|Researched by||Jacqueline Hill||Refereed by||Dr Stefan Kraan|
|Authority||(Hudson) J.V.Lamouroux, 1813|
|Other common names||-||Synonyms||Laminaria cucullata (Hudson) J.V.Lamouroux, 1813, Laminaria cucullata (Hudson) J.V.Lamouroux, 1813|
A large conspicuous kelp growing up to 2 m in length commonly found at low water during spring tides on rocky shores. The frond is broad and digitate, glossy and dark brown in colour and lacks a midrib. The stipe is oval in cross section, smooth and flexible and is usually free of epiphytes, although old stipes which have become slightly roughened may support a few epiphytes, notably Palmaria palmata. The kelp is attached by freely branched haptera, which spread out to form a shallow dome-shaped holdfast. Laminaria digitata may be confused with young Laminaria hyperborea plants. However, the stipe of Laminaria hyperborea is circular in cross section, is stiff and snaps easily when bent (although you won't see that in younger plants).
Most coasts of Britain and Ireland, including Rockall. Scarce along east coast of England, particularly between Ouse and Thames estuaries, due to turbidity and lack of hard substrata. (Information continued in additional information).
Recorded from the Atlantic coasts of Europe as far north as Novaya Zemlya and south to the Canary Islands including the Baltic and Black Sea. It has also been recorded in Romania. (Information continued in additional information).
Found attached to bedrock or other suitable hard substrata in the lower intertidal and sublittoral fringe, down to a maximum depth of 20 m in clear waters. Laminaria digitata flourishes in moderately exposed areas or at sites with strong water currents. In exposed locations with strong wave action the species may extend upwards into the lower eulittoral. Occurs in rockpools up to mid-tide level and higher on wave-exposed coasts.
Common names in England also include Tangle, Red ware and Sea girdle. In Ireland common names include Leath and Learach. The length of the frond varies with season, age of plant and location, reaching over 1 m in suitable conditions. The number of frond digits vary with amount of exposure. In shelter these are few and short, but with increasing exposure, they are more numerous (up to 10 or 12) and extend almost to the base of the frond. Reported to store sodium glutamate and thus tasty when dried.
- none -
|Phylum||Ochrophyta||Brown and yellow-green seaweeds|
|Authority||(Hudson) J.V.Lamouroux, 1813|
|Recent Synonyms||Laminaria cucullata (Hudson) J.V.Lamouroux, 1813Laminaria cucullata (Hudson) J.V.Lamouroux, 1813|
|Typical abundance||High density|
|Male size range|
|Male size at maturity||Gametophyte size circa 0.005mm|
|Female size range||Gametophyte size circa 0.01mm|
|Female size at maturity|
|Growth rate||See additional information|
|Body flexibility||High (greater than 45 degrees)|
|Characteristic feeding method||Autotroph|
|Typically feeds on||Not relevant|
|Is the species harmful?||No|
Kelps of the family Laminariaceae exhibit an alternation of generations, which involves dissimilar (heteromorphic) phases; an asexual diploid phase (the sporophyte) is usually of considerable size and a haploid dioecious phase (the gametophyte) that is microscopic. Sporophytes of Laminaria digitata can grow to a length of 2-4 m. In the sporophyte, new growth takes place at the base of the lamina (blade) (Dickinson, 1963).
Growth rate is seasonally controlled with a period of rapid growth from February to July and one of slower growth from August to January. A mean growth rate of 1.3 cm / day has been reported during the season of maximal growth (Pérez, 1971; cited in Kain, 1979).
|Physiographic preferences||Enclosed coast / Embayment, Open coast, Ria / Voe, Strait / sound|
|Biological zone preferences||Lower eulittoral, Sublittoral fringe, Upper infralittoral|
|Substratum / habitat preferences||Artificial (man-made), Bedrock, Cobbles, Large to very large boulders, Pebbles, Small boulders|
|Tidal strength preferences||Moderately Strong 1 to 3 knots (0.5-1.5 m/sec.), Strong 3 to 6 knots (1.5-3 m/sec.), Very Strong > 6 knots (>3 m/sec.), Weak < 1 knot (<0.5 m/sec.)|
|Wave exposure preferences||Exposed, Moderately exposed, Sheltered, Very exposed|
|Salinity preferences||Full (30-40 psu), See additional Information|
No text entered
|Migration Pattern||Non-migratory / resident|
There is a marked difference in the lower depth limit of Laminaria digitata between the various parts of its geographical range. The lower depth limit for growth and survival is determined by water clarity, competition and grazers. In the Isle of Man the lower limit is at 1-2 m below the lowest astronomical tide and at Milford Haven it has been recorded at 5 m. At the northern distribution limit Laminaria digitata extends to depths of 15-20 m (Birkett et al., 1998b). Where Laminaria hyperborea thrives it out-competes Laminaria digitata limiting the lower limit of Laminaria digitata (Kain, 1975). The salinity optimum for Laminaria digitata is full salinity. However, on the Norwegian coast, which is subjected to seasonal fluctuations in salinity, healthy Laminaria digitata plants were found growing at 15-25 psu (Sundene, 1964).
Recorded distribution in Britain and Ireland continued
Absent from Liverpool Bay and Severn estuary due to turbidity. Also scarce on the south-east coast of Ireland, in particular Counties Wicklow and Wexford, due to lack of hard substrata.
Global distribution continued
Also found in southern Greenland and east coast Canada, Quebec and North America from Hudson Straits to New York.
|Reproductive type||Gonochoristic (dioecious)|
|Reproductive frequency||Annual protracted|
|Fecundity (number of eggs)||>1,000,000|
|Generation time||1-2 years|
|Age at maturity||18-20 months|
|Season||See additional text|
|Life span||6-10 years|
|Larval/juvenile development||Spores (sexual / asexual)|
|Duration of larval stage||1 day|
|Larval dispersal potential||100 -1000 m|
|Larval settlement period||All year (see additional information)|
This MarLIN sensitivity assessment has been superseded by the MarESA approach to sensitivity assessment. MarLIN assessments used an approach that has now been modified to reflect the most recent conservation imperatives and terminology and are due to be updated by 2016/17.
|Laminaria digitata is permanently attached to hard substrata and so would be completely removed by any substratum loss. They cannot re-attach once removed and would be swept away. Plants are able to rapidly re-colonize gaps in the upper infralittoral which result from storm damage (Birkett et al., 1998b) and after plant cutting the standing crop of Laminaria digitata was re-established within 18-20 months (Kain, 1979). In macroalgae clearance experiments at Port Erin, Isle of Man (Kain, 1975) recolonization of Laminaria digitata on concrete blocks had taken place within 2 years. In France, Ciam (le Comité interprofessionel des algues marines) proposed that , regardless of collection method, the restoration of stands of Laminariales took up to 18 months after harvesting (from Arzel, 1998). Recovery of cleared plots in Helgoland to original density took longer, 25 months, probably because plots were burned to ensure all spores and germlings were also removed (Markham & Munda, 1980). However, although the density of algal cover had returned to pre-clearance levels the Laminaria digitata plants were smaller than those on undisturbed plots. This suggests full population recovery is longer than 25 months.|
|Smothering of mature sporophytes by a 5 cm layer of sediment on the substratum is unlikely to have an impact on photosynthetic activity because only the holdfast of the plant is likely to be covered. Germlings, spores and gametophytes are intolerant of smothering inhibiting development and so intolerance has been assessed as intermediate. Recoverability should be high as Laminaria digitata can rapidly re-colonize suitable substrata.|
|Increased siltation can increase turbidity of the water and reduce available light for photosynthesis. Lyngby & Mortensen (1996) found that an increase in the level of suspended sediment may significantly reduce growth of Laminaria plants. Germlings, gametophytes and spores are probably more intolerant of siltation. Combined with water movements sediments can abrasively scour surfaces of settled spores. Development of Saccharina latissima (studied as Laminaria saccharina) gametophytes, for example, was inhibited by silt and failed to form an attachment when settling out on silty surfaces (Norton, 1978). However Laminaria saccharina is more tolerant of siltation and may out-compete Laminaria digitata in high silt environments. Heavy siltation may also result in smothering of plants (see Smothering).|
|Tolerant*||Not relevant||Not sensitive*||Moderate|
|Laminaria digitata may well benefit from a reduction in levels of suspended sediment as a result of potential decreased light attenuation and, therefore, increased light for photosynthesis. Tolerant* has been suggested.|
|Laminaria digitata regularly becomes exposed to air during very low water events and so is moderately tolerant of desiccation. Dring & Brown (1982) found that plants that lost up 40-50 % of their initial water content were still able to return to their original photosynthetic rate on re-immersion.|
|At the sublittoral fringe Laminaria digitata regularly becomes exposed to air at very low water events and so is moderately tolerant of emergence. The rate of photosynthesis during emersion does not decline over a period of several hours if the thallus does not dry out, indicating that emersion is not, in itself, detrimental for photosynthesis (Dring & Brown, 1982). Laminaria digitata has also been shown to extend upshore when the algae immediately above it is removed (Hawkins & Hartnol, 1985) although plants at the upper extreme of the range may be killed when periods of emersion coincide with high temperatures. An increase in the period of emersion over the period of the benchmark (a 1 hour change in the time covered or not covered by the sea for a period of 1 year) would probably result in a depression of the upper limit of Laminaria digitata.|
|Tolerant*||Not relevant||Not sensitive*||Moderate|
|An decrease in the period of emersion over the period of the benchmark would probably result in an extension of the upper limit of Laminaria digitata. Therefore, tolerant* has been suggested.|
|With a flexible stipe and low profile holdfast Laminaria digitata flourishes in areas with strong water currents. In Lough Ine in Ireland, for example, Laminaria digitata forms dense forests in the fast flowing water of the Rapids where water speeds vary from 4-6 knots (Bassingdale et al., 1948). However, Laminaria digitata is also found in very strong flows (> 6 knots) although it is often out-competed by Alaria esculenta.
The morphology of the blade varies with flow rate, becoming narrower and more digitate as water flow rate increases (Sundene, 1964).
|With a flexible stipe and low profile holdfast Laminaria digitata flourishes in areas with strong water currents. However, it can also be found in slower currents although it is likely to be out competed by Laminaria hyperborea and therefore an intolerance of intermediate has been suggested.|
|Laminaria digitata is a eurythermal species with sporophytes growing over a wide temperature range. Atlantic species showed only slightly sub-optimal growth over a range of temperatures, from 0-20 °C, with optimum growth at 10 °C (Bolton & Lüning, 1982). Laminaria digitata is likely to tolerate a long term, chronic change in temperature within this range, e.g. a 2 °C change in temperature for a year. Lüning (1984) detected a seasonal shift in heat tolerance of Laminaria digitata plants in Helgoland of 2 °C between spring and summer. However, Laminaria digitata may be intolerant of rapid changes in temperature outside its tolerance range. During an exceptionally warm summer in Norway, Sundene (1964) reported the destruction of plants exposed to temperatures of 22-23 °C. Therefore Laminaria digitata is likely to be of intermediate intolerance to short term acute temperature change.|
|Laminaria digitata is a eurythermal species with sporophytes growing over a wide temperature range. Atlantic species showed only slightly sub-optimal growth over a range of temperatures, from 0-20 °C, with optimum growth at 10 °C (Bolton & Lüning, 1982). Laminaria digitata is likely to tolerate a long term, chronic change in temperature within this range, e.g. a 2 °C change in temperature for a year. Lüning (1984) detected a seasonal shift in heat tolerance of Laminaria digitata plants in Helgoland of 2 °C between spring and summer. However, Laminaria digitata may be intolerant of rapid changes in temperature outside its tolerance range. In Scotland, when spring low tides coincided with night time extreme air frosts on several consecutive days mortality of all but the lowest shore adult Laminaria digitata plants occurred (Todd & Lewis, 1984). Therefore Laminaria digitata is likely to be of intermediate intolerance to short term acute temperature change.|
|In very turbid waters the depth at which Laminaria digitata is found will be reduced because of light attenuation. In the silt-laden waters around Helgoland, Germany the depth limit for Laminaria digitata growth may be reduced to between 0 m and 1.5 m (Birkett et al., 1998b). Increased turbidity around a sewage treatment plant was thought to be responsible for the absence of Laminaria digitata plants in the Firth of Forth (Read et al., 1983). An increase in turbidity will reduce photosynthesis and growth of plants. In Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island growth rates of Laminaria digitata fell during a summer bloom of microalgae that dramatically reduced irradiance. Quality of light is also important with blue light necessary for gametogenesis and development of gametophytes. Dissolved organic materials (yellow substance or gelbstoff) absorbs blue light strongly, therefore changes in riverine input or other land based runoff are likely to influence kelp density and distribution.|
|Tolerant*||Not relevant||Not sensitive*||Moderate|
|A decrease in turbidity is concurrent with a decrease in light attenuation. Reduced turbidity will increase photosynthesis and the growth of the plants. Quality of light is also important with blue light necessary for gametogenesis and development of gametophytes. A decrease in turbidity is likely benefit the plants and therefore tolerant* has been suggested.|
|Laminaria digitata flourishes in moderately to strongly exposed areas due to a flexible stipe and low profile holdfast. The species may extend its upper limit upwards into the lower eulittoral in exposed areas with strong wave action. Laminaria digitata is found at very exposed locations such as Rockall. In extreme wave exposure it is replaced by Alaria esculenta. The level of wave exposure is known to effect the morphology of the blade, becoming narrower and more digitate as wave exposure increases (Sundene, 1964).|
|Laminaria digitata flourishes in moderately to strongly exposed areas due to a flexible stipe and low profile holdfast. As wave exposure decreases, Laminaria digitata combines with, and is then replaced by, Saccharina latissima (studied as Laminaria saccharina) (Birkett et al., 1998b). It is possible that the extent of the Laminaria digitata stand will decrease over the year and therefore an intermediate intolerance has been suggested.|
|Tolerant||Not relevant||Not sensitive||Not relevant|
|Macroalgae have no known receptors for noise or vibration.|
|Tolerant||Not relevant||Not sensitive||Not relevant|
|Macroalgae have no known mechanism for visual perception.|
|Abrasion is a part of the normal growth cycle of the frond where growth at the base of the frond is almost balanced by erosion at the tips. Fronds of the plant are leathery and the whole plant is very flexible so physical disturbance equivalent to a standard boat anchor landing on or being dragged across the organism, is unlikely to cause significant damage to the plant. However, a passing dredge is likely to catch and damage or remove individual plants. Therefore, an intolerance of intermediate has been recorded. Recoverability is likely to be high.|
|Laminaria digitata cannot re-attach once displaced from the substratum and it will be swept away. Individual plants are unable to recover but populations have good recoverability because recolonization of cleared areas can take place within about two years (see Substratum loss).|
|Intolerance to some chemicals has been observed. Laminaria digitata was found absent from sites close to acidified, halogenated effluent from a bromide extraction plant (Hoare & Hiscock, 1974). Axelsson & Axelsson (1987) investigated the effect on Laminaria digitata of exposure to various chemicals for 24 hours by measuring ion leakage as an indication of plasma membrane damage. The pesticide Lindane had no effect on ion loss when compared to the control at concentrations ranging from 0.03 to 0.3mg/L. Only limited ion loss was seen on exposure to two detergents, nonylphenol ethoxylate (NP-10) and linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS).|
|Zinc was found to inhibit growth in Laminaria digitata at a concentration of 100µg/L and at 515µg/L growth had almost completely ceased (Bryan, 1969). Axelsson & Axelsson (1987) investigated the effect of exposure to mercury (Hg), lead (Pb) and nickel (Ni) for 24 hours by measuring ion leakage to indicate plasma membrane damage. Inorganic and organic Hg concentrations of 1mg/L resulted in the loss of ions equivalent to ion loss in seaweed that had been boiled for 5 minutes. Laminaria digitata was unaffected when subjected to Pb and Ni at concentrations up to 10mg/L. The results also indicate that the species is intolerant of the tin compounds butyl-Sn and phenyl-Sn.|
|The toxic effects of oil on algae fall into two categories: those associated with coating of the plant and those due to uptake of hydrocarbons resulting in disruption of cellular metabolism. Reductions in photosynthesis rates are correlated with the thickness of the oil layer. Laminaria digitata is less susceptible to coating than some other seaweeds because of its preference for exposed locations where wave action will rapidly dissipate oil. The brown algae are thought to be largely protected from oil penetration damage by the presence of a mucilaginous coating (O'Brian & Dixon, 1976). In addition effects of oil accumulation on the thalli are mitigated by the perennial growth of kelps. No significant effects of the Amoco Cadiz spill were observed for Laminaria populations and the World Prodigy spill of 922 tons of oil in Narragansett Bay had no discernible effects on Laminaria digitata (Peckol et al., 1990). The upper limit of distribution for Laminaria digitata moved up wave exposed shores by as much as 2m during the first few years after the Torrey Canyon oil spill due to the death of animals that graze the plants (Southward & Southward, 1978). Mesocosm studies in Norwegian waters showed that chronic low level oil pollution (25µg/L) reduced growth rates in Laminaria digitata but only in the second and third years of growth (Bokn, 1985).|
|No information||No information||No information||Not relevant|
|Brown algae readily accumulate radionuclides and have been routinely used in temperate latitudes as biomonitors of radionuclide pollution (van der Ben & Bonotto, 1991). Any contaminants bioaccumulated in the alga can enter the food chain through, for example, grazers such as sea urchins. However, the actual effects of radionuclide accumulation in the alga are not well documented and accordingly, insufficient information has been suggested for this section.|
|The growth of macroalgae in temperate coastal waters is generally expected to be limited by nitrogen in the summer period. A comparison of Laminaria digitata growth rates in Arbroath, Scotland with a more oligotrophic and a more eutrophic site appears to support this hypothesis (Davison et al., 1984). In Helgoland, where ambient nutrient concentrations are double those of the Scotland site Laminaria digitata grows in the summer months. Laminaria digitata does not accumulate the significant internal reserves seen in some other kelps. Higher growth rates have also been associated with plants situated close to sewage outfalls. However, after removal of sewage pollution in the Firth of Forth, Laminaria digitata became abundant on rocky shores from which they had previously been absent. Therefore, although nutrient enrichment may benefit Laminaria digitata, the indirect effects of eutrophication, such as increased light attenuation from suspended solids in the water column and interference with the settlement and growth of germlings, may be detrimental.|
|Not relevant||None||Not relevant||Moderate|
|Laminaria digitata is commonly found in areas of full salinity on the open coast and an increase in salinity is therefore unlikely.|
|Birkett et al. (1998b) suggest that kelps are stenohaline seaweeds, in that they do not tolerate wide fluctuations in salinity. Growth rate may be adversely affected if the kelp plant is subjected to periodic salinity stress. The lower salinity limit for Laminaria digitata lies between 10 and 15psu. On the Norwegian coast Sundene (1964) found healthy Laminaria digitata plants growing between 15 and 25psu. Axelsson & Axelsson (1987) investigations indicated damage of plants plasma membranes occurs when salinity is below 20 or above 50psu. Localized, long term reductions in salinity, to below 20psu, may result in the loss of kelp beds in affected areas.|
|No information||No information||No information||Not relevant|
|The occurrence of hyperplasia or gall growths, seen as dark spots, on Laminaria digitata is well known and may be associated with the presence of endophytic brown filamentous algae. Ectocarpus deformans, for example, was considered the cause of galls in Laminaria digitata by Apt (1988). In Helgoland, Ellertsdottir and Peters (1997) found 86 % of Laminaria digitata thalli infected with endophytic brown algae and all those that exhibited weak to moderate but visible thallus alterations such as dark spots on the lamina or small warts on the stipe were infected. No cases of the severe morphological deformities as seen in Saccharina latissima were observed.|
|Low||No information||Moderate||Very low|
|The Northwest Pacific kelp Undaria pinnatifida has been introduced into Europe in recent years both deliberately for aquaculture purposes in northern Brittany and accidentally probably through movement of shellfish for aquaculture. Introduction into Britain (primarily in the south-west) is thought to have been on ships' hulls due to its propensity for colonizing floating objects. It may cause displacement of native kelp species including Laminaria digitata although in Brittany Undaria pinnatifida was seen to colonize areas normally inhabited by Saccorhiza polyschides rather than Laminaria digitata or Laminaria hyperborea.|
Sargassum muticum, first found in the UK in the 1970s, is also a potential threat. Cosson (1999) reported a progressive disappearance of Laminaria digitata from the coasts of Calvados (France) together with a huge growth of Sargassum muticum in the same area.
|Laminaria digitata plants are able to rapidly re-colonize any gaps in the upper infralittoral which result from storm damage (Birkett et al. 1998b). After plant cutting (harvesting) the standing crop was re-established within 18-20 months (Kain, 1979). In macroalgae clearance experiments at Port Erin, Isle of Man (Kain, 1975) recolonization of Laminaria digitata on concrete blocks took place within 2 years. In France, Ciam (le Comité interprofessionel des algues marines) proposed that , regardless of collection method, the restoration of stands of Laminariales took up to 18 months after harvesting (from Arzel, 1998). In Helgoland, recovery of cleared and burned plots to original density took 25 months, but plants were smaller than those on undisturbed plots (Markham & Munda, 1980). This suggests that when all spores and germlings are removed, full population recovery takes longer than 25 months.|
|Removal of kelp grazing animals has been observed to have an impact on the density and distribution of kelps. Laminaria digitata was able to extend 2m upshore after the death of limpets and other grazers caused by the Torrey Canyon oil spill (Southward & Southward, 1978). In Newfoundland removal of sea urchins resulted in the growth of kelps including Laminaria digitata that had previously been absent (Keats et al., 1990).|
- no data -
|National (GB) importance||-||Global red list (IUCN) category||-|
Apt, K.E., 1988. Etiology and development of hyperplasia induced by Streblonema sp. (Phaeophyta) on members of the Laminariales (Phaeophyta). Journal of Phycology, 24, 28-34.
Arzel, P., 1998. Les laminaires sur les côtes bretonnes. Évolution de l'exploitation et de la flottille de pêche, état actuel et perspectives. Plouzané, France: Ifremer.
Axelsson, B. & Axelsson, L., 1987. A rapid and reliable method to quantify environmental effects on Laminaria based on measurements of ion leakage. Botanica Marina, 30, 55-61.
Birkett, D.A., Maggs, C.A., Dring, M.J. & Boaden, P.J.S., 1998b. Infralittoral reef biotopes with kelp species: an overview of dynamic and sensitivity characteristics for conservation management of marine SACs. Natura 2000 report prepared by Scottish Association of Marine Science (SAMS) for the UK Marine SACs Project., Scottish Association for Marine Science. (UK Marine SACs Project, vol V.). Available from: http://www.ukmarinesac.org.uk/publications.htm
Bokn, T., 1985. Effects of diesel oil on commercial benthic algae in Norway. In Proceedings of 1985 Oil Spill Conference, (ed. American Petroleum Institute), pp. 491-496. Washington, D.C.: American Petroleum Institute.
Bolton, J.J. & Lüning, K.A.F., 1982. Optimal growth and maximal survival temperatures of Atlantic Laminaria species (Phaeophyta) in culture. Marine Biology, 66, 89-94.
Bryan, G.W., 1969. The absorption of zinc and other metals by the brown seaweed Laminaria digitata. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 225-243.
Chapman, A.R.O., 1981. Stability of sea urchin dominated barren grounds following destructive grazing of kelp in St. Margaret's Bay, Eastern Canada. Marine Biology, 62, 307-311.
Cosson, J., 1999. Sur la disparition progressive de Laminaria digitata sur les cotes du Calvados (France). Cryptogamie: Algol, 20, 35-42.
Davison, I.R., Andrews, M. & Stewart, W.D.P., 1984. Regulation of growth in Laminaria digitata: use of in-vivo nitrate reductase activities as an indicator of nitrogen limitation in field populations of Laminaria spp. Marine Biology, 84, 207-217.
Dickinson, C.I., 1963. British seaweeds. London & Frome: Butler & Tanner Ltd.
Dring, M.J. & Brown, F.A., 1982. Photosynthesis of intertidal brown algae during and after periods of emersion: a renewed search for physiological causes of zonation. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 8, 301-308.
Ellertsdottir, E. & Peters, A.F., 1997. High prevalence of infection by endophytic brown algae in populations of Laminaria spp. (Phaeophyceae). Marine Ecology Progress Series, 146, 135-143.
Gayral, P. & Cosson, J., 1973. Exposé synoptique des données biologiques sur la laminaire digitée Laminaria digitata. Synopsis FAO sur les pêches, no. 89.
Guiry, M.D. & Blunden, G., 1991. Seaweed Resources in Europe: Uses and Potential. Chicester: John Wiley & Sons.
Guiry, M.D. & Nic Dhonncha, E., 2000. AlgaeBase. World Wide Web electronic publication http://www.algaebase.org, 2000-01-01
Guiry, M.D., 2006. AlgaeBase. World Wide Web electronic publication
Hardy, F.G. & Guiry, M.D., 2003. A check-list and atlas of the seaweeds of Britain and Ireland. London: British Phycological Society
Hawkins, S.J. & Hartnoll, R.G., 1985. Factors determining the upper limits of intertidal canopy-forming algae. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 20, 265-271.
Hayward, P., Nelson-Smith, T. & Shields, C. 1996. Collins pocket guide. Sea shore of Britain and northern Europe. London: HarperCollins.
Hoare, R. & Hiscock, K., 1974. An ecological survey of the rocky coast adjacent to the effluent of a bromine extraction plant. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 2 (4), 329-348.
Howson, C.M. & Picton, B.E., 1997. The species directory of the marine fauna and flora of the British Isles and surrounding seas. Belfast: Ulster Museum. [Ulster Museum publication, no. 276.]
Kain, J.M., 1975a. Algal recolonization of some cleared subtidal areas. Journal of Ecology, 63, 739-765.
Kain, J.M., 1979. A view of the genus Laminaria. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 17, 101-161.
Keats, D.W., South, G.R. & Steele, D.H. 1990. Effects of an experimental reduction in grazing by green sea urchins on a benthic macroalgal community in eastern Newfoundland Marine Ecology Progress Series, 68, 181-193
Lüning, K., 1984. Temperature tolerance and biogeography of seaweeds: the marine algal flora of Helgoland (North Sea) as an example. Helgolander Meeresuntersuchungen, 38, 305-317.
Lyngby, J.E. & Mortensen, S.M., 1996. Effects of dredging activities on growth of Laminaria saccharina. Marine Ecology, Publicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli I, 17, 345-354.
Markham, J.W. & Munda, I.M., 1980. Algal recolonisation in the rocky eulittoral at Helgoland, Germany. Aquatic Botany, 9, 33-71.
Norton, T.A., 1978. The factors influencing the distribution of Saccorhiza polyschides in the region of Lough Ine. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 58, 527-536.
Peckol, P., Levings, S.C. & Garrity, S.D., 1990. Kelp response following the World Prodigy oil spill. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 21, 473-476.
Pérez, R., 1971. Écologie, croissance et régénération, teneurs en acide alginique de Laminaria digitata sur les cotes de la Manche. Revue des Travaux de l'Institut des Peches Maritimes, 35, 287-346.
Read, P.A., Anderson, K.J., Matthews, J.E., Watson, P.G., Halliday, M.C. & Shiells, G.M., 1983. Effects of pollution on the benthos of the Firth of Forth. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 14, 12-16.
Reed, D.C., 1990. The effects of variable settlement and early competition on patterns of kelp recruitment. Ecology, 71, 776-787.
Southward, A.J. & Southward, E.C., 1978. Recolonisation of rocky shores in Cornwall after use of toxic dispersants to clean up the Torrey Canyon spill. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 35, 682-706.
Sundene, O., 1964. The ecology of Laminaria digitata in Norway in view of transplant experiments. Nytt Magasin for Botanik, 11, 83-107.
Todd, C.D. & Lewis, J.R., 1984. Effects of low air-temperature on Laminaria digitata in Southwestern Scotland. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 16, 199-201.
van der Ben, D. & Bonotto, S., 1991. Utilization of brown algae for monitoring the radioactive contamination of the marine environment. Oebalia, 17, 143-153.
Centre for Environmental Data and Recording, 2018. Ulster Museum Marine Surveys of Northern Ireland Coastal Waters. Occurrence dataset https://www.nmni.com/CEDaR/CEDaR-Centre-for-Environmental-Data-and-Recording.aspx accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-09-25.
Cofnod – North Wales Environmental Information Service, 2018. Miscellaneous records held on the Cofnod database. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/hcgqsi accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-09-25.
Environmental Records Information Centre North East, 2018. ERIC NE Combined dataset to 2017. Occurrence dataset: http://www.ericnortheast.org.uk/home.html accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-09-38
Fenwick, 2018. Aphotomarine. Occurrence dataset http://www.aphotomarine.com/index.html Accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-10-01
Fife Nature Records Centre, 2018. St Andrews BioBlitz 2014. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/erweal accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-09-27.
Fife Nature Records Centre, 2018. St Andrews BioBlitz 2015. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/xtrbvy accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-09-27.
Fife Nature Records Centre, 2018. St Andrews BioBlitz 2016. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/146yiz accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-09-27.
Kent Wildlife Trust, 2018. Biological survey of the intertidal chalk reefs between Folkestone Warren and Kingsdown, Kent 2009-2011. Occurrence dataset: https://www.kentwildlifetrust.org.uk/ accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-10-01.
Kent Wildlife Trust, 2018. Kent Wildlife Trust Shoresearch Intertidal Survey 2004 onwards. Occurrence dataset: https://www.kentwildlifetrust.org.uk/ accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-10-01.
Manx Biological Recording Partnership, 2017. Isle of Man wildlife records from 01/01/2000 to 13/02/2017. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/mopwow accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
Manx Biological Recording Partnership, 2018. Isle of Man historical wildlife records 1990 to 1994. Occurrence dataset:https://doi.org/10.15468/aru16v accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
Manx Biological Recording Partnership, 2018. Isle of Man historical wildlife records 1995 to 1999. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/lo2tge accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
Merseyside BioBank., 2018. Merseyside BioBank (unverified). Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/iou2ld accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
National Trust, 2017. National Trust Species Records. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/opc6g1 accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
NBN (National Biodiversity Network) Atlas. Available from: https://www.nbnatlas.org.
OBIS (Ocean Biogeographic Information System), 2020. Global map of species distribution using gridded data. Available from: Ocean Biogeographic Information System. www.iobis.org. Accessed: 2020-01-22
Outer Hebrides Biological Recording, 2018. Non-vascular Plants, Outer Hebrides. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/goidos accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 2018. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Herbarium (E). Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/ypoair accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-02.
South East Wales Biodiversity Records Centre, 2018. SEWBReC Algae and allied species (South East Wales). Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/55albd accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-02.
South East Wales Biodiversity Records Centre, 2018. Dr Mary Gillham Archive Project. Occurance dataset: http://www.sewbrec.org.uk/ accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-10-02
Suffolk Biodiversity Information Service., 2017. Suffolk Biodiversity Information Service (SBIS) Dataset. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/ab4vwo accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-02.
The Wildlife Information Centre, 2018. TWIC Biodiversity Field Trip Data (1995-present). Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/ljc0ke accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-02.
Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, 2018. Yorkshire Wildlife Trust Shoresearch. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/1nw3ch accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-02.
This review can be cited as:
Last Updated: 29/05/2008