., 2015. Unheralded arrivals: non-native sessile invertebrates in marinas on the English coast. Aquatic Invasions, 10 (3), 249-264. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2015.10.3.01

  28. Blanchard, M., 2009. Recent expansion of the slipper limpet population (Crepidula fornicata) in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel (Western Channel, France). Aquatic Living Resources, 22 (1), 11-19. DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2009004

  29. Blanchard, M., 1997. Spread of the slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata (L.1758) in Europe. Current state and consequences. Scientia Marina, 61, Supplement 9, 109-118. Available from: http://scimar.icm.csic.es/scimar/index.php/secId/6/IdArt/290/

  30. Bohn, K., Richardson, C. & Jenkins, S., 2012. The invasive gastropod Crepidula fornicata: reproduction and recruitment in the intertidal at its northernmost range in Wales, UK, and implications for its secondary spread. Marine Biology, 159 (9), 2091-2103. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-1997-3

  31. Bohn, K., Richardson, C.A. & Jenkins, S.R., 2015. The distribution of the invasive non-native gastropod Crepidula fornicata in the Milford Haven Waterway, its northernmost population along the west coast of Britain. Helgoland Marine Research, 69 (4), 313.

  32. Bohn, K., Richardson, C.A. & Jenkins, S.R., 2013a. Larval microhabitat associations of the non-native gastropod Crepidula fornicata and effects on recruitment success in the intertidal zone. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 448, 289-297. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2013.07.020

  33. Bohn, K., Richardson, C.A. & Jenkins, S.R., 2013b. The importance of larval supply, larval habitat selection and post-settlement mortality in determining intertidal adult abundance of the invasive gastropod Crepidula fornicata. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 440, 132-140. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.12.008

  34. Boolootian, R.A.,1966. Physiology of Echinodermata. (Ed. R.A. Boolootian), pp. 822. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  35. Bosch-Belmar, M., Milanese, M., Sarà, A., Mobilia, V. & Sarà, G., 2024. Effect of Acute Thermal Stress Exposure on Ecophysiological Traits of the Mediterranean Sponge Chondrilla nucula: Implications for Climate Change. Biology-Basel, 13 (1). DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13010009

  36. Boulcott, P. & Howell, T.R.W., 2011. The impact of scallop dredging on rocky-reef substrata. Fisheries Research (Amsterdam), 110 (3), 415-420.

  37. Bower, S.M., 1996. Synopsis of Infectious Diseases and Parasites of Commercially Exploited Shellfish: Bald-sea-urchin Disease. [On-line]. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. [cited 26/01/16]. Available from: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/science/aah-saa/diseases-maladies/bsudsu-eng.html

  38. Braber, L. & Borghouts, C.H., 1977. Distribution and ecology of Anthozoa in the estuarine region of the rivers Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt. Hydrobiologia, 52, 15-21.

  39. Bradshaw, C., Veale, L.O., Hill, A.S. & Brand, A.R., 2000. The effects of scallop dredging on gravelly seabed communities. In: Effects of fishing on non-target species and habitats (ed. M.J. Kaiser & de S.J. Groot), pp. 83-104. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

  40. Bryan, G.W., 1984. Pollution due to heavy metals and their compounds. In Marine Ecology: A Comprehensive, Integrated Treatise on Life in the Oceans and Coastal Waters, vol. 5. Ocean Management, part 3, (ed. O. Kinne), pp.1289-1431. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  41. Bucklin, A., 1987. Growth and asexual reproduction of the sea anemone Metridium: comparative laboratory studies of three species. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 110, 41-52.

  42. Budd, G.C. 2008. Alcyonium digitatum Dead man's fingers. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1187

  43. Bullard, S. G., Lambert, G., Carman, M. R., Byrnes, J., Whitlatch, R. B., Ruiz, G., Miller, R. J., Harris, L., Valentine, P. C., Collie, J. S., Pederson, J., McNaught, D. C., Cohen, A. N., Asch, R. G., Dijkstra, J. & Heinonen, K., 2007. The colonial ascidian Didemnum sp. A: Current distribution, basic biology and potential threat to marine communities of the northeast and west coasts of North America. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 342 (1), 99-108. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.020

  44. Bullimore, B., 1985. An investigation into the effects of scallop dredging within the Skomer Marine Reserve. Report to the Nature Conservancy Council by the Skomer Marine Reserve Subtidal Monitoring Project, S.M.R.S.M.P. Report, no 3., Nature Conservancy Council.

  45. Bustamante, M., Tajadura-Martín, F.J. & Saiz-Salinas, J.I., 2010. Temporal and spatial variability on rocky intertidal macrofaunal assemblages affected by an oil spill (Basque coast, northern Spain). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 90 (07), 1305-1317.

  46. Carballo, J., Naranjo, S. & García-Gómez, J., 1996. Use of marine sponges as stress indicators in marine ecosystems at Algeciras Bay(southern Iberian Peninsula). Marine Ecology Progress Series, 135 (1), 109-122.

  47. Carman, M.R. & Grunden, D.W., 2010. First occurrence of the invasive tunicate Didemnum vexillum in eelgrass habitat. Aquatic Invasions, 5 (1), 23-29. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2010.5.1.4

  48. Carver, C.E., Thériault, I. & Mallet, A.L., 2010. Infection of cultured eastern oysters Crassostrea virginica by the boring sponge Cliona celata, with emphasis on sponge life history and mitigation strategies. Journal of Shellfish Research, 29 (4), 905-915.

  49. Castège, I., Milon, E. & Pautrizel, F., 2014. Response of benthic macrofauna to an oil pollution: Lessons from the “Prestige” oil spill on the rocky shore of Guéthary (south of the Bay of Biscay, France). Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 106, 192-197.

  50. Castric-Fey, A. & Chassé, C., 1991. Factorial analysis in the ecology of rocky subtidal areas near Brest (west Brittany, France). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 515-536.

  51. Castric-Fey, A., 1983. Recruitment, growth and longevity of Pomatoceros triqueter and Pomatoceros lamarckii (Polychaeta, Serpulidae) on experimental panels in the Concarneau area, South Brittany. Annales de l'Institut Oceanographique, Paris, 59, 69-91.

  52. Chamberlain, Y.M., 1996. Lithophylloid Corallinaceae (Rhodophycota) of the genera Lithophyllum and Titausderma from southern Africa. Phycologia, 35, 204-221.

  53. Chapman, E.C.N., Rochas, C.M.V., Piper, A.J.R., Vad, J. & Kazanidis, G., 2023. Effect of electromagnetic fields from renewable energy subsea power cables on righting reflex and physiological response of coastal invertebrates. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 193. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115250

  54. Charifi, M., Khalifa, R., Giraldes, B.W., Sow, M., Hizam, Z., Carrara, M., Maneux, E., Hamza, S., Bassères, A., Blanc, P., Leitao, A. & Massabuau, J.-C., 2023. Deep behavioral impairment in the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata exposed to anthropogenic noise and light stress. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10. DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1251011

  55. Chava, A.I. & Mokievsky, V.O., 2022. Multi-Year Succession of Biofouling Communities on Subsea Engineering Structures in the Aphotic Zone of the Sea of Okhotsk. Doklady Earth Sciences, 507 (2), S330–S333. DOI http://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X2260133X

  56. Chimienti, G., Di Nisio, A. & Lanzolla, A.M.L., 2020. Size/Age Models for Monitoring of the Pink Sea Fan Eunicella verrucosa (Cnidaria: Alcyonacea) and a Case Study Application. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8 (11). DOI http://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8110951

  57. Chomsky, O., Kamenir, Y., Hyams, M., Dubinsky, Z. & Chadwick-Furman, N., 2004. Effects of temperature on growth rate and body size in the Mediterranean Sea anemone Actinia equina. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 313 (1), 63-73.

  58. Cinar, M. E. & Ozgul, A., 2023. Clogging nets Didemnum vexillum (Tunicata: Ascidiacea) is in action in the eastern Mediterranean. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 103. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315423000802

  59. Cocito, S. & Sgorbini, S., 2014. Long-term trend in substratum occupation by a clonal, carbonate bryozoan in a temperate rocky reef in times of thermal anomalies. Marine Biology, 161 (1), 17-27.

  60. Cocito, S., Sgarbini, S. & Bianchi, C.N., 1998a. Aspects of the biology of the bryozoan Pentapora fascialis in the northwestern Mediterranean. Marine Biology, 131, 73-82.

  61. Comely, C.A. & Ansell, A.D., 1988. Invertebrate associates of the sea urchin, Echinus esculentus L., from the Scottish west coast. Ophelia, 28, 111-137.

  62. Connor, D.W., Allen, J.H., Golding, N., Howell, K.L., Lieberknecht, L.M., Northen, K.O. & Reker, J.B., 2004. The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland. Version 04.05. ISBN 1 861 07561 8. In JNCC (2015), The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland Version 15.03. [2019-07-24]. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. Available from https://mhc.jncc.gov.uk/

  63. Cook, E.J., Stehlíková, J., Beveridge, C.M., Burrows, M.T., De Blauwe, H. & Faasse, M., 2013b. Distribution of the invasive bryozoan Tricellaria inopinata in Scotland and a review of its European expansion. Aquatic Invasions, 8 (3), 281-288.

  64. Coolen, Joop W. P., Lengkeek, Wouter, Lewis, Gareth, Bos, Oscar G., Van Walraven, Lodewijk & Van Dongen, Udo, 2015. First record of Caryophyllia smithii in the central southern North Sea: artificial reefs affect range extensions of sessile benthic species. Marine Biodiversity Records, 8, e140. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755267215001165

  65. Costello, M., 2001. European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification: Paris: Muséum national d'histoire naturelle.

  66. Costello, M.J., Coll, M., Danovaro, R., Halpin, P., Ojaveer, H. & Miloslavich, P., 2010. A census of marine biodiversity knowledge, resources, and future challenges. Plos One, 5 (8), e12110.

  67. Cotter, E., O’Riordan, R.M. & Myers, A.A., 2003. Recruitment patterns of serpulids (Annelida: Polychaeta) in Bantry Bay, Ireland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 83 (1), 41- 48. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315403006787h

  68. Coutts, A.D.M. & Forrest, B.M., 2007. Development and application of tools for incursion response: Lessons learned from the management of the fouling pest Didemnum vexillum. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 342 (1), 154-162. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.042

  69. Crisp, D.J. (ed.), 1964. The effects of the severe winter of 1962-63 on marine life in Britain. Journal of Animal Ecology, 33, 165-210.

  70. Cross, F.A., Davis, W.P., Hoss, D.E. & Wolfe, D.A., 1978. Biological Observations, Part 5. In The Amoco Cadiz Oil Spill - a preliminary scientific report (ed. W.N.Ness). NOAA/EPA Special Report, US Department of Commerce and US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington.

  71. Davies, T.W., Levy, O., Tidau, S., Marangoni, L.F.d.B., Wiedenmann, J., D’Angelo, C. & Smyth, T., 2023. Global disruption of coral broadcast spawning associated with artificial light at night. Nature Communications, 14 (1). DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38070-y

  72. Davison, J.J., van Haren, H., Hosegood, P., Piechaud, N. & Howell, K.L., 2019. The distribution of deep-sea sponge aggregations (Porifera) in relation to oceanographic processes in the Faroe-Shetland Channel. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 146, 55–61. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2019.03.005

  73. De Kluijver, M.J., 1993. Sublittoral hard-substratum communities off Orkney and St Abbs (Scotland). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 73 (4), 733-754.

  74. De Montaudouin, X., Blanchet, H. & Hippert, B., 2018. Relationship between the invasive slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata and benthic megafauna structure and diversity, in Arcachon Bay. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 98 (8), 2017-2028. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315417001655

  75. De Vos, L., Rútzler K., Boury-Esnault, N., Donadey C., Vacelet, J., 1991. Atlas of Sponge Morphology. Atlas de Morphologie des Éponges. Washington, Smithsonian Institution Press.

  76. Diaz, R.J. & Rosenberg, R., 1995. Marine benthic hypoxia: a review of its ecological effects and the behavioural responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 33, 245-303.

  77. Dijkstra, H.H., Warén, A. & Gudmundsson, G., 2009. Pectinoidea (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from Iceland. Marine Biology Research, 5 (3), 207-243. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000802425643

  78. Dijkstra, J., Harris, L.G. & Westerman, E., 2007. Distribution and long-term temporal patterns of four invasive colonial ascidians in the Gulf of Maine. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 342 (1), 61-68. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.015

  79. Dons, C., 1927. Om Vest og voskmåte hos Pomatoceros triqueter. Nyt Magazin for Naturvidenskaberne, LXV, 111-126.

  80. Dorgham, M.M., Hamdy, R., El-Rashidy, H.H. & Atta, M.M., 2013. First records of polychaetes new to Egyptian Mediterranean waters. Oceanologia, 55 (1), 235-267.

  81. Duckworth, A.R. & Peterson, B.J., 2013. Effects of seawater temperature and pH on the boring rates of the sponge Cliona celata in scallop shells. Marine Biology, 160 (1), 27-35.

  82. Dunlop, K., Harendza, A., Plassen, L. & Keeley, N., 2020. Epifaunal Habitat Associations on Mixed and Hard Bottom Substrates in Coastal Waters of Northern Norway. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7. DOI http://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.568802

  83. Durden, J., Clare, M., Vad, J. & Gates, A., 2023. First in-situ monitoring of sponge response and recovery to an industrial sedimentation event. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 191. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114870

  84. Dyrynda, P., Fairall, V., Occhipinti Ambrogi, A. & d'Hondt, J.-L., 2000. The distribution, origins and taxonomy of Tricellaria inopinata d'Hondt and Occhipinti Ambrogi, 1985, an invasive bryozoan new to the Atlantic. Journal of Natural History, 34 (10), 1993-2006.

  85. Dyrynda, P.E.J. & Ryland, J.S., 1982. Reproductive strategies and life histories in the cheilostome marine bryozoans Chartella papyracea and Bugula flabellata. Marine Biology, 71, 241-256.

  86. Dyrynda, P.E.J., 1994. Hydrodynamic gradients and bryozoan distributions within an estuarine basin (Poole Harbour, UK). In Proceedings of the 9th International Bryozoology conference, Swansea, 1992. Biology and Palaeobiology of Bryozoans (ed. P.J. Hayward, J.S. Ryland & P.D. Taylor), pp.57-63. Fredensborg: Olsen & Olsen.

  87. Edwards, R.V. 2008. Tubularia indivisa Oaten pipes hydroid. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1967

  88. Edyvean, R.G.J.  & Ford, H., 1987. Growth rates of Lithophyllum incrustans (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) from south west Wales. British Phycological Journal, 22 (2), 139-146.

  89. Edyvean, R.G.J.  & Ford, H., 1984a. Population biology of the crustose red alga Lithophyllum incrustans Phil. 2. A comparison of populations from three areas of Britain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 23 (4), 353-363.

  90. Edyvean, R.G.J. & Ford, H., 1986. Population structure of Lithophyllum incrustans (Philippi) (Corallinales Rhodophyta) from south-west Wales. Field Studies, 6, 397-405.

  91. Eerkes-Medrano, Dafne, Drewery, Jim, Burns, Finlay, Cárdenas, Paco, Taite, Morag, Mkay, David W., Stirling, David & Neat, Francis, 2020. A community assessment of the demersal fish and benthic invertebrates of the Rosemary Bank Seamount marine protected area (NE Atlantic). Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 156, 103180. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2019.103180

  92. Egger, C., Melo, C., Marquardt, B., Engelen, A., Melzer, R., Santos, E., Fernandes, M., Baylina, N., Serrao, E. & Coelho, M., 2025. Reproductive phenology and sexual propagation of the pink sea fan Eunicella verrucosa (Pallas, 1766): implications for coral restoration. Coral Reefs. DOI http://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-025-02705-x

  93. Eggleston, D., 1972a. Patterns of reproduction in marine Ectoprocta off the Isle of Man. Journal of Natural History, 6, 31-38.

  94. Eggleston, D., 1972b. Factors influencing the distribution of sub-littoral ectoprocts off the south of the Isle of Man (Irish Sea). Journal of Natural History, 6, 247-260.

  95. Eno, N.C., MacDonald, D.S., Kinnear, J.A.M., Amos, C.S., Chapman, C.J., Clark, R.A., Bunker, F.S.P.D. & Munro, C., 2001. Effects of crustacean traps on benthic fauna ICES Journal of Marine Science, 58, 11-20. DOI https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0984

  96. Evans, T.R., 2024. Effects of Abiotic and Biotic Stress on Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Properties of Haliclona sp. Berkeley Scientific Journal, 29 (1). DOI https://doi.org/10.5070/BS329164936

  97. Evseeva, O. & Dvoretsky, A., 2024. Bryozoan communities off Franz Josef Land (northern Barents Sea, Russia): Distribution patterns and environmental control. Journal of Marine Systems, 242. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2023.103944

  98. Fariñas-Franco, J.M., Pearce, B., Porter, J., Harries, D., Mair, J.M. & Sanderson, W.G, 2014. Development and validation of indicators of Good Environmental Status for biogenic reefs formed by Modiolus modiolus, Mytilus edulis and Sabellaria spinulosa under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Joint Nature Conservation Committee,

  99. Fava, F., Ponti, M. & Abbiati, M., 2016. Role of Recruitment Processes in Structuring Coralligenous Benthic Assemblages in the Northern Adriatic Continental Shelf. PLoS ONE, 11 (10). DOI http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163494

  100. Fell, P.E., Parry, E.H. & Balsamo, A.M., 1984. The life histories of sponges in the Mystic and Thames estuaries (Connecticut), with emphasis on larval settlement and postlarval reproduction. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 78 (1), 127-141.

  101. Fletcher, L. M., Forrest, B. M., Atalah, J. & Bell, J. J., 2013a. Reproductive seasonality of the invasive ascidian Didemnum vexillum in New Zealand and implications for shellfish aquaculture. Aquaculture Environment Interactions, 3 (3), 197-211. DOI https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00063

  102. Fortic, A., Mavric, B., Pitacco, V. & Lipej, L., 2021. Temporal changes of a fouling community: Colonization patterns of the benthic epifauna in the shallow northern Adriatic Sea. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 45. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101818

  103. Fowler, S. & Laffoley, D., 1993. Stability in Mediterranean-Atlantic sessile epifaunal communities at the northern limits of their range. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 172 (1), 109-127. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(93)90092-3

  104. Freese, J.L., 2001. Trawl-induced damage to sponges observed from a research submersible. Marine Fisheries Review, 63 (3), 7-13.

  105. Freese, L., Auster, P.J., Heifetz, J. & Wing, B.L., 1999. Effects of trawling on seafloor habitat and associated invertebrate taxa in the Gulf of Alaska. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 182, 119-126.

  106. Gündogdu, S., Çevik, C. & Karaca, S., 2017. Fouling assemblage of benthic plastic debris collected from Mersin Bay, NE Levantine coast of Turkey. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 124 (1), 147–154. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.023

  107. Gage, J.D., 1992a. Growth bands in the sea urchin Echinus esculentus: results from tetracycline mark/recapture. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 72, 257-260.

  108. Gavazzi, G.M., Kapasakali, D.-A. & Degraer, S., 2024. The ecological status of subtidal natural hard substrate biotopes in Belgian waters. MSFD Assessment of the Belgian marine waters – Indicator ANS-BE-BENTH-COND-2024,   1–39 pp. 

  109. Gerrodette, T. & Flechsig, A., 1979. Sediment-induced reduction in the pumping rate of the tropical sponge Verongia lacunosa. Marine Biology, 55 (2), 103-110.

  110. Gittenberger, A, Rensing, M, Dekker, R, Niemantsverdriet, P, Schrieken, N & Stegenga, H, 2015. Native and non-native species of the Dutch Wadden Sea in 2014. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, The Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority.

  111. Giusti, M., Canese, S., Fourt, M., Bo, M., Innocenti, C., Goujard, A., Daniel, B., Angeletti, L., Taviani, M., Aquilina, L. & Tunesi, L., 2019. Coral forests and Derelict Fishing Gears in submarine canyon systems of the Ligurian Sea. Progress in Oceanography, 178. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2019.102186

  112. Gochfeld, D., Easson, C., Freeman, C., Thacker, R. & Olson, J., 2012. Disease and nutrient enrichment as potential stressors on the Caribbean sponge Aplysina cauliformis and its bacterial symbionts. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 456, 101-111.

  113. Gochfeld, D.J., Schlöder, C. & Thacker, R.W., 2007. Sponge community structure and disease prevalence on coral reefs in Bocas del Toro, Panama. Porifera Research: Biodiversity, Innovation, and Sustainability, Série Livros, 28, 335-343.

  114. Gommez, J.L.C. & Miguez-Rodriguez, L.J., 1999. Effects of oil pollution on skeleton and tissues of Echinus esculentus L. 1758 (Echinodermata, Echinoidea) in a population of A Coruna Bay, Galicia, Spain. In Echinoderm Research 1998. Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Echinoderms, Milan, 7-12 September 1998, (ed. M.D.C. Carnevali & F. Bonasoro) pp. 439-447. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.

  115. Gontar, V.I., Hop, H. & Voronkov, A.Y., 2001. Diversity and distribution of Bryozoa in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Polish Polar Research, 22 (3-4), 187-204.

  116. Goodwin, C.E., Strain, E.M., Edwards, H., Bennett, S.C., Breen, J.P. & Picton, B.E., 2013. Effects of two decades of rising sea surface temperatures on sublittoral macrobenthos communities in Northern Ireland, UK. Marine Environmental Research, 85, 34-44. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.12.008

  117. Graves, K. (2022) The Application of Habitat Suitability Modelling to Mapping VME Distribution in the Deep Sea to Inform Spatial Management. Thesis. University of Plymouth. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.24382/876

  118. Graves, K., Bridges, A., Dabrowski, T., Furey, T., Lyons, K. & Howell, K., 2023. Oceanographic variability drives the distribution but not the density of the aggregation forming deep-sea sponge Pheronema carpenteri. Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers, 191. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2022.103917

  119. Griffith, K., Mowat, S., Holt, R.H., Ramsay, K., Bishop, J.D., Lambert, G. & Jenkins, S.R., 2009. First records in Great Britain of the invasive colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002. Aquatic Invasions, 4 (4), 581-590. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2009.4.4.3

  120. Griffiths, A.B., Dennis, R. & Potts, G.W., 1979. Mortality associated with a phytoplankton bloom off Penzance in Mounts Bay. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59, 515-528.

  121. Groner, F., Lenz, M., Wahl, M. & Jenkins, S.R., 2011. Stress resistance in two colonial ascidians from the Irish Sea: The recent invader Didemnum vexillum is more tolerant to low salinity than the cosmopolitan Diplosoma listerianum. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 409 (1), 48-52. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.08.002

  122. Gunda, V.G. & Janapala, V.R., 2009. Effects of dissolved oxygen levels on survival and growth in vitro of Haliclona pigmentifera (Demospongiae). Cell and tissue research, 337 (3), 527-535.

  123. Riisgård, H.U., Thomassen, S., Jakobsen, H., Weeks, J.M. and Larsen, P.S., 1993. Suspension feeding in marine sponges Halichondria panicea and Haliclona urceolus: effects of temperature on filtration rate and energy cost of pumping. Marine Ecology Progress Series96, pp.177-188.

  124. Hall-Spencer, J.M. & Moore, P.G., 2000a. Impact of scallop dredging on maerl grounds. In Effects of fishing on non-target species and habitats. (ed. M.J. Kaiser & S.J., de Groot) 105-117. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

  125. Hamed, I., Tsoukalas, D., Jakobsen, A., Zhang, J., Asimakopoulos, A., Seyitmuhammedov, K. & Lerfall, J., 2024. Edible Sea urchins Echinus esculentus from Norwegian waters- Effect of season on nutritional quality and chemical contaminants. Food Chemistry, 447. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139032

  126. Hand, C.H., 1955. The sea anemones of central California: San Francisco University, Wasmann Biological Society.

  127. Hansson, H., 1998. NEAT (North East Atlantic Taxa): South Scandinavian marine Echinodermata Check-List. Tjärnö Marine Biological Assocation [On-line] [cited 26/01/16]. Available from: http://www.tmbl.gu.se/libdb/taxon/neat_pdf/NEAT*Echinodermata.pdf

  128. Hartikainen, H., Johnes, P., Moncrieff, C. & Okamura, B., 2009. Bryozoan populations reflect nutrient enrichment and productivity gradients in rivers. Freshwater Biology, 54 (11), 2320-2334.

  129. Hartman, W.D., 1958. Natural history of the marine sponges of southern New England. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Bulletin, 12 (12), 1-155.

  130. Hartnoll, R.G., 1975. The annual cycle of Alcyonium digitatum. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 3, 71-78.

  131. Hartnoll, R.G., 1998. Circalittoral faunal turf biotopes: an overview of dynamics and sensitivity characteristics for conservation management of marine SACs, Volume VIII. Scottish Association of Marine Sciences, Oban, Scotland, 109 pp. [UK Marine SAC Project. Natura 2000 reports.] Available from: http://ukmpa.marinebiodiversity.org/uk_sacs/pdfs/circfaun.pdf

  132. Hayward, P.J. & Ryland, J.S. 1979. British ascophoran bryozoans. London: Academic Press.

  133. Hayward, P.J. & Ryland, J.S. 1999. Cheilostomatous Bryozoa. Part II Hippothooidea - Celleporoidea. London: Academic Press. [Synopses of the British Fauna, no. 14. (2nd edition)]

  134. Hayward, P.J. & Ryland, J.S. (ed.), 1995. The marine fauna of the British Isles and north-west Europe. Volume 2. Molluscs to Chordates. Oxford Science Publications. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  135. Helmer, L., Farrell, P., Hendy, I., Harding, S., Robertson, M. & Preston, J., 2019. Active management is required to turn the tide for depleted Ostrea edulis stocks from the effects of overfishing, disease and invasive species. Peerj, 7 (2). DOI https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6431

  136. Herbert, R.J.H., Humphreys, J., Davies, C.J., Roberts, C., Fletcher, S. & Crowe, T.P., 2016. Ecological impacts of non-native Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) and management measures for protected areas in Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation, 25 (14), 2835-2865. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1209-4

  137. Herbert, R.J.H., Roberts, C., Humphreys, J., & Fletcher, S. 2012. The Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in the UK: economic, legal and environmental issues associated with its cultivation, wild establishment and exploitation. Available from: https://www.daera-ni.gov.uk/publications/pacific-oyster-uk-issues-associated-its-cultivation-wild-establishment-and-exploitation

  138. Herborg, L.M., O’Hara, P. & Therriault, T.W., 2009. Forecasting the potential distribution of the invasive tunicate Didemnum vexillum. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46 (1), 64-72. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01568.x

  139. Herreid, C.F., 1980. Hypoxia in invertebrates. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology, 67 (3), 311-320. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9629(80)80002-8

  140. Hill, A.S., Brand, A.R., Veale, L.O. & Hawkins, S.J., 1997. Assessment of the effects of scallop dredging on benthic communities. Final Report to MAFF, Contract CSA 2332, Liverpool: University of Liverpool

  141. Hill, J.,  2008. Antedon bifida. Rosy feather-star. Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Sub-programme [On-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. [cited 25/01/18] Available from: https://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1521

  142. Hinz, H., Capasso, E., Lilley, M., Frost, M. & Jenkins, S.R., 2011b. Temporal differences across a bio-geographical boundary reveal slow response of sub-littoral benthos to climate change. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 423, 69-82. DOI https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08963

  143. Hinz, H., Tarrant, D., Ridgeway, A., Kaiser, M.J. & Hiddink, J.G., 2011a. Effects of scallop dredging on temperate reef fauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 432, 91-102.

  144. Hiscock, K., 2014. Marine biodiversity conservation: a practical approach. Taylor & Francis.

  145. Hiscock, K. & Hoare, R., 1975. The ecology of sublittoral communities at Abereiddy Quarry, Pembrokeshire. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55 (4), 833-864.

  146. Hiscock, K. & Jones, H., 2004. Testing criteria for assessing ‘national importance’ of marine species, biotopes (habitats) and landscapes. Report to Joint Nature Conservation Committee from the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). Plymouth, Marine Biological Association of the UK. [JNCC Contract no. F90-01-681]

  147. Hiscock, K. & Wilson, E. 2007. Metridium senile Plumose anemone. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1185

  148. Hiscock, K., 1983. Water movement. In Sublittoral ecology. The ecology of shallow sublittoral benthos (ed. R. Earll & D.G. Erwin), pp. 58-96. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  149. Hiscock, K., 1985. Littoral and sublittoral monitoring in the Isles of Scilly. September 22nd to 29th, 1984. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, CSD Report, no. 562., Field Studies Council Oil Pollution Research Unit, Pembroke.

  150. Hiscock, K., 1994. Marine communities at Lundy - origins, longevity and change. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 51, 183-188.

  151. Hiscock, K., 2002. Changes in the marine life of Lundy. Report of the Lundy Field Society. 52, 84-93. Available from https://lfs-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/ar52/LFS_Annual_Report_Vol_52_Part_16.pdf

  152. Hiscock, K., Sharrock, S., Highfield, J. & Snelling, D., 2010. Colonization of an artificial reef in south-west England—ex-HMS ‘Scylla’. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 90 (1), 69-94. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315409991457

  153. Hiscock, K., Southward, A., Tittley, I. & Hawkins, S., 2004. Effects of changing temperature on benthic marine life in Britain and Ireland. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 14 (4), 333-362.

  154. Hitchin, B., 2012. New outbreak of Didemnum vexillum in North Kent: on stranger shores. Porcupine Marine Natural History Society Newsletter, 31, 43-48.

  155. Hoare, R. & Hiscock, K., 1974. An ecological survey of the rocky coast adjacent to the effluent of a bromine extraction plant. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 2 (4), 329-348.

  156. Holland, L., Jenkins, T. & Stevens, J., 2017. Contrasting patterns of population structure and gene flow facilitate exploration of connectivity in two widely distributed temperate octocorals. Heredity, 119, 35–48. DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2017.14

  157. Holme, N.A. & Wilson, J.B., 1985. Faunas associated with longitudinal furrows and sand ribbons in a tide-swept area in the English Channel. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 1051-1072. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400019500

  158. Holt, R., 2024. GB Non-native organism risk assessment for Didemnum vexillum. GB Non-native Species Information Portal, GB Non-native Species Secretariat. Available from: https://www.nonnativespecies.org/assets/Uploads/Didemnum-vexillum-final_forwebsite.pdf

  159. Holt, T.J., Jones, D.R., Hawkins, S.J. & Hartnoll, R.G., 1995. The sensitivity of marine communities to man induced change - a scoping report. Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor, Contract Science Report, no. 65.

  160. Hopkins, S.H., 1962. Distribution of species of Cliona (boring sponge) on the Eastern Shore of Virginia in relation to salinity. Chesapeake Science, 3 (2), 121-124.

  161. Hutchison, Z.L., Secor, D.H. & Gill, A.B., 2020. The interaction between resource species an electromagnetic fields associated with electricity production by offshore wind farms. Oceanography, 33 (4), 96–107. DOI https://doi/org/10.5670/oceanog.2020.409

  162. Idan, T., Goren, L., Shefer, S., Brickner, I. & Ilan, M., 2020. Does Depth Matter? Reproduction Pattern Plasticity in Two Common Sponge Species Found in Both Mesophotic and Shallow Waters. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7. DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.610565

  163. Jackson, A. 2016. Pentapora foliacea (Ross). In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. [cited Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1389

  164. Jenkins, S.R., Beukers-Stewart, B.D. & Brand, A.R., 2001. Impact of scallop dredging on benthic megafauna: a comparison of damage levels in captured and non-captured organisms. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 215, 297-301. DOI https://doi.org/10.3354/meps215297

  165. Jenkins, T.L. & Stevens, J.R., 2022. Predicting habitat suitability and range shifts under projected climate change for two octocorals in the north-east Atlantic. Peerj, 10. DOI http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13509

  166. Jennings, S. & Kaiser, M.J., 1998. The effects of fishing on marine ecosystems. Advances in Marine Biology, 34, 201-352.

  167. Jensen, A.C., Collins, K.J., Lockwood, A.P.M., Mallinson, J.J. & Turnpenny, W.H., 1994. Colonization and fishery potential of a coal-ash artificial reef, Poole Bay, United Kingdom. Bulletin of Marine Science, 55, 1263-1276.

  168. JNCC (Joint Nature Conservation Committee), 2022.  The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland Version 22.04. [Date accessed]. Available from: https://mhc.jncc.gov.uk/

  169. Johnston, E.L. & Roberts, D.A., 2009. Contaminants reduce the richness and evenness of marine communities: a review and meta-analysis. Environmental Pollution, 157 (6), 1745-1752.

  170. Jones, J., Bunker, F., Newman, P., Burton, M., Lock, K., 2012. Sponge Diversity of Skomer Marine Nature Reserve. CCW Regional Report,  CCW/WW/12/3.

  171. Kaiser, M.J., Ramsay, K., Richardson, C.A., Spence, F.E. & Brand, A.R., 2000. Chronic fishing disturbance has changed shelf sea benthic community structure. Journal of Animal Ecology, 69, 494-503.

  172. Kaiser, M.J., Hormbrey, S., Booth, J.R., Hinz, H. & Hiddink, J.G., 2018. Recovery linked to life history of sessile epifauna following exclusion of towed mobile fishing gear. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55 (3), 1060–1070. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13087

  173. Kayser, H., 1990. Bioaccumulation and transfer of cadmium in marine diatoms, Bryozoa, and Kamptozoa. In Oceanic processes in marine pollution, vol. 6. Physical and chemical processes: transport and transformation (ed. D.J. Baumgartner & I.W. Duedall), pp. 99-106. Florida: R.E. Krieger Publishing Co.

  174. Kazanidis, G., Vad, J., Henry, L.-A., Neat, F., Berx, B., Georgoulas, K. & Roberts, J.M., 2019. Distribution of Deep-Sea Sponge Aggregations in an Area of Multisectoral Activities and Changing Oceanic Conditions. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6 (163). DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00163
  175. Kelly, M., Owen, P. & Pantazis, P., 2001. The commercial potential of the common sea urchin Echinus esculentus from the west coast of Scotland. Hydrobiologia, 465 (1-3), 85-94.

  176. Kinne, O. (ed.), 1984. Marine Ecology: A Comprehensive, Integrated Treatise on Life in Oceans and Coastal Waters.Vol. V. Ocean Management Part 3: Pollution and Protection of the Seas - Radioactive Materials, Heavy Metals and Oil. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

  177. Kleeman, S.N., 2009. Didemnum vexillum - Feasibility of Eradication and/or Control. CCW Contract Science report, 53 pp. Available from: https://www.nonnativespecies.org/assets/Management-documents/Kleeman_2009-1.pdf

  178. Knight-Jones, E.W. & Nelson-Smith, A., 1977. Sublittoral transects in the Menai Straits and Milford Haven. In Biology of benthic organisms (ed. B.F. Keegan, P. O Ceidigh & P.J.S. Broaden), pp. 379-390. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

  179. Koukouras, A., 2010. Check-list of marine species from Greece. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Assembled in the framework of the EU FP7 PESI project

  180. Kukliński, P. & Barnes, D.K., 2008. Structure of intertidal and subtidal assemblages in Arctic vs temperate boulder shores. Polish Polar Research, 29 (3), 203-218. 

  181. Kupriyanova, E.K. & Badyaev, A.V., 1998. Ecological correlates of arctic Serpulidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) distributions. Ophelia, 49 (3), 181-193.

  182. Lambert, G., 2009. Adventures of a sea squirt sleuth: unraveling the identity of Didemnum vexillum, a global ascidian invader. Aquatic Invaders, 4(1), 5-28. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2009.4.1.2

  183. Lancaster, J. (ed), McCallum, S., A.C., L., Taylor, E., A., C. & Pomfret, J., 2014. Development of Detailed Ecological Guidance to Support the Application of the Scottish MPA Selection Guidelines in Scotland’s seas. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No.491 (29245), Scottish Natural Heritage, Inverness, 40 pp.

  184. Langhamer, O., 2016. The location of offshore wave power devices structures epifaunal assemblages. International Journal of Marine Energy, 16, 174–180. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijome.2016.07.007

  185. Langton, R., Stirling, D. & Boulcott, P., 2023. Using regional-scale predictive habitat models to assess protection and identify potential locations for additional management or monitoring for a species of conservation interest. Aquatic conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 33 (11), 1263–1280. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4021

  186. Lawrence, J.M., 1975. On the relationships between marine plants and sea urchins. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 13, 213-286.

  187. Lengyel, N.L., Collie, J.S. & Valentine, P.C., 2009. The invasive colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum on Georges Bank - Ecological effects and genetic identification. Aquatic Invasions, 4(1), 143-152. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2009.4.1.15

  188. Lewis, G.A. & Nichols, D., 1979a. Colonization of an artificial reef by the sea-urchin Echinus esculentus. Progress in Underwater Science, 4, 189-195.

  189. Lock, K., Burton, M., Jones, J. & Massey, A., 2025. Skomer Marine Conservation Zone Annual Report 2024/25.. NRW Evidence Reports, 61 pp.

  190. Lock, K., Burton, M., Luddington, L. & Newman, P., 2006. Skomer Marine Nature Reserve project status report 2005/06. Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor, CCW Regional Report CCW/WW/05/9.

  191. Lock, K., Burton, M., Newman, P. & Jones, J., 2020. Skomer Marine Conservation Zone, Distribution and Abundance of Echinus esculentus and selected starfish species 2020. NRW Evidence Report No.400, Natural Resources Wales, 37 pp. 

  192. Lombardi, C., Taylor, P.D. & Cocito, S., 2010. Systematics of the Miocene–Recent bryozoan genus Pentapora (Cheilostomata). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 160 (1), 17-39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00594.x

  193. Long, H. A. & Grosholz, E. D., 2015. Overgrowth of eelgrass by the invasive colonial tunicate Didemnum vexillum: Consequences for tunicate and eelgrass growth and epifauna abundance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 473, 188-194. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2015.08.014

  194. Long, S., Blicher, M., Arboe, N., Fuhrmann, M., Darling, M., Kemp, K., Nygaard, R., Zinglersen, K. & Yesson, C., 2021. Deep-sea benthic habitats and the impacts of trawling on them in the offshore Greenland halibut fishery, Davis Strait, west Greenland. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 78 (8), 2724–2744. DOI http://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab148

  195. Lyster, I., 1965. The salinity tolerance of polychaete larvae. Journal of Animal Ecology, 34 (3), 517-527.

  196. MacBride, E.W., 1914. Textbook of Embryology, Vol. I, Invertebrata. London: MacMillan & Co.

  197. Magorrian, B.H. & Service, M., 1998. Analysis of underwater visual data to identify the impact of physical disturbance on horse mussel (Modiolus modiolus) beds. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 36 (5), 354-359. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-326x(97)00192-6

  198. Marin, A., Lopez, M., Esteban, M., Meseguer, J., Munoz, J. & Fontana, A., 1998. Anatomical and ultrastructural studies of chemical defence in the sponge Dysidea fragilis. Marine Biology, 131 (4), 639-645.

  199. Marra, M.V., 2019. Investigation of biological factors that may contribute to bioactivity in Haliclona (Porifera, Haplosclerida). PhD Thesis, Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, University of Galway, NUI Galway, 279 pp. 

  200. Martin, J.P., Garese, A., Sar, A. & Acuña, F.H., 2015. Fouling community dominated by Metridium senile (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Actiniaria) in Bahía San Julián (southern Patagonia, Argentina). Scientia Marina, 79 (2), 211-221.

  201. Matthews, A., 1917. The development of Alcyonium digitatum with some notes on early colony formation. Quarterly Journal of Microscopial Science, 62, 43-94.

  202. McKenzie, C.H, Reid, V., Lambert, G., Matheson, K., Minchin, D., Pederson, J., Brown, L., Curd, A., Gollasch, S., Goulletquer, P, Occphipinti-Ambrogi, A., Simard, N. & Therriault, T.W., 2017. Alien species alert: Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002: Invasion, impact, and control. ICES Cooperative Research Reports (CRR), 33 pp. DOI http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.2138

  203. McKinney, F.K., 1986. Evolution of erect marine bryozoan faunas: repeated success of unilaminate species The American Naturalist, 128, 795-809.

  204. Mercer, J.M, Whitlatch, R.B, & Osman, R.W. 2009. Potential effects of the invasive colonial ascidian (Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002) on pebble-cobble bottom habitats in Long Island Sound, USA. Aquatic Invasions, 4, 133-142. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2009.4.1.14

  205. Micaroni, V., McAllen, R., Rovellini, A., Strano, F., Morrow, C., Picton, B., Turner, J., Harman, L. & Bell, J.J., 2025. Slow recovery in temperate mesophotic communities following disturbance: An example from Lough Hyne (Ireland). Marine Environmental Research, 210, 107341. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2025.107341

  206. Michaelis, R., Hass, H., Mielck, F., Papenmeier, S., Sander, L., Gutow, L. & Wiltshire, K., 2019. Epibenthic assemblages of hard-substrate habitats in the German Bight (south-eastern North Sea) described using drift videos. Continental Shelf Research, 175, 30–41. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2019.01.011

  207. Migliaccio, O., Castellano, I., Romano, G. & Palumbo, A., 2014. Stress response to cadmium and manganese in Paracentrotus lividus developing embryos is mediated by nitric oxide. Aquatic Toxicology, 156, 125-134. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.08.007

  208. Minchin, D.M & Nunn, J.D., 2013. Rapid assessment of marinas for invasive alien species in Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland Environment Agency Research and Development Series, Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

  209. Moore, H.B., 1937. Marine Fauna of the Isle of Man. Liverpool University Press.

  210. Moore, P.G., 1977a. Inorganic particulate suspensions in the sea and their effects on marine animals. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 15, 225-363.

  211. Morrison, K.M., Meyer, H.K., Roberts, E.M., Rapp, H.T., Colaço, A. & Pham, C.K., 2020. The First Cut Is the Deepest: Trawl Effects on a Deep-Sea Sponge Ground Are Pronounced Four Years on. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7. DOI http://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.605281

  212. NBN, 2015. National Biodiversity Network 2015(20/05/2015).https://data.nbn.org.uk/

  213. NBN, 2024. National Biodiversity Network 2024(20/05/2024).https://data.nbn.org.uk/

  214. Neish, A.H. 2007. Pachymatisma johnstonia A sponge. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1885

  215. Nelson, M.L. & Craig, S.F., 2011. Role of the sea anemone Metridium senile in structuring a developing subtidal fouling community. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 421, 139-149.

  216. Nerlovic, V., Peric, L., Sliskovic, M. & Mrcelic, G., 2018. The invasive Anadara transversa (Say, 1822) (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in the biofouling community of northern Adriatic mariculture areas. Management of Biological Invasions, 9 (3), 239–251. DOI http://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2018.9.3.06

  217. Nichols, D., 1979. A nationwide survey of the British Sea Urchin Echinus esculentus. Progress in Underwater Science, 4, 161-187.

  218. Nichols, D., 1984. An investigation of the population dynamics of the common edible sea urchin (Echinus esculentus L.) in relation to species conservation management. Report to Department of the Environment and Nature Conservancy Council from the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter.

  219. Nilsson, C.L., Faurby, S., Burman, E., Germishuys, J. & Obst, M., 2025. Applying Deep Learning to Quantify Drivers of Long-Term Ecological Change in a Swedish Marine Protected Area. Ecology and evolution, 15 (9), e72091. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72091

  220. Novarin, M., Meretta, P., Genzano, G. & Schejter, L., 2025. New northernmost record of Clathria (Clathria) unica and updated records of Cliona aff. celata and Spongia (Spongia) magellanica in Mar del Plata, Argentina, SW Atlantic Ocean. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 105. DOI http://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315425000219

  221. O'Dea, A. & Okamura, B., 2000. Life history and environmental inference through retrospective morphometric analysis of bryozoans: a preliminary study. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 80, 1127-1128.

  222. OBIS (Ocean Biodiversity Information System),  2026. Global map of species distribution using gridded data. Available from: Ocean Biogeographic Information System. www.iobis.org. Accessed: 2026-09-12

  223. Oliva, M., De Marchi, L., Cuccaro, A., Fumagalli, G., Freitas, R., Fontana, N., Raugi, M., Barmada, S. & Pretti, C., 2023. Introducing energy into marine environments: A lab-scale static magnetic field submarine cable simulation and its effects on sperm and larval development on a reef forming serpulid*. Environmental Pollution, 328. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121625

  224. Pagès-Escolà, M., Linares, C., Gómez-Gras, D., Medrano, A. & Hereu, B., 2020. Assessing the effectiveness of restoration actions for Bryozoans: The case of the Mediterranean Pentapora fascialis. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30 (1), 8–19. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3236

  225. Patzold, J., Ristedt, H. & Wefer, G., 1987. Rate of growth and longevity of a large colony of Pentapora foliacea (Bryozoa) recorded in their oxygen isotope profiles. Marine Biology, 96, 535-538.

  226. Pham, C.K., Murillo, F.J., Lirette, C., Maldonado, M., Colaço, A., Ottaviani, D. & Kenchington, E., 2019. Removal of deep-sea sponges by bottom trawling in the Flemish Cap area: conservation, ecology and economic assessment. Scientific Reports, 9 (1), 15843. DOI http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52250-1

  227. Piazzi, L., Kaleb, S., Ceccherelli, G., Montefalcone, M. & Falace, A., 2019. Deep coralligenous outcrops of the Apulian continental shelf: Biodiversity and spatial variability of sediment-regulated assemblages. Continental Shelf Research, 172, 50–56. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2018.11.008

  228. Picton, B. & Goodwin, C., 2007. Sponge biodiversity of Rathlin Island, Northern Ireland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 87 (06), 1441-1458. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315407058122

  229. Pikesley, S.K., Godley, B.J., Latham, H., Richardson, P.B., Robson, L.M., Solandt, J.-L., Trundle, C., Wood, C. & Witt, M.J., 2016. Pink sea fans (Eunicella verrucosa) as indicators of the spatial efficacy of Marine Protected Areas in southwest UK coastal waters. Marine Policy, 64, 38–45. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.10.010

  230. Pineda, M.-C., Strehlow, B., Kamp, J., Duckworth, A., Jones, R. & Webster, N.S., 2017a. Effects of combined dredging-related stressors on sponges: a laboratory approach using realistic scenarios. Scientific Reports, 7 (1), 5155.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05251-x

  231. Pineda, M.-C., Strehlow, B., Sternel, M., Duckworth, A., Haan, J.d., Jones, R. & Webster, N.S., 2017b. Effects of sediment smothering on the sponge holobiont with implications for dredging management. Scientific Reports, 7 (1), 5156. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05243-x

  232. Piscitelli, M., Corriero, G., Gaino, E. & Uriz, M.J., 2011. Reproductive cycles of the sympatric excavating sponges Cliona celata and Cliona viridis in the Mediterranean Sea. Invertebrate Biology, 130 (1), 1-10.

  233. Porter, J., 2012. Seasearch Guide to Bryozoans and Hydroids of Britain and Ireland.   Ross-on-Wye: Marine Conservation Society.

  234. Porter, J., Nunn, J., Ryland, J., Minchin, D. & Jones, M., 2017. The status of non-native bryozoans on the north coast of Ireland. Bioinvasions Records, 6 (4), 321–330. DOI http://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2017.6.4.04

  235. Powell, N., 1971. The marine bryozoa near the Panama Canal. Bulletin of Marine Science, 21 (3), 766-778.

  236. Powell-Jennings, C. & Callaway, R., 2018. The invasive, non-native slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata is poorly adapted to sediment burial. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 130, 95-104. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.03.006

  237. Prentice, M. B., Vye, S. R., Jenkins, S. R., Shaw, P. W. & Ironside, J. E., 2021. Genetic diversity and relatedness in aquaculture and marina populations of the invasive tunicate Didemnum vexillum in the British Isles. Biological Invasions, 23 (12), 3613-3624. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02615-3

  238. Preston J. & Burton, M., 2015. Marine microbial assemblages associated with diseased Porifera in Skomer Marine Nature Reserve (SMNR), Wales. Aquatic Biodiversity and Ecosystems, 30th August – 4th September,  Liverpool.,  pp. p110.

  239. Preston, J., Fabra, M., Helmer, L., Johnson, E., Harris-Scott, E. & Hendy, I.W., 2020. Interactions of larval dynamics and substrate preference have ecological significance for benthic biodiversity and Ostrea edulis Linnaeus, 1758 in the presence of Crepidula fornicata. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30 (11), 2133-2149. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3446

  240. Price, J.H., Irvine, D.E. & Farnham, W.F., 1980. The shore environment. Volume 2: Ecosystems. London Academic Press.

  241. Ramos, M., 2010. IBERFAUNA. The Iberian Fauna Databank, 2015(2015/12/21). http://iberfauna.mncn.csic.es/

  242. Rees, H.L., Waldock, R., Matthiessen, P. & Pendle, M.A., 2001. Improvements in the epifauna of the Crouch estuary (United Kingdom) following a decline in TBT concentrations. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42, 137-144. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00119-3

  243. Reinhardt, J.F., Gallagher, K.L., Stefaniak, L.M., Nolan, R., Shaw, M.T. & Whitlatch, R. B., 2012. Material properties of Didemnum vexillum and prediction of tendril fragmentation. Marine Biology, 159 (12), 2875-2884. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-2048-9

  244. Renn, C., Rees, S., Rees, A., Davies, B.F.R., Cartwright, A.Y., Fanshawe, S., Attrill, M.J., Holmes, L.A. & Sheehan, E.V., 2024. Lessons from Lyme Bay (UK) to inform policy, management, and monitoring of Marine Protected Areas. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 81 (2), 276–292. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsad204

  245. Reverter-Gil, O., Souto, J. & Trigo, J.E., 2019. New data on Galician Bryozoa (NW Spain). Nacc-Nova Acta Cientifica Compostelana Bioloxia, 26.

  246. Roberts, D., Cummins, S., Davis, A. & Chapman, M., 2006a. Structure and dynamics of sponge-dominated assemblages on exposed and sheltered temperate reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 321, 19-30.

  247. Rodolfo-Metalpa, R., Montagna, P., Aliani, S., Borghini, M., Canese, S., Hall-Spencer, J.M., Foggo, A., Milazzo, M., Taviani, M. & Houlbrèque, F., 2015. Calcification is not the Achilles’ heel of cold-water corals in an acidifying ocean. Global Change Biology, 21 (6), 2238-2248. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12867

  248. Rosenberg, R., Hellman, B. & Johansson, B., 1991. Hypoxic tolerance of marine benthic fauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 79, 127-131. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps079127

  249. Russell, M., 2013. Echinoderm Responses to Variation in Salinity. Advances in Marine Biology, 66, 171-212. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-408096-6.00003-1

  250. Ryland, J.S. & De Putron, S., 1998. An appraisal of the effects of the Sea Empress oil spillage on sensitive invertebrate communities. Countryside Council for Wales Sea Empress Contract Report, no. 285, 97pp.

  251. Ryland, J.S., 1970. Bryozoans. London: Hutchinson University Library.

  252. Ryland, J.S., 1976. Physiology and ecology of marine bryozoans. Advances in Marine Biology, 14, 285-443.

  253. Ryland, J.S., Holt, R., Loxton, J., Spencer Jones, M. & Porter, J.S., 2014. First occurrence of the non-native bryozoan Schizoporella japonica Ortmann (1890) in Western Europe. Zootaxa, 3780 (3), 481-502.

  254. Sánchez, F., Serrano, A. & Ballesteros, M.G., 2009. Photogrammetric quantitative study of habitat and benthic communities of deep Cantabrian Sea hard grounds. Continental Shelf Research, 29 (8), 1174–1188. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2009.01.004

  255. Sagasti, A., Schaffner, L.C. & Duffy, J.E., 2000. Epifaunal communities thrive in an estuary with hypoxic episodes. Estuaries, 23 (4), 474-487.

  256. Samuelsen, A., Schrum, C., Yumruktepe, V.Ç., Daewel, U. & Roberts, E.M., 2022. Environmental Change at Deep-Sea Sponge Habitats Over the Last Half Century: A Model Hindcast Study for the Age of Anthropogenic Climate Change. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9. DOI http://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.737164

  257. Santín, A., Grinyó, J., Ambroso, S., Uriz, M., Gori, A., Dominguez-Carrió, C. & Gili, J., 2018. Sponge assemblages on the deep Mediterranean continental shelf and slope (Menorca Channel, Western Mediterranean Sea). Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers, 131, 75–86. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2017.11.003

  258. Sassaman, C. & Mangum, C., 1970. Patterns of temperature adaptation in North American Atlantic coastal actinians. Marine Biology, 7 (2), 123-130.

  259. Schönberg, C.H.L., 2015. Happy relationships between marine sponges and sediments–a review and some observations from Australia. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 1-22.

  260. Schiaparelli, S., Castellano, M., Povero, P., Sartoni, G. & Cattaneo‐Vietti, R., 2007. A benthic mucilage event in North‐Western Mediterranean Sea and its possible relationships with the summer 2003 European heatwave: short term effects on littoral rocky assemblages. Marine Ecology, 28 (3), 341-353.

  261. Schiavo, A., Costantino, G., Carbonara, P., Trani, R. & Longo, C., 2024. Data on the distribution of the uncommon Mediterranean sponge Pachymatisma johnstonia (Porifera: Demospongiae). European Zoological Journal, 91 (2), 1160–1166. DOI http://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2024.2415661

  262. SeaTemperature, 2015. World Sea Temperatures. (15/10/2015). http://www.seatemperature.org/

  263. Sebens, K.P., 1985. Community ecology of vertical rock walls in the Gulf of Maine: small-scale processes and alternative community states. In The Ecology of Rocky Coasts: essays presented to J.R. Lewis, D.Sc. (ed. P.G. Moore & R. Seed), pp. 346-371. London: Hodder & Stoughton Ltd.

  264. Sebens, K.P., 1986. Spatial relationships among encrusting marine organisms in the New England subtidal zone. Ecological Monographs, 56, 73-96. DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/2937271

  265. Segrove, F., 1941. The development of the serpulid Pomatoceros triqueta L. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 82, 467-540.

  266. Service, M. & Magorrian, B.H., 1997. The extent and temporal variation of disturbance to epibenthic communities in Strangford Lough, Northern Ireland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 77, 1151-1164.

  267. Service, M., 1998. Recovery of benthic communities in Strangford Lough following changes in fishing practice. ICES Council Meeting Paper, CM 1998/V.6, 13pp., Copenhagen: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES).

  268. Sheehan, E.V., Rees, A., Bridger, D., Williams, T. & Hall-Spencer, J.M., 2017. Strandings of NE Atlantic gorgonians. Biological Conservation, 209, 482–487. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.020

  269. Shumway, S.E., 1978. Activity and respiration of the sea anemone, Metridium senile (L.) exposed to salinity fluctuations. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 33, 85-92.

  270. Smith, A., 2014. Growth and Calcification of Marine Bryozoans in a Changing Ocean. The Biological Bulletin, 226, 203-210. DOI http://doi.org/10.1086/BBLv226n3p203

  271. Smith, J.E. (ed.), 1968. 'Torrey Canyon'. Pollution and marine life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  272. Smyth, T.J., Wright, A.E., McKee, D., Tidau, S., Tamir, R., Dubinsky, Z., Iluz, D. & Davies, T.W., 2021. A global atlas of artificial light at night under the sea. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 9 (1). DOI https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00049

  273. Snowden, E. 2007. Cliona celata A sponge. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/2188

  274. Soule, D.F. & Soule, J.D., 2002. The eastern Pacific Parasmittina trispinosa complex (Bryozoa, Cheilostomatida): new and previously described species. Hancock Institute for Marine Studies, University of Southern California.

  275. Soule, D.F. & Soule, J.D., 1979. Bryozoa (Ectoprocta). In Hart, C.W. & Fuller, S.L.H. (eds), Pollution ecology of estuarine invertebrates. New York: Academic Press, pp. 35-76.

  276. Souto, J. & Reverter-Gil, O., 2019. Identity of bryozoan species described by Jullien & Calvet from the Bay of Biscay historically attributed to Smittia. Zootaxa, 4545 (1), 105–123. DOI http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4545.1.6

  277. Stebbing, A.R.D., 1971a. Growth of Flustra foliacea (Bryozoa). Marine Biology, 9, 267-273.

  278. Stefaniak, L. M. & Whitlatch, R. B., 2014. Life history attributes of a global invader: factors contributing to the invasion potential of Didemnum vexillum. Aquatic Biology, 21 (3), 221-229. DOI https://doi.org/10.3354/ab00591

  279. Stefaniak, L., Zhang, H., Gittenberger, A., Smith, K., Holsinger, K., Lin, S. & Whitlatch, R.B., 2012. Determining the native region of the putatively invasive ascidian Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 422-423, 64-71. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.04.012

  280. Stephenson, T.A., 1935. The British Sea Anemones, vol. 2. London: Ray Society.

  281. Stock, J.H., 1988. Lamippidae (Copepoda : Siphonostomatoida) parasitic in Alcyonium. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 68 (2), 351-359.

  282. Storr, J.F. 1976. Ecological factors controlling sponge distribution in the Gulf of Mexico and the resulting zonation. In Aspects of Sponge Biology (ed. F.W. Harrison & R.R. Cowden), pp. 261-276. New York: Academic Press.

  283. Stubler, A., Robertson, H., Styron, H., Carroll, J. & Finelli, C., 2017. Reproductive and recruitment dynamics of clionaid sponges on oyster reefs in North Carolina. Invertebrate Biology, 136 (4), 365–378. DOI http://doi.org/10.1111/ivb.12188

  284. Stubler, A., Sardine, M., Carroll, J. & Finelli, C., 2024. With or without nutrients, sponges are boring: No effect of inorganic nutrients on clionaid sponge bioerosion of carbonate substrate. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 206. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116738

  285. Svane, I. & Groendahl, F., 1988. Epibioses of Gullmarsfjorden: an underwater stereophotographical transect analysis in comparison with the investigations of Gislen in 1926-29. Ophelia, 28, 95-110.

  286. Switzer, S.E., Therriault, T.W., Dunham, A. & Pearce, C.M., 2011. Assessing potential control options for the invasive tunicate Didemnum vexillum in shellfish aquaculture. Aquaculture, 318 (1), 145–153. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.04.044

  287. Tagliapietra, D., Keppel, E., Sigovini, M. & Lambert, G., 2012. First record of the colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002 in the Mediterranean: Lagoon of Venice (Italy). Bioinvasions Records, 1 (4), 247-254. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/bir.2012.1.4.02

  288. Thieltges, D.W., Strasser, M. &  Reise, K., 2003. The American slipper-limpet Crepidula fornicata (L.) in the Northern Wadden Sea 70 years after its introduction. Helgoland Marine Research57, 27-33

  289. Thomas, J.G., 1940. Pomatoceros, Sabella and Amphitrite. LMBC Memoirs on typical British marine plants and animals no.33. University Press of Liverpool. Liverpool

  290. Tillin, H. & Tyler-Walters, H., 2014a. Assessing the sensitivity of subtidal sedimentary habitats to pressures associated with marine activities. Phase 1 Report: Rationale and proposed ecological groupings for Level 5 biotopes against which sensitivity assessments would be best undertaken. JNCC Report No. 512A,  68 pp. [View report] Available from http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-6790
  291. Tillin, H.M., Kessel, C., Sewell, J., Wood, C.A. & Bishop, J.D.D., 2020. Assessing the impact of key Marine Invasive Non-Native Species on Welsh MPA habitat features, fisheries and aquaculture. NRW Evidence Report. Report No: 454. Natural Resources Wales, Bangor, 260 pp. Available from https://naturalresourceswales.gov.uk/media/696519/assessing-the-impact-of-key-marine-invasive-non-native-species-on-welsh-mpa-habitat-features-fisheries-and-aquaculture.pdf

  292. Tilmant, J.T., 1979. Observations on the impact of shrimp roller frame trawls operated over hard-bottom communities, Biscayne Bay, Florida: National Park Service.

  293. Tjensvoll, I., Kutti, T., Fosså, J.H. & Bannister, R., 2013. Rapid respiratory responses of the deep-water sponge Geodia barretti exposed to suspended sediments. Aquatic Biology, 19, 65-73.

  294. Tranter, P.R.G., Nicholson, D.N. & Kinchington, D., 1982. A description of spawning and post-gastrula development of the cool temperate coral, Caryophyllia smithi. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 62, 845-854. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315400044106

  295. Tyler, P.A. & Young, C.M., 1998. Temperature and pressure tolerances in dispersal stages of the genus Echinus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea): prerequisites for deep sea invasion and speciation. Deep Sea Research II, 45 (1), 253-277. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(97)00091-X

  296. Tyler-Walters, H., 2005c. Bugula turbinata an erect bryozoan. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. [cited 30.03.16] Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1715

  297. Tyler-Walters, H., 2008. Echinus esculentus. Edible sea urchin. Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Sub-programme [on-line]. [cited 26/01/16]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1311

  298. Tyler-Walters, H. & Ballerstedt, S., 2007. Flustra foliacea Hornwrack. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1609

  299. Tyler-Walters, H., 2008b. Corallina officinalis Coral weed. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1364

  300. Ursin, E., 1960. A quantitative investigation of the echinoderm fauna of the central North Sea. Meddelelser fra Danmark Fiskeri-og-Havundersogelser, 2 (24), pp. 204.

  301. Vad, J., Kazanidis, G., Henry, L., Jones, D., Gates, A. & Roberts, J., 2020. Environmental controls and anthropogenic impacts on deep-sea sponge grounds in the Faroe-Shetland Channel, NE Atlantic: the importance of considering spatial scale to distinguish drivers of change. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 77 (1), 451–461. DOI http://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz185

  302. Vad, J., Kazanidis, G., Henry, L.-A., Jones, D.O.B., Tendal, O.S., Christiansen, S., Henry, T.B. & Roberts, J.M., 2018. Chapter Two - Potential Impacts of Offshore Oil and Gas Activities on Deep-Sea Sponges and the Habitats They Form. In Sheppard, C. (ed.) Advances in Marine Biology: Academic Press, pp. 33–60. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.amb.2018.01.001

  303. Valentine, P.C., Carman, M.R., Blackwood, D.S. & Heffron, E.J., 2007a. Ecological observations on the colonial ascidian Didemnum sp. in a New England tide pool habitat. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 342 (1), 109-121. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.021

  304. Valentine, P.C., Collie, J.S., Reid, R.N., Asch, R.G., Guida, V.G. & Blackwood, D.S., 2007b. The occurrence of the colonial ascidian Didemnum sp. on Georges Bank gravel habitat — Ecological observations and potential effects on groundfish and scallop fisheries. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 342 (1), 179-181. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.038

  305. Van Dolah, R.F., Wendt, P.H. & Nicholson, N., 1987. Effects of a research trawl on a hard-bottom assemblage of sponges and corals. Fisheries Research, 5 (1), 39-54.

  306. Veale, L.O., Hill, A.S., Hawkins, S.J. & Brand, A.R., 2000. Effects of long term physical disturbance by scallop fishing on subtidal epifaunal assemblages and habitats. Marine Biology, 137, 325-337.

  307. Vercaemer, B., Sephton, D., Clément, P., Harman, A., Stewart-Clark, S. & DiBacco, C., 2015. Distribution of the non-indigenous colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum (Kott, 2002) in the Bay of Fundy and on offshore banks, eastern Canada. Management of Biological Invasions, 6, 385-394. DOI https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2015.6.4.07

  308. Vieira, Rui P., Bett, Brian J., Jones, Daniel O. B., Durden, Jennifer M., Morris, Kirsty J., Cunha, Marina R., Trueman, Clive N. & Ruhl, Henry A., 2020. Deep-sea sponge aggregations (Pheronema carpenteri) in the Porcupine Seabight (NE Atlantic) potentially degraded by demersal fishing. Progress in Oceanography, 183, 102189. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2019.102189

  309. Walsh, P. & Somero, G., 1981. Temperature adaptation in sea anemones: physiological and biochemical variability in geographically separate populations of Metridium senile. Marine Biology, 62 (1), 25-34.

  310. Warburton, F.E., 1966. The behavior of sponge larvae. Ecological Society of America, 47 (4), 672-674.

  311. Webster, N.S. & Taylor, M.W., 2012. Marine sponges and their microbial symbionts: love and other relationships. Environmental Microbiology, 14 (2), 335-346.

  312. Webster, N.S., Botté, E.S., Soo, R.M. & Whalan, S., 2011. The larval sponge holobiont exhibits high thermal tolerance. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 3 (6), 756-762.

  313. Webster, N.S., Cobb, R.E. & Negri, A.P., 2008. Temperature thresholds for bacterial symbiosis with a sponge. The ISME Journal, 2 (8), 830-842.

  314. Whomersley, P. & Picken, G., 2003. Long-term dynamics of fouling communities found on offshore installations in the North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK, 83 (5), 897-901.

  315. Williams, R., 1997. Actinothoe sphyrodeta (Cnidaria, Actiniaria): the first records from Portugal and the Mediterranean Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 77 (1), 245-248.

  316. Wood, C., 2007. Seasearch Observer's Guide to Marine Life of Britain and Ireland,  Ross-on-Wye: Marine Conservation Society.

  317. Wood, E. (ed.), 1988. Sea Life of Britain and Ireland. Marine Conservation Society. IMMEL Publishing, London

  318. Wood, G., McAllen, R., Woods, L., Wood, A., Harman, L. & Bell, J., 2025. Multispecies approach shows high tolerance of temperate marine sponges to nitrogenous fertiliser. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 593. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2025.152132

  319. Wood. C., 2005. Seasearch guide to sea anemones and corals of Britain and Ireland. Ross-on-Wye: Marine Conservation Society.

  320. WoRMS (World Register of Marine Species), 2026. WoRMS (World Register of Marine Species). Available from: https://www.marinespecies.org/index.php

  321. Wulff, J., 2006. Resistance vs recovery: morphological strategies of coral reef sponges. Functional Ecology, 20 (4), 699-708.

  322. Zintzen, V., Norro, A., Massin, C. & Mallefet, J., 2008a. Temporal variation of Tubularia indivisa (Cnidaria, Tubulariidae) and associated epizoites on artificial habitat communities in the North Sea. Marine Biology, 153 (3), 405-420.

Citation

This review can be cited as:

Charalambides, G., Stamp, T.E., Lloyd, K.A., & Watson, A.J., 2026. Caryophyllia (Caryophyllia) smithii, sponges and crustose communities on wave-exposed circalittoral rock. In Tyler-Walters H. Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. [cited 12-09-2026]. Available from: https://www.marlin.ac.uk/habitat/detail/6

 Download PDF version


Last Updated: 09/09/2026